Author Topic: Pakistani Tara TOFTT, Leicester  (Read 6196 times)


3 review(s) for Pakistani_Tara (1 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline NuruGuru

I rang Tara as I saw she was in Nottingham - eventually getting through to her, for logistical reasons, she had to work from Leicester so we arranged to meet there at her incall place.

FEE - £130 / 30mins
LOCATION - In the LE5 area in a block housing estate - to some it might seem a bit of an unsafe place, I even had hesitation looking for the flat, but I bit the bullet and it all turned out to be OK.
COMMS - A bit tricky as her phone was a bit messed up - but she called me back on a withheld number for directions etc.

THE GIRL AND SERVICE -

The pics are her - although no face pic, it's clear from the body / hair etc it's her. She's an attractive girl. Muslim/Sikh mix as she told me.
British born India and well spoken, not chavy.

She greeted me in her traditional Indian red sari and full on red lip stick. From the opening the door she was very friendly, very warm and made me feel at ease very quickly.

She asked me what kind of things I enjoyed, an indication that she was tactful and eager to please - I let her know that I just go with the flow and we began DFK and the rest continued.

Got her out of her outfit and she has a great body. She's gym toned and knows how to shake her ass - her hips move like a belly dancers.

Gave her some RO and she began with some really dirty talk - she loves telling you that she wants your dick inside her pussy - she makes all the right noises, all the good moans, sometimes, it little exaggerated but I guess that's part of the experience.

did the business and cleaned up and we chatted and had a good laugh.

Overall, she's a pretty girl, good attitude and decent service - with her price being quite steep you'd expect it and I felt it delivered - I've paid for and felt let down - but as an Indian SP with good service and who looks great and the dirty talk was great I'd say overall it was a great experience.

Would I return - certainly.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Theman1

I do get the feeling this Nuruguru chap is the pimp daddy, all his reviews are very much a sales pitch for the girls. Just a hunch.

Offline NuruGuru

I do get the feeling this Nuruguru chap is the pimp daddy, all his reviews are very much a sales pitch for the girls. Just a hunch.

A stupid hunch, but you're entitled to it I guess.

Offline Bangers and Gash


Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,201
  • Likes: 82
  •  
  • Reviews: 104
We should not be encouraging these sorts of rates in the EM!

Offline jayuk99

the 2nd pic looks like a bloke with a wig in the shower, the stance and hands dont loke like that of a £130 for 30mins genuine female...  sorry but its a NO from me

Offline Bangers and Gash

We should not be encouraging these sorts of rates in the EM!

Finally, something we can agree on.  :hi:

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,159
  • Likes: 583
  •  
  • Reviews: 519
I struggle with £130/hr so obviously for 30 mins that would be insane  :lol:

Offline Turtle Z

I struggle with £130/hr so obviously for 30 mins that would be insane  :lol:

You obviously missed the fact that her half hourly rate is reduced from £200 to £130.... Get in while the going is good!  :lol: :lol: :lol:

On a serious note, something doesn't quite stack up here and I don't just mean her tits.

Offline Picti

We should not be encouraging these sorts of rates in the EM!

I'm never sure why people become so vexed on this issue. She can set her rates as she wishes, but I as a punter will always decide what I'm prepared to pay. I wouldn't pay the rates she has set, and especially as she seems to provide a fairly average service. If other punters think likewise then market forces prevail as she doesn't do much business.

Offline NuruGuru

Whilst I completely agree that her prices are very high, end of the day, it's up to her what she charges surely. and if a punter can comfortably afford it, then why not?
If you can afford it, go for it, if you can't then don't.

Offline Turtle Z

if a punter can comfortably afford it, then why not?


I don't think anyone is vexed about it but as you say, her prices are very high and she can charge what the fuck she wants. Why not? Because her prices are considerably higher than the average, particularly for the EM, and I can see nothing whatsoever to justify those high prices, she doesn't even show her face, which for me would be an absolute must at those sort of prices, not that I'd ever pay it, despite being comfortably able to afford it. It wasn't even a particularly rousing review to be honest, albeit, it was a positive. She has 27 feedback on AW, most of which are for camming and phone sex. No, I think punters are right to say those sort of prices shouldn't be encouraged.

Offline NuruGuru

I think punters are right to say those sort of prices shouldn't be encouraged.

I agree, punters are entitled to show disagreement or not feel like it's worth paying. I've not disputed this, I've said a few times now I feel her prices are steep.
I don't think SP's care about what location they're in, they'll charge what they want, and they'll have a clientele who will pay for it.

I even asked her why her prices were high during the punt - according to her, it attracts a certain client and that's understandable.

By admission, yes it was a positive, because I had a pleasant time with her. Was it the best I've had with an SP? No. But it wasn't a neutral or negative either.

Also, no one is encouraging pricing, even with my positive review, I've stated I felt her prices are steep

Offline Bangers and Gash

Charging those rates whilst 'working' from a shithole is unacceptable.  :thumbsdown:

Offline Picti

I even asked her why her prices were high during the punt - according to her, it attracts a certain client and that's understandable.

Oh dear, the "certain type of client" rationale! This is entirely spurious as there are many punters who could pay her rates but would make the discerning choice not to as there are better options and better value elsewhere.

When someone is offering a routine, rather than specialist service, I interpret higher rates as wanting an income but  trying to do as little as possible for it. They're often the ones offering the least service for the most cost. If another reason was needed to avoid her, then it's this type of attitude.

Offline NuruGuru

Her rates can be up for debate that's the beauty of this forum. Either way, I had her in my HL for a while as I'm sure many others may have done too. I TOFTT and reported back my experience only, i.e. she's not fake and you get a decent service for other people to be aware of.

Either way, I paid for what I got and I had a decent time. I probably would return, but not as a priority as I agree that for the cost, there are better SP's and that's the end of it really.

I don't feel out of pocket or feel ripped off for what I paid.

The majority thread seems to be concerning her cost - if you're all that annoyed about the high prices, we can set up a GoFundme page and you can all donate so that I get my money back if it really bugs you that much.  ;)

Offline Turtle Z



I even asked her why her prices were high during the punt - according to her, it attracts a certain client and that's understandable.



Yes, I'm sure it does.... mugs!


Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,201
  • Likes: 82
  •  
  • Reviews: 104
I'm never sure why people become so vexed on this issue. She can set her rates as she wishes, but I as a punter will always decide what I'm prepared to pay. I wouldn't pay the rates she has set, and especially as she seems to provide a fairly average service. If other punters think likewise then market forces prevail as she doesn't do much business.

I am not vexed about it, as you say up to her. In the end the market will decide and my comment was because we are a chunk of that market and if we stand firm and do not book at silly prices it will encourage a more sensible pricing.

Offline NuruGuru

if we stand firm and do not book at silly prices it will encourage a more sensible pricing.

Get a grip - this is prostitution. There's no consumer watchdog for punters to regulate prices - if you don't pay for it, someone else will. Boycotts don't work in this industry, that's why you'll see even girls with tons of negative reviews still getting work.

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,201
  • Likes: 82
  •  
  • Reviews: 104
Get a grip - this is prostitution. There's no consumer watchdog for punters to regulate prices - if you don't pay for it, someone else will. Boycotts don't work in this industry, that's why you'll see even girls with tons of negative reviews still getting work.

You are missing the point completely. UKP is the “consumer watchdog” and by raising issues on here we can at times have a positive influence on the way WGs behave. On pricing Tonober, if I have that right, is a good example where some girls responded and reduced prices for the month.

UKP has had an impact with some girls who have seen that good service and/or being value for money gets them business.

Offline Picti

I am not vexed about it, as you say up to her. In the end the market will decide and my comment was because we are a chunk of that market and if we stand firm and do not book at silly prices it will encourage a more sensible pricing.

Not sure there's an argument here as our posts essentially state the same opinion.

The only area of difference is that I view myself as a customer rather than regulator. It's certainly the case that if customers act together in their purchasing behaviour then they set a market force. However, customers will never form an absolutely communal group, and there will always be those prepared to pay more. Market force is the only way I'd seek to influence a WGs rates, as although I've the right to spend my money as I see fit, I don't have the right to tell someone what they should charge. I may also view other punters paying a higher premium as mugs, but I believe that I've no right to tell them how to spend their disposable income.

I'd actually rather that some WGs engaged in this sort of pricing as it conveys necessary information. I require that a WG has a balanced understanding of the game (including market forces), that she has the right attitude, that she's comfortable in this type of work, etc. My interpretation is that this WG fails on these tests, and that's good enough reason to discount her as a prospective punt.

Offline The Owl

South Asian women do seem to charge well above the norm and finding one that's any good rather than trading on her ethnicity only is pretty hard. I'm not sure I'd be tempted to see this one just yet though, she doesn't seem worth average pornstar rates yet.

Offline Turtle Z

There's no consumer watchdog for punters to regulate prices

I disagree entirely, this site is sort of a consumer watchdog for punters. Don't you yourself use it to gauge quality? If so then why should price be any different. Suggesting that we're not regulators is kind of an obvious statement but if you don't think punters also use this site to gauge value for money then you're not being very realistic. As I said, she can charge what she wants but her market will be influenced by what's written on these boards.  Her alleged comments that she attracts a 'certain kind of punter' at those rates is laughable because even at £120.00 an hour you're hardly gonna attract down and outs but the idea that punters who pay £200 and hour are a different demographic to those who punt in the £120-£140 region is clearly false so what 'type' of punter do you think she was describing?

Offline NuruGuru

As I said, she can charge what she wants but her market will be influenced by what's written on these boards.

 - Well, clearly not...  :dash:

Offline jeanphillipe

i was was with her for half hour, got let down by big boot kat. (External Link/Members Only) . i was half way to walsall with 150 for the hour in pocket and got a cancellation message from her. so last minute saw tara who was in the same hotel, but wanted 130 for half hour, wasnt too pleased by this but reluctantly agreed, didn't have the time to set something else up. but at the time was appreciative of the last minute booking.

her body was amazing, wholesome booty, silky olive skin, beautiful eye n lips her attitude was nice too, just the price was too high. and now she seems to have completely lost the plot. half hour 180...

her OWO was lackluster tho, wasn't impressed, i was freshly shaven and clean too. showered before hand.

but she is stunning i have to say,

back to OP i think its scandalous at these prices she works from a housing estate wtf, that aint right, she says she wants to attract upscale clients, i could maybe understand the 130 if they were better hotels/residences
« Last Edit: April 16, 2018, 04:10:32 pm by jeanphillipe »

Offline NuruGuru

back to OP i think its scandalous at these prices she works from a housing estate wtf, that aint right, she says she wants to attract upscale clients, i could maybe understand the 130 if they were better hotels/residences

I don't agree with her accommodation, I found it a bit daunting going to see her especially as it was at night. Her profile said she was working in Nottingham but due to some logistical problems with her flat there she had to work from Leicester - I gave her the benefit of the doubt.

I'm glad you didn't have a horrible time and can verify her existence to a degree as there seems to be some doubts about her validity.

If she's charging £180 for 30 mins then that is bonkers. I paid for this time with her purely out of curiosity more than anything but thats my own personal limit and am happy to do that

Offline Lincs.man1

i was was with her for half hour, got let down by big boot kat. (External Link/Members Only) . i was half way to walsall with 150 for the hour in pocket and got a cancellation message from her. so last minute saw tara who was in the same hotel, but wanted 130 for half hour, wasnt too pleased by this but reluctantly agreed, didn't have the time to set something else up. but at the time was appreciative of the last minute booking.

her body was amazing, wholesome booty, silky olive skin, beautiful eye n lips her attitude was nice too, just the price was too high. and now she seems to have completely lost the plot. half hour 180...

her OWO was lackluster tho, wasn't impressed, i was freshly shaven and clean too. showered before hand.

but she is stunning i have to say,

back to OP i think its scandalous at these prices she works from a housing estate wtf, that aint right, she says she wants to attract upscale clients, i could maybe understand the 130 if they were better hotels/residences

And she only has one eye... :lol: :lol: :lol:
« Last Edit: April 17, 2018, 12:29:24 pm by Lincs.man1 »

Offline Turtle Z

- Well, clearly not...  :dash:

Why clearly not?  She can charge what she wants and punters can pay what they want and comment on prices.

midlandz_boy88

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
i know indian/pakistanis usually charge more, but this is taking the piss, 300 ph. she will get a dusty phone in midlands and drop her rates

Offline NuruGuru

Why clearly not?  She can charge what she wants and punters can pay what they want and comment on prices.

Well, in context that just proves my point. So I don't know what you're trying to get at.

Offline Turtle Z

Well, in context that just proves my point. So I don't know what you're trying to get at.

What point, that she can charge what she wants cos theres no consumer watchdog? As has been pointed out, UK is the punters consumer watchdog.