Author Topic: Lizzie xox (edinburgh)  (Read 6804 times)


35 review(s) for Lizzie xox (32 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Matrix]

Offline watcher

4th punt in 7 years (have been saved from many a mistake from info here since my previous one - happy to review those girls though 2 years and 4 years out of date and no longer working).

Anyway, incall for an hour £130 as the profile pics and description had me wanting two pops. Arranged the night before, decent comms despite her not working that evening and confirmed by text at the requested time.

Decent flat with nearby onstreet parking, maybe a little smoky but covered with scented candles (had me a bit paranoid about what i'd smell of upon returning home).

Met at the door with lizzie in a silk gown, paperwork exchanged, offered a drink and then straight into kissing upon her return. Wonderful firm petite body coupled with lots of enthusiasm, possibly slightly smaller than advertised.

More vanilla than i had planned and she'd agreed to (intended a bit of tie and tease/domimation). FK OWO RO and then chose to have her doggy and admire her gorgeous ass to finish rd1.

Decent friendly chat before she stroked me hard again, more OWO before i asked her to ride me. Very enthusiastic on top and looked incredible. Rode me to completion and (either faked very well or) got there herself too. Not quite enough time or energy for rd3 but best punt ive had to date.

Id be up for a repeat but not sure when ill get the itch and free time coinciding again.



Offline Name Not Found

Nice review, thanks. How would you say she is facially? Is she a cute wee babe or a hackit old hag (or maybe something in between) ?  How was the FK, full on DFK or a bit reserved?

Links (yes, I know its already been indexed) External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 10:39:51 pm by Name Not Found »

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,792
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
Nice review, thanks. How would you say she is facially? Is she a cute wee babe or a hackit old hag (or maybe something in between) ?  How was the FK, full on DFK or a bit reserved?

Links (yes, I know its already been indexed) External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Pointless posting the link after it's been indexed. It's already there.

Offline watcher

Apologies had the link ready to paste in and and then noticed phone was at 1% so posted what i had above. Thanks for indexing and the link.

Age appears accurate, girl next door facially far from old hackit hag. Seemed very keen on kissing lots and.lots through the meet but not full down tongue throat stuff.

Offline edinburgh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 132
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Appearance:  If u look at her ratings on AW, most punters say, "stunning" and "gorgeous", so I was slightly underwhelmed when I actually met her, but then it turned out she was very nice and the punt was good , so it became irrelevant. but i have to say I rarely came across a WG who everyone says a stunner etc and then turned out that way or even near in reality.  I wonder who really IS good looking whether the service is good or not, in Edinburgh at the moment.. I have noticed Isla Alba and Lilywhite have had men say good looking. But then you have to remember if the service was good, the punter would say she was gorgeous and so on.   Lizzie WAS a good girl though, I repeat. 
Banned reason: If you don't like the site then fuck off
Banned by:

Offline Name Not Found

I have noticed Isla Alba and Lilywhite have had men say good looking. But then you have to remember if the service was good, the punter would say she was gorgeous and so on.   Lizzie WAS a good girl though, I repeat.

I'd have to disagree (a bit). I've seen plenty of girls who I would class a very good looking, but have given a mediocre service, and vice versa. I've always tried not to confuse the two and I've seen plenty other reports along the lines of 'not the best looker but fantastic service'.

Anyway, attractiveness is a very personal thing, so you'll never get a definitive view on anyone.  I hate glammed up burds with fat lips and fake tits; some other punters love them.

Offline S.X. MacHine

Appearance:  If u look at her ratings on AW, most punters say, "stunning" and "gorgeous", so I was slightly underwhelmed when I actually met her, but then it turned out she was very nice and the punt was good , so it became irrelevant. but i have to say I rarely came across a WG who everyone says a stunner etc and then turned out that way or even near in reality.  I wonder who really IS good looking whether the service is good or not, in Edinburgh at the moment.. I have noticed Isla Alba and Lilywhite have had men say good looking. But then you have to remember if the service was good, the punter would say she was gorgeous and so on.   Lizzie WAS a good girl though, I repeat.

Looks are, to an extent, subjective. I was once lambasted on here for opinions that a well known Glasgow WG's face 'was not her best feature'...
I think you probably have higher standards or expectations than most. I thought Lizzie look really good, face and body, but I'm an elderly punter and I think grateful for getting to shag young gals.
 :D

Offline edinburgh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 132
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Her face is rather vague now, but I remember I thought hers was a very common face in this country, very hard to describe if asked by the police, for example, you would say, "dark slightly fizzy hair..."  and I would say the kind of face you often see among the organic food shop staff or at independent coffee shop.  I didn't find her face attractive at all, but I do remember her boobs.  That was a beauty, texture, too, wonderful. So forgive me, Lizzie, if you are reading this...
Banned reason: If you don't like the site then fuck off
Banned by:

Offline mills_and_bhuna

Her face is rather vague now, but I remember I thought hers was a very common face in this country, very hard to describe if asked by the police, for example, you would say, "dark slightly fizzy hair..."  and I would say the kind of face you often see among the organic food shop staff or at independent coffee shop.  I didn't find her face attractive at all, but I do remember her boobs.  That was a beauty, texture, too, wonderful. So forgive me, Lizzie, if you are reading this...
Jesus wept . Even Google translate is fucked on this one.............

Offline Name Not Found

Jesus wept . Even Google translate is fucked on this one.............

I think it's maybe an entry for 'poetry corner'.  :unknown:

Offline S.X. MacHine

Her face is rather vague now, but I remember I thought hers was a very common face in this country, very hard to describe if asked by the police, for example, you would say, "dark slightly fizzy hair..."  and I would say the kind of face you often see among the organic food shop staff or at independent coffee shop.  I didn't find her face attractive at all, but I do remember her boobs.  That was a beauty, texture, too, wonderful. So forgive me, Lizzie, if you are reading this...

Eh?
Mate, before making a 'contribution', to use the word in its widest sense, STOP and REMEMBER the words of a wise man who said '' it is better to remain silent and be thought foolish, than to open one's mouth and remove all possible doubt''.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Prossies (members that Admin decides are SPs) no longer Have access to the reviews sections so no need to mince words.

Most women have pretty average looks and hence we rate them to the upper or lower end of average, often paying more attention to their personality and/or what they do. Some women are fucking ugly. Some are stunningly beautiful.

I’ve met filmstars and cat walk models, several of whom are stunningly beautiful. Prossies are not stunningly beautiful and I’ve met hundreds. But some are clearly at the upper end of average: body and face roughly proportional with nominal deviation from ‘standard beauty’ — enough to make oneself believe it for half an hour or to tell them they’re beautiful (ie during the punt); they also take care of themselves physically (I shagged one this week but a repeat so haven’t reviewed again).

Think of it as singing them a love song or writing them a poem during the punt that says they have “beautiful skin/bum/breasts/legs/heart” (whatever is their least worst feature) since most women want to hear that, together with getting paid (literally or in kind) to get wet.

I’m a punter. I don’t need to know what shite you told her to get her wet.

Offline Lilywhite

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 604
  • Likes: 27
  •  
Prossies (members that Admin decides are SPs) no longer Have access to the reviews sections so no need to mince words.



I told Admin I'm a SP and I can see them?

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
I told Admin I'm a SP and I can see them?

Interesting. Maybe he’s just given you a green card just now (or not given you the red one) as your contributions have largely been aimed at helping punters.

I don’t remember which thread Admin announced it — but the way he implements anything like that is purely up to him (I guess if it was too rigid it would incentivise bampots to find ways round it).

Offline willie loman

IMO describing the face as the sort you would see in an organic food shop or independent coffee shop, is way more useful than reviews that just give her shoe and dress size. Most wgs I find look like the job the did previously, an ex hotel receptionist looks different to an ex home help, to cite 2 jobs that are common enough in the sex industry. Saying a girl looks like she works in Greggs, can help someone make up their mind about a girl way better than reams of rubbish about how I pounded her for 20 minutes.

Offline whiskyfan

Prossies (members that Admin decides are SPs) no longer Have access to the reviews sections so no need to mince words.



I thought it was just the post reports and deleted posts sections that were now off-limits to SP's.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=180527.msg1926169#msg1926169
« Last Edit: February 11, 2018, 09:13:54 am by whiskyfan »

Offline Lilywhite

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 604
  • Likes: 27
  •  
I thought it was just the post reports and deleted posts sections that were now off-limits to SP's.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=180527.msg1926169#msg1926169

Yeah that's gone for me.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
IMO describing the face as the sort you would see in an organic food shop or independent coffee shop, is way more useful than reviews that just give her shoe and dress size. Most wgs I find look like the job the did previously, an ex hotel receptionist looks different to an ex home help, to cite 2 jobs that are common enough in the sex industry. Saying a girl looks like she works in Greggs, can help someone make up their mind about a girl way better than reams of rubbish about how I pounded her for 20 minutes.

I agree. I was just thinking of one of the chavs at BSS. However, while that sort of description is indeed helpful when it can be offered, her dress size for many gives an indication of a no-no. It is not really very exact, but few punters will come out with the fact that they fucked a fat bird, so if they say she is dress size 16 then I don't have to bother clicking on her profile.