Sweet katie back xxx glasgow

[Bang_Bro]

External Link/Members Only

+447804995961

So, I read a few reviews on here and from the descriptions it sounded as though Katie would be pretty awesome with a "cracking" body.

I am here to report an honest review, now I get that some guys on here are maybe over 40, over 50 and have a different standard, I would say that if you are 50+ and have a different tastes then Sweet Katie Back is the girl for you,

Me, I like a girl to have a nice bum, some shapely legs, not big..... anyway,

Comms was good, got there on time she made me wait outside in the rain for about 6 minutes, but the day before I missed her becuase of traffic so fairs fair.

Got inside, greated by her husky voice, sounds like a Polish Dot cotton from eastenders, smokers voice. Saw straight away that she is at least 46 (At least) I am being generous, I know 50 year old women who look younger. She doesnt have a decent shape, However read on!

Had some chit chat, sorted the reddies, then she started kissing me slow and dirty mouth open and tongues, stroking my cock through my boxers til it was stonking, Nice and slow the way I like it, bear in mind I only paid 15 mins when I saw her, in fact I nearly left but I was super horny.

She dropped to her knees, gave me a nasty (porn star style) hard blow job, lots of deep throat, a tit wank (oh yeah, her tots are pretty much perfect, lovely and big classic page 3 girl style, they are not fake either? some dude reviewed that they were fake?, her tits are 10/10) She sucked the tip of my cock while doing a good tit wank and then I blew my beans all over her tits,

Quick clean up and left. I left feeling satisfied, I wasnt pissed off, pretty much got what I wanted however I was expecting a much better body and face from the reviews.

I wouldnt go back, but her effort and technique for BJ would have most people pop in 5 minutes. Recomend a tit wank and have her suck the tip while she does it!

I would say she is decent for some guys, but she wasnt for me. I wanted to do an honest review becuase I probably would have gone somehwere else if I knew what I know now.

[Clattypats]

External Link/Members Only

 now I get that some guys on here are maybe over 40, over 50 and have a different standard, I would say that if you are 50+ and have a different tastes then Sweet Katie Back is the girl for you,

I wouldnt go back, but her effort and technique for BJ would have most people pop in 5 minutes. Recomend a tit wank and have her suck the tip while she does it!

I would say she is decent for some guys, but she wasnt for me.

You make a hell of alot of assumptions of what punters may or may not like

If you do a review, it is for fellow punters to judge, and come to a conclusion on whether they want to see her or not..we don't need recommendations..

To suggest most people would pop in 5 minutes is totally absurd and condescending ..How the hell do you know how fellow punters react to certain services in a booking....Mental! ..

[Bang_Bro]

Fine I wont leave reviews then

[OGS20]

Fine I wont leave reviews then

I found your review helpful, especially as a contrast to others 

[Clattypats]

Fine I wont leave reviews then

Don't Bubble ..I was only commenting on how you come across..

I'm not really into being told who is or isn't for me..I have enough nouse to decide that for myself, based on a review..I also don't need to be told I'll probably "Blow my beans" (as you put it) after five minutes when you don't know what I like or how I react to certain services in a booking...

Whether you leave reviews or not, is totally up to you.. 

[henry brubaker]

I found your review helpful, especially as a contrast to others 

Same

[henry brubaker]

Don't Bubble ..I was only commenting on how you come across..

I'm not really into being told who is or isn't for me..I have enough nouse to decide that for myself, based on a review..I also don't need to be told I'll probably "Blow my beans" (as you put it) after five minutes when you don't know what I like or how I react to certain services in a booking...

I didn't notice your name in the review

[Clattypats]

I didn't notice your name in the review

Well last time I checked..I was a punter...So GO figure! ...

[henry brubaker]

I figured some and most were not all when I was in primary school.

[Bang_Bro]

Clattypats

Last time I checked I was a punter?

I never said anything about punter blowing load I said "some people"

Also, this site is free for me to give my opinion on a service, For some reason you took it how you wanted to take it, as if I am telling you who to go and see?

Maybe you should keep your insecurities and thoughts on how you feel to yourself.

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Thanks for the review.

Now calm down you lot. 

[David1970]

Clattypats

Last time I checked I was a punter?

I never said anything about punter blowing load I said "some people"

Also, this site is free for me to give my opinion on a service, For some reason you took it how you wanted to take it, as if I am telling you who to go and see?

Maybe you should keep your insecurities and thoughts on how you feel to yourself.

This guy could start a fight in an empty grave yard.
He had a go at me for suggesting he might want to put the city/town in the title of one of his other reviews.
He is well balanced, chip on each shoulder.

[younglad22]

your complaining about her body but saying her tits are perfect? you payed for 15 minutes you got a good blowjob, seems a harsh neutral... everything is positive in the review a part from her looks, seems odd when her pictures don`t look anything special so not sure what you expected

[Clattypats]

This guy could start a fight in an empty grave yard.
He had a go at me for suggesting he might want to put the city/town in the title of one of his other reviews.
He is well balanced, chip on each shoulder.

I thought you meant me for a minute  ..and was looking through my posts to see where I said this to you  ...Then realised it wasn't me you meant! ...

[happychess]

External Link/Members Only

+447804995961

So, I read a few reviews on here and from the descriptions it sounded as though Katie would be pretty awesome with a "cracking" body.

I am here to report an honest review, now I get that some guys on here are maybe over 40, over 50 and have a different standard, I would say that if you are 50+ and have a different tastes then Sweet Katie Back is the girl for you,

Me, I like a girl to have a nice bum, some shapely legs, not big..... anyway,

Comms was good, got there on time she made me wait outside in the rain for about 6 minutes, but the day before I missed her becuase of traffic so fairs fair.

Got inside, greated by her husky voice, sounds like a Polish Dot cotton from eastenders, smokers voice. Saw straight away that she is at least 46 (At least) I am being generous, I know 50 year old women who look younger. She doesnt have a decent shape, However read on!

Had some chit chat, sorted the reddies, then she started kissing me slow and dirty mouth open and tongues, stroking my cock through my boxers til it was stonking, Nice and slow the way I like it, bear in mind I only paid 15 mins when I saw her, in fact I nearly left but I was super horny.

She dropped to her knees, gave me a nasty (porn star style) hard blow job, lots of deep throat, a tit wank (oh yeah, her tots are pretty much perfect, lovely and big classic page 3 girl style, they are not fake either? some dude reviewed that they were fake?, her tits are 10/10) She sucked the tip of my cock while doing a good tit wank and then I blew my beans all over her tits,

Quick clean up and left. I left feeling satisfied, I wasnt pissed off, pretty much got what I wanted however I was expecting a much better body and face from the reviews.

I wouldnt go back, but her effort and technique for BJ would have most people pop in 5 minutes. Recomend a tit wank and have her suck the tip while she does it!

I would say she is decent for some guys, but she wasnt for me. I wanted to do an honest review becuase I probably would have gone somehwere else if I knew what I know now.

This is abosolutely non-sense. You gave a neutral just because she is not the same as your imagination?
I had met Katie for AT LEAST ten times. Her performance is the same in every single meet. Her attitude and the skills are not paralleled. Besides her skills, her body is in almost perfect I'm my mind. BTW, I am not 50+ but mid 30s, your review is useless and too subjective. DO NOT mis-guide other punters. Thanks

[Clattypats]

This is abosolutely non-sense. You gave a neutral just because she is not the same as your imagination?
I had met Katie for AT LEAST ten times. Her performance is the same in every single meet. Her attitude and the skills are not paralleled. Besides her skills, her body is in almost perfect I'm my mind. BTW, I am not 50+ but mid 30s, your review is useless and too subjective. DO NOT mis-guide other punters. Thanks

You can't say someone's  review is nonsense,you walloper....His money..His review..you review her then!..

[Courtney]

This is abosolutely non-sense. You gave a neutral just because she is not the same as your imagination?
I had met Katie for AT LEAST ten times. Her performance is the same in every single meet. Her attitude and the skills are not paralleled. Besides her skills, her body is in almost perfect I'm my mind. BTW, I am not 50+ but mid 30s, your review is useless and too subjective. DO NOT mis-guide other punters. Thanks

...abosolutely to the rescue of sweet Katie.

[Marmalade]

Most white knight attempts fail.

Most prossie attempts to defend their crap service or have lists deleted fail.

Most trolls are caught and banned.

Most of the posts made by idiots who post rubbish are not removed: they remain as a warning to others and as a record should they try to do it again.

This is UKP. Not some half-assed woos site. Seriously.

[Boinky]

Happychess saw Katie at least 10 times

Happychess review for Katie = 0


Twat.

A banned twat at that.

[Bang_Bro]

You can't say someone's  review is nonsense,you walloper....His money..His review..you review her then!..

They got banned anyhow! and look at the grammar, clearly her!