Chalrize Glamour - Milton Keynes

[Boulder]

External Link/Members Only
1 hour for £120

Hi Guys,

First review, punted a few times now so thought it was time I gave back to the community.

Was in MK for a business meeting last year and tried numerous ladies but all were busy or not answering there phones.

I managed to make a booking with Charlize, headed to the area she directed me to within 5 minutes of the meeting! Was told her buzzer number and headed up the stairs! Was met at the door. She showed me to the room and we concluded the business side if things. Asked for a shower and she was happy for me to do so. When I arrived back at the room after my shower she lay me on the bed and started kissing and caressing me down for some OWO. She was very good at it and had me blowing my load in no time.

Turned over for a massage until mini me was up for round 2. After 5 minutes I was rock hard again! We tried various positions and then onto some mish until I exploded violently into the bag. Crumbled on a heap next to her, sweat dripping from my forehead.

We talked and she offered me an other shower if I wanted but I was going straight back to the hotel anyway so declined.

Overall I was very satisfied and felt I got my monies worth. We were just about the hour but she never once checked a clock / phone or anything. She was purely interested in me. A very good positive punt.

PROS- Very professional, sexy body, nice and tight, clean room/toilet, experienced professional.
CONS- Shared flat with another lady, her age (if you like them young)

[DrConners]

Thanks for the review Boulder - I would say welcome to UKP but you've been lurking here for almost a year.

I'm definitely not disputing you saw her & had a good time - But surely you must have read enough reviews on UKP by now to know that this kind of statement will only bring sarcastic comments as it sounds like something out of the pages of the script for "Fifty Shades of Bollocks"

We tried various positions and then onto some mish until I exploded violently into the bag. Crumbled on a heap next to her, sweat dripping from my forehead.

What does this mean please ? :

CONS- Shared flat with another lady, her age (if you like them young)

Not trying to be a clever cunt, I genuinely don't understand - There was another WG there her age or younger ?
I see on her profile she has listed her age as 46 (so 46 +5 to 10 years then)

PROS- Very professional, sexy body, nice and tight, clean room/toilet, experienced professional.

Ok, she is professional I get it!  I see you've also stated she has a sexy body, she certainly looks fuckable but the photo's on her initial AW profile page are all photoshopped bullshit - & some of the gallery pictures have been modified to hide the fact that she has not got a slim waist line - Examples attached. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

When I first read your ,slightly, touty review I thought she might have a dusty phone - but looking at her AW FB she's cramming in the punters, really guzzling that cum - She already has good reviews on here & you sound like you had a good time.

If your genuine & an honest punter you will be welcomed at UKP - I look forward to your next review (sort of) 







Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[finn5555]

Thanks for the review Boulder - I would say welcome to UKP but you've been lurking here for almost a year.

I'm definitely not disputing you saw her & had a good time - But surely you must have read enough reviews on UKP by now to know that this kind of statement will only bring sarcastic comments as it sounds like something out of the pages of the script for "Fifty Shades of Bollocks"

What does this mean please ? :

Not trying to be a clever cunt, I genuinely don't understand - There was another WG there her age or younger ?
I see on her profile she has listed her age as 46 (so 46 +5 to 10 years then)

Ok, she is professional I get it!  I see you've also stated she has a sexy body, she certainly looks fuckable but the photo's on her initial AW profile page are all photoshopped bullshit - & some of the gallery pictures have been modified to hide the fact that she has not got a slim waist line - Examples attached. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

When I first read your ,slightly, touty review I thought she might have a dusty phone - but looking at her AW FB she's cramming in the punters, really guzzling that cum - She already has good reviews on here & you sound like you had a good time.

If your genuine & an honest punter you will be welcomed at UKP - I look forward to your next review (sort of) 







Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

I see the old grannie of a pro$$ie has reported you  is

[timsussex]

strange
shes reported DrC(who questioned the review) and she then reported the review itself as fake   

[Cunning Punt]

strange
shes reported DrC(who questioned the review) and she then reported the review itself as fake   

That's prossie logic for you!

Seems she wants it both ways, so to speak.. which is strange as she doesn't do anal. 

She's trying to hide the facts.

In the pictures of in blue lingerie, she is clearly bent back and holding her stomach in. Also, numerous other posters have made reference to the fact she is older than 46, including both previous reviews linked to her AW profile:

I doubt very much she is the 46 years old as stated

you can tell in her face that she's late 40s, perhaps even into her 50s.

[tesla]

I will stand by my review, she does have a slim attractive body, no hint of a belly, but facially she is showing her age. Her service was excellent, fully attentive to my needs.I could not fault.

[James999]

strange
shes reported DrC(who questioned the review) and she then reported the review itself as fake   

The reality is she's probably just not happy that her advancing years are showing and the state pension looming 

[James999]

CONS- Shared flat with another lady, her age

This has been reported by Exotic Lady, perhaps she's the one who shares the flat with Charlize

Sounds like a care home 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[James999]

she is showing her age.

Is she good on the phone?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Boulder]

Ta DrC, duly noted!

The cons are, 1) she shared a flat with another woman
2) her age

How do you tell she's reported the thread?

[James999]

she shared a flat with another woman

Another Pro$$ie called exotic-lady reported it, perhaps that's one of the girls she shares the flat with 

But then she says that she doesn't share the flat 

So is the flat shared as you said, or not as she say?

[finn5555]

strange
shes reported DrC(who questioned the review) and she then reported the review itself as fake   

At her age senile dementia is not beyond the realms of possibility 

[DrConners]

I see the old grannie of a pro$$ie has reported you  is

I saw  What's the problem love ? I said :

she certainly looks fuckable

I'm guessing it was this :

When I first read your ,slightly, touty review I thought she might have a dusty phone - but looking at her AW FB she's cramming in the punters, really guzzling that cum

Oh well, sometimes the truth of your passtime/profession can be a little hard to swallow 

That's some ego you have - Googling yourself - Narcissistic personality disorder perhaps ? 

[DrConners]

The cons are, 1) she shared a flat with another woman
2) her age

How do you tell she's reported the thread?

You won't have access to that section due to your low post/review count. She reckons she doesn't share the flat, you never clarified the comment :

CONS- Shared flat with another lady, her age (if you like them young)

You never complained about her age in the review, only now.

And you got the pricing wrong, she's currently showing rates as £130 per hour ? You sure you actually saw her Boulder ?

She's never complained about other reviews about her - and yours was a positive ?

I'm starting to think now you might be slighty full of shit ? 

[Happyjose]

Not much detail in the review, and most of what is there could be gleaned from previous reviews

Apart from the issue he's been called out on

Back to you OP.....

[DrConners]

Not much detail in the review, and most of what is there could be gleaned from previous reviews

Apart from the issue he's been called out on

Back to you OP.....

He's been online - Hasn't responded - Your silence speaks volumes Boulder 

Your a bullshitter 

[Boulder]

I can guarantee there was a woman in the living room with black leather/pvc on. I came out the bathroom and went into the room in front of the bathroom.

When speaking to Charlize she even said she rents the room as she doesn't stay in MK but a town near by.

Feeling a bit sheepish about putting my next reviews on here if this is how bad people get about a positive review, cos I can imagine the hassle that would ensue after my negative review.

Peace out

[James999]

But that would mean the pro$$ie report was lying then   

[Happyjose]

I can guarantee there was a woman in the living room with black leather/pvc on. I came out the bathroom and went into the room in front of the bathroom.

When speaking to Charlize she even said she rents the room as she doesn't stay in MK but a town near by.

Feeling a bit sheepish about putting my next reviews on here if this is how bad people get about a positive review, cos I can imagine the hassle that would ensue after my negative review.

Peace out

Just the way it works around here

Your review was very light on detail, some prossie challenged it, you were slow to respond.

These things play out one way or another

There's useful info on the wiki with regards to review writing.

[James999]

Hidden Image/Members Only

That's bad photoshop, clearly trying to hide her advancing years and waistline