yahoobabe (No Show)

[jsommers798]

External Link/Members Only

Visit never happened as follows:

Sent her a text at mid afternoon yesterday 27/12/2017 asking if she was available, we arranged for a 6.45pm meet.

I had to specifically ask her for a postcode as she agreed to a first time meet without giving me directions, which I found slightly odd especially for someone as seasoned as she is.

I arrived at 6.34 and sent her a text saying I had arrived. I didn't hear from her and left at 6.45.

At 6.55 I get a missed call, which due to being on the motorway could not answer, followed by a text.

When I replied to her she said she didn't see the text till she called and it was my fault for not calling her as she does not always hear her texts.

To my thinking not hearing my text sounds weird and leaving me hanging for 20 minutes when she can see me from her place is dangerous and not acceptable.

Would love to hear from others what you think?

[Sinz]

So let me get this right, you arrived at the location 11 minutes before the proposed meet time and left exactly at the time you intended to meet her.

How is this the WGs fault ?

[ThreeSixty]

Sorry but I'm with Sinz on this one.  Having made a journey to somewhere I know is a pain to get too and leaving bang on time of the planned time is a bit daft.

Admittedly she could have been paying more attention to her phone given that she was expecting somebody but at the same time a text will merely be on beep or a short tune where as a phone call will repeatedly ring until it's answered or goes to answer phone.

If it was me I'd have at least waited until 7.00 before calling it off and going home and I'd have tried ringing too.  N

Not a mistake I'm sure you'll be making again.

[Moby Dick]

Did you at any point have a conversation, is speak to her on the phone, either to agree the time, services, prices etc, or to ask her what is happening.
Texts can easily be missed. Sometimes I don't get mine until hours later.

[Marquis]

So let me get this right, you arrived at the location 11 minutes before the proposed meet time and left exactly at the time you intended to meet her.

How is this the WGs fault ?

I agree with Sinz, I think you jumped the gun.

[Richthescouser]

Seems a harsh negative. A couple of texts or a phone call on arrival remove the chance for things like this happening.

Also bluetooth is handy for taking those calls that prevent what seems a harsh review.

[bolster3]

Can't understand why you didn't call her at the agreed time???

Also seems strange that you've been on here for over 2 years and waited until now to make your 1st post and review.

[bigthickdick]

I think the OP is totally out of order. It's your fault being early. Don't. Ever. Understand that she's WORKING and you're not the only person meeting her. She had to be ready for you at 6.45pm not a minute earlier. You should have called her at 6.45 and if at that time not ready yet it's still a harsh negative but this way it's definitely not a justified negative. OP you've asked for our opinions. In my opinion you're a dickhead.

[Real John Doe]

I think you're a dreamer who probably just messages WGs about meeting them but never do

[scutty brown]

OP is an idiot

[Yanusmc]

I think the OP is totally out of order. It's your fault being early. Don't. Ever. Understand that she's WORKING and you're not the only person meeting her. She had to be ready for you at 6.45pm not a minute earlier. You should have called her at 6.45 and if at that time not ready yet it's still a harsh negative but this way it's definitely not a justified negative. OP you've asked for our opinions. In my opinion you're a dickhead.

Seconded, balmy that you didn't go to the effort to phone her at 645 but you went to the effort to do the review, but thanks for at least doing a review!

[nigel4498]

I think you're a dreamer who probably just messages WGs about meeting them but never do

I think this too.
Over 2 years a member and this review is your first post.

[Moby Dick]

I think you're a dreamer who probably just messages WGs about meeting them but never do

Or maybe a rival WG or pimp, or a stalking punter (wannabe boyfriend) with a grudge.

[NigelF]

I think the OP is totally out of order. It's your fault being early. Don't. Ever. Understand that she's WORKING and you're not the only person meeting her. She had to be ready for you at 6.45pm not a minute earlier. You should have called her at 6.45 and if at that time not ready yet it's still a harsh negative but this way it's definitely not a justified negative. OP you've asked for our opinions. In my opinion you're a dickhead.

That sounds a bit like something a deranged WG would say! It is true that she only needs to (and you should only expect her to) be ready for you at the exact meeting time and it is likely she's just finishing up with another punter if you arrive more than a few mins early but it's still good form for the WG to be ready early, if only because it shows they're not operating a "conveyor belt" and they leave enough time to have a shower, look nice and be ready on time. Saying don't arrive early is stupid, not to mention it leaves you liable to being late. There are a good number of WGs out there who prefer it when you're a few mins early. The kind that don't (provided you're not very early) are often the kind that start later than agreed but kick you out as if they started on time. The WG should also check her phone, especially around the time a punter is due. Still, the OP should have called and stuck around for longer, so he's definitely an idiot. Dickhead seems a bit harsh though, especially since he wasted more of his own time than he did hers. It is a shit first post though, especially from a member of over 2 years.

Or maybe a rival WG or pimp, or a stalking punter (wannabe boyfriend) with a grudge.

Unlikely because it's such a shit review. How is it going to put anyone off? Surely he would have just made up a story about how she was ugly and/or her service was crap etc.

[bigthickdick]

That sounds a bit like something a deranged WG would say! It is true that she only needs to (and you should only expect her to) be ready for you at the exact meeting time and it is likely she's just finishing up with another punter if you arrive more than a few mins early but it's still good form for the WG to be ready early, if only because it shows they're not operating a "conveyor belt" and they leave enough time to have a shower, look nice and be ready on time. Saying don't arrive early is stupid, not to mention it leaves you liable to being late. There are a good number of WGs out there who prefer it when you're a few mins early. The kind that don't (provided you're not very early) are often the kind that start later than agreed but kick you out as if they started on time. The WG should also check her phone, especially around the time a punter is due. Still, the OP should have called and stuck around for longer, so he's definitely an idiot. Dickhead seems a bit harsh though, especially since he wasted more of his own time than he did hers. It is a shit first post though, especially from a member of over 2 years.

Unlikely because it's such a shit review. How is it going to put anyone off? Surely he would have just made up a story about how she was ugly and/or her service was crap etc.

Totally disagree. A WG has to get ready. Think of it. You leave, she then has to change the bed (I wouldn't want to shag in the same bedding where you or anyone else has shagged before), put used condoms wipes etc. in bin. Then needs a shower, sort out her make up and hair, get dressed. That takes at least half an hour in my opinion. So if she's not operating a conveyor belt and leaves 30mins in between 2 punters that gives her no wiggle room so you can't expect her to be ready any earlier nevermind 11mins early.

And leaving bang on the agreed time without even trying to ring her makes him a timewaster. And coming on here and leaving her a negative review for no show claiming that she left him hanging for 20mins is making him a dickhead. My opinion not gospel...

[Marmalade]

The review’s not out of order in my opinion since on the face of it it was a confirmed appointment and she didn’t keep it.

However the OP looks a bit of a plonker for not phoning her at the agreed time. However he only had a postcode. The prossie should have given him a more exact location before the meet time. The fact that he’s a one-post wonder so far mitigates against him suggesting either inexperience or even a competitor prossie. But I think the review should stand unless there’s more evidence forthcoming about the reviewer. It’s only one review. Readers can make up their own mind. Defending a prossie’s ‘honour’ especially when it would appear she has acted unprofessionally, is the fucking pits. Start doing that and every cunting Romanian will have a paramour shouting it’s not her fault. Who gives a fuck? If the punter was genuine and didn’t have a good time for his efforts, it’s shit.

[Moby Dick]

Unlikely because it's such a shit review. How is it going to put anyone off? Surely he would have just made up a story about how she was ugly and/or her service was crap etc.

Fair point NigelF.
Perhaps I should have said "Or maybe a REALLY THICK rival WG or a REALLY THICK pimp, or a REALLY THICK stalking punter (wannabe boyfriend) with a grudge.
Or maybe just a REALLY THICK first poster who has never punted before."

Also he mentions he has never been there before, requested a postcode but then says "leaving me hanging for 20 minutes when she can see me from her place is dangerous and not acceptable." Something doesn't ring true here. I would have rang her up or knocked on the door!

[Link7]

Not a review, just a story. OP arrived early and for whatever reason bottled it. If he had arrived at the agreed time he would've got a shag. The WG did what most normal people do - wait 5-10 minutes for someone who's late, then ring them.

After two years of membership without making a post, I can't believe this non-event is what moved him to post. If he had shagged her, bet he wouldn't have even told us. OP is just looking for an agony aunt, won't find one in me

[Rack Admirer]

Bizarre review/first post.

To leave bang on the time the booking should've started is very odd. I'm sure most people would've waited at least an extra 15 mins, maybe longer, before giving up. Delays are to be expected in this line of work, so surely hanging on until 7pm was the thing to do, plus not phoning is strange also. That is always more effective than texting when wanting an immediate response.

Something fishy about this post but I doubt we'll ever get to the bottom of it.

[bolster3]

I suppose he'll disappear for another 2 years without posting.

[bolster3]

External Link/Members Only

Visit never happened as follows:

Sent her a text at mid afternoon yesterday 27/12/2017 asking if she was available, we arranged for a 6.45pm meet.

I had to specifically ask her for a postcode as she agreed to a first time meet without giving me directions, which I found slightly odd especially for someone as seasoned as she is.

I arrived at 6.34 and sent her a text saying I had arrived. I didn't hear from her and left at 6.45.

I make this 11 minutes, not 20.

At 6.55 I get a missed call, which due to being on the motorway could not answer, followed by a text.

If you got on the motorway in 10 minutes you must have been driving about 100 mph.

When I replied to her she said she didn't see the text till she called and it was my fault for not calling her as she does not always hear her texts.

To my thinking not hearing my text sounds weird and leaving me hanging for 20 minutes when she can see me from her place is dangerous and not acceptable.

Would love to hear from others what you think?

You said she only gave you a postcode so how do you know she can see you from her place??

[Beamer]

Bizarre review/first post.

To leave bang on the time the booking should've started is very odd. I'm sure most people would've waited at least an extra 15 mins, maybe longer, before giving up. Delays are to be expected in this line of work, so surely hanging on until 7pm was the thing to do, plus not phoning is strange also. That is always more effective than texting when wanting an immediate response.

Something fishy about this post but I doubt we'll ever get to the bottom of it.

Agreed !

[bbois77]

This is trolling at its finest, not a true review, damages Yahoobabes reputation ( for no real reason) and adds nothing to the forum, I'd be quite happy for the thread to be deleted.

[cueball]

Well, it's a strange one is this. On here, I generally err towards believing the reviewer. The review is still up on the boards, the boss hasn't binned it yet.

Imo the op is doing himself no favours though, if it were me, I'd come back on and address some of the issues raised.

Maybe he's tweaked times and timelines to keep his anonymity 

Time will tell as always on here.

[NEGaz]

I would have rung that way you would have known for sure. Sometimes texts don't always come through straight away. I think you are been a bit harsh with her.

[threechilliman]

Would love to hear from others what you think?

Yer a muppet. Well, you did ask.....

[Littlejohn2807]

🤔🤔🤔 maybe the op only posted this to show everybody else how not to do it

[Marmalade]

🤔🤔🤔 maybe the op only posted this to show everybody else how not to do it

Such a kind thought. We’ll have to wait and see if Admin shows him the door. Personally although he seems a twat, especially as he hasn’t come back to defend himself, there’s nothing technically wrong with the review (unless it’s deemed a trollish fake post). If it’s a genuine punter, he should be helped. Ridiculing his errors is part of that. But the purpose is not to lord it or feel superior, much less risk white knighting. The prossie maybe acted quite normally but she’s still (supposedly) the professional in charge of seeing that the customer has a good punt. Sadly too many prossies leave it to the very last minute before giving the exact address and even then have an excuse to keep someone waiting. If I’d gone there by public transport I damn well would have phoned her. But if she kept me hanging about outside in this weather I’d be pissed off. At the prices they charge, prossies should have some thought of the customer. Even thick as shit ones. Just my tuppence. Not defending him (or the prossie) but keeping a clear unemotional head is appropriate I think.

[Yanusmc]

Such a kind thought. We’ll have to wait and see if Admin shows him the door. Personally although he seems a twat, especially as he hasn’t come back to defend himself, there’s nothing technically wrong with the review (unless it’s deemed a trollish fake post). If it’s a genuine punter, he should be helped. Ridiculing his errors is part of that. But the purpose is not to lord it or feel superior, much less risk white knighting. The prossie maybe acted quite normally but she’s still (supposedly) the professional in charge of seeing that the customer has a good punt. Sadly too many prossies leave it to the very last minute before giving the exact address and even then have an excuse to keep someone waiting. If I’d gone there by public transport I damn well would have phoned her. But if she kept me hanging about outside in this weather I’d be pissed off. At the prices they charge, prossies should have some thought of the customer. Even thick as shit ones. Just my tuppence. Not defending him (or the prossie) but keeping a clear unemotional head is appropriate I think.

They arn't professionals, they're just women having sex for cash.  If I remember that concept when I'm organising a punt I don't feel as disappointed when comms arn't great

[vw]

They arn't professionals, they're just women having sex for cash.  If I remember that concept when I'm organising a punt I don't feel as disappointed when comms arn't great

They charge professional rates and should be held accountable like a professional, luckily we have here to do so.

[Marmalade]

Indeed. Whether they’re any good at their ‘profession’ is another matter. They are paid a high wage to perform a service. It’s not a case of the punter should be perfect or that he should utterly overlook shortcomings. Most of them are shit at their job: it’s not a justification. Because they are “under the radar” they expect to get away with all sorts of unprofessional attitudes that would be unacceptable in (even a part-time) gardener, hairdresser, maid, toilet attendant, plumber, postman, or pizza delivery boy. They think they’re fucking royalty. They’re not.

[Marmalade]

They arn't professionals, they're just women having sex for cash.  If I remember that concept when I'm organising a punt I don't feel as disappointed when comms arn't great

There’s two different mindsets. One is to enjoy the punt or make the best of it. The other is head-not-cock when estimating a potential punt, dealing with problems, or writing a review. I use your concept at times when I have booked a fucking Romanian. I steel myself to the fact that in all likelihood she’ll have as much personality as a DOS computer in a power outage but she might look nice while I fuck her. I nevertheless begin with a big smile, warm gesture and a compliment in case I’m wrong. Then switch back to polite fuck-her-hole mode unless she responds.

But no way will I start making excuses for her crap on here, which would simply be disrespectful to other punters. They want information. Not my fucking in-the-punt fantasies.

[Tony4447]

Op, 1 post and 1 review, and jumps the gun to go home at the proposed meet time?

[Jay-Jay]

How many pages will this pointless exercise run to?

Jay

[Marmalade]

How many pages will this pointless exercise run to?

Jay

Probably a few more yet. 

[bigthickdick]

Personally although he seems a twat, especially as he hasn’t come back to defend himself, there’s nothing technically wrong with the review (unless it’s deemed a trollish fake post).

I've never seen her therefore I am not familiar with her exact location. However I'm very familiar with the traffic heading out of Glossop towards the motorway and I seriously doubt anyone being able to make it to the motorway in 10 minutes at 6.45pm. Maybe those who have visited her could confirm me or correct me. But if I'm right that makes the whole story questionable.

The prossie maybe acted quite normally but she’s still (supposedly) the professional in charge of seeing that the customer has a good punt...

This is true in general. But you seem to be missing a very important point in this specific case. She hasn't been given the chance to perform as her performance was due to start when the guy has left without trying to contact her. When he did try to contact her it was her own time and in that time she (or any other WG) should be allowed to do whatever they need to/feel like. For example getting ready for their performances.

...Not defending him (or the prossie) but keeping a clear unemotional head is appropriate I think.


Right. Looking at it with a 'clear unemotional head' in this case the punter was a no show as he hasn't turned up at the agreed time. Allegedly he was there but he admittedly hasn't tried contacting her in due time.
So letting him leaving a negative review sets a real bad example as he gave her no chance to fulfil her part of the agreement.

[Marmalade]

Thank you for your reply. I agree some analysis is required.

The part I found most valuable was the timings that suggest his claimed time to the motorway would have been impossible. Not doubting your word but a second confirmation of that would be good evidence.

If the review is deemed a non-review, I believe it should be on the basis that it was a fake review. If his story is physically impossible that would make it a fake report.

But you can’t have it both ways. If someone relies on texts and doesn’t get a reply, that’s arguably stupid for not phoning, not fake. Girls that don’t answer texts shortly before the agreed time often don’t answer calls either. She neither phoned or texted him at the agreed time.

So what I’m saying is that the prossie or the punter being at fault is arguable either way. But if the story is physically impossible due to impossible driving times that is much clearer evidence and suggests a fake review. Maybe he made the booking and then bottled it, just pretended he went there. Who knows. But if his story is demonstrably false that’s different to him just being twattish. The latter would possibly be forgivable in a very shy punter who needs to learn from his mistakes: but I’m guessing the former would most probably be a straightforward ban.   

[vw]

But you can’t have it both ways. If someone relies on texts and doesn’t get a reply, that’s arguably stupid for not phoning, not fake. Girls that don’t answer texts shortly before the agreed time often don’t answer calls either. She neither phoned or texted him at the agreed time. 

thats pretty clear that she never called or texted at agreed time 6:45

He got missed call at 6:55

You would think a prossie expecting a punter at 645 would check her phone at 645 but didn't.

Sounds a good warning to call this one only when outside, all useful intel.

[bolster3]

Thank you for your reply. I agree some analysis is required.

The part I found most valuable was the timings that suggest his claimed time to the motorway would have been impossible. Not doubting your word but a second confirmation of that would be good evidence.

Already mentioned this on the 1st page, no way could he have made the motorway from Glossop in 10 minutes at that time of night

If the review is deemed a non-review, I believe it should be on the basis that it was a fake review. If his story is physically impossible that would make it a fake report.

But you can’t have it both ways. If someone relies on texts and doesn’t get a reply, that’s arguably stupid for not phoning, not fake. Girls that don’t answer texts shortly before the agreed time often don’t answer calls either. She neither phoned or texted him at the agreed time.
Surely anyone with a modicum of common sense would have phoned at 6.45

So what I’m saying is that the prossie or the punter being at fault is arguable either way. But if the story is physically impossible due to impossible driving times that is much clearer evidence and suggests a fake review. Maybe he made the booking and then bottled it, just pretended he went there. Who knows. But if his story is demonstrably false that’s different to him just being twattish. The latter would possibly be forgivable in a very shy punter who needs to learn from his mistakes: but I’m guessing the former would most probably be a straightforward ban.

[OakTree]

The OP has logged on today but it would seem he’s reticent to expand further on what’s gone on.

[bigthickdick]

Girls that don’t answer texts shortly before the agreed time often don’t answer calls either.

i disagree with this. A txt message is often just one beep. A phone call rings for at least 15-20 seconds if not longer. I for instance can't hear my txt messages if I'm downstairs and my phone is upstairs but i usually can hear it ringing.

She neither phoned or texted him at the agreed time.

She wasn't supposed to. He was. She must be aware of the traffic situation in and out of Glossop (horrible both ways at that time) so she may have given him 5-10 minutes for running late before reaching for her phone chasing him up and at that point she has seen the missed txt message and rang him straight away. Call me a WK but i don't see how is that her fault or how is that a no show at her part?

[vw]

bigthickdick you seem to be posting like you were in the room with her, has she been bending your ear? 

[bigthickdick]

bigthickdick you seem to be posting like you were in the room with her, has she been bending your ear?

As i said I've never seen her at all. Can't comment on her service or look pro or contra. But i can use common sense and I can read and understand and based on what has been said i can form an opinion. My opinion is that this is an unjustified negative review at least. But if someone who actually has seen her at her place can confirm the length of travelling time from her to the M67 it may even be a fake review.

[vw]

As i said I've never seen her at all. Can't comment on her service or look pro or contra. But i can use common sence and I can read and understand and based on ehat has been said i can form an opinion. My opinion is that this is an unjustified negative review at least. But if someone who actually has seen her at her place can confirm the length of travelling time from her to the M67 it may even be a fake review.

Problem with common sense its not very common, you cannot even spell it.   

People, should be aware when in business the world is lacking common sense and have procedures to overcome that, like checking phones at appointment time.

[bigthickdick]

Problem with common sense its not very common, you cannot even spell it.   

Thanks for that, corrected it.

[Gordon Bennett]

Reckon OP should have tried phoning her before slinging his hook.

[Bustydusty]

So at the exact time of the proposed meet instead of calling her you just left - strangest “review” I’ve read 😂😂😂

[NEGaz]

So at the exact time of the proposed meet instead of calling her you just left - strangest “review” I’ve read 😂😂😂

[NigelF]

A WG has to get ready. Think of it. You leave, she then has to change the bed (I wouldn't want to shag in the same bedding where you or anyone else has shagged before), put used condoms wipes etc. in bin. Then needs a shower, sort out her make up and hair, get dressed.

I do agree with that which is why it's almost exactly what I said:

they leave enough time to have a shower, look nice and be ready on time.

Although I do think you're rather naive if you think most WGs change the sheets between every punter (unless visibly wet, dirty etc). Some will but the vast majority won't (including some good ones). It's almost guaranteed that a girl on tour won't, unless she's brought multiple suitcases full of duvet & pillow covers in addition to the extra towels and other stuff. 

That takes at least half an hour in my opinion. So if she's not operating a conveyor belt and leaves 30mins in between 2 punters that gives her no wiggle room so you can't expect her to be ready any earlier nevermind 11mins early.

I pretty much agree with that (although I think a bit less time is usually needed) however, it does not give her no wiggle room. The wiggle room is totally up to her and she should include some as a contingency for unexpected delays. To say "don't ever arrive early" (your previous post) is absolutely ridiculous, as in many (but not necessarily most) cases, good WGs will be ready earlier because they've included enough wiggle room or for other reasons (e.g. last punter cancelled etc). In those case they'll usually be very happy to see you as it means they'll run less risk of running late for subsequent clients (as well as feeling less rushed in your booking). Also, if you don't arrive early, you yourself run the risk of arriving late which is obviously much worse.

And leaving bang on the agreed time without even trying to ring her makes him a timewaster. And coming on here and leaving her a negative review for no show claiming that she left him hanging for 20mins is making him a dickhead. My opinion not gospel...

I think he is a timewaster but he's not a "normal" or malicious one because he did intend to see her and he ended up wasting more of his own time than he did hers. I don't think he's a dickhead for leaving this review but I do actually now think he's a bit of a dickhead for this being his one and only review in over 2 years. I'd loved to be proved wrong by him posting more though (preferably of a much higher quality/usefulness). Link7 sums up my thoughts well:

After two years of membership without making a post, I can't believe this non-event is what moved him to post. If he had shagged her, bet he wouldn't have even told us. OP is just looking for an agony aunt, won't find one in me

Fair point NigelF.
Perhaps I should have said "Or maybe a REALLY THICK rival WG or a REALLY THICK pimp, or a REALLY THICK stalking punter (wannabe boyfriend) with a grudge.
Or maybe just a REALLY THICK first poster who has never punted before."

Yeah you could well be right, I should have added that caveat too.