Attractive but overpriced (declining listed services) at £100 phExternal Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyBackground (skip this if you just want the review)
The London board threads; “….posterity”, “…new in North London”, and “…veri pic” have recently provoked a marked shift in my punting approach. I am now targeting new profiles of young SP’s at or below £100 ph with zero UKP reviews and less than five AW reviews sourced either on these threads or directly from AW. The results have been varied and startling. There is a lot of dross, you are on your metal in qualification but there are also some real bargins.
This market is a test of punting skill; ability to interpret a profile, qualify incisively and make good judgements in the room, as this experience shows.
ReviewI called by phone on the day at lunchtime. It is a terraced house, residential street, North East corner of Westwood Recreation Ground, Seven Kings, 10 minute walk from Goodmayes Station. Either she can be slightly difficult to understand or I am becoming a deaf old cunt. The house is shared with
External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only who I thought was pretty. I would be mindful of the experience with Alice if I were to book her, but I think they will deliver services where agreed...
The photos are accurate if flattering. She is petite (size 4 dress size) b cup and maybe 5’3”. She appears older than 18 and I would guess at mid 20’s. I thought she was very pretty although lack of preparation lets her down. No make up, a slightly droopy bosom, gappy teeth (not missing, just gappy) lack of tone in her physique kept her to a high 7 facially and an 8 figure wise. Better presentation could push her north on both dimensions. She has a nice ratio and I enjoyed the view in doggy. Her English is barely serviceable and has been in the country 10 days. She was dressed in a black body and stockings; my dress suggestion helped things a bit.
My mistake with Alice was allowing hot looks and a 4 position on my short list (see below) to distract me from qualifying services and price thoroughly in advance, then not testing services effectively in the room. I had to ask for a shower at the start and she wanted to keep the room dark which I take as a classic indicator of a clock watcher. She declined French kissing and reverse oral but (as confirmed) did offer OWO inclusive in an hour booking. Her hand and oral skills are serviceable but it is very much an arms length, no kissing, no RO and pretty mechanical. With the omissions it is too short a service list for me and in my view renders her overpriced from the combination of looks, “likes” and service in the area. Doggy was good. She has a hot body. She was hot enough to bring me off in half an hour and there was no indication of any follow up from her. You could view this as a negative but she was hot and my confirmation was not clear enough to merit a warning based on how the punt panned out.
Qualification notesI also qualified out
External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only who responded to my text confirmation of listed services and price as follows,
"Her: No sorry I do normal service",
and
External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members OnlyShe gave the postcode and then did not respond to a confirmation text
and
External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only who answered the phone and then did not respond to a confirmation text.
While they may have just been busy or disorganised it could also indicate they do not want to be held to advertised services or there are hidden extras. I have delisted Rosie and Larina.
