Author Topic: Stunning Blonde-Manchester  (Read 4750 times)


2 review(s) for  Stunning Blonde (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Scarboroughdude]

Offline Mancman3599

This is my 1st review,if I've gone wrong anywhere please let me know, cheers.


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Got put on to this girl by another WG I tried to book,comms was pretty easy considering it was 1.30am. Swapped a few texts,she said anal included in the price and can come twice in a 30 mins meet for £80,sweet!! I wasn't sure if the profile photos were real or fake but thought fuck it and took a chance willing to walk if she was rough. Arrived at the postcode(a top floor flat above some shops in chorlton) and text for the door number. Arrived at the flat and was greeted by a stunning looking girl,wearing a red bikini and black Lacey dressing gown,I was very happy my chances paid off!! She honestly looks amazing. She leads me into the bedroom and ask how long,I say 30 mins and give her the £80, it was at this point I tried to engage in a little convo with her but she says her English isn't too  good so I thought fuck the small talk,let's crack on. she disappeared out of the room for a moment to hide the cash leaving me to get my gear off,she comes back and strip's off revealing an amazing body,nice tits,nice shaven pussy with a landing strip style.  While standing we share a kiss and I suck on each of her lovely tits in turn,she then turns round and starts rubbing her peachy arse on my semi with my boxers still on. I then ask her to lie on the bed while I give her some oral, she thinks I mean oral on me!! she was very responsive making nice moans and speaking Spanish,a few times she pulled away while I was teasing her clit,maybe I was been too rough. After going down on her for a few minutes i decide i want to fuck that sexy arse so up she gets,grabs a Johnny,starts sucking me off without the Johnny on so I'm nice and hard,puts the Johnny on,adds a bit of lube and lies on her back,I'm thinking I can't pound her arse this way so tell her to turn over doggy style which she does. I'm guiding myself in to this lovely looking arse and she reaches round and puts it in her fanny!! I'm asking her 'anal?' and she's going 'no no',at this point I call her a dirt bitch weather she understands me or not and I pound away still thinking I'm the cat that got the cream. Pounding away and I can't hold on any more and finish in the Johnny. I wasn't sure how long I had left but she had already started dressing herself and with the bad English scenario I couldn't be arsed asking for round 2 so started getting dressed. While getting dreesed I try engaging in conversation again,she tells me she called Louisa and she's 26,I ask her why no anal as we had agreed and she starts rubbing her belly,I took this to mean she had a sore stomach but was probably a load of crap,ask if I can have anal next time she says yes. While dressed I get another snog and leave,get outside and find I've only been in there 20 mins but still leave happy. I'm sure she was a proper Brazilian girl,i would say the 2nd pic on her profile is her not sure about the 1st pic but she looks much better in the flesh and looks amazing naked. Overall I left very happy even tho I didn't get the anal or round 2 as planned.

Offline shaft10



Offline Titi

Indeed, I smell a fake profile.

Offline bigthickdick

Well... she's on aw for 5 days and has no feedback there but already reviewed here... also she's admittedly shortchanged the op (20mins instead of 30, 1pop instead of the agreed 2) and she refused providing some of her advertised services (anal).

That should've been a negative review.

Offline OakTree

Yes it all does look a little suspect. A brand new profile that looks to good to be true and reviewed by a two post wonder.

I suspect the AW profile anyway when she goes on about offering a service where she is tied up and blindfolded. I doubt very much any WG is going to do that even with trusted clients.

Time will tell though and we shall see.

Offline Mancman3599

Well... she's on aw for 5 days and has no feedback there but already reviewed here... also she's admittedly shortchanged the op (20mins instead of 30, 1pop instead of the agreed 2) and she refused providing some of her advertised services (anal).

That should've been a negative review.
Why should it be negative? It's my opinion,is it not? I still left happy even tho it wasn't what was agreed, weather she was trying it on with the me no speak English bullshit or not I enjoyed myself.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2018, 09:46:56 am by Mancman3599 »

Offline Mancman3599

Yes it all does look a little suspect. A brand new profile that looks to good to be true and reviewed by a two post wonder.

I suspect the AW profile anyway when she goes on about offering a service where she is tied up and blindfolded. I doubt very much any WG is going to do that even with trusted clients.

Time will tell though and we shall see.
I agree,it would probably be easier to knit fog that try to communicate with this girl but I promise she's fit,go see for yourself.

Offline yorkieyorkie

Only time will tell if this is a true reflection of this girl. One thing is for certain, it’s not swayed me into seeing her.

Offline FLYING BLUE


marlboro20

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
+1 FB
If this was a fake review think I'd have done a better job on it... think it's legit.
Where's she based for incalls OP... I just love a Brazilian trimmed landing strip

Offline Fast and Bulbous

Where's she based for incalls OP... I just love a Brazilian trimmed landing strip

Arrived at the postcode(a top floor flat above some shops in chorlton) and text for the door number.

marlboro20

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Apologies F & B... missed that.

Offline Fast and Bulbous

It would be helpful if the OP could verify that the girl he met is the same girl on the AW site who looks much tgtbt... :hi:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Mancman3599

Let the skeptical among you chew the fat till someone else sees her and does a review. I'm not saying the service was magnificent but she was certainly better looking than most of the WG on AW at that price range. At the end of the day it's my experience and I left happy so I decided to rate it positive.

Offline Mancman3599

It would be helpful if the OP could verify that the girl he met is the same girl on the AW site who looks much tgtbt... :hi:

Yes pal that's her,like I said in the review I couldn't say if the 1st pic was her but the 2nd pic,the 1 you put up defo is. I actually thought she looked better in person but she was half naked and I was horny haha.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline OakTree

Let the skeptical among you chew the fat till someone else sees her and does a review. I'm not saying the service was magnificent but she was certainly better looking than most of the WG on AW at that price range. At the end of the day it's my experience and I left happy so I decided to rate it positive.


I quite agree. You have to rate it as you feel. Someone else might well have rated the same or at least similar experience differently but it doesn’t matter really. It’s the detail in the review that gives the essential info and there’s plenty in your review for people to digest and come to their own conclusions.

Offline Fast and Bulbous

Yes pal that's her,like I said in the review I couldn't say if the 1st pic was her but the 2nd pic,the 1 you put up defo is. I actually thought she looked better in person but she was half naked and I was horny haha.

 :thumbsup: Considering her profile and your review, someone else here is bound to be tempted to see her and post another review soonish...

Offline bigthickdick

Let the skeptical among you chew the fat till someone else sees her and does a review. I'm not saying the service was magnificent but she was certainly better looking than most of the WG on AW at that price range. At the end of the day it's my experience and I left happy so I decided to rate it positive.

To be honest I am not sceptical the slightest. I believe it's her who opens the door ( and to be fair she is nowhere near stunning judging by the face picture at least not by Latin American standards...)

Judging by what you said she is good looking with a very fit body but provides a pump and dump and for that she is fairly overpriced. But of course your review your rating.

Btw if she is Brazilian then she more than likely said something in Portuguese and not Spanish.

pierrot506

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Loads of Romanian write origine Brazilian, from her service she does sound Romanian.

Offline NigelF


I quite agree. You have to rate it as you feel. Someone else might well have rated the same or at least similar experience differently but it doesn’t matter really. It’s the detail in the review that gives the essential info and there’s plenty in your review for people to digest and come to their own conclusions.

+1

This review is written with rose tinted glasses on but the OP doesn't exclude any of the major details, including negative ones such as only getting 20 mins, no anal, no 2nd round, poor English etc.

This is a fairly well balanced review in my book. I disagree with the rating but it's not my review and as OakTree says, there's enough information for me to make my own conclusion so the OP's rating doesn't really matter.

The OP is clearly somewhat easily satisfied (which isn't ideal for a reviewer) but he makes that pretty clear in the review (and his subsequent comments) so it doesn't really matter. I'm certainly a lot better informed with this review than without it so cheers for the review OP  :drinks:

A tip for the future - paragraphs would help make it more readable.

Did she deliver DFK (deep french kissing) or was it mainly just lip kissing or FK?
« Last Edit: April 13, 2018, 01:56:03 pm by NigelF »

Offline bigthickdick

+1

This review is written with rose tinted glasses on but the OP doesn't exclude any of the major details, including negative ones such as only getting 20 mins, no anal, no 2nd round, poor English etc.

This is a fairly well balanced review in my book. I disagree with the rating but it's not my review and as OakTree says, there's enough information for me to make my own conclusion so the OP's rating doesn't really matter.

The OP is clearly somewhat easily satisfied (which isn't ideal for a reviewer) but he makes that pretty clear in the review (and his subsequent comments) so it doesn't really matter. I'm certainly a lot better informed with this review than without it so cheers for the review OP  :drinks:

A tip for the future - paragraphs would help make it more readable.

Did she deliver DFK (deep french kissing) or was it mainly just lip kissing or FK?

^^ this ^^

Offline babehunter66

It would be helpful if the OP could verify that the girl he met is the same girl on the AW site who looks much tgtbt... :hi:

Hidden Image/Members Only
the pictures are of Keisha grey ... pornstar...

Offline p3ngu1n


Offline p3ngu1n


I ask her why no anal as we had agreed and she starts rubbing her belly,I took this to mean she had a sore stomach but was probably a load of crap,ask if I can have anal next time she says yes.

I suspect she were trying to tell you that she'd just had something to eat (some women feel gassy if they have anal right after a meal. No poking after porking!).
Review reads well-balanced to me. Thanks for sharing OP  :thumbsup:

Offline NigelF

Hidden Image/Members Only

I'm not convinced

I agree.

I was also going to say that even though the WG's face pic is clearly cropped, it would surely still be likely to appear in reverse image searches if it was a pornstar (especially one as popular as Keisha Grey) however the pic you've just posted doesn't come up on TinEye or GRIS either so clearly I'm wrong about that!

Offline OakTree

You’ve only got to look at the chin and jaw line, kiesha grey has a far less sharper more rounded chin. Her teeth as well, Kiesha has a slight gap between her front teeth.


Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: April 24, 2018, 09:09:43 pm by OakTree »

Offline p3ngu1n

...however the pic you've just posted doesn't come up on TinEye or GRIS either ....

That's because sometimes after heavy cropping (which I did do, otherwise her whole fanny and lovely knockers would be on show here!) a reverse image search won't pull owt  :hi:

OP did confirm the facial pic is of the lass in question, so it's clearly the other 2 pics on her profile which are suspect (they do look like stock photographs anyway)
« Last Edit: April 24, 2018, 09:13:56 pm by p3ngu1n »