Author Topic: CumFuckMyArse - Waterloo landmark  (Read 5854 times)


59 review(s) for CumFuckMyArse (53 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline Stones69

External Link/Members Only

I'm giving her a positive because she did everything she could to make it a good punt but she just wasn't my type, or I wasn't into it that day, basically it was me not her.
Looks - 5 (getting on a bit but in good nick)
Service - 9 (anal, squirting, owo, sex in all positions delivered with enthusiasm)
VFM - 4 (I could have paid the same for a younger more attractive WG, but she won't let you down when it comes to effort)

Comms was excellent, simple and easy and wasn't made to wait.
The meet - she was fun and full on and tried to make me feel at ease. My first impression was that she was older than I wanted and so was somewhat disappointed. Not really her fault. She'd just come back from holiday so was chatty and up for fun.

It's all a bit hazy now but I remember having my face soaked in her cum, it was everywhere, she really got into RO. Great owo technique. Anal was really tight and I popped far too quickly. We talked for a bit and she gave me a decent massage. She did everything she could to make me pop again but my heart wasn't in it. I should have walked and saved myself the cash as I kept thinking what a waste, but it was not her fault.

She gets a positive and I give myself a negative for that one.

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Stones,  the guidance here is crystal clear “your review, your rating” but please excuse me if I try to pursuade you to change this to a neutral.  A while ago Admin launched the aggregate rating which appears below every post where there is a recognisable link to a profile that has been reviewed.  Your review will be included in this aggregate rating and contains some very important information - that an average punter paid £150 for an hour and was dissapointed with her looks.  This is not about blame or fault.  It is about signalling to other punters your experience so they are better advised about whether to book.  A neutral flags this important message, a green positive does not.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2017, 07:15:15 pm by mrhappypants »

Offline BillGoldberg

Stones69, how old would you guesstimate her to be ?

How old does she look to you ?

Offline nfarday

Stones69, how old would you guesstimate her to be ?

How old does she look to you ?

Apparently 2 years ago she admitted to be 45, so today she is 47.

Offline Stones69

47 might be right but a much better body. I understand what you are saying about the review but she was amazing in her service and if you were prepared for the older lady confronting you you'd have an amazing time.

Offline Fugly

I totally get what Stones is saying.  When I saw her she was professional, chatty, welcoming; couldn't do enough.  Great place - supremely well equipped for purpose.  Large selection of booze.  10/10 for service.  The shagging was great - I left saturated and happy, but as I walked towards Waterloo station I got this uneasy feeling.  She's got a smoking body, but she's starting to look a bit middle aged.  It just got to me a bit.  Overall however (had I submitted a review - my bad), it would be totally unfair to rate it neutral