Author Topic: SCOTTISHxxKylie / SCOTTISHxxDAISY glasgow  (Read 3523 times)

runtywunty90

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
First review so here it goes...  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Decided to TOFTT as couldn't find any reviews of her on here but the pics looked decent and the fact she was Scottish was another big deciding factor.  Paid £80 for hh but to be honest only got 20 mins.

Comms - very good, quick replies and came across a good person and gave clear instructions on how to get to the hotel she was staying.

Looks - not bad, not great.  Definitely a few extra pounds than what the photos indicate.  I don't think the face photo on her AW profile is her but she's still probably a 6 or 7 out of 10.  She said she was 29 which I'd say was about right.

Service - pretty decent - had a couple issues however.  She gives a really good blowjob.  Lots of eye contact and looks like she's fairly enjoying it.  during RO I could tell her moans were definitely fake like as soon as I began she had her eyes fixed on the TV giving me the exaggerated "ooohs" and "aaahs"
Doggy was nice, then she rode me cowgirl but the thing that put me off is she ripped the condom off my cock and said "right lets have you cum all over my tits".  Was barely 15 minutes into the booking - which I said out loud and she rolled her eyes at me (don't think she'd think I'd notice).  She also said I could only cum once.  I found this a little frustrating.  Looking at the clock when I left showed I had only been in the room 20 minutes.

I was close to posting a neutral review but I'd say the positives still outweighed the negatives.  Was fun fucking her and she really does give fantastic oral but I don't think I'll back.  Came across as a really nice girl when chatting at the end.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2017, 12:53:58 pm by runtywunty90 »

Offline FBman78

From your review I think I will give the girl a miss. I was interested by the 2nd photo but even you reckon that isn't a true representation and she knocks you out after 20 mins???? Your review I suppose but reading what you wrote I would go neutral myself.

Offline ekpunter

Carrying extra pounds, Don't think the pic is her, and ripping you for 33% of you time and you see that as a positive ?  :dash:

Neg all day long for me

Offline guns

She looks great in the pics but no value for money by the sound of it .
Cheers for reviewing  :hi:

Offline bigmike32

One to avoid i reckon i would put this as a negative review.

Offline seeker

£80 for 20 minutes that will include getting undressed
Plus a few extra pounds
Possibly a B&S
That would be a Negative imo  :thumbsdown:
Thanks for toftt....i was interested
Not now  :thumbsdown:

Offline randydandy2013

She’s now charging £90 HH on AW profile and wants you out after 20 mins, no thanks not for me. Cheers for the review. One to avoid imo  :thumbsdown:

runtywunty90

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Cheers for the feedback guys.

I guess I originally made it positive because I thought I may be too picky.  My main reasons for making it positive was that it still was fun fucking her and she gave really good oral. But I'm gonna change it to neutral (was my first review)

But yeah I wouldn't let that face photo be a reason for you guys to have a punt because trust me, it's not what you are expecting.

runtywunty90

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
OK, I don't think I can change it to neutral. 

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,786
  • Likes: 12
  •  
  • Reviews: 164

Offline TommyMoundfrigger

Oh! The power of the crowd.

And only runtywunty90 was actually there.   :unknown:

Offline FBman78

Oh! The power of the crowd.

And only runtywunty90 was actually there.   :unknown:

Read the review mate no one forced him to change his opinion we just pointed out the key facts of what he wrote and upon  reflection he agrees that is all.

Offline TommyMoundfrigger

Read the review mate no one forced him to change his opinion we just pointed out the key facts of what he wrote and upon  reflection he agrees that is all.

He's only writing a brief review.
He's not drawing pictures. He's not including a movie.
It's his recap of what happened along with his perceived rating.
Seems a new fad for everyone else to give their rating when they weren't there.
Just read the review, take from it what you will, thank the reviewer and be happy he bothered to take the trouble.
If all peeps do is criticise or disagree the number of reviews will diminish.

hardtoplease

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Cheers runty  :drinks: looks like I dodged one here. Tried to make a booking with this burd few weeks back but it all went to fuck when she texted me to say anal off the menu that week for some reason.

Why do some WG's think they can get away with it? Dodgy picture, lying about their age, lying about their weight, dishing crap service, make me so feckin  :angry: :mad:

runtywunty90

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yeah she said anal was off the cards for me too.

hardtoplease

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yeah she said anal was off the cards for me too.

Mibes, like me, you’re hung like a cuddy  :cool: :D :lol:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She's a meber here now and not happy about this review  :unknown:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
She's a meber here now and not happy about this review  :unknown:

How do you know that she hasn't posted anything on her review?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline Lilywhite

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 604
  • Likes: 24
  •  
How do you know that she hasn't posted anything on her review?

The post reports section.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Perhaps now she's a member she would care to post and explain the situation  :unknown:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

JustHilts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

runtywunty90

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
lol I'm just being honest about my experience.  There would be nothing to be mad at for her if she provided a better service.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
lol I'm just being honest about my experience.  There would be nothing to be mad at for her if she provided a better service.

Guess she doesn't like honesty  :unknown: