Anyone seen PrincessRay? Leigh on Sea

[Wiill]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Anyone seen this girl?

Considering a meet but she’s a bit of a mystery at the moment.

[workinallweek]

no pics  dodgy  mind you the whole area is very barren ....

[Wiill]

Had a few body pics sent over text, but she seems quite nervous about people recognising her. Her profile says she’s only 20 so I can understand that she doesn’t want her face posted around everywhere in a place she most likely grew up.

She has some feedback and turning down OWO over text doesn’t seem like a very scam thing to do.

I’m 90% sure she’s legit, was just hoping someone else had TOFTT already

[fatboy]

If you look at her feedback there are some punters who themselves have high feedback and have seen quite a few other WGs.
I know AW feedback is shite but if you cross reference the punters and girls it gives an idea of what she might be like.
It is not 100% or even 25% but it is somewhere to start.
Apart from turning up and TOFFT that's about as far as you will get.
Cheers FB 

[Students Notebook]

If you look at her feedback there are some punters who themselves have high feedback and have seen quite a few other WGs.
I know AW feedback is shite but if you cross reference the punters and girls it gives an idea of what she might be like.
It is not 100% or even 25% but it is somewhere to start.
Apart from turning up and TOFFT that's about as far as you will get.
Cheers FB 

FBs' advice is spot on. 

[wizzo9]

Agreed F.B. and S.N.

Usually  when S.P.'s  start up a profile,and want to try and drum up business, they  want to get a few quick feedbacks 

if you look at the alleged punters they  will have either 0 or very few previous feedbacks. Likely the S.P. herself or her "manager" has set up a couple of accounts , just to get the ball rolling.

If a reviewer has a good number of F.B. under his belt, especially over a period of time, then  i normally accept it as kosher. The main thing is do a bit of research  by "drillling back"

[Students Notebook]

Agreed F.B. and S.N.

Usually  when S.P.'s  start up a profile,and want to try and drum up business, they  want to get a few quick feedbacks 

if you look at the alleged punters they  will have either 0 or very few previous feedbacks. Likely the S.P. herself or her "manager" has set up a couple of accounts , just to get the ball rolling.

If a reviewer has a good number of F.B. under his belt, especially over a period of time, then  i normally accept it as kosher. The main thing is do a bit of research  by "drillling back"

Very wise, young man.

If only you knew my AW nick, then you would find yourself in safe hands. And that goes for Fatty too.
My apologies FB. Just slipped out. If you know wot I mean. LOL

S.N.

[wizzo9]

 As a follow -on  from my post about feed-backs, most of the  the "ghost" feed-backs  are merely cut and paste jobs from some other W.G  in a different part of the country. [they probably won't recognise that somebody in a different part of the country has lifted off their profile]

Sergei is the worst offender, his language skills are too poor to post a convincing feed-back, so having created a new account for feed-back purposes, merely lifts somebody else's work  and posts as his own.   Easy!!

Similarly that is how he creates a new profile in the first place, cut and paste parts of somebody else's work. Saves having to sub-contract to a native English speaker !!

W