Kate and Roxana - The Secret Boudoir - Outcall

[ragged]

(This is my first review.  Be gentle.  Also, don't moan about the price I paid - it's my money and I'll spend it how I like.  Each to their own.)

This was a duo with these two women from External Link/Members Only  Individual links
Kate - External Link/Members Only
Roxana - External Link/Members Only

Date: 20 Nov 2017
Place: My hotel in central London
Cost: £890 for 90 mins

I like this agency - communications with them are always professional, the girls speak well of them, and seem to stick with them, which is always a good sign.

The girls arrived bang on time, which I appreciate.  I had made some dress/underwear requests, which they accommodated.

Kate - as per the photos.  English and well spoken.  Large, well shaped enhanced breasts.  Nicely filled out curves and a very pretty face.

Roxana - photos are accurate, but she's done something with her hair.  Russian, but her english is fine. Much more athletic build, with smaller enhanced breasts.

Both ladies were skilled and accommodating.  Kate was much more comfortable in a threesome.  Roxana was a little uncomfortable and I think she felt out of place.  Roxana was very keen to offer prostate massage - a little too much possibly - I don't really want to hear the words 'fist' or 'strapon' in that context.  She was adamant that she didn't want to be spanked, but was insistent in offering it.

Meanwhile Kate was happy to offer the sensuous GFE that I asked for.

I suspect that Roxana is used to being more in a dominant role, and would be a good choice if you want a domme - especially if you want your arse abused.  Kate was much more your courtesan-style escort.

I was happy with them both, but would probably not choose to see Roxana again.  However, I look forward to seeing Kate again on her own or with another.

[Dereks]

They saw you coming.

[Goldfinch]

don't moan about the price I paid - it's my money and I'll spend it how I like.  Each to their own.)


Cost: £890 for 90 mins

 

You've obviously got a lot more disposable income than most of us lot.

[martini2429]

As long as you enjoyed yourself, that's all that matters

 

[S_holmes]

What actually happened? OWO? Penetration? A level?
Your money, spend it how you wish to,   But personally 890 is too much for my blood.

Bit more detail as to what actually happened would Be good - did you feel you got VFM?

[Dereks]

Got bummed!!! In every way

[mrhappypants]

Ragged, Thanks for your review although I must say you have written the equivalent of a restaurant review in which you say you paid 4x the going rate for a meal and refuse to describe the taste of the food...

[Brazilian Martian]

Ragged, Thanks for your review although I must say you have written the equivalent of a restaurant review in which you say you paid 4x the going rate for a meal and refuse to describe the taste of the food...

So basically it's a useless review, he's probably to much of a gentleman to go into detail.

[LLPunting]

Given the amount of florid BS on the profiles it would indeed be useful to have an objective description of the competency of these expensive SPs.

Your "trust me they were good, though not both to my tastes" is basiclally spiteful to the community here.  In that context as we read this as an encounter with one tall, British GFE and another amazonian Russian Dom, I see this more as a tout than anything useful from an honourable member.

If you are a genuine punter, just because you have a fuck-ton of disposable cash and you felt the need to proclaim your exploits to an audience, you deserve ZERO credit for walking into the bar and saying "See those two?  I had 'em both, together."

[Rocket Scientist]

(This is my first review.  Be gentle.  Also, don't moan about the price I paid - it's my money and I'll spend it how I like.  Each to their own.)

Appreciate OP's contribution to UKP.  OP clearly knows he's spunking good money away. 

[ragged]

Well shit, I thought I was contributing to the sum of collective knowlede.  Given the number of reviews that complain about photos being innaccuracte/comms being bad/girls being late or messing you around I thought it worth mentioning these details. I tried to talk about the general ambience of the encounter without being too fluffy, because the overall encounter quality is what is important to me.

But it seems that unless you describe exactly what she lets you do with your cock under what circumstances then it's not a review for some people.

[LLPunting]

You can objectively describe each lady's technique for different services, degree of enthusiasm, did it feel genuine/insincerely fake/convincingly professional, tightness or lack there of, any services denied and reason, were they passive or active in the events unfolding, time-keeping, softness of skin, degree of depilation, quality of complexion, use of makeup and grooming.

All of the above can be stated without fluffiness and mention of how (well) you employed your cock.

[GeorgeForeman]

Agreed, this review was basically a waste of print. No detail, and most of us haven't got this amount of cash to spare