Author Topic: The elephant in the room.  (Read 18666 times)

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
The innocent looking backslappers and attempted thread lockers.

Its even sadder when you realise they don't even understand that they are part of the claque.

Offline Devon Maverick

One reason that  Portfolio  might get a lot of reviews that hasn't been mentioned  is that for whatever reason they Seem to have quite a few young girls coming and going. Also checking the reviews there are certain favourites with quite a few different posters by the look. and within the numbers abounding in Cardiff that probably makes a difference. Another point not mentioned is reliability, I have suffered from that and been let down by some independents on the day. Or before.   I would hope and expect  ANY  agency would be more reliable as they charge more. If an Agency let me down I would find that unacceptable, and would certainly stop using them. I suppose it is the confidence factor to an extent when diving into the 'unknown'

Also I and  a few others probably do see regular Escorts that we have  reviewed before so don't review again, I certainly do. And don't review again  as everything is similar, but if meeting someone new I post a review.
Needless to say I will be much more concise next time I review anyone or wear my bullet proof outfit and be prepared for the pleasant challenges !! But again I will say as long as not being dishonest or false in any shape or form you should be entitled to post and review as you feel but yes I do take into consideration and listen to what others are saying. Even if not always agreei If I am only trying to help Having been helped by others on here!! Both in posts and PM ...so thanks for that too

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

Oh good grief!  Elvis does speak to you, doesn't he? Maybe you should change your screen name to Joe McCarthy.  I'm not, and I seriously doubt anyone else is, colluding with anyone.  This whole business is pretty bloody anonymous and you're throwing conspiracy theories of allegiances around on a punting board to promote an agency we (and I include you in that, are you part of the Claque?) haven't even visited??!  Maybe you need to get out more, or perhaps go book a Portfolio girl and have a shag, and then perhaps write a review in the interests of objectivity.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Another point not mentioned is reliability, I have suffered from that and been let down by some independents on the day.
and your reviews reflect that do they ?

Also I and  a few others probably do see regular Escorts that we have  reviewed before so don't review again, I certainly do. And don't review again  as everything is similar, but if meeting someone new I post a review.

some punters review many times

for instance this guy

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=97846

2 for chloe and 4 for kandice and sure he had one merged.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2017, 05:14:31 pm by vw »

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Oh good grief!  Elvis does speak to you, doesn't he? Maybe you should change your screen name to Joe McCarthy.  I'm not, and I seriously doubt anyone else is, colluding with anyone.  This whole business is pretty bloody anonymous and you're throwing conspiracy theories of allegiances around on a punting board to promote an agency we (and I include you in that, are you part of the Claque?) haven't even visited??!  Maybe you need to get out more, or perhaps go book a Portfolio girl and have a shag, and then perhaps write a review in the interests of objectivity.

You've not reviewed any girls from Portfolio, have you? So you weren't someone who was seemingly involved in any of this until you started complaining.
No-one had suggested you were doing anything wrong. But now? Sometimes people really do protest too much

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126

for instance this guy

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=97846

2 for chloe and 4 for kandice and sure he had one merged.

Interesting
35 out of his last 38 posts have been about Portfolio girls

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You've not reviewed any girls from Portfolio, have you? So you weren't someone who was seemingly involved in any of this until you started complaining.
No-one had suggested you were doing anything wrong. But now? Sometimes people really do protest too much

And nor have you, and correct me if I'm wrong but you were one of the first to offer his opinion on the subject.  Mine is as valid as yours and unlike you I'm not complaining about the reviews, or their proliferation, merely that you're talking bollocks about conspiracy theories.  And in response to one of my posts you provided a link to a wikipedia page about claques, which I and I'm sure others took to mean you were suggesting I was doing something wrong.  How about you get of your soap box.  Why are you involved?  You don't review girls in Wales (south) so what concern is it of yours?  Does it affect who you're going to book?  Does it influence your choice?  If any of the answers are no I suggest you go forth and procreate.

Offline Placebo88

Perhaps the answer is to introduce a standardised scoring system, much as CAMRA do with their beer scoring.
As a first attempt, how about:

0. No shaggable girls present. Walking is imperative.
1. Poor. Girl that is anything from barely shaggable to shaggable with considerable resentment.
2. Average. Clean, presentable girl who doesn't inspire in any way, not worth walking but you shag the girl without really noticing.
3. Good. Good girl in good form. You may cancel plans to leave after 30 minutes. You want to stay for another fuck and may seek out the girl again.
4. Very Good. Excellent girl in excellent condition giving an excellent fuck
5. Perfect. Probably the best you are ever likely to find. A seasoned punter will award this score very rarely.

As opposed to what? There is already a rating system and you can then read the reviews themselves if you want more detail and an idea of just how good the reviewer found the booking. No such thing as standardised when personal opinions are the deciding factor, have you seen the ridiculous Out Of Ten looks rating guide on here?

Overall standard of escorts available in an area will determine locals ideas of good and bad. East Midlands a good example, from touring punters reviews came across as if a few of their favourites were big fish in a small pond. A sign of a proper quality escort is how well her reviews travel.

If all the welsh punters are happy with what they are getting then maybe leave them to it. Why not make a few bookings yourself to find out the truth, funny how a list of positives deters rather than encourages you. Touring escorts in Wales are usually lapped up as well so they may be an easily pleased bunch. If they all have a 'standardised' set of 'standards' then the reviews will work for them.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
And nor have you, and correct me if I'm wrong but you were one of the first to offer his opinion on the subject.  Mine is as valid as yours and unlike you I'm not complaining about the reviews, or their proliferation, merely that you're talking bollocks about conspiracy theories.  And in response to one of my posts you provided a link to a wikipedia page about claques, which I and I'm sure others took to mean you were suggesting I was doing something wrong.  How about you get of your soap box.  Why are you involved?  You don't review girls in Wales (south) so what concern is it of yours?  Does it affect who you're going to book?  Does it influence your choice?  If any of the answers are no I suggest you go forth and procreate.

Maybe if you want to be insular join walespunting.cymru

What next will you be demanding the thread gets locked?
« Last Edit: August 14, 2017, 05:31:33 pm by vw »

Offline Devon Maverick

Virtua if the meeting falls through I don't review at all ..and give the benefit of the doubt ..the times I have had an issue were in Bristol though not Wales. Last time I was given the escort's phone number from AW early on and did all texting from then with the arrangements on there only to be let down by 'illness' early evening on the day. Again I gave the benefit of the doubt but wasted a Hotel Trip. I would not take a chance and risk a second time because of that ..in retrospect I should maybe have used the AW booking system too and not phone texts.

Because I could not be sure of how genuine the cancelation was or not  I never posted a negative ..would not want to cause potential damage if she was ill ..


slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Maybe if you want to be insular join walespunting..boyo

So who put you in charge... waster?  No, leave the thread open by all means.  It's quite fun troll-hunting.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
And nor have you, and correct me if I'm wrong but you were one of the first to offer his opinion on the subject.  Mine is as valid as yours and unlike you I'm not complaining about the reviews, or their proliferation, merely that you're talking bollocks about conspiracy theories.  And in response to one of my posts you provided a link to a wikipedia page about claques, which I and I'm sure others took to mean you were suggesting I was doing something wrong.  How about you get of your soap box.  Why are you involved?  You don't review girls in Wales (south) so what concern is it of yours?  Does it affect who you're going to book?  Does it influence your choice?  If any of the answers are no I suggest you go forth and procreate.

Others had spotted the problem before me, I just happened to ask a few questions.
Yes I complained about the reviews, because it was apparent that a number of them are fluffy nonsense written by fanbois of the agency.
As regard the claque link, I was answering a question from you. I did not say you were part of a claque, however your subsequent behaviour shows a good candidature for guilt by association.
As for my not reviewing women in South Wales, its only a matter of time before work takes me there, and when I do I expect the reviews to be as reliable as they are in other parts of the country. At present they are not. They are full of fluffy bollocks, and its clear that objective standards have slipped. My interest is in preserving the quality standards of the reviews on this site, and my belief is that at present many of the reviews in your area are inaccurate or biased.
We already know that Portfolio have made past attempts to manipulate the Welsh board. Its my belief that they - and possibly some of the other welsh agencies - are still doing so. The absence of "bad" agency reviews is a strong indicator of this.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Virtua if the meeting falls through I don't review at all ..and give the benefit of the doubt ..the times I have had an issue were in Bristol though not Wales. Last time I was given the escort's phone number from AW early on and did all texting from then with the arrangements on there only to be let down by 'illness' early evening on the day. Again I gave the benefit of the doubt but wasted a Hotel Trip. I would not take a chance and risk a second time because of that ..in retrospect I should maybe have used the AW booking system too and not phone texts.

Because I could not be sure of how genuine the cancelation was or not  I never posted a negative ..would not want to cause potential damage if she was ill ..

up to you really but your just highlights the negatives that go missing.  I expect many don't review the agency honestly as not to get blocked for all girls. Anyone active out of interest pm me as i do lots of outcalls and want to know who is a waster.

I do find it odd though girls leaving these agencies seem to get more profile problems than most, another idea for a thread i think.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Virtua if the meeting falls through I don't review at all ..and give the benefit of the doubt ..the times I have had an issue were in Bristol though not Wales. Last time I was given the escort's phone number from AW early on and did all texting from then with the arrangements on there only to be let down by 'illness' early evening on the day. Again I gave the benefit of the doubt but wasted a Hotel Trip. I would not take a chance and risk a second time because of that ..in retrospect I should maybe have used the AW booking system too and not phone texts.

Because I could not be sure of how genuine the cancelation was or not  I never posted a negative ..would not want to cause potential damage if she was ill ..

You made a booking, the booking failed.
In my view that's a negative whatever the cause. If there were known extenuating circumstances post them in mitigation, but it is still a negative

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So who put you in charge... waster?  No, leave the thread open by all means.  It's quite fun troll-hunting.

Trolls on this forum are the fake reviewers, fluffies and whiteknights.  You seem fond of these, can i ask did you used to be called randolph69?

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
..........If all the welsh punters are happy with what they are getting then maybe leave them to it. Why not make a few bookings yourself to find out the truth, funny how a list of positives deters rather than encourages you. Touring escorts in Wales are usually lapped up as well so they may be an easily pleased bunch. If they all have a 'standardised' set of 'standards' then the reviews will work for them.

But that's part of the problem isn't it? The welsh punters aren't simply writing for the benefit of themselves, but for the whole site: any one of us could travel there on holiday or for work. Just as welsh punters sometimes cross the Severn Bridge. Saying "let them get on with it" is a way to head for balkanisation of the website, with each separate geographic area following its own standards.

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Others had spotted the problem before me, I just happened to ask a few questions.
Yes I complained about the reviews, because it was apparent that a number of them are fluffy nonsense written by fanbois of the agency.
As regard the claque link, I was answering a question from you. I did not say you were part of a claque, however your subsequent behaviour shows a good candidature for guilt by association.

Has your butt plug come out, as you seem to be talking out of your arse.

As for my not reviewing women in South Wales, its only a matter of time before work takes me there, and when I do I expect the reviews to be as reliable as they are in other parts of the country. At present they are not.

Why should your reviews be reliable when others that are favourable to a particular girl (and remember they are reviews for the girls themselves, not the agency) are deemed "fluffy"? Why does your opinion count for more than others?

They are full of fluffy bollocks, and its clear that objective standards have slipped. My interest is in preserving the quality standards of the reviews on this site, and my belief is that at present many of the reviews in your area are inaccurate or biased.

Again, your opinion, based on what exactly?  You yourself have proven that it's not a small group of punters promoting the agency, so seriously, what IS your point?

We already know that Portfolio have made past attempts to manipulate the Welsh board. Its my belief that they - and possibly some of the other welsh agencies - are still doing so. The absence of "bad" agency reviews is a strong indicator of this.

Again with the foil hat.  I'm also sure that the agencies do what they can to promote themselves here, but again you have proven your own argument to be false.  Do you think you're blessed with more intelligence than us that live in Wales?  Why is it your duty to oreserve the quality standards?  Who died and made you the King of Standards?  We are quite capable of reading reviews and making up our own minds as to the voracity and accuracy, thank you very much.  Or is there an ulterior motive?  Given your prolific posting and high number of reviews in such a short space of time are you perhaps angling for a position of authority on this site, moderator or admin perhaps?  And how have you time for work when all you seem to do is fuck prostitutes day in and day out?

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Touring escorts in Wales are usually lapped up as well so they may be an easily pleased bunch. If they all have a 'standardised' set of 'standards' then the reviews will work for them.
If i was a escort with a few bad reviews i would come to wales to clean the recent bad history.

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Trolls on this forum are the fake reviewers, fluffies and whiteknights.  You seem fond of these, can i ask did you used to be called randolph69?

The trolls are the ones causing issues where there are none. Fluffies and white knights are annoying yes because the information is unreliable, but it's the trolls that start stupid pointless arguments and fling shit and accusations around without actual evidence. They thrive on conflict, upping their post counts and doing nothing but trying to curry favour.   

And no, I've only ever had one account and this is it, but thanks for asking.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
The trolls are the ones causing issues where there are none. Fluffies and white knights are annoying yes because the information is unreliable, but it's the trolls that start stupid pointless arguments and fling shit and accusations around without actual evidence. They thrive on conflict, upping their post counts and doing nothing but trying to curry favour.   

And no, I've only ever had one account and this is it, but thanks for asking.

Pointless argument?  More like a wake up call to the Wales board.

This thread has highlighted many good points including that portfoilio write faker reviews for himself and probably still do.  Expect more to come out as this unravels.

As for evidence there is plenty, the site owner posted he has banned them for this and the review statistics are unbelievable for an agency and something is not right.

Anyway if you feel it is trolling report the posts. 

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Pointless argument?  More like a wake up call to the Wales board.

This thread has highlighted many good points including that portfoilio write faker reviews for himself and probably still do.  Expect more to come out as this unravels.

As for evidence there is plenty, the site owner posted he has banned them for this and the review statistics are unbelievable for an agency and something is not right.

Anyway if you feel it is trolling report the posts.

Why should I report the posts?  It's a free and open forum for all opinions.   And I'm pretty sure we in Wales are awake, but thanks for looking out for us dumb hillbilly sheep-shaggers   :hi:

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Has your butt plug come out, as you seem to be talking out of your arse.

Oh dear....when out of ideas resort to ad hominem attacks.....predictable

Quote
Why should your reviews be reliable when others that are favourable to a particular girl (and remember they are reviews for the girls themselves, not the agency) are deemed "fluffy"? Why does your opinion count for more than others?

As I said before, you've not posted any of the suspect reviews, so your fluffiness wasn't under question, which makes your comments the more remarkable. What are you trying to hide?

Quote
Again, your opinion, based on what exactly?  You yourself have proven that it's not a small group of punters promoting the agency, so seriously, what IS your point?
Self evident from the reviews which read as film score hagiographies

Quote
Again with the foil hat.  I'm also sure that the agencies do what they can to promote themselves here, but again you have proven your own argument to be false.  Do you think you're blessed with more intelligence than us that live in Wales?
I make no claim to intelligence. I merely report the shit I see, which others seem to overlook

Quote
Why is it your duty to oreserve the quality standards?  Who died and made you the King of Standards?  We are quite capable of reading reviews and making up our own minds as to the voracity and accuracy, thank you very much.
It should be an imperative on all members of the site to ensure the information posted is accurate, true and unbiased. However the information on the Welsh board fails

Quote
Or is there an ulterior motive?  Given your prolific posting and high number of reviews in such a short space of time are you perhaps angling for a position of authority on this site, moderator or admin perhaps?
I am not angling for such a position, and I think such a position is very unlikely to come my way. Have you ever read Admin's comments about how the site is managed? I suggest you do.

Quote
And how have you time for work when all you seem to do is fuck prostitutes day in and day out?
That's an irrelevant question which won't get an answer because its none of your business

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Why should I report the posts?  It's a free and open forum for all opinions.   And I'm pretty sure we in Wales are awake, but thanks for looking out for us dumb hillbilly sheep-shaggers   :hi:

What you are saying then is your troll accusations are baseless and would not back them up by reporting them. Seems nobody reports anything untoward on the wales board.

I am 1/4 welsh and punt with and review many Wales based escorts, so have a vested interest in the wales board.  Yet more bollocks you post.   :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Offline Placebo88

But that's part of the problem isn't it? The welsh punters aren't simply writing for the benefit of themselves, but for the whole site: any one of us could travel there on holiday or for work. Just as welsh punters sometimes cross the Severn Bridge. Saying "let them get on with it" is a way to head for balkanisation of the website, with each separate geographic area following its own standards.

Punters can only review based on their own experiences and standards that they are used to. I'd argue that most punters only stick within their own region. Not sure what you expect them to write or use for comparison to ' national standards '. It could be that the escorts being reviewed are properly good, even by outsiders standards. If there are guys visiting Wales and making bookings where are their reviews to add an outside perspective to things. East Midlands Mandy was raved about by the locals, the hype was tempered by a couple of touring punters being underwhelmed. Same as the Scottish thinking that Celtic and Rangers were decent football teams, lucky they had European competitions to prove how lowly they are by better countries standards. You don't know the answers until it happens, why not find out in person, speculation is never going to be conclusive.


slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Oh dear....when out of ideas resort to ad hominem attacks.....predictable
Is that the only bit of latin they taught you?

As I said before, you've not posted any of the suspect reviews, so your fluffiness wasn't under question, which makes your comments the more remarkable. What are you trying to hide?
The square root of fuck all.  Just because I haven't reviewed them or seen a girl from Portfolio doesn't assume that I never will.  So these reviews are of more benefit to me than to you, but I'm able to distinguish the fluff from the substance without having it pointed out by you, as I suspect most people here are.  If the reviews are fluff, how come more than one trusted punter has also left good reviews?  Is it because the girl actually was good (I know this may come as a bit of a novel concept for you, given your apparent exceptionally high standards) or is it because seasoned punters have been swayed by the agency?

It should be an imperative on all members of the site to ensure the information posted is accurate, true and unbiased. However the information on the Welsh board fails
We get by, thanks.

That's an irrelevant question which won't get an answer because its none of your business

So how are the voracity of reviews for agency girls any of yours?  You said yourself you punt in the north west, not South Wales.  So why so much concern for us down here?

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
What you are saying then is your troll accusations are baseless and would not back them up by reporting them. Seems nobody reports anything untoward on the wales board.
Maybe we're a little more tolerant and take pity on the poor souls who have nothing to do but post continually on a punting forum.  Or perhaps we can see bollocks when we read it and just move right along.

I am 1/4 welsh and punt with and review many Wales based escorts, so have a vested interest in the wales board.  Yet more bollocks you post.   :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

None of your reviews have been posted on the Wales Board.  Outcall and tourers aside, what interest do you have apart from being vaguely welsh? Perhaps you feel we're lacking a certain je ne sais quoi when it comes to being able to spot fake reviews. 

np500

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I look forward to a similar list for the top agency's in every other region to see where we really stand on this, are we the only region with this anomaly ? Has anyone done this ?  I can see the points raised , but would like to know if the issues are the norm or not ? Off out, cheers.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Maybe we're a little more tolerant and take pity on the poor souls who have nothing to do but post continually on a punting forum.  Or perhaps we can see bollocks when we read it and just move right along.

None of your reviews have been posted on the Wales Board.  Outcall and tourers aside, what interest do you have apart from being vaguely welsh? Perhaps you feel we're lacking a certain je ne sais quoi when it comes to being able to spot fake reviews.

Clearly you hate people who contribute to the forum it seems and have a chip on your shoulder about being Welsh.

Are you aware this is uk punting, my reviews of wales based girls are searchable and viewable by all those that research before, even the Welsh punters can see them.  Do you realish how close wales is to England?

as for this agency, visit this page

External Link/Members Only

Makes it very relevant to me that they cover the south west also.

I will post where i like and call out what i want and discuss any shady patterns as i see them.

Glad this has made many more punters aware that this agency has history of fake reviews, and we all know history repeats itself.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Is that the only bit of latin they taught you?
its the only bit thats relevant, though I guess you are approaching the point where doli incapax has to be invoked to understand your meaning

Quote
The square root of fuck all.  Just because I haven't reviewed them or seen a girl from Portfolio doesn't assume that I never will.  So these reviews are of more benefit to me than to you, but I'm able to distinguish the fluff from the substance without having it pointed out by you, as I suspect most people here are.  If the reviews are fluff, how come more than one trusted punter has also left good reviews?  Is it because the girl actually was good (I know this may come as a bit of a novel concept for you, given your apparent exceptionally high standards) or is it because seasoned punters have been swayed by the agency?
We get by, thanks.
No-one has said ALL the reviews are untrusted. Just some
As for "getting by". That phrase suggests that something is wrong and being worked around

Quote
So how are the voracity of reviews for agency girls any of yours?  You said yourself you punt in the north west, not South Wales.  So why so much concern for us down here?
I punt all over the country, but for reasons of my own not for the last six or seven months. It may well be that my jobs send me to south wales soon, in which case these reviews are important to me, in the meantime they are important to any other vistors - but of course English visitors are discouraged aren't they?

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Clearly you hate people who contribute to the forum it seems and have a chip on your shoulder about being Welsh.

psssst... I'm not welsh, I just live here.  So you and your assumptions are a tad wrong  :cool:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
psssst... I'm not welsh, I just live here.  So you and your assumptions are a tad wrong  :cool:

good luck with the asylum claim, did reddevil guarantee you safe passage through the valley.   :D


Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
I look forward to a similar list for the top agency's in every other region to see where we really stand on this, are we the only region with this anomaly ? Has anyone done this ?  I can see the points raised , but would like to know if the issues are the norm or not ? Off out, cheers.

Here in the NW there are relatively few reports from agency girls on UKP - users of agencies tend to post more on another Manchester based forum which we know is corrupt. Those who do post on UKP tend to be rather more critical than those who post on the other forum.
My own view is that we're touching the tip of the iceberg here - the smaller size of the Wales board makes the problem more visible. However I certainly don't have the time to carry out the required analysis

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
i see this thread has resulted in the spotlight shining on wales and getting these 3 profiles banned. after my mention of his multiple reviews

king072016, jayj77, giliman007
some punters review many times

for instance this guy

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=97846

2 for chloe and 4 for kandice and sure he had one merged.

« Last Edit: August 14, 2017, 06:54:09 pm by vw »

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
psssst... I'm not welsh, I just live here.  So you and your assumptions are a tad wrong  :cool:

but to paraphrase a certain lady "You would say that wouldn't you..."

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
i see this thread has resulted in the spotlight shining on wales and getting these 3 profiles banned. after my mention of his multiple reviews

king072016, jayj77, giliman007

Well that proves something

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
but to paraphrase a certain lady "You would say that wouldn't you..."

Well if you were Welsh you'd know that welshmen would rather walk on hot Lego before ever saying  they were English  :thumbsup:

np500

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well if you were Welsh you'd know that welshmen would rather walk on hot Lego before ever saying  they were English  :thumbsup:

Fair point , as the English would rather walk on hot coles than say thay were Welsh ! and I married an English woman, hang on !  I punt ?  :dash:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Fair point , as the English would rather walk on hot coles than say thay were Welsh ! and I married an English woman, hang on !  I punt ?  :dash:

Arranged marriage was it ?   :lol: :lol:

Offline Mil 34

Have the family forgiven you yet red 😂

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Fair point , as the English would rather walk on hot coles than say thay were Welsh ! and I married an English woman, hang on !  I punt ?  :dash:

Ewe must be joking

slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Fair point , as the English would rather walk on hot coles than say thay were Welsh ! and I married an English woman, hang on !  I punt ?  :dash:

External Link/Members Only

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126


slimboyo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest


SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
i see this thread has resulted in the spotlight shining on wales and getting these 3 profiles banned. after my mention of his multiple reviews

king072016, jayj77, giliman007

Never understood why some people feel the need to have multiple accounts. What a waste of time and effort, don't they realise Admin will catch them eventually?

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Never understood why some people feel the need to have multiple accounts. What a waste of time and effort, don't they realise Admin will catch them eventually?

Key word is "eventually"
In the meantime he's been able to indulge in the kind of forum pollution we've been discussing. Appears as three different people, acting as cheerleaders and trying to influence opinion. The more who cheer, the more who will join in

Offline Mikeh38

Well hopefully it may wake up a few of the fluffy s on this forum, there are people who will post fake reviews, and try to influence the people here, and no offence most of the folks here fell hook line and sinker for the reviews. I have no doubt he was associated to Portfolio, and as I said him being found out pretty much destroys Chloe's reputation in my eyes and we all know Portfolio are a discredited agency.

Said it before and I'll say it again their reports should be pulled from this site, there's just too much proof now that they are manipulating this site for their own means.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,740
  • Likes: 544
  •  
  • Reviews: 126

Said it before and I'll say it again their reports should be pulled from this site, there's just too much proof now that they are manipulating this site for their own means.

Difficult, because its clear that some of the reviews ARE for real.
The other problem is that as I skim-read the reviews while counting them, I came to the conclusion that its not just Portfolio who are gaming the system: I think at least two other agencies are as well, though it would be bloody hard to prove: I would need several days to pull the stats, days I don't have at present.
If you were to pull all the reviews for the agencies concerned you wouldn't have much left....
« Last Edit: August 14, 2017, 09:12:33 pm by scutty brown »

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well hopefully it may wake up a few of the fluffy s on this forum, there are people who will post fake reviews, and try to influence the people here, and no offence most of the folks here fell hook line and sinker for the reviews. I have no doubt he was associated to Portfolio, and as I said him being found out pretty much destroys Chloe's reputation in my eyes and we all know Portfolio are a discredited agency.

Said it before and I'll say it again their reports should be pulled from this site, there's just too much proof now that they are manipulating this site for their own means.

Admin has left reviews up in the past unless there is proof that the visit didn't actually take place.