...
Jesse, I must ask, why do you think it is report on Saafe that is false (in part) rather than KT being a disgusting and fetid individual? His views about women have been well-documented all over this site, so perhaps it should be not a huge shock that his contempt for women, particularly escorts, would manifest in not only how he behaved in bookings, but with regards to his lack of attention to his own hygiene.
It is also worth considering that many agency escorts are transient and only in London for weeks, if not a few months at a time. Many do not speak English particularly well, and it is doubtful they even know about things like CE, NUM and Saafe to file a report after a booking with KT. Add this to their agents probably telling them that KT is a good customer and it's important that they please him, at all costs. All these things considered, it is perhaps unsurprisingly they are not many reports about KT out in the open.
Everything you say is plausible Dunhill; I respect your judgement, perhaps you're entirely right and us saafe skeptics are wrong.
The single biggest reason I dont trust the saafe thread is that some of the points contradict KT's own claims. E.g. when he said "I don't pull hair, piss on them, face slap them, spit on them, throw them around, bang them hard, spank them ( even though I've been requested too)"
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=364416.150 There's multiple reasons why I believe he's honest. Many a time, when an escort has been cold or disagreeable towards him, triggering a -ve review, he'll still admit she was good looking, sometimes even rating his -ves as high as 9/10 for physical excellence. That thing about not spanking women is something I remember him saying years back - and not when he was defending himself, it was just to express disapproval at other punters doing it. A lot of what he says is consistent with what some of my grandads mates used to say about women - views that are very sexist by today's standards, but still the views of men who in their own way believed in treating woman well.
I could write paragraphs more about why I tend to believe he's honest, and at least 8 other reasons why I suspect the safe thread is a hatchet job. But not really worth it - it would just be possibly entirely wrong speculation. And as said in the other thread, I'm glad he's been perma'd. Some of his own posts showed he *sometimes* treated women horribly. We dont have to trust saafe accounts to know that. And even if the only pressure WGs get is to give him the non extreme services he says he likes (such as DFK when the WG prefers to give only LFK) then its still a good thing he no longer has this site as a platform to give him bargaining power with agency bosses.
