Amelia Andrews - South Shields

[OldAdmin]

I've received PMs from both parties but not really read them, as I feel it's usual waste of my time. I've had enough after 7 years.
So what is the general opinion here about this review drama?

[Mansell]

I was only kidding when I said this would still be going at Christmas, but maybe it will 

Always an interesting read, but then every time any popular WG gets a Negative you can pretty much guarantee a shit storm 

[cueball]

So what is the general opinion here about this review drama?

She's an angry nutter and he can't remember what day of the week it is 

[vw]

I've received PMs from both parties but not really read them, as I feel it's usual waste of my time. I've had enough after 7 years.
So what is the general opinion here about this review drama?

punters can make their own minds up, do you really need to waste time on it, she has offered no proof just some questions.

[Tiger63]

I've received PMs from both parties but not really read them, as I feel it's usual waste of my time. I've had enough after 7 years.
So what is the general opinion here about this review drama?

IMHO its just going round in circles and going no where.
There is something about it that doesnt sit right with me but I cant put my finger on it
I feel that some are turning it into a prossie bashing exercise to suit their agenda and maybe to get AA to bite.
Bob is a trusted member whos  done plenty of reviews and isnt an idiot....despite trying to come across as one.

 I would have to say the review will have to stand.

[moreplease]

I've received PMs from both parties but not really read them, as I feel it's usual waste of my time. I've had enough after 7 years.
So what is the general opinion here about this review drama?

To be honest, I'm beyond caring. Whole load of " He said, She said " and no end result will come of it, it just keeps regurgitating itself.

I doubt it'll affect bookings for AA in the slightest and in all honesty it's not a review I'd take on board, even though it's written by a long standing member ( no pun intended..........  ) 

May as well leave the review up..... it's lost its impact anyway.

[hendrix]

I don't have a horse in this game - all seems a bit odd with the punters memory being in question when tbh I probably wouldn't remember some of those details either.. Just wouldn't register.

[AnthG]

I was only kidding when I said this would still be going at Christmas, but maybe it will 

But it should not need to. It seems pretty clear-cut to me.

1. Punter posted a negative review of a popular girl saying she had hygiene issues.

2. Girl comes back to this saying booking never even happened. She asked the punter to provide some info like what tattoos are on her back or what colour were the bedsheets etc.

3. Punter refuses to give her this info saying he cannot remember them. And the punter doesn't have to give her this info.

5. That should be the end of it.

6. If the punter comes along posting reviews for other girls in the future who she then comes along and claims that booking never even took place. Then this review would need to be relooked at then.

7. If the girl gets further reviews suggesting the same things; i.e hygiene issues. Then once again this review would need to be relooked at then with this in mind.

8. In the meantime take it or leave it. It wasn't that bad of a review. And from what I understand girls can easily get BV and not know about it and not do nothing to cause it. It wasn't that big of a deal. It was not that bad of a review.

9. In the arguments of who is telling the truth, punters post quotes of her own posts on UKE showing she claims herself she is close pals with the north east local gangland community, has a rage filled type temper and works for the NHS as a counsellor. And yet she has two stalkers (who must obviously have a serious death wish about them).

10. What more is there. Other than she is friends with Mia/Ms Maddison who is a complete and utter bitch who likes to out people.

[vw]

10. What more is there. Other than she is friends with Mia/Ms Maddison who is a complete and utter bitch who likes to out people.

Is she on the prossie blacklist ?

[waynekerr600]

What happened to number 4.Anth?

[bobdavid]

I've been thinking about this and, honestly, wondering why everyone (including myself) is so riled up... yeah, Amelia is - I understand that ... nobody likes bad reviews... though her reaction is OTT and throws up worrying stalkish/threatening behaviour that it seems she's also exhibited in the past.

For myself, though, it doesn't really matter whether this review stays up or not. I'd hope that the site was fair and honest - not just deleting negative reviews for those who can scream the loudest - and have certainly found it to be so far... but if Admin chooses to remove the review, so be it.

If this was debated in Parliament, particularly EU Parliament, they'd be putting all sorts of ridiculous red tape in place... eg.:-

1) every time you arrive for a punt you have to have a selfie taken with the Prossie;
2) when you register for UKP you have to supply 3 forms of ID, one of which needs to be a Passport or Driving Licence... originals can be supplied - or a copy can be certified by a recognised legal entity;
3) when you submit your review you have to swear an oath that it is a fair and true representation of what occurred;
4) those with short-term memory problems must submit their review within 30 minutes of the punt ending - or must attach a certificate from a registered hypnotist to certify that it's a true account;
5) if an SP disagrees with the review, they can apply to the appeals court with video evidence (which must always be kept, for every single meeting, for a minimum of 5 years);
6) anyone questioning the validity of a review in replies to it will be hung by order of the Queen.

That oughta sort out all the kinks, I reckon.

[AnthG]

What happened to number 4.Anth?

This is what happens when you type at 2 in the morning. I thought I was so good coming up with 10 points too.

[vw]

I've been thinking about this and, honestly, wondering why everyone (including myself) is so riled up... yeah, Amelia is - I understand that ... nobody likes bad reviews... though her reaction is OTT and throws up worrying stalkish/threatening behaviour that it seems she's also exhibited in the past.

For myself, though, it doesn't really matter whether this review stays up or not. I'd hope that the site was fair and honest - not just deleting negative reviews for those who can scream the loudest - and have certainly found it to be so far... but if Admin chooses to remove the review, so be it.

If this was debated in Parliament, particularly EU Parliament, they'd be putting all sorts of ridiculous red tape in place... eg.:-

1) every time you arrive for a punt you have to have a selfie taken with the Prossie;
2) when you register for UKP you have to supply 3 forms of ID, one of which needs to be a Passport or Driving Licence... originals can be supplied - or a copy can be certified by a recognised legal entity;
3) when you submit your review you have to swear an oath that it is a fair and true representation of what occurred;
4) those with short-term memory problems must submit their review within 30 minutes of the punt ending - or must attach a certificate from a registered hypnotist to certify that it's a true account;
5) if an SP disagrees with the review, they can apply to the appeals court with video evidence (which must always be kept, for every single meeting, for a minimum of 5 years);
6) anyone questioning the validity of a review in replies to it will be hung by order of the Queen.

That oughta sort out all the kinks, I reckon.

The touts, fluffies and prossies would love that for when anything negative is posted, yet they never seem to ask for any proof when its a positive comment/review though.   

[vw]

“I don’t remember the bedding”
“I don’t remember the previous booking”
“I don’t recall my adultwork password”
“My memory is terrible, really, really terrible”

Yet:

“I remember a few enjoyable punts and I remember some regulars I saw, I can happily talk to admin about this side of things”  (this side of things, you remember this side of things.  Does that mean your memory is ‘sided’?)
“The agencies, of course, I remember”
“I remember the names of 9-10 girls”
“Those things make the whole things more memorable”

Good to see your last post got you banned, for what i ask? 

[Sar-Major]

Haha, whatever it is ...

"I never go on UKE" isn't the same as "I have never been on UKE"

It's like "I never watch I'm A Celebrity.." - which everyone says despite the massive viewing figures..

I fekin "Lurve It".....................

 

[thekidah01]

Has Amelia removed herself from uke?
I can’t seem to find her profile over there

[Shearer1955]

Has Amelia removed herself from uke?
I can’t seem to find her profile over there

Probably taking a sabbatical after her rants or is she banned? 

[OldAdmin]

Seems someone is using her "Amelia" name to slag off UKP and UKE on another site, for now I'll presume it's some imposter and not her, despite some similarities in writing.....

[vw]

Seems someone is using her "Amelia" name to slag off UKP and UKE on another site, for now I'll presume it's some imposter and not her, despite some similarities in writing.....

Oh dear, take football home and scream as loud as you can to who ever will listen sounds about par for the course. 

[paulbay]

I met Amelia Andrews a little while ago for my 1st ever tie and tease. Now unfortunately my business has took a bit of a tumble so can’t afford to go back.
If I could afford to go back and see her I would without fail.
I appreciate the op may not of liked the service in which he received but you can’t please everyone.
My only bit of advice I can give you guys is try for yourself as she has more positive ratings than negative intact this is the 1st time I’ve ever seen a negative for Amelia.
At worst I believe this should be a neutral
But that’s my opinion
Keep up the good work Amelia..

[vw]

I met Amelia Andrews a little while ago for my 1st ever tie and tease. Now unfortunately my business has took a bit of a tumble so can’t afford to go back.
If I could afford to go back and see her I would without fail.
I appreciate the op may not of liked the service in which he received but you can’t please everyone.
My only bit of advice I can give you guys is try for yourself as she has more positive ratings than negative intact this is the 1st time I’ve ever seen a negative for Amelia.
At worst I believe this should be a neutral
But that’s my opinion
Keep up the good work Amelia..

You white knights crack me up, bumping these reviews so more people got to read it.

[SeekingtheTruth]

I met Amelia Andrews a little while ago for my 1st ever tie and tease. Now unfortunately my business has took a bit of a tumble so can’t afford to go back.
If I could afford to go back and see her I would without fail.
I appreciate the op may not of liked the service in which he received but you can’t please everyone.
My only bit of advice I can give you guys is try for yourself as she has more positive ratings than negative intact this is the 1st time I’ve ever seen a negative for Amelia.
At worst I believe this should be a neutral
But that’s my opinion
Keep up the good work Amelia..

Fear not fair damsel, your knight has arrived!

[Kev3773]

I met Amelia Andrews a little while ago for my 1st ever tie and tease. Now unfortunately my business has took a bit of a tumble so can’t afford to go back.
If I could afford to go back and see her I would without fail.
I appreciate the op may not of liked the service in which he received but you can’t please everyone.
My only bit of advice I can give you guys is try for yourself as she has more positive ratings than negative intact this is the 1st time I’ve ever seen a negative for Amelia.
At worst I believe this should be a neutral
But that’s my opinion
Keep up the good work Amelia..

Who the fuck are are you to tell the op what rating his review should be, white knighting at its best/worst 
Oh and she has 2 negatives if you look at the top of this thread 

[Moresomes]

If I could afford to go back and see her I would without fail.

You might get lucky then.
Following this thread there could be a chance of a good deal to be had, (and your white knighting wont harm your chances)

[bobdavid]

At worst I believe this should be a neutral
But that’s my opinion

Everyone should be free to rate how they like. A negative felt right for me for Amelia given how it went and how I felt (sick, mostly). I could equally go over other people's reviews and suggest that Positives be changed to Neutrals.. but why would I? Since you're suggesting this, though, I thought I'd take a look at your own reviews ... you've done 6 so far with 4 positives, 1 negative and 1 neutral.

Your neutral: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=146827.0 .. you paid £100 for a 30mins threesome... quote: "I have to say there was no spark and no energy from them ...
I think I'll stick to my massages from now on". Now, for me, that would be a negative. It doesn't sound like it went well at all.

A positive review of yours ... https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=170480.0 "Would I go back ????? No ... She was a lovely lass but not my type". Not your type, you wouldn't go back - but you gave a positive  .. I would've given this one a neutral myself.

Compare that to your (positive) Amilia review: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=151727.0 "Best £110 I have ever spent and will definitely be returning" .. this one, yeah, I understand the positive.

All that said, I wouldn't question your ratings - because you're free to rate how you see fit, just as those people reading your reviews have the choice about whether to trust them or not.

[Kev3773]

Everyone should be free to rate how they like. A negative felt right for me for Amelia given how it went and how I felt (sick, mostly). I could equally go over other people's reviews and suggest that Positives be changed to Neutrals.. but why would I? Since you're suggesting this, though, I thought I'd take a look at your own reviews ... you've done 6 so far with 4 positives, 1 negative and 1 neutral.

Your neutral: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=146827.0 .. you paid £100 for a 30mins threesome... quote: "I have to say there was no spark and no energy from them ...
I think I'll stick to my massages from now on". Now, for me, that would be a negative. It doesn't sound like it went well at all.

A positive review of yours ... https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=170480.0 "Would I go back ????? No ... She was a lovely lass but not my type". Not your type, you wouldn't go back - but you gave a positive  .. I would've given this one a neutral myself.

Compare that to your (positive) Amilia review: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=151727.0 "Best £110 I have ever spent and will definitely be returning" .. this one, yeah, I understand the positive.

All that said, I wouldn't question your ratings - because you're free to rate how you see fit, just as those people reading your reviews have the choice about whether to trust them or not.

Well said, just ignore him though as he's clearly a white knight or been put up to it ( maybe a freebie on offer as he's skint ) 

[Shearer1955]

I met Amelia Andrews a little while ago for my 1st ever tie and tease. Now unfortunately my business has took a bit of a tumble so can’t afford to go back.
If I could afford to go back and see her I would without fail.
I appreciate the op may not of liked the service in which he received but you can’t please everyone.
My only bit of advice I can give you guys is try for yourself as she has more positive ratings than negative intact this is the 1st time I’ve ever seen a negative for Amelia.
At worst I believe this should be a neutral
But that’s my opinion
Keep up the good work Amelia..

Nobody except the reviewer has the entitlement to decide his marking
You might disagree with it & that is perfectly acceptable & you can comment with your thoughts subject to reviews you have posted which corroborate what you believe; failing that you do nothing on behalf of Amelia except verify every doubt about her and undermine the lass.
All you do is put this Negative to the top of the postings and add to the doubts about her; for what its worth she looks good on her profile & I think she would be a good meet but with and because of everything said & what I read here I would not want to visit her
Everything posted to absolve her of guilt does the opposite; is it that difficult to understand 
Let it rest & her credibility will improve with positive feedback!

[Kev3773]

Let it rest & her credibility will improve with positive feedback!

But she can't let it rest 

[datwabbit]

White knighting can get you banned.

If you have a positive experience, write it up separately.

[paulbay]

I’m sorry if I upset /offended op or anyone else for that matter I was only trying to say how I found her
Although reading all 12 pages of this thread I’m not sure what to think anymore
Reading my post back I can see how and why it’s got some people’s backs up
I am sorry that was not my intention

[AnthG]

So you bumped the topic back up again saying this......

I seen this and thought she had received another negative. All because of you bumping this yet again after another full week has went by.

[Shearer1955]

I’m sorry if I upset /offended op or anyone else for that matter I was only trying to say how I found her
Although reading all 12 pages of this thread I’m not sure what to think anymore
Reading my post back I can see how and why it’s got some people’s backs up
I am sorry that was not my intention

As long as you are not seen to be white knighting you can give your opinions and thoughts on a lady; you have done a review for Amelia which was positive so your any views you express have relevance providing they are fair and reasonable without falling into the trap of trying to succor up
There is a good review posted for Amelia today & she has many others; obviously she is more of a domme which isn't for me but different girls cater for different tastes

[Brazilian Martian]

Bloody hell this thread is still going  i doubt most of the posters will be receiving a x mas card from Ms Andrews.

[daviemac]

Bloody hell this thread is still going  i doubt most of the posters will be receiving a x mas card from Ms Andrews.

As often happens with the WK type of posts, they think they're doing good when in reality they only succeed in keeping a neg review at the top of the board.