Alex - Barely Available - Nottingham

[Mutinyonthecounty]

I always fancied a go on that Holly but for some reason I never did.
That bloke looks like a right pussy

I saw Holly Adams quite a few times about 4 years ago. Fucking great she was, loved being fucked outdoors. The bloke looks like a typical chav fat prick.

[Picti]

JK1 - Any update on the Police response? It would be positive to hear that they took appropriate action in this case.

[Mrpieman]

Same i was very close to booking, thanks OP.

On a side note, one of her positive reviews is from a member now banned for 'Making threats', and their only review is of Alix. Review sounds like its touting too. I wonder if its the meat head.

I posted the original review. Im not the meat-head, just made the mistake of being fluffy and starry eyed.... it was my first ever review and I learned my lesson.
Personally Ive seen her 7 or 8 times and had an outcall, never experienced any presence at her place. She has told me her 'fiance' is a huge gym dude to be fair, so hes probably there all the time, something which has now worried me. My only other gripe is her expense, clock watching and extras. She is fit though.

[Newtothisstuff]

I posted the original review. Im not the meat-head, just made the mistake of being fluffy and starry eyed.... it was my first ever review and I learned my lesson.
Personally Ive seen her 7 or 8 times and had an outcall, never experienced any presence at her place. She has told me her 'fiance' is a huge gym dude to be fair, so hes probably there all the time, something which has now worried me. My only other gripe is her expense, clock watching and extras. She is fit though.

If it was your first review then it''s understandable that it would be a little 'fluffy'. A lot are. My first review was. Sadly, time and experience teaches us some hard lessons.
So, 'fiancee' must be the new term for 'pimp' then? If not, it sounds like she is as deluded as her pricing structure.
You could almost imagine their wedding. £150 a ticket but you can only look at the buffet and you have to pay extra if you want to listen to the speeches.

[HailWood]

You could almost imagine their wedding. £150 a ticket but you can only look at the buffet and you have to pay extra if you want to listen to the speeches.

I can imagine it will be a garden wedding because no guests will be allowed to come inside 

[CoolTiger]

I can imagine it will be a garden wedding because no guests will be allowed to come inside 

Cracking one, MTB.

 

[PepeMAGA]

I can imagine it will be a garden wedding because no guests will be allowed to come inside 

Probably why Mr Pieman spent 45 mins doing her garden for her.

[CoolTiger]

I posted the original review. Im not the meat-head, just made the mistake of being fluffy and starry eyed.... it was my first ever review and I learned my lesson.
Personally Ive seen her 7 or 8 times and had an outcall, never experienced any presence at her place. She has told me her 'fiance' is a huge gym dude to be fair, so hes probably there all the time, something which has now worried me. My only other gripe is her expense, clock watching and extras. She is fit though.

Probably why Mr Pieman spent 45 mins doing her garden for her.

Mr P now duly banned.

[Newtothisstuff]

I can imagine it will be a garden wedding because no guests will be allowed to come inside 

 
Can't be much of a garden. The profile says she doesn't even have a bush.

[vw]

Can't be much of a garden. The profile says she doesn't even have a bush.

I wonder if there are any rosebuds in the garden?

External Link/Members Only

[HailWood]

I wonder if there are any rosebuds in the garden?

External Link/Members Only

Thanks for that VW. Just had my lunch   

[Newtothisstuff]

Thanks for that VW. Just had my lunch   

I've just seem mine again!   

[badsin]

Well done guys - you lot could teach MI5 a lesson. Hope that fat bastard gets what is coming to him.

Im always amazed at the skills of some on here, great work guys.

I quite like the guy to be fair, makes me realise im a fucking Adonis of a guy, with a far superior cock haha

[CoolTiger]

External Link/Members Only

This is the fat bastard a few years ago when he tried to become a porn star 😂 The address they work from is 17a Newcastle street, Huthwaite, Sutton-in-Ashfield, there's a black BMW 1 series outside I believe to be his or the hookers. They are fucked   

Well done guys - you lot could teach MI5 a lesson. Hope that fat bastard gets what is coming to him.

I'm still intrigued... JK1, I appreciate that that this twat assualted you. Whilst you knew the address of his flat, how did you manage to get your sherlock holmes hat on and dig out this old video of him
and able to tie it to him?

[vw]

I'm still intrigued... JK1, I appreciate that that this twat assualted you. Whilst you knew the address of his flat, how did you manage to get your sherlock holmes hat on and dig out this old video of him
and able to tie it to him?

JK1 fucks prossies and they all gossip if given the chance. 

[James999]

She's not happy about this negative review 

[Picti]

Alix 97 member on here for over a year without a single post, has this evening made two post reports (said the review was false and objected to the posting of their address) and was promptly banned by Admin.

Member for over a year and yet no attempt to post on either this or JK1's review with an explanation or alternative version of events.

[CoolTiger]

She's not happy about this negative review 

Alix 97 member on here for over a year without a single post, has this evening made two post reports (said the review was false and objected to the posting of their address) and was promptly banned by Admin.

Member for over a year and yet no attempt to post on either this or JK1's review with an explanation or alternative version of events.

SNAP!!!

You beat me to it. He/She had chance to explain other negative reviews as well, but decided to remain low / hidden to see what was being posted, all this time.

May have only reasted by reporting this post due to his/her phone getting dusty, as more and more punters now avoid her.

[HailWood]

She's not happy about this negative review 

Well she's only herself and her fat cunt of a pimp fiancé to blame. Dusty phone is utterly justified.

[Newtothisstuff]

She'd have been far better off if she'd tried to explain herself rather than just reporting a post.
If she wanted to deny something, she'd have had a better reception if she'd posted a comment. I realise that something like this is her word against mine as the op. But, as others in various posts have also said that they've also met her pimp, I guess she realised that was a lost cause before she started.
She could at least explain why she doesn't allow anyone to come inside her when they're bagged up. If that's her policy then that's her choice. Fair enough if punters know about the rule before they book. She needs to clearly state it on her profile though as by the time punters find out about that little quirk, they're already well into a booking they've handed the cash over for.

[PepeMAGA]

she doesn't seem that smart generally. a dusty phone is probably the best thing that can happen to her. maybe the guy will have to go get a job rather tricking her out.

[Bangers and Gash]

I'm sure that's Butch Dingle off Emmerdale Farm.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Iloveoral]

Looks like a young Peter Kay, in the days when he was funny 

[Iloveoral]

I'm sure that's Butch Dingle off Emmerdale Farm.

I knew you was an emmerdale fan, explains it all now 

[Bangers and Gash]

I quite like the guy to be fair, makes me realise im a fucking Adonis of a guy, with a far superior cock haha

Ditto to that. 

After I'd wiped the tears from my eyes I realised that Pilsbury dough boy makes me look/feel like Brian Ferry. 

[Kingy28]

Ditto to that. 

After I'd wiped the tears from my eyes I realised that Pilsbury dough boy makes me look/feel like Brian Ferry. 

I've not heard the Pilsbury dough boy insult in ages. Bravo 

[Picti]

Any further information or updates on this one? Many of the questions posed have not been answered.

[mrfishyfoo]

Any further information or updates on this one? Many of the questions posed have not been answered.

...and they won't be either IMHO. 

Spineless are they that know spineless I say. 

[Picti]

...and they won't be either IMHO. 

Yeah you may be right. I would've liked those questions answered though, rather than left as loose ends.

I'd also like to understand the disparity between her recent reviews on here and the plethora of recent positive feedback on AW. Some of those punters must be on here, but not a peep from them in this thread, or the courage of their conviction in a review of her. 

[HailWood]

Shame on the lurkers on this one who derive benefit but contribute nothing. Man up fellas!
Definitely one to be avoided regardless IMO.

[Picti]

Definitely one to be avoided regardless IMO.

That would be my view, but judging by her feedback it seems that she's busier than ever. Just wonder why none of those guys represent their views on here. Unless of course she / they are manipulating her feedback in a disingenuous way. I did suggest this possibility earlier.

[HailWood]

Just had a look at her recent feedback. Can't balance this up at all. Some of the guys have feedback from some very well know lasses. Normally I'd read this as very encouraging 
Still not going to meet her though!

[vw]

Just had a look at her recent feedback. Can't balance this up at all. Some of the guys have feedback from some very well know lasses. Normally I'd read this as very encouraging 
Still not going to meet her though!

Have seen a punter lose a negative in a week from well known girls, very easy to game the aw system.

[Picti]

Just had a look at her recent feedback. Can't balance this up at all. Some of the guys have feedback from some very well know lasses.

Strange isn't it! As I said before it would be shameful if they've offered false or induced feedback that could lure a punter into a shit punt and potentially a hostile encounter with her pimp.

Also strange that the self-styled cynical "hardmen" of UKP have nothing to say about a really concerning issue.

[vw]

Strange isn't it! As I said before it would be shameful if they've offered false or induced feedback that could lure a punter into a shit punt and potentially a hostile encounter with her pimp.

Also strange that the self-styled cynical "hardmen" of UKP have nothing to say about a really concerning issue.

Hardmen in leather coats members of a forum biker gang

Well us cynics know aw feedback is shit and easily manipulated, glad you now realise.   

what do you want the cynics to do ?  Link he aw profiles reviewing with members here ?

[HailWood]

VW - I am shocked, shocked I say, that I find myself agreeing with you twice in one day. There is fuck all we can do about it other than help each other by contributing information where we can to help fellow members make better and more informed choices.
I repeat - shame on the lurkers!

[Picti]

Hardmen in leather coats members of a forum biker gang

Well us cynics know aw feedback is shit and easily manipulated, glad you now realise.   

what do you want the cynics to do ?  Link he aw profiles reviewing with members here ?

No, just represent the issue instead of fucking about with EM stereotypes and convenient elements of history.

I'm fully aware that AW feedback is readily manipulated. Just as I'm aware that organising 30+ feedbacks in a couple of weeks will have involved some underhanded tactics, and collusion with some who are probably members on here. Send them a clear message that it's cuntish at best and potentially dangerous for a punter at worst.

Anyway, it's always good to bump a thread like this to keep the issue in members' minds. It's a pity that JK1's reaction got the other thread locked, but this one's ok.

[vw]

No, just represent the issue instead of fucking about with EM stereotypes and convenient elements of history.

I'm fully aware that AW feedback is readily manipulated. Just as I'm aware that organising 30+ feedbacks in a couple of weeks will have involved some underhanded tactics, and collusion with some who are probably members on here. Send them a clear message that it's cuntish at best and potentially dangerous for a punter at worst.

Anyway, it's always good to bump a thread like this to keep the issue in members' minds. It's a pity that JK1's reaction got the other thread locked, but this one's ok.

Yes always good to bump or mention any thread that features underhand behaviours, will have a study with my beady eye see if can spot a pattern on hers.   

[Picti]

Yes always good to bump or mention any thread that features underhand behaviours, will have a study with my beady eye see if can spot a pattern on hers.   

Good man, and glad to have caught your attention on this one 

[vw]

Good man, and glad to have caught your attention on this one 

JK1 looks well shady though, seems very well informed about eh pair.

a few post negative reviewers do seem to follow these forums and go to the popular girls

Can sense a big whiff about mr Bridger former member on one of the profiles.   

[CoolTiger]

JK1 looks well shady though, seems very well informed about the pair.

a few post negative reviewers do seem to follow these forums and go to the popular girls

Can sense a big whiff about mr Bridger former member on one of the profiles.   

I'm still intrigued... JK1, I appreciate that that this twat assualted you. Whilst you knew the address of his flat, how did you manage to get your sherlock holmes hat on and dig out this old video of him
and able to tie it to him?

Agree about JK1. 11 out of 14 posts are about Alix. He even mentioned that Holly Adams (who retired a long, long time ago) had same contact number.

I raised the above query to him. He has since then logged in numerous times, but avoids replying to my query.

[Avg_Joe]

the whole lot looks fucking dodgy, a simple avoid, blacklist her and any others known to be linked with the neanderthal, even the holly bint if she pops up again, although if retired then probably wont be back, shame she's tainted by that ape, i sure as well wouldn't touch her with a 10 foot barge pole if i knew he was in her history

[Dipper]

Had to laugh at CIM WITH CONDOM!! On one of the reviews!

What a piss taker. £100 for 30. Dream on with the rest at that rate.

Also changes age before your very eyes on the profile... one minute a teen, next she's twenty. 

[Picti]

I raised the above query to him. He has since then logged in numerous times, but avoids replying to my query.

It's this, but also the lack of denial, counter-allegation from her/ them on here or AW. They didn't ever deny the assault on JK1. The eventual moan to Admin suggests panic at the dusty phone, but at the same time some punters are queuing up to leave her positive (and probably false or induced) feedback. That means that some on here could be colluding in this.

I won't say much about JK1s AW account but it looks like he may, or at least wants to be on the periphery of the porn scene, so may have gained information there. It would be helpful for him to respond to the various questions.

I'm not too bothered about him, or this Alix as I've no intention of seeing her. However, it does bother me that some members on here could be playing both sides, and that's against the site ethos of helping / informing other punters. If you saw her and left genuinely positive feedback then have the balls to put a review up. If you were approached to leave her falsely positive feedback, it would be good to hear from you.

[HailWood]

Some interesting detective work there Picti. 
I don't get JK's motivation. Having left a very damming negative, he then fails to follow through as most contributing members would. Are you suggesting that he may have been cooerced following the review and that his possible porn scene connections / intentions were the lever?

[Picti]

Some interesting detective work there Picti. 
I don't get JK's motivation. Having left a very damming negative, he then fails to follow through as most contributing members would. Are you suggesting that he may have been cooerced following the review and that his possible porn scene connections / intentions were the lever?

I was thinking more about how he readily found the video of the fat lad. No idea about his motivation as he won't tell us 

The coercion, influence, inducement I'm more interested in is any resulting in her recent obviously false positive feedback. Or if it's not false, why none of those will state their views openly? White knighting isn't tolerated, but punters with different experiences of the same WG should be able to discuss.

[CoolTiger]

It's this, but also the lack of denial, counter-allegation from her/ them on here or AW. They didn't ever deny the assault on JK1. The eventual moan to Admin suggests panic at the dusty phone, but at the same time some punters are queuing up to leave her positive (and probably false or induced) feedback. That means that some on here could be colluding in this.

I won't say much about JK1s AW account but it looks like he may, or at least wants to be on the periphery of the porn scene, so may have gained information there. It would be helpful for him to respond to the various questions.

I'm not too bothered about him, or this Alix as I've no intention of seeing her. However, it does bother me that some members on here could be playing both sides, and that's against the site ethos of helping / informing other punters. If you saw her and left genuinely positive feedback then have the balls to put a review up. If you were approached to leave her falsely positive feedback, it would be good to hear from you.

Pimp has been member since Aug 2016, so was fully aware of UKP, and all the discussions on her since then. The fact the he simply sat on the side tell you all you need to know. IMHO he was simply observing and any negative comments etc on here were dealt with bumping up of her feedback on AW (either through fake feedback, or asking regular punters to leave further positive feedback, without having gone back to see her). He ONLY decided to report his post AFTER his real life details were exposed on here. IMHO this was his panic moment, as he did not go about the right way, and was duly banned. I have no sympathy for him.

BTW, a couple of members (and non-members) have sent me his real-life details.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=104384



As for JK1, picti great detective work on his AW account. He attempted to see yuffielan. There's already as post on here where she worked with holly adams.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[vw]

As for JK1, picti great detective work on his AW account. He attempted to see yuffielan. There's already as post on here where she worked with holly adams.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Her feedback is hidden now.   

[Picti]

Her feedback is hidden now.   

I just checked and it's not hidden now.

I suspect they know how hidden feedback makes punters very cautious, suspicious, and less likely to proceed. It may also increase the chances that punters would come on here to check for the reasons the feedback's hidden, and in doing so would find her three negative reviews.

They must be running out of punters who are prepared to leave her false positive feedback.

[mrfishyfoo]

They must be running out of punters who are prepared to leave her false positive feedback.

They never learn do they.

Good pro$$ies do well and shite ones ALWAYS eventually come unstuck.

Won't be long now till she's running a second and even a 3rd AWank profile.