Come around children, a story I will tell. I have just been threatened by a WG with "exposure to public" and possibly destroy my marriage and life.
You might say, "so, you met a prosie and she turned nasty? Or you might have asked her to do something she didn’t like?"
None of the above. My crime?
I have asked her permission to submit a booking request, period.
But this pissed her off, as she was "not interested", she replied, so much so I was worthy of being threatened with exposing my "details" (what are they and how? well, she now knows a WG I was with who possibly kept my phone no. and remember vaguely my face, she said she could contact her. that’s it)
Rather than drawing your attention to my pitiful annoyance, I would highlight the haughtiness and arrogance of some prosies. I partly blame AW; its flawed feedback system makes them hear only sycophancy such as "stunning!" and "gorgeous!" and it gets into their head and think they are stars.
Admittedly, I could sense in her page the haughtiness of this particular prosie, as she portrayed herself as god’s gift to men and made it clear she was doing a favour by allowing men to pay her. Naturally she was picky as regards the punters she would meet; she was especially fussy about the AW feedback the punter had accumulated. But when I noticed she had written that she might consider punters with insufficient feedback case by case, I sent an email asking if I, with no feedback yet as I never bothered collecting those, may be allowed to send a booking request. No reply. I wasn’t surprised and moved on. That was a few moths ago.
Now that I have a couple of good feedbacks under my belt, I tried again. I still fully expected more silence or "My answer is still NO". I know the part and parcel of the game. Instead I found a barrage of abuse and threats.
Let’s put this in the context, as I said before, forget about my little annoyance, it is this:
Some prosies became so haughty because AW allows them to be, that
while SHE had put up an ad (i.e. the AW page) which invites men to pay her a visit (and pay her good money), when a punter contacts her politely
(let’s get this straight) asking her the permission to send an booking request (no more) but if for some reason she was not interested in taking him, then he deserves to be threatened with his marriage and public life destroyed.
With the cunning and decisiveness of a devious woman, correctly expecting
that I would report the threat to AW admin, she quickly killed off her account with immaculate timing. As you might know, once you destroy your account, all the emails you sent would disappear instantly from the recipients’ box. I reported these threats to AW, as she crossed the line, but when they asked me to send a screen shot or some kind of harder proof, I could not find them anymore. But then, this was what AW said what would happen.
Threatening to destroy my life was apparently worth all the hassle of creating a new account and ID and starting with 0 feedback, apparently, as asking this demi-goddess permission to send in a request was unheard of effrontery and crime. She had no choice. But she knew she overstepped. Otherwise, why did she destroy her account and disappear?
She would surely resurface with new name but with the same fussiness about feedback (while she herself has 0 feedback, funny that) and who she would meet. Beware. So who she was? You might wonder. As I said, she killed her account and wouldn’t use the same name again, so not much point naming. But some eagle eyed of you might notice a certain wg disappeared abruptly.
