Innocentchick3 - Coventry

[Sparkhead1985]

Name: innocentchick3 (kay)

AW: External Link/Members Only or https://www.adultwork.com/innocentchick3

Location Coventry near Walsgrave

Accomidation: budget motel with east access and plenty of parking.

Coms: slow but obviously english

Photos: there real. Very real

Looks: late teens. Very cute looking fantastic boobs. And naturally curvy.

Services agreed: owo protected sex

Services performed owo, protected sex, dfk,  ro, nipple play, cim

Price £80 For 30 mins

Arrival: texted on arrival. Dirrections sent to room after a short delay. Door was opened no hiding as Kay was wearing normal clothes and a smile. Buisness sorted out and we both stripped. Wow just wow. Kay need to do better photos. She explained to me that's shes shy and likes her clients to tell her what to do and when. Aside from a few things which she listed.

During. Kissing touching anywhere  owo to 69. Anything I suggested kay tried and tried well . My only problem was I kept trying differnt things and soon time was nearly up. Wrapped the old guy up and went for glory. Came in her mouth and she swallowed the lot.
My fav thing was nothing she did seemed fake. No fake noises (thats bugs me)
Advice. Decide what u want and stick to it else the time goes to quickly

[rob75]

Get yourself tested if I were you - search the phone number and it comes up she does creampie gangbangs.

[Sparkhead1985]

Get yourself tested if I were you - search the phone number and it comes up she does creampie gangbangs.

Are you sure? Never got that impression from the advert? And condoms were readily available and pointed out at the start.

[Roadster]

I did the search.  Came up with multiple adverts offering "safe sex" only, with similar photos to the AW listing.  Didn't see anything for "creampie gangbangs".

Supply a link please.

[rob75]

This is her adultwork profile with her bloke (link at the bottom-right of her own page) - External Link/Members Only

Search the number on that: 447379596787

[Sparkhead1985]

This is her adultwork profile with her bloke (link at the bottom-right of her own page) - External Link/Members Only

Search the number on that: 447379596787

I've already booked to see her again on Thursday. I'll ask her about it

[Rcracer]

Bareback used to be listed on both their couples but dropped on both. Did she imply condoms were optional?

[Roadster]

This is her adultwork profile with her bloke (link at the bottom-right of her own page) - External Link/Members Only

Search the number on that: 447379596787

You suggested that this lass is a barebacker and sent us on a hunt via a phone number.  I asked you to provide a link.  You gave us another phone number to search.

If you know something post the link to what you know and show us how you are connecting the offending advert to lass in question.  That way everyone can make their own informed decisions about whether or not to punt her.

Please show us what you have seen rather than repeatedly offer us a trail of breadcrumbs.  Doing it the way you are makes you look suspicious.

[Rcracer]

If you search for the phone number on their couples profile it lists bb adverts linked to the phone number  External Link/Members Only

[rob75]

You suggested that this lass is a barebacker and sent us on a hunt via a phone number.  I asked you to provide a link.  You gave us another phone number to search.

If you know something post the link to what you know and show us how you are connecting the offending advert to lass in question.  That way everyone can make their own informed decisions about whether or not to punt her.

Please show us what you have seen rather than repeatedly offer us a trail of breadcrumbs.  Doing it the way you are makes you look suspicious.

Are you serious? I've provided you the link to their couples page, explained how I found it (from her individual page), and pasted in the number from it. Right click on said number and do a google search - about ten different bareback events come up. I'm not sure what else I can do short of wipe your arse for you.

If highlighting a barebacker for others to avoid makes me look suspicious then so be it, at least my conscience is clear.

[Sparkhead1985]

Bareback used to be listed on both their couples but dropped on both. Did she imply condoms were optional?

God no. Even on the communication safe sex was very clearly stated. I as suggested looked at the old adverts and yes it implies bareback was offered. But they are old adverts. As i said in seeing her again thuraday evening i will report back. In the mean time maybe somone else could msg her/them and just ask. I'd do it myself but I dont want to come accross as her defender or anything

[Roadster]

Are you serious? I've provided you the link to their couples page, explained how I found it (from her individual page), and pasted in the number from it. Right click on said number and do a google search - about ten different bareback events come up. I'm not sure what else I can do short of wipe your arse for you.

If highlighting a barebacker for others to avoid makes me look suspicious then so be it, at least my conscience is clear.

Yeah, actually I am serious. 

Looking at the link supplied by Rcracer I see abstacted text fragments of an advert or adverts, no longer available, taken from a listing site with many offers of many things from many people. 

We may be looking at fragments of multiple ads.  We may be looking at her male partners phone with someone else.  We may be looking at her offering BB. We may be looking at something else entirely.  None of the listing that seem to maybe connect with her "phone number once removed" are actually available to view. 

So in truth we don't actaully know what any of that means.  This may or may not indicate barebacking on her part.

From all my checking of actual ads that I can relate to this particular WG, I am seeing plenty of inseistence on safe sex.

From everything I have seen I have no idea whather she barebacks, or has barebacked, or has/does not.  The same can obviously be said of any othe WG, regardless of what they advertise.  The truth is that what we do when we puunt is play the odds.  Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.

You said "Get yourself tested if I were you - search the phone number and it comes up she does creampie gangbangs."

I don't think that that degree of certainty is justified by the evidence so far presented.  Which is why I (seriously) asked you to link to the actual advert that made you so certain that this particular woman "does creampie gangbangs."

I guess that is because you can't, and it's merely your ego that causes you to want us all to crawl all over the interernet until we agree with you. 

I'm really pleased that your "conscience is clear".  For my part, I'm just trying to make properly informed, best guess decisions, about who I punt and who I avoid.

Not certain about her.  Am about you.

[rob75]

Dear God. Look at the pictures - it's obviously her. She even has the same necklace on in her individual AW profile and in some of these pictures.

This is from three months ago - not long enough ago to be sure everything will show up in a test.

External Link/Members Only

This one's from one month ago, but it's in the past so no doubt not a problem to you.

External Link/Members Only


You play by your odds and I'll play by mine. I'll keep quiet so as not to annoy anyone from now on as obviously I'm a complete prick.

[Roadster]

Great.  There is an actual advert.  The actual thing you saw, now shared with the rest of us.  Much better and more direct than an invitation to go searching. 

That is all I asked for in the beginning.  Not so hard really.

Thanks.

[Ming]

To be fair to rob75, I inputted the phone number and found the ad he was referring to quite easily, it was about the 3rd one down in the google search.

Thanks for pointing it out Rob, though a straight link would have been easier?

Ming 

[Roadster]

To be fair to rob75, I inputted the phone number and found the ad he was referring to quite easily, it was about the 3rd one down in the google search.

That wasn't my experience.  I found a lot of expired ads.  A straight link lets everyone see what the poster has seen and is the work of seconds.  Asking the entire user group top replicate his search is wasteful of time and prone to errors, as was the case here.

Thanks for pointing it out Rob, though a straight link would have been easier?

Ming 

Couldn't agree more.  I was considering her.  Not any more.  That's what this site does best.

Once again Rob ... Thanks.