English Katie Smith

[KeriY]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

I saw Katie before Christmas.  Comms all easy. 

She is not the lady in the pictures on her profile and that is my only criticsm.  She's much curvier than the pictures, perhaps a size 14-16 not the size 10 on the profile. 

Having said that we had a fun time, plenty of dfk, reverse oral and sex.

I think I paid £200 for an hours outcall (she's now advertising £210).

[FCB]

She is not the lady in the pictures on her profile and that is my only criticsm.  She's much curvier than the pictures, perhaps a size 14-16 not the size 10 on the profile. 

+447388433431
07388433431
Fake pics + profile screenshot....

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Image searches of one of those stolen pics leads to some sort of fashion site...

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

According to profile:
Town:   Euston, Paddington, Heathrow, Mayfair, Oxford St
County:   City of Westminster
Region:   London
Country:   United Kingdom
Nationality:   British
Member Since:   26/10/2017
Gender:   Female
Orientation:   Straight
Age:   28
Views:   14960
Last Login:   Yesterday

[Link7]

I am pretty sure she has had a previous profile, recognise the pics. I thought it was a PG scam, as there was little/no escort feedback and I sent an email which was read without a reply.

Fair enough if you were happy with the sex but deception is never a positive in my book.

Not saying there's anything wrong with a size 16 if that's what you like. But surely, you thought you were signing up to shag a trim little hottie? I would've been so disappointed, for £210 it's got to be the girl in the photos man.

[Stud01]

I am pretty sure she has had a previous profile, recognise the pics. I thought it was a PG scam, as there was little/no escort feedback and I sent an email which was read without a reply.

Fair enough if you were happy with the sex but deception is never a positive in my book.

Not saying there's anything wrong with a size 16 if that's what you like. But surely, you thought you were signing up to shag a trim little hottie? I would've been so disappointed, for £210 it's got to be the girl in the photos man.

Yes, she was English Amilia before. Good thing I did not go through with this one. What a major disappointed she would have been.

[dami3n]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

I saw Katie before Christmas.  Comms all easy. 

She is not the lady in the pictures on her profile and that is my only criticsm.  She's much curvier than the pictures, perhaps a size 14-16 not the size 10 on the profile. 

Having said that we had a fun time, plenty of dfk, reverse oral and sex.

I think I paid £200 for an hours outcall (she's now advertising £210).

thanks for reviewing, lack of detail kinda sticks out from your previous reviews which consistently follow Comms,Arrival/Appearance,Session,Overall,VFM

outcall I get but, how was her timekeeping? clockwatching? proactive or needed prompting? hygiene? close to the stated 28 yrs? curvy 14-16 you say, but is she toned or not fit? big boobs? bubble butt?

you have to admit for positive for a pricey bait and switch with that much of a size disparity it doesn't really give a prospective punter much to go on ...if anything it gives more NOT to go on ...B&S

pictures in the first instance are not even softcore or 'puntable' (generally one expects an escort will have indoor pics, a bed, mirror, in a "hey you ...yes you, this is a close representation of who you could be shagging at short notice if you call my number" kinda pose...

how bad looking is she that she can't use even a faceless pic that's actually her body

[KeriY]

thanks for reviewing, lack of detail kinda sticks out from your previous reviews which consistently follow Comms,Arrival/Appearance,Session,Overall,VFM

outcall I get but, how was her timekeeping? clockwatching? proactive or needed prompting? hygiene? close to the stated 28 yrs? curvy 14-16 you say, but is she toned or not fit? big boobs? bubble butt?

you have to admit for positive for a pricey bait and switch with that much of a size disparity it doesn't really give a prospective punter much to go on ...if anything it gives more NOT to go on ...B&S

pictures in the first instance are not even softcore or 'puntable' (generally one expects an escort will have indoor pics, a bed, mirror, in a "hey you ...yes you, this is a close representation of who you could be shagging at short notice if you call my number" kinda pose...

how bad looking is she that she can't use even a faceless pic that's actually her body

Yeah, sorry about lack of detail.  Just wanted to get the reference up there about the pics.

Everything else was spot on: time keeping, no clock watching (I think she stayed a bit longer than agreed), v proactive, v clean, lovely pussy enjoyed eating her. She’s not toned though. Face is pretty, she has a “proper” job hence not showing her face.

We had a fun time so I’m ok with the positive, but the info is there for others to make their own choice.

[Hobbit]

Fake pictures is a no-no in my book! It's a bit like going to a pizza restaurant and being served Mexican food. If I wanted Mexican I would have gone to a Mexican. In other words, putting up completely fake pictures is a scam and I would have given it a negative, because if one girl gets away with it, then they all will start doing it!

[smiley9]

Fake Pictures is Bait and Switch 


A Negative in my opinion