ebony magic - Edinburgh

[embrame]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Visited this girl located at bottom of leith walk.
Discreet location behind shops.
Insisted she was the girl in pictures pre booking, but wasn't (They all do lol) .
Asked to confirm services on offer before arrival and all good.
On arrival was met with quite a large girl but thought what the hell.
Must be around 5ft 2, 16-18 with very large breasts.
Room clean and looked unused, no soothing music or any oils on offer, not even a rough towel to cover the bed.

Verbal communication seemed to be an issue in the room, unsure if it was my accent or her complete disinterest so assumed the number on ad was her receptionist.

Massage/service very poor and had to be asked to remove her top at the end, seemed more bothered about her phone than anything else.

Was in an out in 20 mins.

Avoid !

[seeker]

Why the F
Did you even enter the flat if it was an unattractive b and S 
You deserve what you got.   

[embrame]

I posted it so idiots like you can leave those pointless replies, which are always opinions rather than anything else rather than facts based on the subject.

Job then then.

[seeker]

I never asked you why you posted the review you twat 
neg reviews are always helpful .
I asked you why if you could see it was an unattractive b and s munter
You actually went into the flat paid your money ,had a shit time
And where then disappointed
Or where you expecting the time of your life
 ,Or did the  one brain cell in
Your head go to sleep when you saw the yeti   
Maybe you will learn something from the experience
Maybe 

[embrame]

I never asked you why you posted the review you twat 
neg reviews are always helpful .
I asked you why if you could see it was an unattractive b and s munter
You actually went into the flat paid your money ,had a shit time
And where then disappointed
Or where you expecting the time of your life
 ,Or did the  one brain cell in
Your head go to sleep when you saw the yeti   
Maybe you will learn something from the experience
Maybe 


So thats 2x you said unattractive , where does it say unattractive in my review?
i pointed out it wasn't the girl in the picture and she was big but at no point did use the word unattractive.

i suppose you didn't see where i wrote what the hell as well and went in.

i post here when i can be bothered and remember to review, nothing else, you post here for the sake of it by the posts to reviews % ratio.

I still dont see where i put unattractive - maybe you need to get a new pair of glasses.

You really like you emoji stuff dont you lol makes you look clever.

 

[seeker]

 5 foot 2 inches, size 18 must be attractive in your book then.
 
See you fucked up the reply as well 

[auldie63]

You really like you emoji stuff dont you lol makes you look clever.

Something I don't see us ever accusing you of being!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[seeker]

You must be clever as well Auldie 

[embrame]

You must be clever as well Auldie 

Oh look you've added to your post ratio without contributing anything of any use to any of readers.

Keep spamming ....

[embrame]

5 foot 2 inches, size 18 must be attractive in your book then.
 
See you fucked up the reply as well 

I still don't see UNAttractive in my review that you keep on saying.

How is that a fucked up reply when youre the one whose fucked up?
Closing  in 3000 posts and none will have any relevant information to anyone i suspect.

[Clattypats]

While on the subject of idiots...Did you not cross reference and check on here to see she already had a NEG against her...

Now whether the other punter got the WG that was in the pics or not, the NEG should have been enough of a warning to sway your decision...

You make a point of slating people having opinions (which tends to happen on forums btw)..Yet you have a review in front of you in Black n white, which is "Fact" based , yet don't take heed of it..

Maybe you should be the one reassessing how you use forums...

[Dukey]

It says there are 2negative reviews for her and I can only see one which is obviously this one.
How do I see the other one?

[STAR-LORD]

It says there are 2negative reviews for her and I can only see one which is obviously this one.
How do I see the other one?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=138078.0

[auldie63]

It says there are 2negative reviews for her and I can only see one which is obviously this one.
How do I see the other one?

Go back to the top of the thread and click on her blue name and all her reviews are revealed.

[Dukey]

Sorry. Had mind block. Didn't link the two different name and locations as bring same girl.
Thanks though.

[doodlecrazy]

Give the guy a break, it's his money and decision whether to stay or not and he's warning others on it being B&S.

He is right, he DIDN'T say she was an unattractive munter. A black girl with big tits being big doesn't mean she was a complete horror

[raymcfarland]

Oh look you've added to your post ratio without contributing anything of any use to any of readers.

Keep spamming ....

[Clattypats]

Give the guy a break, it's his money and decision whether to stay or not and he's warning others on it being B&S.

He is right, he DIDN'T say she was an unattractive munter. A black girl with big tits being big doesn't mean she was a complete horror

That's not what I asked him though...nor said to him..

Others would have checked...seen the first negative, and more than likely, steered well clear....

Are you his spokesperson? ...Think I'll wait and see what he has to say, thanks anyway...

[doodlecrazy]

The guy posted a review in good faith and seeker jumps right in with his tuppence half which was not fact based and guaranteed just to cause aggro. And whether someone walks or not is up to them.

No harm in pointing out he could've looked at a review but no need for it to come with attitude attached (you saying talking of idiots). Having another review up now should be helpful to someone else in the future. 

You don't like what I say, too bad. People get criticised here for not reviewing then criticised when reviewing. Looks like lose lose to me.

Embrane answered me in a similar way himself recently so he's as guilty as the next person as far as I'm concerned. I have no interest in supporting him but have no problem pointing out heavy handed unnecessary input. This forum should be an altogether more friendly place because most people are just trying to help each other out.

[Jock D]

Good post Doodle.

[seeker]

Why the F
Did you even enter the flat if it was an unattractive b and S 
You deserve what you got.

My first post was mainly aimed at the Fact it was a bait and switch 
Now if punters just think with thier dicks and think "ahh well I'm here so might as well "
It just lets the  conning wg just keep on conning away with no consequences
The fact she is  5'2 and a size 18 I thought she may have been unattractive...
But forgot to consider that the op may be a chubby chaser.
His money his choice even if its a blatant b & s providing
What turned out to be a shit service... Fact .

[Clattypats]

The guy posted a review in good faith and seeker jumps right in with his tuppence half which was not fact based and guaranteed just to cause aggro. And whether someone walks or not is up to them.

No harm in pointing out he could've looked at a review but no need for it to come with attitude attached (you saying talking of idiots). Having another review up now should be helpful to someone else in the future. 

You don't like what I say, too bad. People get criticised here for not reviewing then criticised when reviewing. Looks like lose lose to me.

Embrane answered me in a similar way himself recently so he's as guilty as the next person as far as I'm concerned. I have no interest in supporting him but have no problem pointing out heavy handed unnecessary input. This forum should be an altogether more friendly place because most people are just trying to help each other out.

I've not slated his review. at all ..I appreciate the fact he has stuck it up to warn others...Can you point out to me where I've slated the review?...

If he wants to band the word idiots about, then he can expect similar back...He thinks people shouldn't have opinions on forums, I think not...He wants to deal in facts...They were in front of him in the other review..He didn't choose wisely...His money his choice as has been rightly stated..

Punters will ask questions and have opinions on reviews, it's to be expected...They may be asked in different manners etc...I've had 2 Bait & Switches before, and walked from both, so it's not that strange of a comment  to be made...

You can maybe read my first post again and quote me the part where I've slated the actual review...If you can't, and somehow find my post in bad taste, then I can only mirror your sentiments, and say, Too bad...

[Uncle Buck]

Chaps, we need to cut out the playground fighting otherwise almost every thread becomes a complete waste of time. Up until a couple of months ago, there was good valuable information (and humour) on most threads which we could make our informed decisions upon. Now it’s mostly petty squabbling (which I am now contributing to FFS).

#justsaying

UB

[Dukey]

Chaps, we need to cut out the playground fighting otherwise almost every thread becomes a complete waste of time. Up until a couple of months ago, there was good valuable information (and humour) on most threads which we could make our informed decisions upon. Now it’s mostly petty squabbling (which I am now contributing to FFS).

#justsaying

UB

Tend to agree UB.
Let's not lose sight of the fact that the OP was useful in the fact it was a review and a clear warning to members to avoid this excuse for a WG..
The fact he went through with the punt is his choice and is in essence, immaterial. What's important is that he hasn't hidden behind his "error of judgement", shrugged his shoulders and ignored it. He's came on here and said, by the way guys here's what I did and I wish to fuck I hadn't.
His review backs up the previous review, (something that is sometimes needed) and should now unequivocally cement the fact that this WG is indeed a cunt.

[doodlecrazy]

Tend to agree UB.
Let's not lose sight of the fact that the OP was useful in the fact it was a review and a clear warning to members to avoid this excuse for a WG..
The fact he went through with the punt is his choice and is in essence, immaterial. What's important is that he hasn't hidden behind his "error of judgement", shrugged his shoulders and ignored it. He's came on here and said, by the way guys here's what I did and I wish to fuck I hadn't.
His review backs up the previous review, (something that is sometimes needed) and should now unequivocally cement the fact that this WG is indeed a cunt.

+1

Agree with UB, should be good humour and banter not slaggings and cheek. I found it a bit amazing because I can see no reason for it.

[Clattypats]

Agreed...UB and Dukey...

There was no "playground" fighting intended on my part...If I had seen the review earlier I would probably have initially questioned why he didn't walk from  a B&S (which I have done now), albeit may have phrased it differently...whether I would then have got the "idiots" comment or not is anyone's guess...That's why I mirrored it(rightly or wrongly...probably the latter) in my original post..

Like I've said I appreciate the OP sticking his NEG review up as it does build a picture of what this WG is like, and I hope it doesn't put the OP off contributing  ...I just wanted to know his thought process of still booking, having seen the original NEG...which I believe the other reviewer said could have been a NEG NEG, if there was the option...That was all..

As you were guys...

[Dukey]

I think it's a bit unfair to judge a WG on one review. Simply because one mans steak is another mans burger and, as shows frequently on this forum, you can have vastly differing reviews of the same girl on the same page or the same day.
I think, if nothing else there is a fairly definite picture being painted about this WG now and this review and thead has been valuable in establishing that  I for one wouldnt go near it.
I will say one thing however, the OP seems to like taking risks with some of the girls he sees given some of the bad punts he has had.

[Clattypats]

I think it's a bit unfair to judge a WG on one review. Simply because one mans steak is another mans burger and, as shows frequently on this forum, you can have vastly differing reviews of the same girl on the same page or the same day.
I think, if nothing else there is a fairly definite picture being painted about this WG now and this review and thead has been valuable in establishing that  I for one wouldnt go near it.
I will say one thing however, the OP seems to like taking risks with some of the girls he sees given some of the bad punts he has had.

...I would probably Base my decision on the content that's in the NEG review(s), rather than it solely being a NEG in itself, although that would set the alarm bells ringing initially....would also take heed of the ensuing comments from other punters aswell...

[Dukey]

...I would probably Base my decision on the content that's in the NEG review(s), rather than it solely being a NEG in itself, although that would set the alarm bells ringing initially....would also take heed of the ensuing comments from other punters aswell...

Fully agree with you. It's entirely up to you how you filter the profiles but what works for you may not work for someone else. The more detail and opinion that is available the easier it becomes. As I said, looking at the OPs reviews, maybe his system, if he has one, isn't working.

[Clattypats]

Fully agree with you. It's entirely up to you how you filter the profiles but what works for you may not work for someone else. The more detail and opinion that is available the easier it becomes. As I said, looking at the OPs reviews, maybe his system, if he has one, isn't working.

Yip ...a case of "Horses for courses" I suppose...

[S.X. MacHine]

Chaps, we need to cut out the playground fighting otherwise almost every thread becomes a complete waste of time. Up until a couple of months ago, there was good valuable information (and humour) on most threads which we could make our informed decisions upon. Now it’s mostly petty squabbling (which I am now contributing to FFS).

#justsaying

UB

I agree with you. The site is here to exchange info on good and bad providers.
Sadly, the 'usual suspects' use it to attack other contributors. If contributors are continually belittled for their opinions, fewer of them will have the confidence to write in, limiting the information available to us.

[Clattypats]

I agree with you. The site is here to exchange info on good and bad providers.

interesting point you make, and I also agree...

Would this also take into account a NEG review in which a meet did not take place, and the punter has been totally messed around...whether that be a short notice cancellation with no reason given, or radio silence on the day, leaving the said punter in "Limbo land"...Punters can then make an informed decision on any such review, when it shows as a NEG...

I find these negatives to be of great value every bit as much as ones where the meet has taken place...and in no way futile...What do you think?....Like I say...interesting point you make...

[FBman78]

Messed around and left hung out to dry is definitely a negative in my books.

[Clattypats]

Messed around and left hung out to dry is definitely a negative in my books.

yeah...I would have thought so aswell...Always good to have this information at hand when checking "reviews" on here...

[Rudixx]

I've seen her once for 30 minutes in Wolverhampton - service she provided was absolutely terrible. As OP said she is quite chubby but I thought why not. I paid extra for OWO which was really bad she acted like she really hated what she was doing. Then she went on top but she was acting like she is being hurt to we went for doggy. Again she gave me impression like she is hating it so at that point I just fucked her, cum and left as soon as I finished.

I would definitely NOT recommend her.