Not white knighting lads but The vfm rating comes really from the lack of decent girls in Glasgow. Decent being that she was clean, British, relatively young, friendly and really put the effort in. You must admit that we're being constantly ripped off for substandard services and I'm finding myself paying that little bit extra just to make sure I get something special. I understand why she would get that reaction from her prices but the markets saturated in complete shit.
Anal and swallow twice from a smoking-hot Scottish girl who supplies full-on passion at those prices might be "something special". What you've described is no more than a decent, standard-ish service from a reasonable-looking girl you've paid way over the odds for.
I'm obviously not disputing you genuinely enjoyed it, nor your right to pay what you want for it. But when there's as good, if not better looking girls, still offering a similar, if not better service in Glasgow for 20-30 quid less (albeit not many, but they do exist), you can't come on here and argue you got good value, when you clearly didn't.
VFM isn't simply calculated by the shite state of one WG-void, randy punter-saturated sellers' market in one location, which Glasgow currently is, either. The Glasgow punting-scene is simply the current victim of such circumstances where some greedy girls, like this one, are exploiting the situation and further damaging the market due to daft punters, like you, willing to pay for it. VFM is determined by the lowest price you can still get a decent service from a decent girl for, regardless of how few there are, and also in comparison to the rates and services ratio in other areas of, not only this country, but others of similar economic conditions.
Burying your head in the sand and trying to convince yourself "this is what Glasgow rates are these days" simply because your dick can't wait for a decent-value punt, isn't addressing the problem, it's simply contributing to it.
