uhh shouldn't we be more outraged at the fact that she is posting text logs with a punter on the internet? what's stopping her doing that to anyone else
perhaps she's equally outraged at being (according to her) falsely accused of BB
I'd hope most punters are not this easily outraged anyway, as pointed out the number is redacted and any names mentioned are punting / UKP names and she's defending herself right here not on twitter and not exposing his number - what's the outrage?
considering the texter had seen her before yet was cringely swinging a UKP review over her head in exchange for a good service I'm inclined to disbelieve the cringester that texted that BS walked out on a fine young lass he couldn't wait to lick all over and begged to bring the booking earlier
yeah right he walked
best case he would have had his fun covered and posted a negative review ASAP
so just checking, a 0 reviewer comes on here to say he overheard “we can do if I like you” and interpreted that to mean BB ...not DFK? and everyone believes he actually walked, same guy accuses her of doing drugs but walked before they started, in the space of the few moments before the punt she had solicited BB and taken drugs but not taken his cash
David did not feel inclined to leave a review (and still hasn't) but was okay to casually drop it on another posters positive review. the drugs comment is hearsay from David, I don't believe for 1 second he witnessed anything, the OP on the other hand was told this after the fact, he didn't witness drug taking either I don't think (?) so maybe she had some weed prior and was hornier as a result, don't see the issue - and I'm in the minority here but if I felt the service was better than it would have otherwise been I'd probably have been discreeet about her disclosing she was high, if the service was a negative and she was inhibited by it then I'd call it out.
On the issue of nationality maybe she's dual by parents or naturalization and can choose to identify as any nationality she pleases, or she's lying
seems a bit anorak to be asking WG's for their passports? - cmon. if she provides a good punting service then ukpunting should judge her on that and allow the Homeoffice decide her post brexit status if that need arises ...unless you intend to book her for her language skills
Last thing it sounds desperate and sour grapes to suggest for a 20 quid increase a punter won't see a WG they 'intended to' ...but would be happy to see other WG's charging the same or more because their prices were always set that high? don't get it, people review 150, 200, 250 WG's all the time, a girl may undercharge because she's new, or charge extra's on the side (i believe she's already justified the price change due to rounding up for extras ?) heck if she want's to part time with less bookings at increased rate and have more time for herself it's a service and demand game, at her prerogative.
If she's judged it wrong she can adjust her rates, happens all the time no need to get agitated like some are doing.
I think WG's create problems for themselves when they try to defend themselves on this forum, no matter their intentions. probably better to make your case on UKE outside the context and heat of a review
Topic: Jessica Pakistani Girl - Old street (Read 24437 times)