englishrebecca121 - (London Tour)

[jm08adm]

The problem with that logic is that it’s almost accepted that a girl lies about her age. All agencies drop atleast 3 years of the ages so independents probably follow suit to not be left behind or beade to look old. Even some of the most well reviewed girls on here lie about their ages so it’s not really that valid a point IMHO

[pepsicolaboy]

The problem with that logic is that it’s almost accepted that a girl lies about her age. All agencies drop atleast 3 years of the ages so independents probably follow suit to not be left behind or beade to look old. Even some of the most well reviewed girls on here lie about their ages so it’s not really that valid a point IMHO

Hello, not sure who this is in reply to 

Yes most of the working girls and agencies lie about ages - point taken but that doesnt mean its right or fair to Punters who pay them their hard earned money for what is hoped will be a good service/fair trade.

BUT The 2nd point in this thread is that she was called out on it, had a chance to openly explain situation and admit what she'd done with her various ages at various times and instead dodged and it and waivered on insulting members here instead.

Without said great intel sharing on this site, many a punter would be 'fucked' and have even more money thrown in the bin due to dodgy, lying SP/Sergei/Handlers than there all ready is; be that: service level, doctored photos, B&S, hidden extras, lies about age...need I go on?

White knights be gone please   

Hidden Image/Members Only

Edit: I can see there is some back and forth here with members, many of whom are excellent members so I wont quote anyone and ill stay out of it. BUT this is not personal on her per se, the fact this is that shes providing a service, her age and what she is 'selling' is part of that service and if shes lying/BS she should be questioned on it IMO

Ford for sale 1 careful owner, 30,000 miles on the clock 3 years old - turns out its 10 years old - yes that IS important 

Edit again: They are 'service providers' and this is not a dating site

[holland]

My obsession led me to google her name
And here we go. This comes up on top of the search:

External Link/Members Only

Math says 35.

I was right


Hidden Image/Members Only

[pepsicolaboy]

My obsession led me to google her name
And here we go. This comes up on top of the search:

External Link/Members Only

Math says 35.

I was right


Hidden Image/Members Only

Excellent work, another SP who lies about lying 

Sadly however I think any publicity is better than none for some of these SP and some soft punters won't heed this red flag 

The fact shes so active on here makes me think dusty phone IMO 

How exactly can anyone trust anything she says on this forum now 

[Kev40ish]

My obsession led me to google her name
And here we go. This comes up on top of the search:

External Link/Members Only

Math says 35.

I was right


Hidden Image/Members Only

Well done, it was obviously worth all that effort. I am a simple person who cares about the service and the accuracy of the photos. If I went to see an 18 year old and she was 30 then I would be a tad disappointed.

I just think that sometimes people try too hard to find faults to score points, I am not sure what their motive is. Maybe it makes them feel good... so well done you must feel so good now. It just gets tedious sometimes to me.

But what do I know it may be of value to others.

[Kev40ish]

Excellent work, another SP who lies about lying 

Sadly however I think any publicity is better than none for some of these SP and some soft punters won't heed this red flag 

The fact shes so active on here makes me think dusty phone IMO 

How exactly can anyone trust anything she says on this forum now 

Another example of someone trying to score points!!! Or maybe I’m a soft punter.

[pepsicolaboy]

It just gets tedious sometimes to me.

I do see your point here Kev but we all have the choice of not reading it or just browsing past the said discussion

and maybe in the big scheme of things it is small i.e. if you fancy them and you get the service you want - all good right?

However other punters might be super concerned with age and its important to them in order to enjoy their booking or the fantasy of it etc others just simply prefer not to be lied to 

The good news is that the intel is logged on here and can be added to any other BS of any SP in the future (inorder to make informed decisions in the future about whether to see the said SP):

eg
- SP has a new 2nd profile but on the profile claims 'brand new' to escorting
- SP profile says would never do anal, but intel says otherwise
- SP says not Romanian, but intel says otherwise
etc etc

Maybe age is lower down the 'NO NO' list and that will have a different order for each punter but its on it and should be logged here IMO

Its up to Punters what they do with the shared intel 

Edit if im following this discussion correctly a proposed 25 vs 35 IS a big difference 

[EnglishRebecca121]

My obsession led me to google her name
And here we go. This comes up on top of the search:

External Link/Members Only

Math says 35.

I was right



Hidden Image/Members Only

you really are a twat arnt u here is that acount

External Link/Members Only

29 as in 29 now not in 2012 .....try getting it correct next time.

[Waterhouse]

My obsession led me to google her name
And here we go. This comes up on top of the search:

External Link/Members Only

Math says 35.

I was right


Hidden Image/Members Only

Regardless of her age, whether it's 28, 29, 35 or anything in between... this does not make you right or prove anything.

How do you know that her last activity on the 26 Aug 2016 was not to enter/edit/modify her birthday/age?

You've made an assumption which is not a fact.

Just saying, like.

VB.

[Kev40ish]

I do see your point here Kev and maybe in the big scheme of things it is small i.e. if you fancy them and you get the service you want - all good right?

However other punters might be super concerned with age and its important to them in order to enjoy their booking or the fantasy of it etc

I think the main point is that the intel is logged on here and can be added to any other BS of any SP in the future...

eg
- SP has a new 2nd profile but on the profile claims 'brand new' to escorting
- SP profile says would never do anal, but intel says otherwise
- SP says not Romanian, but intel says otherwise
etc etc

Maybe age is lower down the No NO list but its on it and should be logged IMO

Its up to Punters what they do with the shared intel 

I totally agree with what you say, but my concern is that at the moment, it seems there are a few people who get satisfaction out of just commenting on reviews, often rehashing things that have been discussed before.

This to me seems like cheap shots and not really adding any value.

You can guarantee any thread on Becky will go onto numerous pages.. it won’t harm her as it’s all publicity.

Like I say it becomes tedious, maybe I just have too much time on my hand at the moment and am just getting frustrated on the same old arguements.

[pepsicolaboy]

No worries Kev

I dont follow all the ongoing stuff on here, as much as I could do, except the stuff I cant miss eg Pakistani Jessica

Fair enough there is some history here im not aware of.

 

[Kev40ish]

No worries Kev

I dont follow all the ongoing stuff on here, as much as I could do, except the stuff I cant miss eg Pakistani Jessica

Fair enough there is some history here im not aware of.

 

Now that does interest me too  something I may want to investigate

[pepsicolaboy]

Now that does interest me too  something I may want to investigate

I have seen her and enjoyed myself - some of the senior members will have my bollox for not leaving a review yet 

I saw her about 3 weeks back and I havent managed to coordinate a 2nd time yet - mostly because im more of an evening horny bastard 

[Brazilian Martian]

Another example of someone trying to score points!!! Or maybe I’m a soft punter.

Ive got no horse in this race, but its time to let sleeping dogs lie. Becca is a big woman im sure she can defend herself plus she makes it so easy for people to have digs with her constant contradictions 

[dubs]

My obsession led me to google her name
And here we go. This comes up on top of the search:

External Link/Members Only

Math says 35.

I was right


Hidden Image/Members Only

Model mayhem calculates the age from the date of birth and the current date. All you have proved is

A) she’s 29
b) you’re a dick

[jm08adm]

Model mayhem calculates the age from the date of birth and the current date. All you have proved is

A) she’s 29
b) you’re a dick

Agree wholeheartedly. I’ve not been here long but this does rather have the feel
Of someone whose a bit obsessive compulsive. Holland, surely you have something better to do than follow one person around the internet complaining about her age. You remind me of External Link/Members Only

[finn5555]

The bottom line is Rebecca has told so many lies so often that anything she says now is going to be called out as bullshit   

If you you want to fuck her pay her and crack on, especially as she is overdue announcing yet another retirement 

[holland]

Model mayhem calculates the age from the date of birth and the current date. All you have proved is

A) she’s 29
b) you’re a dick

C) if it's that the case she is at least 31
D)you are a pathetic white knight

35 is the number and she looks 35. So i ll stay with that.

So bottom line is: She is a liar.

She lies on her age and she admitted herself that she does it to get more punters. So don't get fooled by ER.
I would be pretty disappointed if i wanted to meet a prossie who claims to be in her twentiws and then turn up to be 35.

[James999]

The bottom line is Rebecca has told so many lies so often that anything she says now is going to be called out as bullshit 

If you you want to fuck her pay her and crack on, especially as she is overdue announcing yet another retirement 

Excactly, she's probably forgotten the truth herself.

And as for retirements, she's had more retirements and comebacks than most, and she should be very grateful to the NHS as they appear to be producing miracles as they have brought her back from deaths door on a regular basis, or so she says 

[holland]

Model mayhem calculates the age from the date of birth and the current date.

Thats not true by the way.
She logged in the website last night after my post (her last access was 2016) and the age didn't change.
So she definitely put her age prior 2016 most likely when she created her account in 2012.
So she is 35 (at least)

[dubs]

Thats not true by the way.
She logged in the website last night after my post (her last access was 2016) and the age didn't change.
So she definitely put her age prior 2016 most likely when she created her account in 2012.
So she is 35 (at least)

Oh FFS. What is your obsession with this girl?

I'll explain it again for the hard of thinking.  The Model Mayhem registration page asks for Date of Birth, not Age.  She didn't put her age anywhere.  When you display the model's page it calculates the age on the fly.

External Link/Members Only

[holland]

Oh FFS. What is your obsession with this girl?

I'll explain it again for the hard of thinking.  The Model Mayhem registration page asks for Date of Birth, not Age.  She didn't put her age anywhere.  When you display the model's page it calculates the age on the fly.

External Link/Members Only

Whatever
She put her dob in 2012.
System doesn t update as explain above.

You get a life white knight

[Hobbit]

  it states 28 not mid 30s!!!

I think we all know that hookers don't age more than 28. They are the Peter Pan's of the sex industry. 

[TTDC]

I don't really understand all the excitement over SP's ages. The majority will decide to visit an escort based on their pictures and services offered so who gives a toss about their age as long as you like what you see.

[finn5555]

Excactly, she's probably forgotten the truth herself.

she should be very grateful to the NHS as they appear to be producing miracles as they have brought her back from deaths door on a regular basis, or so she says 

Hope she tells the doctors the truth 

[weedougie]

I've never seen the girl, but I like her attitude.....

I once PMed her, asking for her details so that I could arrange a punt and she refused to give them to me, saying that she didn't think that was appropriate for this forum, and she didn't want to tout.

If I was close to Bristol I would have seen her, but i'm not going all the way just for a punt, so I have no dog in this fight

Personally I don't look at a girl's age - I look at the pics

[HighlyMotivated]

What matters is the age you identify as, not your real age. Tell them Rebecca!

[pepsicolaboy]

I don't really understand all the excitement over SP's ages. The majority will decide to visit an escort based on their pictures and services offered so who gives a toss about their age as long as you like what you see.

Problem is a lot of the time photos are doctored or taken in best possible light, so having extra reference points, like a REAL age, reviews with intel on REAL looks etc, is helpful IMO

Someone in their 20s is more likely to be toned than someone in their 30s or 40s, that is reality 

[James999]

I once PMed her, asking for her details so that I could arrange a punt and she refused to give them to me, saying that she didn't think that was appropriate for this forum,

She must really have not liked the sound of you then 

[finn5555]

What matters is the age you identify as, not your real age. Tell them Rebecca!

Hidden Image/Members Only

[lewishamguy]

Whatever
She put her dob in 2012.
System doesn t update as explain above.

You get a life white knight

I think he does have a point. That site updates the age like AW. She joined their in 2012 and last login was 2016 at the time of your posts.  then she logged in yesterday. It's nothing to do with whenever she is logging in. The age will update according to the regd. DOB that she put in there.

[holland]

I think he does have a point. That site updates the age like AW. She joined their in 2012 and last login was 2016 at the time of your posts.  then she logged in yesterday. It's nothing to do with whenever she is logging in. The age will update according to the regd. DOB that she put in there.

I dont think so.
I think the age is put and updated by the member like the rest of the other personal info such as height, etc.
The registration dob is something elese, a legal requirement. It doesn't show up in the profile and it is not linked with what the user want to show

[pepsicolaboy]

Unfortunately this is a 'snake oil saleman' 'industry' where lying is par for the course, it seems.

& if you can lie about X you can lie about Y

The more intel the better 

[Bigus Dickus]

Used a few model web sites. She’s 29 now according to the details she entered when joining Model Mayhem.

Keeping my popcorn out anyway! 

[Kev40ish]

Used a few model web sites. She’s 29 now according to the details she entered when joining Model Mayhem.

Keeping my popcorn out anyway! 

I really don’t know if there is much more to say. We know she has been caught out before.. so I always take what she says with a pinch of salt anyway.

Her threads always go on and on and on ( probably like her if you meet, according to many reviews)

[finn5555]

Used a few model web sites. She’s 29 now according to the details she entered when joining Model Mayhem.

Keeping my popcorn out anyway! 

I think she is 29 just looks mid 30s 

[holland]

Used a few model web sites. She’s 29 now according to the details she entered when joining Model Mayhem.

Keeping my popcorn out anyway! 

You are wrong.

Legal requiremt to join mm is 16

There are members who joined in 2005 and their current age shown is 27 which is then obviosly wrong

I saw a member which her age was 100+

So users put manually their age in mm.

Most likely ER put 29 at the time of joining.

So she is 35 now.

Keep your popcorn out. There will be more whiteknights coming out fighting in her defence


Hidden Image/Members Only

 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[pepsicolaboy]

 



Hidden Image/Members Only

[Waterhouse]

Cannot believe you are still banging on about this.

Man oh man. 

[Yankee21]

Cannot believe you are still banging on about this.

Man oh man. 

She couldn't buy this kind of publicity and marketing.

[Waterhouse]

You are wrong.

Legal requiremt to join mm is 16

There are members who joined in 2005 and their current age shown is 27 which is then obviosly wrong

I saw a member which her age was 100+

So users put manually their age in mm.

Most likely ER put 29 at the time of joining.

So she is 35 now.

Keep your popcorn out. There will be more whiteknights coming out fighting in her defence


Hidden Image/Members Only

 

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[holland]

Hidden Image/Members Only

I have my own cup of popcorn out
Usually the posts of ER end with the banning of 1 or more white knights.
Im just waiting for that to happen

[Kev40ish]

I have my own cup of popcorn out
Usually the post of ER ends with the banning of 1 or more white knights.
Im just waiting for that to happen

I would have thought most sensible people would have learnt how far to push it.

But your probably right

[Bigus Dickus]

You are wrong.

Legal requiremt to join mm is 16

There are members who joined in 2005 and their current age shown is 27 which is then obviosly wrong

I saw a member which her age was 100+

So users put manually their age in mm.

Most likely ER put 29 at the time of joining.

So she is 35 now.

Keep your popcorn out. There will be more whiteknights coming out fighting in her defence


Hidden Image/Members Only

 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Didn’t realise you ran the MM site! 

You haven’t convinced me with your ‘evidence’ yet. I know how the sites work so I am not wrong. The site regards her as 29 so she would have put that she was around 25 in 2012. Whether or not she was 25 in 2012 is another issue but your ‘smoking gun’ google search that you came up with tends to support that she is 29 as does the review of Panel, a veteran UKP punter.

But don’t  and try and paint people as white knights because they point out your reasearch failures! 

[Mr_Shins]

If she was 25 in 2012 she would now be 31, but women are scared of saying they are 31 as a lot of people search up to 30 or 29 maximum.

Of course there may be a few who particularly seek a woman over 30 in which case putting 29 would miss the cut that way.

[Bigus Dickus]

If she was 25 in 2012 she would now be 31, but women are scared of saying they are 31 as a lot of people search up to 30 or 29 maximum.

Of course there may be a few who particularly seek a woman over 30 in which case putting 29 would miss the cut that way.

You are right. My bad. She would have to have put 23! 

Point is that MM isn’t like AW where the models can shave off years on a whim.

The age shown is automatically changed to show the model’s age based on her originally specified age.

 

[holland]

Didn’t realise you ran the MM site! 

You haven’t convinced me with your ‘evidence’ yet. I know how the sites work so I am not wrong. The site regards her as 29 so she would have put that she was around 25 in 2012. Whether or not she was 25 in 2012 is another issue but your ‘smoking gun’ google search that you came up with tends to support that she is 29 as does the review of Panel, a veteran UKP punter.

But don’t  and try and paint people as white knights because they point out your reasearch failures! 

Whatever

Dont cry for her.   
I ll let you kids cry and fight for her

[king tarzan]

She seems jovial and in good spirits on this forum..
I think give her a break...
She means no malice towards anyone. .

[Waterhouse]

She seems jovial and in good spirits on this forum..
I think give her a break...
She means no malice towards anyone. .

+1


Let it go... move on.

[holland]

She seems jovial and in good spirits on this forum..
I think give her a break...
She means no malice towards anyone. .

Ok