Author Topic: Sexy Eva - Aberdeen  (Read 1106 times)

BK899

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sexy Eva - Aberdeen

External Link/Members Only

Read a positive review on here about this one so visited earlier in the week one evening. However for me this has to be a neutral at best, and was tempted to give a negative, I'll explain below.

Good comms via text / phone.

Flat just off Mounthooly, same flat as Leggy Blonde (nobody else was in the flat)

Arrived and let in promptly, this could be the girl in the pictures but she's defo much bigger, pix must be out of date, and flatter her figure and face. I would say size 14, guess around 12 stone and early 30's, however she's not "flabby fat" as such.

She took a shower to begin with (fucking hate this time wasting technique).

Pleasant enough girl, smiles and offers small talk.

Onto the games, OWO which was below average, various positions, some fingering etc and finished with CIM

Positives
Good comms
Safe flat
Variety of services
Pleasant enough

Negatives
Enquired about Anal, I don't think it's on offer unless you have a tiny cock
The dreaded SMELL - sorry when it's smells below then I'm tempted to give a negative instead of neutral - maybe she had fucked a load of punters before me that day.
Smell put me off even thinking about RO
Bigger than advertised size 8
Facially I could only give her a 5 or 6
Felt rushed, booked an hour and was out in 30 mins

I'm not doubting the other reviewer, as perhaps if she was cleaner and took things a bit slower then might have been better, and I've also had experiences I've enjoyed that other lads did not.

Take yer chances if you want, I'll not be back though.

Online Davey Dykes

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 110
Sounds like a neg all day long for me. Still, it's your review so fair enough.

Offline spud jizz

good one
was thinking of seeing her next week but will give this one a wide berth  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Racist comments
Banned by: daviemac

BK899

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You are right Davey, should have been a negative.

BK899

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest