Author Topic: Hannah (also briefly called Rachel) - Karma Sutra Girls (KSG), Didsbury  (Read 1721 times)


2 review(s) for taylor-teasexx (0 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by NigelF]

Offline NigelF

Link: External Link/Members Only

This girl is pretty new and is now called Hannah but when she started she was called Rachel. I believe her name was changed because the old Rachel who'd worked at KSG for a good while is now seemingly back: External Link/Members Only (interestingly I'd probably have rated the old Rachel a neutral too because she looks quite lot older than "late 30s" and her pics are old and misleading too - although they don't seem to be as bad as they were when I saw her which was over a year ago - hence no review but people can feel free to ask questions). Anyway, back to Hannah:

Price: £60 for 30 mins (including OWO and sex).

Looks: Her profile says size 8 and that seems accurate but I also think she might be a 6 (at least in some shops) as she's definitely a slim girl. She has very noticeable stretch marks around her stomach and minor stretch marks around her tits, arse and thighs. This perhaps suggests a somewhat significant amount of weight loss so fair play to her if that's the case. Her skin is tanned but there was a bit of patchiness to it in some areas (a natural thing I think). Almost certainly A cup tits (not the claimed B cups). Looks around late 20s (I got the impression from a couple of things she said that she isn't though so I'm going to stick with it and just say that it could well be that she looks older than she actually is). She has quite a pretty face and was well made up but perhaps a little too much so for some. Has a small arse but it does have a decent shape. There's not much meat to it though and when bent right over it felt a little "bony". Overall, she wasn't really what I was expecting from her pics and I was a bit disappointed. I was expecting someone cute but she has a bit more of a "fuck doll" look to her - this may well suit quite a few other punters (if not most) but unfortunately not really me. I definitely didn't think she was bad looking though.

Service: Unusually for me I didn't even try to kiss her, in part because I'd already had my face snogged off by another girl earlier in the day. This means I can't really comment on any kissing although I certainly got the impression you'd have to go in for it (or ask) if you wanted any - presuming she actually does it all, which she might not do. OWO was decent but nothing amazing in terms of technique and certainly not depth. Sex was enjoyed in a variety of positions and in doggy she assumed a rather odd, low position with her knees sharply bent and her thighs against her calfs. Instead of face down ass up, it was face down ass down. However, it didn't feel like it limited penetration and I did enjoy it. The sex was enthusiastic but wasn't mind blowing by any stretch.

Overall: A decent but slightly disappointing punt. There was nothing that's likely to make me want to see her again.

Offline NigelF

Forgot to say that this girl said she used to work for Secrets (agency) - I don't know under what name. She also said she was currently on SA. She didn't mention AW though. Nonetheless, I'm certain I've found her AW profile (due to the pics being her): External Link/Members Only

Two of her pics are taken in KSG and the other one looks like it's taken in GFE Bury (but I could be wrong) so perhaps she works there (or another parlour) as well.


Online Blackpool Rock

I liked the look of this one from her pics as i'm a fan of petite spinners however she's not top of my list at the moment

Offline NigelF

Forgot to say that this girl said she used to work for Secrets (agency) - I don't know under what name.

Apparently she was called Hayley, see this review: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=109331.0

Anyway, I've changed this review rating from a neutral to a negative because she lists bareback and unprotected sex on her likes list (I don't know how long it's been there but it's definitely there currently): External Link/Members Only

Offline Access

Did she give any hint of bareback on your punt? Great review as I came across her (not literally) on AW but the B.B. put me off as I was looking for an anal punt.

Offline NigelF

Did she give any hint of bareback on your punt? Great review as I came across her (not literally) on AW but the B.B. put me off as I was looking for an anal punt.

Good question, I forgot to say. No, she didn't give any hint about bareback during my punt.

It's not particularly important but when did you come across her profile (and notice she was offering BB)? I ask just to see if I can confirm she was offering it before I saw her (although as I said it's not too important and wouldn't affect my rating now anyway).
« Last Edit: June 20, 2018, 02:50:25 pm by NigelF »

Offline Access

I was scouting yesterday afternoon for girls offering anal. She popped up, looked hot, then I noticed the bareback so swerved it.

Offline NigelF

I was scouting yesterday afternoon for girls offering anal. She popped up, looked hot, then I noticed the bareback so swerved it.

Cheers for the info. It seems it's still unclear when she added it to her profile (or if it was there from the start) but it doesn't really matter, the fact that she thinks it's OK to advertise it all at any point is the major issue and why she still deserves the negative (because I'm annoyed at having seen her when I wouldn't have if I'd known, even though of course the sex was protected and I didn't do RO).
« Last Edit: June 20, 2018, 05:44:19 pm by NigelF »

Offline bigthickdick

Cheers for the info. It seems it's still unclear when she added it to her profile (or if it was there from the start) but it doesn't really matter, the fact that she thinks it's OK to advertise it all at any point is the major issue and why she still deserves the negative (because I'm annoyed at having seen her when I wouldn't have if I'd known, even though of course the sex was protected and I didn't do RO).

Couldn't agree more and i totally understand why you're annoyed. Put her on the NW BB avoidance thread with a screenshot of her profile.

Online Blackpool Rock

Couldn't agree more and i totally understand why you're annoyed. Put her on the NW BB avoidance thread with a screenshot of her profile.
Just catching up on threads, I see she doesn't have BB on her AW profile now

Offline NigelF

Just catching up on threads, I see she doesn't have BB on her AW profile now

Yes, I forgot to screenshot it at the time as bigthickdick suggested and when I went to screenshot her profile yesterday (to put on here/the BB thread) I saw that she'd removed it. Bear in mind though it was BB and unprotected sex that she had added to her list (nothing else) so she can't claim she accidentally ticked a box, it was 2 boxes and so it was certainly deliberate and she knew what she was doing.

She may well be trying to have her cake and eat it. People interested in BB will contact her because it's been highlighted on here and her previously listing it and she can still deny it to people who aren't interested in BB because it's not currently on her likes list.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2018, 09:17:58 pm by NigelF »

goldwing1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yes, I forgot to screenshot it at the time as bigthickdick suggested and when I went to screenshot her profile yesterday (to put on here/the BB thread) I saw that she'd removed it. Bear in mind though it was BB and unprotected sex that she had added to her list (nothing else) so she can't claim she accidentally ticked a box, it was 2 boxes and so it was certainly deliberate and she knew what she was doing.

She may well be trying to have her cake and eat it. People interested in BB will contact her because it's been highlighted on here and her previously listing it and she can still deny it to people who aren't interested in BB because it's not currently on her likes list.

The old bareback issue.
Punters on here get slated for going with someone who offers it even though they have protected sex.
I was given a hard time for punting someone who previously offered it but at the time I saw the profile, there was no mention of it.

Offline NigelF

The old bareback issue.
Punters on here get slated for going with someone who offers it even though they have protected sex.
I was given a hard time for punting someone who previously offered it but at the time I saw the profile, there was no mention of it.

You really do love whinging and never seem to realise that every time you get "slated" it's for legitimate reasons. Unlike with most WGs where there's at least some doubt about them doing BB with numerous other people, with a girl who's previously offered BB, you can be pretty much certain that she still does do BB with numerous other people. I don't know which girl you're talking about because you've been called out for seeing numerous barebackers, particularly these WGs:
!!Kennedy!! - External Link/Members Only
hotwifenicole - External Link/Members Only

Regarding Kennedy, she was confirmed to be offering BB around the time of your punt/just before and a basic search on here would have shown that. Regarding "hotwifenicole" you initially claimed there was no sign that she was a barebacker and then when caught out with a screenshot showing otherwise, you then admitted that you knew about that/saw that on her profile and then just started deflecting by making excuses about punting being a dangerous game - which it is, but it's far more so if you see open barebackers. Not that any more proof was needed but based on what she said on here, it was clear that she was definitely still offering BB.

You've also seen other WGs who definitely still bareback (despite not having it currently mentioned on their profile) such as Bella39: External Link/Members Only
As you should know, it was mentioned recently in this thread: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=203917