Author Topic: The Phoenix Club London - Paddington  (Read 3426 times)


162 review(s) for Phoenix Parties (145 positive, 12 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by puntingpumping1920]

Offline Full Moon

Brief review

Thursday - I've been about 6 times this year, so I should really start reviewing the place. First time at the new venue.

External Link/Members Only

Location: London - Paddington

Duration: 2hr for £160

Communication: Phone call and a confirmation text.

Girls:

Mel - Replaced by Lila, alerted via twitter
Kasia
Monique 
Talida
Sandra

Service: Round 1 - Oral with Talida, good technique and eye contact, this eventually led into some 69. Condom on and into missionary with her legs as far back as they could go, pounding away. Quick change to some doggy for a different perspective and back into a deep missionary to unleash my first load.

I had some oral from Sandra during this time, to get me hard for round 2.

Round 2 - Kasia, started out with some oral on me, consistently one of the best working girls for oral imo, well what I've experienced at least. Kasia's very playful and is pretty much a sex fanatic. On with the condom and into a side doggy position, my hand firmly around her neck until I came.   

Round 3 - Punters were tiring as this point so much of the action congregated around a single bed towards the end. Myself and two other punters with Monique and Talida. Again I received oral from Talida to get me hard and then on with the condom. Pounded her in doggy until I came for the third time, she was being spit-roasted during this.
 

Conclusion: Positive - Including myself 6/7 punters attended. The new venue is pleasant, from some of the previous descriptions on the venue I was expecting a decrepit place, far from the truth - it probably helps that I delayed my visit until they settled in a bit more. All girls were engaging and motivated - yes I will continue to visit.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2017, 09:12:43 pm by Full Moon »

TT115

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
how was Lila's attitude at this party?

Offline Full Moon

how was Lila's attitude at this party?

I personally didn't engage with her, but others did and they seemed perfectly pleased.

TT115

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I personally didn't engage with her, but others did and they seemed perfectly pleased.

I partied with Lila a few times she seems to have this obnoxious attitude, most times while youre being intimate with her she would completely blank you turn her head away and be fully focused on another bloke talking about a topic shes mildly interested in like what country they are from something like that which is a complete boner killer

Offline SirCharles

how was Lila's attitude at this party?
TT115, alias Emma: also using UKP to check the performance of your employees? You should pay UKP for this service...

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
TT115, alias Emma

The conspiracy theories are really getting stupid now.  :wacko:

He's been banned for being a white knight, not for being a pimp in disguise.

Why on earth would Emma write this about one of her girls??   :unknown:

I partied with Lila a few times she seems to have this obnoxious attitude, most times while youre being intimate with her she would completely blank you turn her head away and be fully focused on another bloke talking about a topic shes mildly interested in like what country they are from something like that which is a complete boner killer

FWIW, Lila can be easily distracted but I don't think she means any malice by it, it's just her kooky, flighty personaity. She does have the ability to concentrate on the task at hand and easily makes it into the top half of the Gallery for me. Quite a few other girls I would say goodbye to before her.  :hi:




Offline Full Moon

TT115, alias Emma: also using UKP to check the performance of your employees? You should pay UKP for this service...

Looking back at his posts I'm certain he Isn't Emma. Commenting on posts regarding Soho; not necessarily posting truly positives posts on TPC and the incoherence of some of his posts.

I think some are yearning for a conspiracy here, when there isn't one.

Offline SirCharles

The conspiracy theories are really getting stupid now.  :wacko:

He's been banned for being a white knight, not for being a pimp in disguise.

Why on earth would Emma write this about one of her girls??   :unknown:

FWIW, Lila can be easily distracted but I don't think she means any malice by it, it's just her kooky, flighty personaity. She does have the ability to concentrate on the task at hand and easily makes it into the top half of the Gallery for me. Quite a few other girls I would say goodbye to before her.  :hi:
There is no conspiracy here just facts and ratings: Emma is reading all of this and has people supporting her overpriced business lije you and all the others banned;
Lila is a liability who can only work at discount in my opinion: no need of flighty personalities or whatever, she has to suck cocks and make people happy with that..is it so difficult?

Offline SirCharles

The conspiracy theories are really getting stupid now.  :wacko:

He's been banned for being a white knight, not for being a pimp in disguise.

Why on earth would Emma write this about one of her girls??   :unknown:

FWIW, Lila can be easily distracted but I don't think she means any malice by it, it's just her kooky, flighty personaity. She does have the ability to concentrate on the task at hand and easily makes it into the top half of the Gallery for me. Quite a few other girls I would say goodbye to before her.  :hi:
VT pls tell me instead how is Alexia from TPC and ifcyou ever met her...i may have come across with her and, if her, it has been a disaster

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
There is no conspiracy here just facts and ratings: Emma is reading all of this and has people supporting her overpriced business lije you and all the others banned;
Lila is a liability who can only work at discount in my opinion: no need of flighty personalities or whatever, she has to suck cocks and make people happy with that..is it so difficult?

Look mate, if you think it's overpriced and the girls are crap, don't go. No-one is forcing you to.   :hi:

You are inventing conspiracies, TT115 clearly isn't Emma, if you want to jump on the bandwagon, you at least need to need to keep it believable!  :wacko:

Lila does suck cock, but it's a party. You can't expect every girls' 100% attention 100% of the time as there are other guests. If you want that, you need to book a 1-2-1.


vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
VT pls tell me instead how is Alexia from TPC and ifcyou ever met her...i may have come across with her and, if her, it has been a disaster

Yes, I have met Alexia. I've no idea if that girl you met is her. But I notice she is no longer on the TPC gallery.

There's probably a good reason why she's not there. I wouldn't have recommended a 1-2-1 with her based on her party performance.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2017, 01:34:10 am by vt »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I partied with Lila a few times she seems to have this obnoxious attitude, most times while youre being intimate with her she would completely blank you turn her head away and be fully focused on another bloke talking about a topic shes mildly interested in like what country they are from something like that which is a complete boner killer

That's 6 of you TPC cunts now banned, white knight, threats, touting, what a bunch of twats trying to undermine UKP, you will not succeed, sooner or later you will be found out. :thumbsdown:

As to this review I am glad to hear TPC are alerting punters to changes to the advertised rota on their Twitter and I hope by phone if a punter rings them after 11.30am or so, and I hope this is now the way they operate all the time.

And I am glad to hear the max ratio wasn't exceeded and hope that continues at EVERY party for ALL punters.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Look mate, if you think it's overpriced and the girls are crap, don't go. No-one is forcing you to.   :hi:

You are inventing conspiracies, TT115 clearly isn't Emma, if you want to jump on the bandwagon, you at least need to need to keep it believable!  :wacko:

Lila does suck cock, but it's a party. You can't expect every girls' 100% attention 100% of the time as there are other guests. If you want that, you need to book a 1-2-1.

What bandwagons that, admin and thanks to him has banned 6 posters related to TPC who have tried to undermine UKP, not seeing a bandwagon here, I am seeing a purge of TPC related low lifes.:thumbsdown:

 TT115 wasn't Em in my view, I knew they were dodgy from day 1 though, fucking white knight prick. :thumbsdown: TPC touts, white knight fanboys and those who make snide threats aren't welcome on UKP as they are finding out. Genuine punters who aren't touts or white knight fanboys on here to tout and defend TPC are welcome.

 For punters unaware DO NOT give TPC any real details like your real name etc because if you dare challenge them on here at a later date like I have for exceeding the max ratio of 2.1 and not informing punters of the changes to the advertised rota as some have reported, things that have hopefully been sorted now, we shall see, they may try to out you as they tried with me, either themselves or by giving a white knight fanboy banned off here for being that and slagging off UKP the name I gave them years ago, a false name fortunately for me. :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: August 15, 2017, 02:02:06 am by smiths »

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
The conspiracy theories are really getting stupid now.  :wacko:

He's been banned for being a white knight, not for being a pimp in disguise.

Why on earth would Emma write this about one of her girls??   :unknown:

FWIW, Lila can be easily distracted but I don't think she means any malice by it, it's just her kooky, flighty personaity. She does have the ability to concentrate on the task at hand and easily makes it into the top half of the Gallery for me. Quite a few other girls I would say goodbye to before her.  :hi:

VT I did imagine you would be the first on the so called bandwagon to protect the tarnished image of TPC. I was just wondering what would you coin next to deviate the topic and there you have it - conspiracy.

It would have been a conspiracy if it had happened once - 6 times and you still don't get it ?

No offence, I gave a positive for the experience I had at TPC, which I am considering should be amended to Neutral at best. The point is TPC needs to stop trying to fix their business by talking crap on UKP, trying to advertise here and instead actually do it. Positive reviews will then follow.

If you read back the comments by TT115, the disguised low life was trying hard to get back at negative comments made here about Em, goes on justifying the running cost of the place, in fact made one attempt of hiding in the plain sight by making a constructive negative comment.

UKP members are smart and intuitive enough to call bullshit, when it sees one.

Admin has made the ruling based on facts -now if you are calling that a conspiracy, you might be the one who has to get off the bandwagon and take a walk, instead of trying to protect TPC in every freaking instance.

Regardless to say if Anyone wants to tout or white-knight, UKP is not the place to be.


Offline SirCharles

Yes, I have met Alexia. I've no idea if that girl you met is her. But I notice she is no longer on the TPC gallery.

There's probably a good reason why she's not there. I wouldn't have recommended a 1-2-1 with her based on her party performance.
Thank you

An tUasal Liathroid Mor

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I see that we are still on this...never-ending...discussion.........as someone with 150+ visits to LMP/TPC....dating back to 2004....let me make a few comments....

1.  Yes....without doubt...the 'standard' has decreased from its peak...c 2007 to 2011....both in terms of quality of service from the ladies and increased price level.....these points...EM.....needs to address.

2. As regards...the attitude of some of the current girls...yes...I also unfortunately encountered Alexia and Lila/Gina recently....disgraceful attitude and performance to paying customers.


Overall.....as I mentioned in a previous thread on this subject.....EM needs to do a root and branch cleanout and review of the whole operation...in terms of service levels.....then pricing will not be an issue.

One final point....allbeit ...a more personal view......I thought the comments in a previous thread re. EM and her daughters to be totally dispicable....and reflects the thoughts of a sad perverted twat.....a totally pathetic loser...
« Last Edit: August 15, 2017, 09:03:51 am by An tUasal Liathroid Mor »

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
VT I did imagine you would be the first on the so called bandwagon to protect the tarnished image of TPC. I was just wondering what would you coin next to deviate the topic and there you have it - conspiracy.

It would have been a conspiracy if it had happened once - 6 times and you still don't get it ?

No offence, I gave a positive for the experience I had at TPC, which I am considering should be amended to Neutral at best. The point is TPC needs to stop trying to fix their business by talking crap on UKP, trying to advertise here and instead actually do it. Positive reviews will then follow.

If you read back the comments by TT115, the disguised low life was trying hard to get back at negative comments made here about Em, goes on justifying the running cost of the place, in fact made one attempt of hiding in the plain sight by making a constructive negative comment.

UKP members are smart and intuitive enough to call bullshit, when it sees one.

Admin has made the ruling based on facts -now if you are calling that a conspiracy, you might be the one who has to get off the bandwagon and take a walk, instead of trying to protect TPC in every freaking instance.

Regardless to say if Anyone wants to tout or white-knight, UKP is not the place to be.

I am the first to admit the various failings of TPC and have done so many times, supporting efforts to improve things for punters and I'm not out to 'protect' or 'white-knight' it in any area where it has proven not to deliver a good punter experience, but when Sir Charles comes here with the totally unbelievable conspiracy theory that Em is disguising herself as a punter, I think someone should call it out as bullshit.

The fact remains that there are still a number of us that enjoy the party experience. I've tried out quite a few other parties in recent months to try and get an objective view. Whilst I enjoyed most of them, as they all delivered aspects that were fun, they all have various aspects that could be improved to make them perfect. I believe that TPC has its place in that spectrum, the low ratio and quality of many of the girls there justifies a premium over parties that are somewhat cheaper, but whose ratios and/or quality of girl are not as favourable. At £80ph, it is still cheap punting in relative terms.

I am keen to try the new venue after a 2 month gap and to see if Em has taken note of punter feedback on here. The gallery does certainly look as if it's had a makeover, some lazy girls have been lost and there are a number of new girls and returnees that I am eager to meet. When the right line-up appears I will be going again.

Obviously, as I will be putting my own hard-earned on the line, I don't want a disappointing experience, so all power to any that are holding providers to account and are genuinely trying to improve the punter experience at all parties, but I do believe that some who haven't been near the place, like Sir Charles and TrevorN, do see this as a bandwagon to jump on and troll endlessly.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2017, 09:38:37 am by vt »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I am the first to admit the various failings of TPC and have done so many times, supporting efforts to improve things for punters and I'm not out to 'protect' or 'white-knight' it in any area where it has proven not to deliver a good punter experience, but when Sir Charles comes here with the totally unbelievable conspiracy theory that Em is disguising herself as a punter, I think someone should call it out as bullshit.

The fact remains that there are still a number of us that enjoy the party experience. I've tried out quite a few other parties in recent months to try and get an objective view. Whilst I enjoyed most of them, as they all delivered aspects that were fun, they all have various aspects that could be improved to make them perfect. I believe that TPC has its place in that spectrum, the low ratio and quality of many of the girls there justifies a premium over parties that are somewhat cheaper, but whose ratios and/or quality of girl are not as favourable. At £80ph, it is still cheap punting in relative terms.

I am keen to try the new venue after a 2 month gap and to see if Em has taken note of punter feedback on here. The gallery does certainly look as if it's had a makeover, some lazy girls have been lost and there are a number of new girls and returnees that I am eager to meet. When the right line-up appears I will be going again.

Obviously, as I will be putting my own hard-earned on the line, I don't want a disappointing experience, so all power to any that are holding providers to account and are genuinely trying to improve the punter experience at all parties, but I do believe that some who haven't been near the place, like Sir Charles and TrevorN, do see this as a bandwagon to jump on and troll endlessly.

There is NO conspiracy here or band wagon except for 6 now banned posters with more on here touting and white knighting TPC. :thumbsdown:  You and your touting white knighting ilk who defend TPC at every turn either blatantly or in a more subtle way will NOT succeed in undermining UKP. :thumbsdown:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
There is NO conspiracy here or band wagon except for 6 now banned posters with more on here touting and white knighting TPC. :thumbsdown:  You and your touting white knighting ilk who defend TPC at every turn either blatantly or in a more subtle way will NOT succeed in undermining UKP. :thumbsdown:

You didn't read what I said smiths.

1. Sir Charles came up with a 'conspiracy theory' that Em was disguising herself as TT115. You have also said that you don't believe this to be true, so we are saying exactly the same thing there, there is no conspiracy.

2. I said that posters like Sir Charles & TrevorN VIEW the various threads that have been critical of TPC as a 'bandwagon' that they want to jump on and add their unhelpful & inaccurate trolling posts. As a case in point, Sinz & yourself wouldn't support TrevorN's comments about gangbanging Em & her daughters, this was him trying to jump on what HE SAW as a 'bandwagon', that was my point.

All power to any genuine efforts to get party providers to match the reality with the advertising and to improve things for punters.

Now, a genuine question...How can someone say something genuinely positive about TPC on here without getting accused of being a 'tout' or a 'white-knight'? Do those of us who still enjoy attending have to lie about it and adopt the unremittingly negative tone to be accepted?  :unknown:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
You didn't read what I said smiths.

1. Sir Charles came up with a 'conspiracy theory' that Em was disguising herself as TT115. You have also said that you don't believe this to be true, so we are saying exactly the same thing there, there is no conspiracy.

2. I said that posters like Sir Charles & TrevorN VIEW the various threads that have been critical of TPC as a 'bandwagon' that they want to jump on and add their unhelpful & inaccurate trolling posts. As a case in point, Sinz & yourself wouldn't support TrevorN's comments about gangbanging Em & her daughters, this was him trying to jump on what HE SAW as a 'bandwagon', that was my point.

All power to any genuine efforts to get party providers to match the reality with the advertising and to improve things for punters.

Now, a genuine question...How can someone say something genuinely positive about TPC on here without getting accused of being a 'tout' or a 'white-knight'? Do those of us who still enjoy attending have to lie about it and adopt the unremittingly negative tone to be accepted?  :unknown:

More shit as usual, you are full of it but then you are a TPC tout and white knight always on hand to step in to try to help them.:thumbsdown:

 I haven't accused the OP of this review of being a tout or white knight on this thread. I will be posting warning punters about not giving TPC their real details if I see a TPC review, that just might help a punter who dares criticise TPC getting outed by them or their low life punters of whom 6 have so far been banned, total scum all of them. :thumbsdown:

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
More shit as usual, you are full of it but then you are a TPC tout and white knight always on hand to step in to try to help them.:thumbsdown:

 I haven't accused the OP of this review of being a tout or white knight on this thread. I will be posting warning punters about not giving TPC their real details if I see a TPC review, that just might help a punter who dares criticise TPC getting outed by them or their low life punters of whom 6 have so far been banned, total scum all of them. :thumbsdown:

I've only ever called out bullshit when I see it. Sir Charles was posting bullshit about Em being TT115, you didn't think she was, so what's wrong with that?  :unknown:


Offline thetinman007

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,059
  • Likes: 5
  •  
  • Reviews: 13
More shit as usual, you are full of it but then you are a TPC tout and white knight always on hand to step in to try to help them.:thumbsdown:

 I haven't accused the OP of this review of being a tout or white knight on this thread. I will be posting warning punters about not giving TPC their real details if I see a TPC review, that just might help a punter who dares criticise TPC getting outed by them or their low life punters of whom 6 have so far been banned, total scum all of them. :thumbsdown:

So punters of TPC are low life scum? All of them or just a select few?
Banned reason: Needs to review
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
So punters of TPC are low life scum? All of them or just a select few?

The 6 so far banned as I said.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I've only ever called out bullshit when I see it. Sir Charles was posting bullshit about Em being TT115, you didn't think she was, so what's wrong with that?  :unknown:

 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Just to put the case to rest, the punter Full moon the OP here, posted a positive review and to be honest no one has any issues with his review or Positive experience.

Hence, if a positive review is genuine no one has an issue.

The issue arises when low life's start creating fake accounts just to tout for TPC. So before we devivate from topic again, the whole discussion above has been about a banned tout and not the OP.

VT appreciate your detailed breakdown and response.

Offline SirCharles

I see that we are still on this...never-ending...discussion.........as someone with 150+ visits to LMP/TPC....dating back to 2004....let me make a few comments....

1.  Yes....without doubt...the 'standard' has decreased from its peak...c 2007 to 2011....both in terms of quality of service from the ladies and increased price level.....these points...EM.....needs to address.

2. As regards...the attitude of some of the current girls...yes...I also unfortunately encountered Alexia and Lila/Gina recently....disgraceful attitude and performance to paying customers.


Overall.....as I mentioned in a previous thread on this subject.....EM needs to do a root and branch cleanout and review of the whole operation...in terms of service levels.....then pricing will not be an issue.

One final point....allbeit ...a more personal view......I thought the comments in a previous thread re. EM and her daughters to be totally dispicable....and reflects the thoughts of a sad perverted twat.....a totally pathetic loser...
150+ visits and....4 reviews? Thanks for your (poor) support...
Also, let me clarify:
1. I had 10vists at TPC in past 2.5 yrs, but 30-40 1o1 with the girks i like..i prefer extreme parties like Bi-gang, otherwise 1o1, and this is the VT pundit/EM's friend fir benefits (but i appreciate his reviews)
2. EM is a pimp, she sells  girls at TPC and the same girls for private, which is fine, no judgement from me it's only her probs...but an arrogant and botox washed pimp who thinks to be smarter than punters by buying some of them, ripping off or threating others it's a no go zone for me...ifshe isnot making the money she used to do isnot mine or our problems...ihave already my own problems!
3. She calls her daughter glamour models but they are (very arrogant) dicksuckers so, let's call everyone for what it is
4. I am not in afantasy world, and i want to call people for what they are and what they do- i work hard to make my money(and no limited budget as some idiot said) and do not accept ripped off, not by low quality low life people
Happy punting everyone and long life to UKP

Offline SirCharles

We are talking too much of low life losers, we must simply post more reviews imo