Wan - Muang hair and beauty (Sheffield)

[Sensei]

Link:

External Link/Members Only

Meet: (£40 for 1 hour massage)

So after a long christmas/New years break i decided that i needed to finish my de-stress holiday before starting work again by having a rub and tug and after my last positive experience with Cindy at Muang's i thought i'd try my luck again. So i sent a text to Ning to see who would be available hoping for Cindy and got a reply saying: Grace, GG, Rose and Wan were available later that day and from previous reviews on UKP, GG didnt sound like the body type i wanted and didnt know what Grace looked like or know anything about Rose as she has no reviews. However Wan sounds like a thai girl i would love to have a massage off and from a previous thread mentioned if you were on the younger side you were more likely to get a tug (or so i thought!).

So under the presumption of a good massage with a beautiful young thai girl i booked Wan for later that afternoon for an hours massage for £40. When i arrived it was business as usual for Ning paid the money and was escorted upstairs by Wan who is a beautiful slim, petite thai girl, around her early to mid-20's i'd say. So everything was going as usual however, when i began stripping she didn't leave the room and when i got to my boxers i asked if she wanted them off (to test the waters) and she said "i don't mind, whatever you prefer as im going to cover you in a towel anyway". So at this point alarm bells are telling me she is legit even if your on the younger side.

So as the massage begins she covers my bum with the towel and begins an amazing 100% legit massage which was just perfect for my back and legs, although no cc swipes or flirting going on so at this point i just resign myself to a regular massage from a pretty lass. Once my back was done flipped over same again on the front with an excellent massage but no cc swipes, she does use a hot towel to wipe off the oil which is a nice touch but, after an hour is up she is done and packs up and then leaves the room and says she'll let me get dressed.

Final Thoughts:

Now although she is a cute, young and beautiful girl who gives a god-damn good massage, this site isn't for massage reviews its UKP so it has to be a negative from me. However if you just want a good massage from a cute thai girl who gives a good massage, then Wan is your girl but if you want a tug look elsewhere or try another girl.

[mart802]

So its not only me then. Lol.
Thought i was doing sonething wrong..

[banshee121]

seems a few of these Thai girls/parlours are going legit. Had a similar experience at Bangkok Therapy in Leeds (reviewed a while ago).

I've decided to ask up front now to avoid disappointment afterwards.

[TomR]

Bangkok doesn't seem to allow for extras. Baan, Orchid and Rainbow are the places for that.

[Thecunninglinguist]

I fail to see why this is a negative review. By your own admission, you had an excellent massage from a good looking young woman, who was freindly. You got exactly what you paid for, within the going rate. Your failure to ensure you were going to get the services you were looking for, before commencing, is not a valid reason to review negatively  IMHO.

[BP96]

I fail to see why this is a negative review. By your own admission, you had an excellent massage from a good looking young woman, who was freindly. You got exactly what you paid for, within the going rate. Your failure to ensure you were going to get the services you were looking for, before commencing, is not a valid reason to review negatively  IMHO.

It's a punting forum and not a place for recommending massages.

So the negative alerts others that they won't get a punt from her.

I personally think the owners should alert customers if they won't get a happy ending. Ning has been around long enough and knows the score.

[Rotherhampunter]

Doesn’t it state that there is no funny business on their web link? Kind of a clue there.

[mart802]

Doesn’t it state that there is no funny business on their web link? Kind of a clue there.

It does indeed.. but thats the official stance to keep the ad legit on gumtree or whatever.
Muang say it.. but it seems what happens in the room stays in the room.
Ao say it.. but it happens.
The ad on carlisle street says it. But i got more.
I could carry on.. lol

[Anglegrinder]

Got a link to Carlisle Street one Mart? Handy for me that 

[Rotherhampunter]

It does indeed.. but thats the official stance to keep the ad legit on gumtree or whatever.
Muang say it.. but it seems what happens in the room stays in the room.
Ao say it.. but it happens.
The ad on carlisle street says it. But i got more.
I could carry on.. lol

I have no doubt, but people shouldn’t go expecting any extras as if it’s the norm, as it is explicitly stated that it shouldn’t go. They advertise a massage for £40, you get a massage for £40. Nothing untoward there.

[vector58]

Do agree how can it be a negative, you got what you paid for a young Thai lady and a good Massage.
If you want anything else, I have had succes with both Cindy and Rose both do the usual extras a tug and B2B, if its massage only then go for Wan but hey be fare with her. I had the pleasure of spring Rose a couple of days ago will post a review shortly.

[Sensei]

I fail to see why this is a negative review. By your own admission, you had an excellent massage from a good looking young woman, who was freindly. You got exactly what you paid for, within the going rate. Your failure to ensure you were going to get the services you were looking for, before commencing, is not a valid reason to review negatively  IMHO.

Although i mentioned it in the review maybe i didn't phrase it correctly as i'm still new to this forum but as far as i'm aware this forum is about punting and reviewing WG's services??. Whereas if this was a review for a massage services forum it would have been a positive review as i mentioned in my review. Also do you think gumtree would allow an ad that said it is a sexual service? or do you think that it could limit the amount of customers Muang receives by offering sexual services?, then of course they would say its legit to ensure they don't limit there clients regardless of whether its legit or not.

Therefore we have to go for ourselves and check it out to then post reviews here to alert others of whom is strictly legit (as in this case) and those who offer extras once your in the room regardless of what the ads say. As far as i could see Wan had both positive and neutral reviews stating she may give a HE if your within a certain age range (I am) and she decides she wants too (i have no control over that). As i said in my review i tried to suggest i was looking for HE but, its not something you can directly ask for unless your a regular or something and so i decided to enjoy my legit massage. However i can understand the dispute over it being negative where if you said it should be neutral as it was a good massage however as this is a punting review forum i decided to put negative instead of positive/neutral to ensure others knew she was legit and thus not go see her anticipating the possibility of HE with a great massage.

[Thecunninglinguist]

May l say firstly l have not been to Muang, nor would l just because of the up and down reviews, so l am certainly not fluffy. 
I somewhat take your point about it being a punting forum but if you look at site posts and reviews generally accross the country you will find, like me, there are punters on here who enjoy WG's, massage with extras and straight massage, as the mood takes us. I think it is legitimate particlarly for often well regarded and experienced reviewers to share views and reviews on all aspects of our "hobby". If someone only ever reviewed and discussed straight massage, then l would agree entirely although l see the a mix as acceptable.

[JayEZ2K]

It does indeed [say nonsexual service].. but thats the official stance to keep the ad legit on gumtree or whatever.... but it seems what happens in the room stays in the room.

If we can understand how massage parlours operate, then this will make more sense. Does anyone know if the common setup is such that the mamasan/business gets paid for the entry fee (£40/hr) and then give a cut (£10-15) to the masseuse? And then "extras" are strictly a private affair between the masseuse and customer, with the masseuse keeping 100% of that exchange? Or does the business get a cut of the money she makes for extras?

This will be useful to know for general bargaining. And it will also help me understand a situation I was in before where I didn't want extras, and the girl seemed really desperate. It made me think that she was getting a very low base pay, and needed the extras to make any reasonable money at all.

[BP96]

Although i mentioned it in the review maybe i didn't phrase it correctly as i'm still new to this forum but as far as i'm aware this forum is about punting and reviewing WG's services??.

You did the right thing. You contributed to the forum, you wrote a detailed review, and you explained the reasons for your rating. Don't worry about the old timers arguing about minutiae. 

[dogznob]

the girl gets a cut of the massage fee,all extras are hers.

[demonic]

You did the right thing. You contributed to the forum, you wrote a detailed review, and you explained the reasons for your rating. Don't worry about the old timers arguing about minutiae. 

+1 Totally agree. There has been a fundamental change in stance by the establishment. If you read the historical reviews they are all commenting on a service that results in a happy ending .... exactly the end result most of us want. The service now is one that no longer has a happy ending. I have found out the hard way having visited shortly after the change took place and experiencing a nice massage culminating in an anti climax ... (Before anyone snides in with where is the review, a review appeared the next day that pretty much mirrored my experience)

For those of us who enjoy a break from the typical WG and enjoys the massage / HE experience it is essential that negatives are posted to flag up HE is no more .....