Candycane113 Edinburgh EH5

[bigredwolfe]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Met Candy today at short notice - all comms through AW email  - no problems.

Decent flat, safe location with plenty of free parking.

Door was answered and Candy was stood wearing just some sexy lingerie - and I knew I had hit the jackpot with this young lady!

Relaxing to talk to, she says she gets nervous meeting new punters, and gets a bit put off by the number of guys that message asking for things she doesn't do!

Very pretty, perfect 10 figure with quite possibly the best breasts i've been lucky enough to see in person!

A great unhurried punt - can't wait for a repeat!

[Matrix]

How much?

Services, if any?

Sorry to say it but this sounds more like an advert than a review.

[bigredwolfe]

£70 for half an hour
GFE - OW - Great sex

Certainly not an advert!

[Matrix]

Just a hopeless fluffy then. 

[FBman78]

Wow what a great review.........oh wait no it isn't 

[Happyjose]

she says she............... gets a bit put off by the number of guys that message asking for things she doesn't do!

This is great to know, and in no way makes you sound like a tout

[mills_and_bhuna]

If you're going to tout at least make it worth your while .
I've read more credible and informative AW feedback.

[S.X. MacHine]

Guys, guys...while Big_chris' review is a bit thin on content, it is, I am sure, genuine and well intentioned. As such, we should welcome the information.
Cut him some slack, it's only his second review and surely UKP should welcome as much intelligence on SPs as it can get, particularly on newcomers.

[Matrix]

Guys, guys...while Big_chris' review is a bit thin on content, it is, I am sure, genuine and well intentioned. As such, we should welcome the information.
Cut him some slack, it's only his second review and surely UKP should welcome as much intelligence on SPs as it can get, particularly on newcomers.

Not if they're fluffy/touts. If you're sure it's genuine, please share this insight with the rest of us.

As for the content,  no mention of fee, duration or services but we got to know what she doesn't like and that she's happy to blether away during a booking. I'm partial to a good conversation but I doubt a 19 year old  pro$$ie from Ayr has much interesting to say.

[Matrix]

Here's the only Aw feedback she has. More informative than the review and one has a similar theme.

Positive   ERJ195 (7)   20/11/2017 15:34   Seeking Services
    An absolute diamond!Very pretty, perfect 10 figure.Treat with respect please!!!

Feedback
Only   Jimbob5 (74)   08/09/2017 02:59   Seeking Services
    Brilliant session with a super fit girl will defo see again 10/10 service thanks.
   
Response:   Can’t wait to see you again xxx

Perfect 10 (where have I read that before?) and treat with respect please!!!

[Happyjose]

The issue is not that it's a bit thin on content (though it is), but that it contains the kind of garbage that touts often include and that gives away their intent.

The OP had opportunity to view other reviews, read the wiki guide, and generally gain an understanding of the culture of the forum before posting. All genuine reviews are welcome, but they do have to conform.

If everyone could be taken at face value and given the benefit, the integrity of Admin's site would soon diminish.

The fact that the banned section is such a busy cunts jamboree just reinforces this

[Cactus]

I sent her a message on AW a few months ago, enquiring about a booking over the weekend, nothing out of the ordinary in the content and certianly not requesting any services that she doesn't offer.  She responded 42 days later asking if I wanted to schedule a meeting. 

[TKovac]

With matrix on this one. 

Also "gets put off with guys asking for things she doesnt do"

Doesn't list oral without as an option and reviewer got covered oral.  That's fine but also lists CIM and snowballing which either implies she does oral without or had no idea what services mean and what she is offering

[Ydontu]

I realise I barely post and haven't even see anyone to review in ages so hardly an authority. But the lass in question's profile looked dodgy as hell. A tell tale sign of likes not being true - she had milking/lactating ticked as a like. To my knowledge there has only been one girl in Edinburgh who actually provided this. So if it's ticked I generally assume it's a fake profile which knows to not tick bareback etc yet ticks everything else to appear in all the searches.

[Matrix]

I think the best case scenario here is, the girl's a flake and the reviewer's seriously fluffy.

[Matrix]

I've messaged her on Aw and she is a total flake. Won't waste any more time on this.

[daviebond]

I've messaged her on Aw and she is a total flake. Won't waste any more time on this.

Do tell us more mate

[Marmalade]

Decent flat, safe location

I suppose that could be useful if it’s true. Especially as the AW postcode finder plonks her down in Granton’s slagville. Some of that area I’d say an Uber would be safer than free parking (unless you aren’t particularly attached to your hubcaps, tail-lights, that sort of thing).