Author Topic: Kelly May - Outcall (read the review, dont just look at the end score)  (Read 5076 times)


14 review(s) for Kelly_May (13 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by lewishamguy]

Offline Billy no mates

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,848
  • Likes: 53
  •  
  • Reviews: 67
I have struggled with how to review Kelly, I know she is popular on UKE (and rightly so), with lots of followers, and I am not one for confrontation.

External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only

Venue Outcall to my home, Watford,happy to outcall around London
Price £250/90mins got a partial refund, explain later
Comms Contacted girl on AW, meet was booked a couple of days before, some texts, one phonecall
Services RO, fingers, OWO, spanking.
Girl Very clean, smelt lovely. Found her to be very pretty, great eyes and teeth (my thing), others have said she has a girl next door look, I actually found her to be very attractive. As mentioned she is maybe slightly bigger than a 12, but she is not 'big' and everything is firm. Blonde mid to late 20's, awesome arse.

Event We spent maybe 20-30 minutes fooling around (OWO, fingering spanking) and I lost my mojo, so I called time and we had a cuppa.


See this is where it gets difficult, and even as I type this, I have still not decided on the overall score.

OK, lets start with it could have been me.
1) I am a man well into his 50's, these things happen, right?. I have used viagra before, but as a laugh to try it out, I certainly have never needed it. I generally keep myself fit, no smoke, eat healthy. I am probably considered clinically obese on that stupid BMI chart, but the truth of the matter is I am about 1 stone overweight (if that).
2) The night before I was reading UKE and because of a post she made, I got the distinct impression Kelly had worked out who I was here (she said she hadnt when I asked her the next day). I found that a little bit off putting and perhaps that played on my mind, causing my 'softness'.
3) I said to her, at the time, "I have never had this happen to me before" but now a couple of days later thinking about it, it did happen once before in a threesome with my missus with a girl called Sarah, which I reviewed here on UKP.

It could have been her
1) So we spoke the day before, I always like to speak to a girl, even if just for a minute or two, just to get a feeling. I must have got a vibe, becuase for the first time ever. I actually texted Kelly, later that evening and asked her if she was sure she wanted to go ahead with the meet. During the phonecall I had got a unusual feeling. She assured me she was happy. When we actually met she was very warm and friendly and I have no reason to believe she didnt want to go ahead with the meet. She even explained that she "comes across badly on the phone". I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, however it was the first time I felt I had to double check.
2) Mojo was working fine for the first part of the punt, nice and solid.
3) I have literally come (excuse the pun) of the back of two punts, where I could not believe my own stamina, pretty sure one of them, in my review, I said something along the lines of "I felt like a God". My mojo also worked fine the night before (Fucked the missus telling her all the things I was going to do to Kelly). Mojo was also fine Sunday afternoon (quickie just to make sure things were working)
4) She was a bit passive. Now to be fair to Kelly, this roleplay requires her to be passive (shes a naughty girl I am spanking her etc, read my other reviews), but for me it didn't feel right(which I accept may not be her fault).

It could just be one of those things
1) Maybe we just didnt 'click', its gotta happen once in a while I suppose

While we were having a cuppa after the (non) event. I was feeling like shit, thinking 'oh my god my cock doesnt work' Kelly asked if I would like some of the money back. I said "Thats up to you, I certainly wouldnt ask". Lets be fair she had travelled from central London to Watford, arrived on time, looking lovely, if its my cock that doesnt want to work properly (which is obviously how I was feeling), thats hardly her fault. I dropped her back as we had agreed and when I returned home discovered she had left £60 on the side, which was a nice touch, she didnt make a song and dance about it, just did it.


 
So what do I choose, I think I will have to go with a negative. Its a negative beacuse I didnt get what I wanted from the event. However, its a negative that may not actually be Kellys fault.


Offline Wozel

In my opinion I think your being harsh giving it a negative, not her fault and gave you money back.

Offline OutForJustice80

Personally I’d say a neutral would suffice but it’s your review and you should give it the mark you see fit. I think you’ve been very fair in the write up and her other reviews are enough balance to provide a broad spectrum for prospective other punters to make an informed decision.

That’s a nice touch for her to leave the £60. Not many would have done that. I’m seeing her myself in the not too distant, very interested to see how she stacks up as I’ve been looking forward to it for a while.

Online threechilliman

In my opinion I think your being harsh giving it a negative, not her fault and gave you money back.

I'd agree and probably wouldn't have reviewed it had it been me due to uncertainty about what exactly was wrong on the day. As ever it's the reviewers choice but I think it shows her in a positive light - she didn't do a great deal wrong and the money back when it became clear all wasn't well is a decent touch from her.

Offline Cuntminion

I'd agree and probably wouldn't have reviewed it had it been me due to uncertainty about what exactly was wrong on the day. As ever it's the reviewers choice but I think it shows her in a positive light - she didn't do a great deal wrong and the money back when it became clear all wasn't well is a decent touch from her.

+1

Also op don't beat yourself up about erection issues it happens, I'm early 30's and it happens to me more than I'd like it too, your not alone in that and don't set yourself a personal standard to adhere too there's multiple ways to enjoy yourself in any booking

Offline Userworldwide

So to summarise, your cockcould not errect, thus no action ?
You mentioned even she looked decent/attractive clean teeth etc ?
So the question then arises is HOW is it Kelly Fault.I would have understand if perhaps she didn’t deliver any services requested but it was actually the other way around...

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I lost my mojo, so I called time

Been there done that, last time was on me so never reviewed, thanks for the detail anyway, thats the important part.

Hope its only short term mojo loss.   :hi:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So to summarise, your cockcould not errect, thus no action ?
You mentioned even she looked decent/attractive clean teeth etc ?
So the question then arises is HOW is it Kelly Fault.I would have understand if perhaps she didn’t deliver any services requested but it was actually the other way around...

thank you for your reviews, before attacking a reviewers rating maybe do some yourself.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

2.5 years and zero reviews. 

Offline unus669

OP your choice, on scoring your review, for me it’s a neutral.

Mojos, have a brain of their own, it can happen. You seem to have emptied your sacs, several times before your meet with Kelly, maybe the little man, hadn’t recovered fully  :unknown:



vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sinz the UKE one look very different, OP is this one accurate?



Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Sinz the UKE one look very different, OP is this one accurate?
Second row first pic looks similar to the one you have uploaded, same nipples and marks on the body.

Offline cakerusk

Thanks for the review OP.  You have been very honest in your review and explored and reflected on what actually happened. I hope you loosing the mojo is just a temporary thing.

Reading through the review i donot see what the SP did wrong as well. In fact i find that she was very understanding of the sitiation and the returning of the money was very nice touch. As you have mentioned she arrived in time, clean and well dressed and when things didnt clicked she didnt made a fuss about it.

I am not defending her but i think you are being a bit harsh to her here. To me it sounds more like a neutral thing not a negative. But then its your review, hence your ratings. But either way it gives us a lot of information on what to expect from her if one were to meet her and that matters thr most. Again thank you for the review and hope your mojo is back by now!!

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
2) The night before I was reading UKE and because of a post she made, I got the distinct impression Kelly had worked out who I was here (she said she hadnt when I asked her the next day). I found that a little bit off putting and perhaps that played on my mind, causing my 'softness'.

Reading back you did drop a big hint on the next booking thread with announcing next booking is filth, only one person on there is refereed to as that in your area and posts.

I would advise lying on that thread TBH if you find these things off putting, one less clue for them to reverse engineer. 


Offline Skyjuice1000

Really should of given her a neutral cause all else was in line I think negative are for the cheating money grabbers who give a real bad service with no effort or are unclean and rude. In this situation she seems to be have fair as can be and it was just one of those things

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,676
  • Likes: 138
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Thanks for the honest review, OP.
If she didn't know you on UKP before, she certainly does now.

It might be physical with all your exertions catching up on you but it sounds like the seed of doubt was cast before the punt when you spoke to her and read her post on UKE. During the punt your subconscious started playing on your mind and it's a downhill spiral when you let that bastard into your head.

I'd agree with the room - a negative seems unduly harsh but it's your call, of course. I'm not sure what she could have done differently. I've not seen her but she sounds a reasonably good sort, so I'd possibly expect her to contact you to ask about this review. Maybe she won't.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
So to summarise, your cockcould not errect, thus no action ?
You mentioned even she looked decent/attractive clean teeth etc ?
So the question then arises is HOW is it Kelly Fault.I would have understand if perhaps she didn’t deliver any services requested but it was actually the other way around...

You have some front, never bothered reviewing yourself on here despite being a member for years but happy to question the rating of a punter who has bothered. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Billy no mates

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,848
  • Likes: 53
  •  
  • Reviews: 67
Clearly I have written this review fairly, as almost unanimously people agree that I have been harsh, based on only my side of story. I didn’t ‘stack the deck’

I personally think she is a lovely girl, and I provided enough evidence to show that it could easily have been beyond her control, and my own problem.

In view of the comments, I am happy for the overall score to be changed, as far as I am aware I can’t change it myself. (I’m on my phone so it’s hard to anything at the moment)


VirtualWaster - yes your picture is very accurate (I can’t do ‘quote post’ on phone)


stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Clearly I have written this review fairly, as almost unanimously people agree that I have been harsh, based on only my side of story. I didn’t ‘stack the deck’

I personally think she is a lovely girl, and I provided enough evidence to show that it could easily have been beyond her control, and my own problem.

In view of the comments, I am happy for the overall score to be changed, as far as I am aware I can’t change it myself. (I’m on my phone so it’s hard to anything at the moment)


VirtualWaster - yes your picture is very accurate (I can’t do ‘quote post’ on phone)
I have changed it to neutral for you. Let us know if that is ok rather than positive.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have changed it to neutral for you. Let us know if that is ok rather than positive.

I though admin was supposed to do rankings changes when going in a positive direction, some low level pestering  going on on this thread IMO.

You were keen to let her know you changed it.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

VirtualWaster - yes your picture is very accurate (I can’t do ‘quote post’ on phone)

that is useful to know a few reviews have mentioned flattering angles.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2018, 10:46:56 am by vw »

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I though admin was supposed to do rankings changes when going in a positive direction, some low level pestering  going on on this thread .
Not aware of that rule?? I have changed ratings both up and down a handful of times at OP's requests. Have reported the post to check.  :hi:

You were keen to let her know you changed it.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Errrr, no. I changed it 'cos the OP requested it to be done.  I thought that was a mod's job??

Give your head a shake.  :dash: :dash:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have changed it to neutral for you. Let us know if that is ok rather than positive.

FUCKING HELL, You're keen to "help her" BNM made a loose reference to changing the rating, he did nto say what to, and you decide to change it to a neutral but suggest a positive as an alternative  :thumbsdown:

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
FUCKING HELL, You're keen to "help her" BNM made a loose reference to changing the rating, he did nto say what to, and you decide to change it to a neutral but suggest a positive as an alternative  :thumbsdown:
Not in the slightest James. 

I'm assuming you define the loose reference being the OP saying "I am happy for the overall score to be changed". That don't sound too loose to me.  :unknown:

And I'm not particularly sure how I suggested it be positive??

As you rightly point out, the OP didn't say whether he wanted it changed to neutral or positive. I change it to the lower of the two and checked with the OP this is what was he wanted. Drama over you'd have thunk??  :unknown:

I'm sure admin will have a look into it anyway as I reported the post and the OP can clarify if there's any issues.

I'm sure there aren't any dramas like this on your reviews are there James?? :sarcastic:

Now pop off and pick your toys up like a good little boy.

Offline Thepacifist

This has happened to me before cock not playing ball. Don't beat yourself up. It's natural to think is it gonna happen again? Get back on the horse when you're ready  :hi:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm assuming you define the loose reference being the OP saying "I am happy for the overall score to be changed". That don't sound too loose to me.  :unknown:

As it doesn't state to what he wanted it changed to then it is a loose reference, you assumed it was to neutral.

But relax, you were caught out and called on it...  :music:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Clearly I have written this review fairly, as almost unanimously people agree that I have been harsh, based on only my side of story. I didn’t ‘stack the deck’

I personally think she is a lovely girl, and I provided enough evidence to show that it could easily have been beyond her control, and my own problem.

In view of the comments, I am happy for the overall score to be changed, as far as I am aware I can’t change it myself. (I’m on my phone so it’s hard to anything at the moment)


VirtualWaster - yes your picture is very accurate (I can’t do ‘quote post’ on phone)

Why have you allowed other punters views to influence you to change this rating, it was YOUR punt, it was your rating. IMO before doing a review a punter should be VERY clear what rating to give and not be influenced by others on here, but that's up to you of course. I certainly wouldn't change my rating because a number of punters I don't know didn't agree with it.

If this WG hadn't been a forum WG would this rating have been changed I wonder.

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
As it doesn't state to what he wanted it changed to then it is a loose reference, you assumed it was to neutral.

But relax, you were caught out and called on it...  :music:
You'd have preferred it to be changed to positive then??

I'm very relaxed thank you  :cool: although a little confused what I was "caught out" doing??  :unknown:

Offline dwightschrute

Why have you allowed other punters views to influence you to change this rating, it was YOUR punt, it was your rating. IMO before doing a review a punter should be VERY clear what rating to give and not be influenced by others on here, but that's up to you of course. I certainly wouldn't change my rating because a number of punters I don't know didn't agree with it.

If this WG hadn't been a forum WG would this rating have been changed I wonder.
Getting a negative for something that wasn't her fault is harsh, especially since she had the courtesy of leaving £60

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
FUCKING HELL, You're keen to "help her" BNM made a loose reference to changing the rating, he did nto say what to, and you decide to change it to a neutral but suggest a positive as an alternative  :thumbsdown:

very keen to impress her, he is not alone.   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Getting a negative for something that wasn't her fault is harsh, especially since she had the courtesy of leaving £60

Which is the business of the reviewer to decide BEFORE doing the review in my book. If I don't enjoy a punt it would be a negative review off me.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Why have you allowed other punters views to influence you to change this rating, it was YOUR punt, it was your rating. IMO before doing a review a punter should be VERY clear what rating to give and not be influenced by others on here, but that's up to you of course. I certainly wouldn't change my rating because a number of punters I don't know didn't agree with it.

If this WG hadn't been a forum WG would this rating have been changed I wonder.

Well he expected pestering and the predicable happened.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You'd have preferred it to be changed to positive then?

It's not for me or you to decide what the rating should be, You should have left it to the OP to confirm what he wanted, instead of rushing in to "rescue the damsel" and get rid of her negative, without establishing what the OP wanted it changed to, hopefully she's impressed

Hidden Image/Members Only

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's not for me or you to decide what the rating should be, You should have left it to the OP to confirm what he wanted, instead of rushing in to "rescue the damsel" and get rid of her negative, without establishing what the OP wanted it changed to, hopefully she's impressed

Hidden Image/Members Only

I think he was hoping on promotion to be this guy.   :sarcastic:

External Link/Members Only[users]=Kelly+May&o=date

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's rather a large step from doing what the OP said he wanted to be done but didn't have the ability to do.
I am happy for the overall score to be changed, as far as I am aware I can’t change it myself.
and being a WK.

Anyways I'm sure admin will take a look and change it back to negative should he see fit.

Oh and James; let me know if you want me to change the rating on any of your reviews yeah??  :sarcastic:

Thanks for your input chaps.  It's been, well underwelming really.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's rather a large step from doing what the OP said he wanted to be done but didn't have the ability to do.and being a WK.

Anyways I'm sure admin will take a look and change it back to negative should he see fit.

Oh and James; let me know if you want me to change the rating on any of your reviews yeah??  :sarcastic:

Thanks for your input chaps.  It's been, well underwelming really.

you are sounding more and more like tallboy2.  He used to post like this about james999  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: June 05, 2018, 12:56:59 pm by vw »

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
you are sounding more and more like tallboy2.  He used to post like this about james999.   :sarcastic:
Who he???

I don't know the background on James not posting reviews but those that don't do so usually get a bit of a ribbing for it so there must be a reason that's before my time??   :unknown:

I also don't know the background of Tallboy2 for that matter but that's perhaps for a different thread.

However, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that someone with that many posts and zero reviews would be an obvious subject of a sarcastic reply if he chose to attack said member??  :dash: :dash:
« Last Edit: June 05, 2018, 12:59:49 pm by stickman1980 »

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Who he???

I don't know the background on James not posting reviews but those that don't do so usually get a bit of a ribbing for it so there must be a reason that's before my time??   :unknown:

I also don't know the background of Tallboy2 for that matter but that's perhaps for a different time.

However, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that someone with that many posts and zero reviews would be an obvious subject of a sarcastic reply if he chose to attack said member??  :dash: :dash:

did you notice admin reply to your report?  Reviews going that way should be reported for scrutiny.   :hi:

Happy to educate you mere mortals

tallboy2 left just before you joined.   :

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
did you notice admin reply to your report?  Reviews going that way should be reported for scrutiny.   :hi:

Happy to educate you mere mortals

tallboy2 left just before you joined.   :
And I bet you've never seen us in the same room have you VW??

BTW - are you in double figures yet on the number of people you've accused of being Tallboy3?? The plot thickens perhaps??

Seeing as you are the expert you'll also be aware that each rating change has a reason field to report it to admin even before I did it again through the report post function??

Yours,
Mere Mortal (not to be confused with Tallboy2)

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
And I bet you've never seen us in the same room have you VW??

BTW - are you in double figures yet on the number of people you've accused of being Tallboy3?? The plot thickens perhaps??

Seeing as you are the expert you'll also be aware that each rating change has a reason field to report it to admin even before I did it again through the report post function??

Yours,
Mere Mortal (not to be confused with Tallboy2)

well as admin said in his reply to your report they need reporting to bring to his attention.   Not double figures 3 actually, neptune is number 1 suspect though, but you are close 2nd.   :sarcastic:

Offline Placebo88

Not aware of that rule?? I have changed ratings both up and down a handful of times at OP's requests. Have reported the post to check.  :hi:
Errrr, no. I changed it 'cos the OP requested it to be done.  I thought that was a mod's job??


UKP has no mods. Only members with trusted helper status for a set range of non-executive administrative tasks.

If the reviewer wanted to change the rating then they can put in a post report requesting their new rating choice. You jumped the gun.

The review is a very thorough one from someone with a solid history of reviewing. The negative was not a snap call.

The booking was bad for him and he has lots of others to compare it to. I do not see the escort doing anything intentionally wrong yet she failed to keep his interest to the extent he called time. He has paid out a lot for next to nothing. Negatives are not only left for crap attitude. Joe Hart has not been left out of the England squad for bad attitude.

The difference between the profile photographs and the photograph that VW found of her is a negative. The reviewer was very kind about her physical appearance based on that.

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
well as admin said in his reply to your report they need reporting to bring to his attention.   Not double figures 3 actually, neptune is number 1 suspect though, but you are close 2nd.   :sarcastic:
He must have been a top fella if I sound like him.  :thumbsup:

I'm sure admin can do some technological defuddling to prove I aint the aforementioned fine & upstanding chap.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
He must have been a top fella if I sound like him.  :thumbsup:

A garden variety white knight.

Offline Analist

Interesting review, not least because I'd considered booking Kelly in the past. I might still do so, as I feel the circumstances would be very different from this booking.

Full sympathies, as I've had the odd punt where I've either failed to get an erection or not maintained one. Afterwards, like the OP, I've tried to understand why and without fail it's one of two things (or both combined)
1) Physical- Heavy consumption of food, alcohol or cocaine or lack of sleep
2) Psychological- Something not quite right before the punt so you're mentally in the wrong frame of mind and it only gets worse during the punt
Reading your account, the psychological element was certainly present and you had misgivings before you started. Maybe the physical aspect was there too?

Anyway, to the punt itself, 20 minutes in and you have a limp dick. Strictly speaking, not the WGs fault but I think their response determines the rating:
Positive WG is helpful and tries to resolve the situation. No clock watching and does her best to get you to relax. Provides indirect sexual stimulation e.g. a massage, talking dirty, watching porn, whatever it takes to get you horny again. If time is an issue, she gives you a refund or a discount on a future booking.
Neutral WG is literally neutral to your predicament- not helping but not making it worse either. I suspect this was the case but it's unclear if she was passive due to being in character for your roleplay.
Negative WG is actively compounding the problem. Maybe winking at your soft prick and cracking sly jokes about it. No attempt at any refund.

On the plus side, she did come out to Watford and gave a partial refund. On the negative side, I think she could have done more in the situation. Even allowing for the refund, you paid £190 for 20 minutes of OWO and fingering- a pretty steep price to me.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2018, 06:35:22 pm by Analist »

Offline Placebo88

Does it say anywhere how long she was there for in total?

I reckon better rounded escorts faced with plan A failing have the initiative to switch things up and do a good salvage job for the rest of the booking time. The roleplay part was spanking and an erection is not needed for that. Why not move on to that part and see what happens. Plenty of other activities to try seeing as the time is booked and she has been paid to entertain. There are escorts who are incapable of leading and that may be why the reviewer had to rescue his own booking if it was getting rescued at all. His not being sufficiently keen to do so tells its own story.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Well he expected pestering and the predicable happened.    :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

The OP paid £190 for a punt he didn't enjoy and apparently that's not a negative. :rolleyes:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
The OP paid £190 for a punt he didn't enjoy and apparently that's not a negative. :rolleyes:

OP was in 2 minds about the initial rating in the first place, and posted about UKE popularity and not liking confrontation, cannot help think some seized the chance influence him.

All the info is there, plus the replies so others can make up their own minds.

stickman1980

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
All the info is there, plus the replies so others can make up their own minds.
Spot on VW. :thumbsup:

We had to agree on something eventually didn't we???  :unknown:

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
The OP paid £190 for a punt he didn't enjoy and apparently that's not a negative. :rolleyes:

Pretty much sums up the whole thread for me.