Author Topic: Rochelle - Feline, Nottingham (Read 8351 times)

geoff 1171 · « **on:** August 16, 2017, 06:51:10 am »

External Link/Members Only

After deciding to ditch Adultwork I thought I’d give the agency Feline a try before quitting punting, they seemed to be the only reputable agency with some of their girls getting strong positive reviews. Common sense completely went out of the window and I took my chances by booking a completely new girl, Rochelle, but I got lucky!

I’ve had two bookings with Rochelle, after all the hassles you get with AW (unread/ignored messages, empty promises /lies and cancellations), booking could not have been easier. She arrived early both times, £150 outcall for one hour.

She is exactly as described on the site, the photos are her but don’t do her justice, she’s been on a professional photo shoot and I look forward to seeing those which should be on the site soon. Her body is sensational, the best body I’ve seen in my escorting experience (sorry Ava G, English Fran). She’s only 5’1, petite size 8 but with the most incredible tits, so much bigger than you’d expect on such a petite body, imagine a teenage boy designing his dream girl and you might get the picture. She has an incredible bum, great legs, a gorgeous shaved pussy (RO is another highlight) and is facially attractive. I couldn’t take my hands off her whole body, wonderful soft skin (no tattoos – another positive). She has a pleasant, laid back personality which will serve her well escorting.

Yes, she is 18 and had only been escorting for a week the first time I saw her. I’m not as confident or demanding a punter as many but I was very happy with her service, happy to agree to all my requests. If you’re a more demanding punter it’s maybe unrealistic to expect the same level of service as from older, more experienced escorts. We started with a bit of kissing, a little restrained (at the second booking it was clear she is a smoker). She gave excellent OWO (no CIM). I then explored her amazing body. The sex was great, tried a few positions but missionary was my favourite as it got the best response from her, she clearly loves sex and had convincing orgasms.

Dipper · « **Reply #1 on:** August 16, 2017, 07:45:02 am »

Looks red hot.

HailWood · « **Reply #2 on:** August 16, 2017, 08:50:23 am »

Nice review Geoff. May have to give her a try; may have to reconsider my indie strategy too and try Felines - a Notts agency with a good rep!

NervousJ · « **Reply #3 on:** August 16, 2017, 10:56:59 am »

I've never used an agency before. How does it work, you just ring up and then get given details of where the girl lives or works...

CoolTiger · « **Reply #4 on:** August 16, 2017, 11:16:28 am »

Quote from: NervousJimmy on August 16, 2017, 10:56:59 am

I've never used an agency before. How does it work, you just ring up and then get given details of where the girl lives or works...

With Feline, AFAIR, they have an incall flat in centre of Nottingham, so you could go and see her there. Other Agency girls may also be using the flat.

Altohugh Feline are one of the beeter Agencies in Nottingham, I would still advise punters NOT to have an Outcall to your own home, as these pimps then have your personal details.

Read up on here where VIP Agency has threatened/blackmailed punters as a result of posting a negative OUTCALL review on here.

CoolTiger · « **Reply #5 on:** August 16, 2017, 11:17:36 am »

Quote from: NervousJimmy on August 16, 2017, 10:56:59 am

I've never used an agency before. How does it work, you just ring up and then get given details of where the girl lives or works...

When I last used Feline approx 15 years ago, Rachel used to take the calls and arrange my bookings (they were outcalls to a hotel in Leicester or Nottingham).

Dipper · « **Reply #6 on:** August 16, 2017, 11:21:10 am »

After a little research I've found that there's also an £80 half an hour available.

badsin · « **Reply #7 on:** August 16, 2017, 06:52:40 pm »

Cracking young SP, saw her bout 2 weeks ago. I really knocked the back out of her, and she was gagging for round two, in the hour. I obliged. She is bang up for a two girl with sapphire if any of you guys fancy a teen milf combination

RogerBoner · « **Reply #8 on:** August 16, 2017, 07:21:41 pm »

Catherine - Feline Escort Agency External Link/Members Only
Catherine has a good figure 😵
All I've read about escort agencies on Happy Birthday UKPunting is that all agencies in Nottingham are bad. So are Feline Escorts ok after all?

geoff 1171 · « **Reply #9 on:** August 17, 2017, 02:19:29 pm »

Rochelle's new photos are up, and they look great, yes that really is her!

External Link/Members Only

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #10 on:** August 17, 2017, 03:49:55 pm »

Cheers for the review fella.

Quote from: geoff 1171 on August 17, 2017, 02:19:29 pm

Rochelle's new photos are up, and they look great, yes that really is her!

External Link/Members Only

Fuck me she really is FAF.

Think I may forego my no CIM no punt rule for this one.

m@rk · « **Reply #11 on:** August 17, 2017, 08:01:27 pm »

She really does look the business. Bit too good to be true.. how close is she to her pics?

HailWood · « **Reply #12 on:** August 17, 2017, 08:59:36 pm »

Quote from: geoff 1171 on August 17, 2017, 02:19:29 pm

Rochelle's new photos are up, and they look great, yes that really is her!

External Link/Members Only

Wow - amazing and FAF. Thanks for the review Geoff.

bernie_inn · « **Reply #13 on:** August 18, 2017, 07:46:46 pm »

Hey, are her tits real?

badsin · « **Reply #14 on:** August 19, 2017, 01:47:31 pm »

Quote from: bernie_inn on August 18, 2017, 07:46:46 pm

Hey, are her tits real?

Yes

Stoking · « **Reply #15 on:** August 20, 2017, 02:39:49 pm »

Seen her twice now... fit as fuck and while she has rather extreme bitch face, and absolute laugh and probably one of the most convincing girl out there (in terms of how she reacts to getting fucked). I'm always the pessimist when it comes to fucking WG's and never truely believe they're enjoying it, but I'm feeling like Rochelle is starting to make me think otherwise

Cracking body arse and tits, I will fucking scream if she does the stupid thing many WG's do, by getting fake tits as soon as they can afford it despite not needing the damn things!

Also I can confirm felines do 30 min meets for £80 as Dipper posted. Makes it much easier to try a half hour first, without being stuck to the hours like most agencies.

Quote from: m@rk on August 17, 2017, 08:01:27 pm

She really does look the business. Bit too good to be true.. how close is she to her pics?

Seriously fit as fuck! Amazing natural tits, really responsive to you playing with them, never seen a girl with such a nice arse while bent over.....

I would say the pics are extremely accurate, however obviously it's a professional photo shoot and she's plastered in makeup. You can obviously tell it's her in person, albeit I'd say she looks much younger without all her makeup, looks like a legit faf 16-18yo. My only concern would be if she's younger than advertised.

Hidden Image/Members Only

JimBob · « **Reply #16 on:** August 20, 2017, 02:57:15 pm »

I saw Rochelle on Friday evening and can pretty much vouch for everything that has been said here. Will be seeing her again soon. Might hold off til the second meeting before doing a review

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #17 on:** August 20, 2017, 05:50:06 pm »

Quote from: Stoking on August 20, 2017, 02:39:49 pm

Seen her twice now... fit as fuck and while she has rather extreme bitch face, and absolute laugh and probably one of the most convincing girl out there (in terms of how she reacts to getting fucked). I'm always the pessimist when it comes to fucking WG's and never truely believe they're enjoying it, but I'm feeling like Rochelle is starting to make me think otherwise

Cracking body arse and tits, I will fucking scream if she does the stupid thing many WG's do, by getting fake tits as soon as they can afford it despite not needing the damn things!

Also I can confirm felines do 30 min meets for £80 as Dipper posted. Makes it much easier to try a half hour first, without being stuck to the hours like most agencies.

Seriously fit as fuck! Amazing natural tits, really responsive to you playing with them, never seen a girl with such a nice arse while bent over.....

I would say the pics are extremely accurate, however obviously it's a professional photo shoot and she's plastered in makeup. You can obviously tell it's her in person, albeit I'd say she looks much younger without all her makeup, looks like a legit faf 16-18yo. My only concern would be if she's younger than advertised.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Review ??

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #18 on:** August 20, 2017, 05:50:57 pm »

Quote from: JimBob on August 20, 2017, 02:57:15 pm

I saw Rochelle on Friday evening and can pretty much vouch for everything that has been said here. Will be seeing her again soon. Might hold off til the second meeting before doing a review

Look forwards to reading how good a face fucking she took before you came all over her face.

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #19 on:** August 20, 2017, 05:52:11 pm »

Quote from: badsin on August 16, 2017, 06:52:40 pm

Cracking young SP, saw her bout 2 weeks ago. I really knocked the back out of her, and she was gagging for round two, in the hour. I obliged. She is bang up for a two girl with sapphire if any of you guys fancy a teen milf combination

You gonna review her then as well ??

JimBob · « **Reply #20 on:** August 20, 2017, 09:06:05 pm »

Quote from: mrfishyfoo on August 20, 2017, 05:50:57 pm

Look forwards to reading how good a face fucking she took before you came all over her face.

I wish! This one is very vanilla but there's room for a bit of vanilla every now and again

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #21 on:** August 21, 2017, 12:34:56 am »

Quote from: JimBob on August 20, 2017, 09:06:05 pm

I wish! This one is very vanilla but there's room for a bit of vanilla every now and again

Oooh is she now....

INCOMING !!!

beerbelly · « **Reply #22 on:** August 21, 2017, 08:27:50 pm »

Saw her myself a few weeks back, was going to wait till after a 2nd booking before submitting a review,(for one reason or another not got round to it yet) but the above one confirms my own views at the time. Particularly the restrained kissing, also when I asked if she did CIM she said she "couldn't" as wearing makeup???? a no I don't would have sufficed.

But other than those 2 gripes (more so the kissing) couldn't fault her

TobyJohn15 · « **Reply #23 on:** August 23, 2017, 12:04:47 am »

HI does anybody know if felines 30 minutes offer is only incall or outcall too?

Thanks

PepeMAGA · « **Reply #24 on:** August 23, 2017, 12:26:27 am »

Quote from: Stoking on August 20, 2017, 02:39:49 pm

Seen her twice now... fit as fuck and while she has rather extreme bitch face, and absolute laugh and probably one of the most convincing girl out there (in terms of how she reacts to getting fucked). I'm always the pessimist when it comes to fucking WG's and never truely believe they're enjoying it, but I'm feeling like Rochelle is starting to make me think otherwise

Cracking body arse and tits, I will fucking scream if she does the stupid thing many WG's do, by getting fake tits as soon as they can afford it despite not needing the damn things!

Also I can confirm felines do 30 min meets for £80 as Dipper posted. Makes it much easier to try a half hour first, without being stuck to the hours like most agencies.

Seriously fit as fuck! Amazing natural tits, really responsive to you playing with them, never seen a girl with such a nice arse while bent over.....

I would say the pics are extremely accurate, however obviously it's a professional photo shoot and she's plastered in makeup. You can obviously tell it's her in person, albeit I'd say she looks much younger without all her makeup, looks like a legit faf 16-18yo. My only concern would be if she's younger than advertised.

Hidden Image/Members Only

fucking hell is that her?

Weyoun · « **Reply #25 on:** August 23, 2017, 07:38:08 am »

^ Basically yes but as discussed here and my review her photos are heavily airbrushed. She's very fit but bear the air brushing in mind.

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #26 on:** August 23, 2017, 01:09:37 pm »

Quote from: Weyoun on August 23, 2017, 07:38:08 am

.....as discussed here and my review her photos are heavily airbrushed. She's very fit but bear the air brushing in mind.

Why do agencies do this. Nothing that pisses me off more than doctored photos.

While I'm at it why hasn't OP pointed this out ??

PepeMAGA · « **Reply #27 on:** August 23, 2017, 01:17:58 pm »

Quote from: mrfishyfoo on August 23, 2017, 01:09:37 pm

Why do agencies do this. Nothing that pisses me off more than doctored photos.

While I'm at it why hasn't OP pointed this out ??

Makes a change to have a visible face and the actual girl albeit airbrushed, many agencies use stock photos I think. Agree though, I'd rather have no airbrushing.
Guess for the girl, she can walking down the street and no one will recognise her.

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #28 on:** August 23, 2017, 04:43:14 pm »

Quote from: PepeMAGA on August 23, 2017, 01:17:58 pm

Guess for the girl, she can walking down the street and no one will recognise her.

Yeah well one poster in this string says she's better than her photos and another says she doesn't match up to her photos.

Needs a trusted podger with a track record for being brutal in their descriptions of the lasses to get in there and fuck her. That ain't going to be me as her service seems IMHO to be too vanilla for the money that's being charged.

geoff 1171 · « **Reply #29 on:** August 23, 2017, 05:01:42 pm »

In my opinion the photos have not been doctored.
I agree with Stoking

Quote from: Stoking on August 20, 2017, 02:39:49 pm

I would say the pics are extremely accurate, however obviously it's a professional photo shoot and she's plastered in makeup.
Hidden Image/Members Only

If any of us went on a professional photo shoot I guess some might even look presentable!

I guess there are two important questions to be answered.
After the photos and reviews would any punter be disappointed in her body in any way? – Absolutely NOT. I said in my review she has the best body I’ve ever seen, what I didn’t say it was the best by some distance. Her tits, pussy, legs, stomach (oops nearly forgot her arse!!)….. are the best I’ve seen.
Would anyone be disappointed by her looks? A harder question to answer because it is so subjective. I think most of us realise it is a pro photo shoot and she’s covered in make up but I found her attractive.

I’ll raise one issue not previously mentioned, yes, there is room for improvement in the kissing experience and because she is so young, unless you’re in your early/mid twenties it’s stretching credibility a bit too far to expect a credible girlfriend experience. This is about great sex with a girl who loves it and has a body beyond your wildest dreams.

I’m not at all surprised the agency have put her up in a hotel room so that east midlands punters can form an orderly queue but I have a feeling she’ll be around for some time.

PepeMAGA · « **Reply #30 on:** August 23, 2017, 06:04:01 pm »

Quote from: geoff 1171 on August 23, 2017, 05:01:42 pm

In my opinion the photos have not been doctored.
I agree with StokingIf any of us went on a professional photo shoot I guess some might even look presentable!

I guess there are two important questions to be answered.
After the photos and reviews would any punter be disappointed in her body in any way? – Absolutely NOT. I said in my review she has the best body I’ve ever seen, what I didn’t say it was the best by some distance. Her tits, pussy, legs, stomach (oops nearly forgot her arse!!)….. are the best I’ve seen.
Would anyone be disappointed by her looks? A harder question to answer because it is so subjective. I think most of us realise it is a pro photo shoot and she’s covered in make up but I found her attractive.

I’ll raise one issue not previously mentioned, yes, there is room for improvement in the kissing experience and because she is so young, unless you’re in your early/mid twenties it’s stretching credibility a bit too far to expect a credible girlfriend experience. This is about great sex with a girl who loves it and has a body beyond your wildest dreams.

I’m not at all surprised the agency have put her up in a hotel room so that east midlands punters can form an orderly queue but I have a feeling she’ll be around for some time.

She looks much older than her started age in the photos, is she more youthful in person? (not a criticism, but those photos I would put her mid 20s)

Weyoun · « **Reply #31 on:** August 23, 2017, 06:42:35 pm »

In the flesh she looks her age which I would say is around 18-20. I'd pretty much agree with geoff in regard to her body and use of make up.

Stoking · « **Reply #32 on:** August 24, 2017, 11:48:14 pm »

Quote from: PepeMAGA on August 23, 2017, 06:04:01 pm

She looks much older than her started age in the photos, is she more youthful in person? (not a criticism, but those photos I would put her mid 20s)

In all honesty she certainly looks her advertised age in person.

As others have said the photo's are obviously her, airbrushing fairly minimal (aka no scars etc). Just more general smoothing that any WG would do with 5 seconds using the edit feature all windows computers come with in windows 10.

That being said her makeup was noway near as thick as on that photo, which obviously is going to make her look older. I doubt any WG would bother seeing it's going to be ruined 5 minutes into a meet anyway.

One think I would disagree on is whether she'll be about for a while. I know she's going to further education (uni or otherwise) after the holidays so she might be moving away.....

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #33 on:** August 25, 2017, 12:23:03 am »

Quote from: Stoking on August 24, 2017, 11:48:14 pm

In all honesty she certainly looks her advertised age in person.

As others have said the photo's are obviously her, airbrushing fairly minimal (aka no scars etc). Just more general smoothing that any WG would do with 5 seconds using the edit feature all windows computers come with in windows 10.

That being said her makeup was noway near as thick as on that photo, which obviously is going to make her look older. I doubt any WG would bother seeing it's going to be ruined 5 minutes into a meet anyway.

One think I would disagree on is whether she'll be about for a while. I know she's going to further education (uni or otherwise) after the holidays so she might be moving away.....

With all the typing you've done on this string you could have written your own review by now.

Stoking · « **Reply #34 on:** August 25, 2017, 09:34:08 pm »

Quote from: mrfishyfoo on August 25, 2017, 12:23:03 am

With all the typing you've done on this string you could have written your own review by now.

Everytime someone hints about me making one I refuse to do another review.

In all seriousness, because of how green she is, I'm waiting for a few more visits before I write a review. I've had such positive experiences with her so far in comparison to other WG's, I'm being a bit pessimistic and I'm convinced she'll lower her standards soon enough.

RogerBoner · « **Reply #35 on:** August 25, 2017, 10:26:11 pm »

Quote from: Stoking on August 25, 2017, 09:34:08 pm

Everytime someone hints about me making one I refuse to do another review.

In all seriousness, because of how green she is, I'm waiting for a few more visits before I write a review. I've had such positive experiences with her so far in comparison to other WG's, I'm being a bit pessimistic and I'm convinced she'll lower her standards soon enough.

I too have a bit of fluff about my person. I may be completely wrong but I suspect that Stoking likes her too much to review her. It's his girl getting over-reviewed and part of him is possessive and he secretly wants her for himself.

mrfishyfoo · « **Reply #36 on:** August 26, 2017, 01:59:42 pm »

Quote from: Stoking on August 25, 2017, 09:34:08 pm

In all seriousness, because of how green she is, I'm waiting for a few more visits before I write a review. I've had such positive experiences with her so far in comparison to other WG's, I'm being a bit pessimistic and I'm convinced she'll lower her standards soon enough.

I'm with you there.

I wrote a review for a lass in Leeds of a punt that was first class and subsequently there was a stampede. I then ended up red carding her.

I suspect you are right that this lass will not be able to "keep going" and she'll burn out.

As ever we will see.

m@rk · « **Reply #37 on:** August 16, 2018, 01:08:23 pm »

Rochelle is back... working this week.

Trying to arrange calendar so i can get

Dipper · « **Reply #38 on:** August 16, 2018, 02:37:49 pm »

Quote from: m@rk on August 16, 2018, 01:08:23 pm

Rochelle is back... working this week.

Trying to arrange calendar so i can get

thanks for the info.

Needed to sample her for a long time.

And she’s still 18

lol. Lauren also looks worth a try.

m@rk · « **Reply #39 on:** August 16, 2018, 03:15:38 pm »

Hopefully childbirth hasn't taking its toll on her body..

Im tempted to see fay. Not sure which one first..

Jb1981 · « **Reply #40 on:** August 17, 2018, 03:29:59 pm »

I’ve been tempted by felines but always unsure due to lack of services listed or whether to expect extras. Is there a way of enquiring which of the girls are ok with anal?

badsin · « **Reply #41 on:** August 17, 2018, 04:26:18 pm »

Quote from: Jb1981 on August 17, 2018, 03:29:59 pm

I’ve been tempted by felines but always unsure due to lack of services listed or whether to expect extras. Is there a way of enquiring which of the girls are ok with anal?

You can ask, doubt you'll get answer over the phone