Much as I find this women’s attitude to punters appalling I’m not fully convinced from this reviewer. It would be helpful if he could provide texts at least of proof of the meet.
I agree, doesn't ring true this, sounds more like a spurned lover.
How does he know her real name after two meets?
How does he know her number when she doesn't give it out? I haven't seen her but I've emailed her a couple of times and it's emails only.
It's the OP's first and only post, hasn't logged on since.
Why would she do this for the sake of a couple of hundred quid and risk her livelihood? She's already had sex with the OP after all, why not just do it again and take the money legitimately?
Isn't it against UKP rules to publish phone numbers?