Likewise I am not bragging, but I could comfortably hire high end escorts as often as I liked. However, it just does not seem to bring any additional value once you cross a certain number.
Or are you saying I am missing something and should try spending more girls in the 300/400/500 range? I have dabbled there before and usually been disappointed.
Put it another way, is the average £500 even 1% better than the average £250 escort? I actually think they will be worse as they will be more likely to have a stuck up attitude.
What about a girl at £5k and hour instead of £500? Billionaires might spend it because they can, but at some point they hit diminishing returns and it just becomes wasteful. It’s only pussy at the end of the day.
But you are assuming that everyone thinks like you.
i know that my reviews are a contradiction to what I am saying in that I go for 30min sessions at £100 a go. That is because I am a dump and go punter. As long as the place is reasonable then not too fussed about the surroundings. But in the same way I would spend £100plus on sandwiches, I can understand why punters spend what you think is silly money.
Having said that, 20 years ago I was booking WGs who charged £250 to £300 back when that was take home pay for a civvy job. My spending priorities were different back then :-)
