Author Topic: Hottest80 Glasgow  (Read 2986 times)


34 review(s) for HottestKat (29 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by lewishamguy]

Online Glesgaboy

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Good comms on Email , her address is often on her AW page. Finally text to confirm.   All good and easy.

The flat is quiet, clean , safe and secure.  Easy parking and open door entry means no loitering about looking dodgy  :thumbsup:
She does share this with another SP but there was no noise. I got the impression they operate solo on different days.

The punt- £70 for half hour incall.
I wanted rough subby sex role play and she delivered that. But it wasn’t great. 
Very good owo, on her knees and with her head hanging over the edge of the bed.
She took a great face fucking.

However I gave a neutral because as reported here she is just way way too skinny to turn me on.
She enthusiastically gets into the role but with limited dfk, and the super thin look, it was an effort to get aroused and complete the fun. I did but the enjoyment was limited.
Also the skinny look and her mileage suggests more like 45 not 37 per her profile.

If your into skinny she’s your punt!
If , like me you’re not, then the hunt for a great pint continues... :hi:


Offline The Man With No Name

Pity, as I too was interested in her services. Still, YGWYPF and you can't really expect full-fantasy submission off a hot young thing with the right-sized curves, in all all the right places for 70 quid these says, sadly.

Would you almost put her in the unhealthy/junkie thin category? As in, being even worse than her pics in the flesh (or lack of it) ?

Offline auldie63

Don't think she is a junkie, absolutely no sign of that when I saw her, IMHO she is just very skinny as some people are.
We all know some of those lucky bastards who can eat anything and never put a pound on. I put on about half a stone just walking by a Greggs! :scare: :hi:

Online Glesgaboy

Agreed no sign of her being a junky.
Just mega skinny.


Offline The Man With No Name

Wasn't implying she was a junkie, just whether she was that thin. And how her real-life appearance compared to her pics.

What's her coupon like? There's been only one vague mention of this in her 4 or so reviews so far.

Offline FBman78

I tried to book her for Sunday but she stopped replying to my emails after I text her from my punting phone as she requested.  Hope she hasn't blacklisted me now.  BTW I grew a set and made a new aw account.

Zidane18

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I like skinny. That has not put me off

Is she really closer to 45 than 37?. 40s plenty for me  :scare:


Online Glesgaboy

IMHO yeh she’s in her 40’s.
I occasionally go there or even older..
But wouldn’t recommend in this case.
Using the ...passing her in the street test....you wouldn’t be tempted.
Face is not appealing....looks quite goth like. 

Offline The Man With No Name

IMHO yeh she’s in her 40’s.
I occasionally go there or even older..
But wouldn’t recommend in this case.
Using the ...passing her in the street test....you wouldn’t be tempted.
Face is not appealing....looks quite goth like.

Good info, cheers. That's me out.

Offline Kornam68

If you like skinny book her. She does a great bj service...deep  :yahoo:

Offline FBman78


Offline randydandy2013

Would anyone say if she is as skinny as Lucy Longlegs?

Online Glesgaboy

A bit skinnier and taller which adds to the skinny appearance

Offline randydandy2013

Cheers Glesgaboy certainly interested in seeing her