Any reasonable person would understand, even if they disagreed with me about the ethics, that her displaying her number publicly and others distributing it (when she isn't) are two very different things.
That’s where I believe you’re wrong and referring to ethics weakens your point of view. It’s not convention in ‘punt world’, if number is not showing, WG doesn’t want to be seen. OP actually stated, he saw her again while she was offline. Her number may not to be available, for many reasons.
I reiterate, any service provider, in any industry, that publishes their number, will assume their number will be passed on. There are many reviews on here, where the WG’s number is left on the review. Are you saying if the WG goes offline, her number on the review shouldn’t be used.
The fact is, any service provider, in any industry, will disconnect or turn off any telephone number they published in public, if they don’t want to be contacted. Give them a bit of credit and give up the I’m the only righteous, moral adhering punter in the house
