Author Topic: Charlie's no Angel Edinburgh  (Read 3552 times)


18 review(s) for Charlie .  (13 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by lewishamguy]
35 review(s) for Scottish Ashley (24 positive, 3 neutral, 8 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline S.X. MacHine

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only - Get QR Code

I'd actually decided to Take One For The Team and booked accordingly, only for Cactus to slip in before me. (Oops; bad pun).
Firstly, parking. Difficult in a residential urban street near Dalry Road, but fortunately I arrived early and had time to find a space. Edinburgh Council seems to be run by car hating fuckwits who make no provision for folk who drive to their city bringing business.
The premises. Spacious, tastefully refurbished, clean, large ground floor flat, ideal for the purpose.
Charlie. Stated age of 26 seemed right to me. At around 5', wee, but what I'd call a pocket Venus with feminine curves and, in particular, an ass to die for. Not big chested, if that bothers you. I'm not bothered. Delightful genitalia...
Personality. Fun, fun, fun. Smiles a lot and is easy to get along with; not in the least reserved and is possessed of a West of Scotland charm which is delightful. As a relative newcomer (newcummer?) to the business, she is enthusiastic and eager to please
The Meeting. DFK, OWO, RO, Anal Play, Spanking and mild BDSM (flogger and pinwheel) Anal and CIM available at extra cost, above the £120 per hour.
I went with the intention of indulging in BDSM on Charlie but, in the event, she was inexperienced although keen to learn; right wee strumpet (in a good way). That said, I am aware most punters are really not into BDSM. Did her in 'cowgirl'.
With the hour almost up, I was offered a shower.
In Conclusion; a kinky GFE with an attractive and likeable newbie. Would I return? All things being equal, yes, but I'd take along an extra (I think £20) and indulge myself with Anal. From the way she talked, she was really quite keen to take it up the Hershey Highway.

Offline Cactus

Glad you had a good one  :drinks:
And thanks for the name check, I've not seen her though. I am sorely tempted to remedy that! The silly emojis were bugging me, but that's probably just me being daft...

This genitalia you mention, what is it that makes it delightful? I'm a fan of RO, so this piqued my interest somewhat.

Offline S.X. MacHine

Yeah, sorry, Cactus; only later did I realise that it wasn't you who had tried her out.
What makes her pudenda delightful? Symmetry and proportion, I guess and, indeed, I did indulge in a little RO. Very nice.

Offline Timeforfun

Yeah, sorry, Cactus; only later did I realise that it wasn't you who had tried her out.
What makes her pudenda delightful? Symmetry and proportion, I guess and, indeed, I did indulge in a little RO. Very nice.

Have to agree I loved RO with her

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
I was about to hotlist her but curious why you only give positive reviews S.X.

Offline S.X. MacHine

I was about to hotlist her but curious why you only give positive reviews S.X.

You make a fair point and, honestly, I expected to be picked up on this. I did have quite a number of lousy punts when I started out on this hobby about six years ago, but at the time I wasn't contributing here.
My first review, a positive one, was for Lena of Rosyth, since when I've really only had one cringeworthingly bad experience with a munter down Easter Road. I fled and left a Negative review.
One reason I don't have negative experiences to relate, is that I use the same WGs time and again, whereas punters who like novelty are, inevitably, going to have a higher rate of bad punts. Well, that's my theory. I am also fastidious in my selection criteria, though this is no guarantee of quality as what is said on AW profiles is not always true.
Alternatively, I might just be easy to please.
Charlie is the first 'new' WG I've sampled since May last year. (Laretta hardly counts as she turned out to be Lanya whom I knew). Looking back, I've awarded two Neutrals and one Negative, but the rest of the WGs, whom I rated, have also received solid reviews from others on here, which may validate my opinions.
I honestly rated Charlie; fresh, enthusiastic, open to kink and apparently enjoying herself. If she stays the course, she may become a very popular WG.
In my reviews I do try to be accurate and objective in relating what services were offered to me, though in assessing a girl's attractiveness and personality, an element of subjectivity will inevitably creep in.