Author Topic: Sexy Lucy Angel (aka Miss Cute Amber) - borderline neutral - Canary Wharf  (Read 3346 times)


3 review(s) for SEXY LUCY ANGEL (2 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by The_Don]

Offline agcnospam

New profile for this girl, I have previously reviewed her but as this is a new profile I thought an update would be useful to others.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Previous profile - External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Comms - via text, comms were good until the time of the punt, when I was asked to wait "1 minute" (I thought, god here we go), but was then texted the full address and flat number after about a 3 minute wait. Then, up into the block, found the flat no problem, but I had to knock on the door about 5 times (louder and louder), and was waiting outside the flat door about 3-4 minutes until Amber opened up, after I had called the number (but it rang out). It felt like longer standing outside the door, but I believe that they use a maid/receptionist hence the comms issues (which others have commented on).
Venue - modern apartment in Canary Wharf   
Duration - 1 hour
Fee - £140 (£120 basic + £20 CIM)
Services - OWO/CIM/RO/COB/LFK/Protected Sex
Girl - She was wearing a TINY pair of Daisy Duke denim shorts and a tight white t-shirt, which showed her body off superbly well - which made me feel a bit better about life.
Brief punt summary - The punt was fine, I love Amber's look and she seems to be getting a bit better service-wise (OWO was better, I paid £20 extra from CIM). Sex in spoons, doggy (her ass is lovely and the view in doggy is memorable), and reverse CG on the edge of the bed (another nice view). First pop CIM, second over her enhanced DD tits.

I also spoke to her flatmate Cindy a bit, she is not as good looking as Amber, but is friendly, seems outgoing, tall, slim, and if I had to guess I'd say a little bit older than Amber - not a total stunner but pretty enough. For info they did say that a duo was on offer, not sure what the rate for that is though. Cindy's profile is below;

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Amber's body is banging IMHO (as per the pics), and she is facially pretty, but her service is a bit passive (she needs to be directed), and her English is ok but not great, which may explain her occasional reticence. I believe she and Cindy are in Canary Wharf until next weekend.

I'd grade this as a positive punt based on her looks and body, which is reduced to borderline neutral based on the comms issues (others have commented on this), patchy service, and her slightly passive nature and need to be directed.

The pics below were taken in the flat I met her in, so are bang up to date.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,385
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
Thanks for the review and linking her old profile.

Which will add some back-ground info for genuine punters that are researching these A/W, I'D on UKP.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,385
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
Back again

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

    
+447718397489


Quote
CIM
CIM (at discretion)
Cross Dressing
Domination (giving)
Face Sitting
Facials
French Kissing
French Kissing (discretion)
Hand Relief
Lapdancing
Massage
Modeling
Oral
Oral without Protection
Parties
Smoking (Fetish)
Spanking
Striptease
Watersports (Giving)

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline pepsicolaboy

Thanks for your original review OP and glad it tipped over the line to Positive for you

Shame about the negative review on this SP on this profile and old profile/swaps before (had a quick look, seems attached to negative reviews as well)  :thumbsdown:

This is a perfect example of someone that could make an absolute bundle being £60/£80 for 30 mins and hour & £100/120 for 1 hour
with a few extra services thrown in free. like Rimming (giving) + Anal/CIM (definately in the 1 hour)

IMO London is crying out for good SPs like that...at least until they get popular and their comms become shit or their prices go hiked  :lol:

She has the looks & the body, sadly let down by mixed reviews, a lack lustre service reported and poor comms




« Last Edit: February 18, 2018, 05:30:22 pm by pepsicolaboy »

Offline ss100

The kind of blond I go for. P+D only for me though due to poor service.

Offline pepsicolaboy

The kind of blond I go for. P+D only for me though due to poor service.
Agreed sir.

Do review if you go!

I cant see a 15 min service, if you get a price be happy to hear it

 :hi:

Offline agcnospam

Met Amber again this week (3rd time I've met her overall), had a good time with her and she looks better than ever. The pics on the profile are pretty much up to date (some of them taken this week) and her look does it for me big time.

Decent session, OWO, DFK, sex (doggy and CG the highlights for me), CIM (£20 extra), and filming (with a mask - £50 extra). She is so photogenic the filming was well worth it for me, a fine addition to my little collection of home movies.

Comms were fine and timing was spot on, only slight neg I would say is that her oral was a bit toothy but I told her and she adjusted her style.

For those who are not aware, she has had various profiles and issues in the past with comms, cancellations etc, but I have not had any issues and I would recommend her for those that value looks, as she is IMHO a little stunner and her service seems to be getting better too.

FlyingBreadMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Met Amber again this week (3rd time I've met her overall), had a good time with her and she looks better than ever. The pics on the profile are pretty much up to date (some of them taken this week) and her look does it for me big time.

Decent session, OWO, DFK, sex (doggy and CG the highlights for me), CIM (£20 extra), and filming (with a mask - £50 extra). She is so photogenic the filming was well worth it for me, a fine addition to my little collection of home movies.

Comms were fine and timing was spot on, only slight neg I would say is that her oral was a bit toothy but I told her and she adjusted her style.

For those who are not aware, she has had various profiles and issues in the past with comms, cancellations etc, but I have not had any issues and I would recommend her for those that value looks, as she is IMHO a little stunner and her service seems to be getting better too.

Is her friend Cindy back too?

InstaPunt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Is her friend Cindy back too?

From coms she appears to be her handling her own texts, but don’t quote me on that. Also said Cindy not with her.

Offline agcnospam

From coms she appears to be her handling her own texts, but don’t quote me on that. Also said Cindy not with her.

Not sure if Cindy is here, cos Amber's in a hotel this trip not a flat like they usually seem to be.

Just to add I also think she is doing her own comms, and she said she planned to stay two weeks, so until around the weekend 3/4 March.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,385
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
She has the looks & the body, sadly let down by mixed reviews, a lack lustre service reported and poor comms

I rank service and attitude above looks and body type. But to be blunt some punters don't see it as that. There happy (to pay over the odds) for a sub standard service/attitude. If a W/G fits what they are looking for (looks and body type). Its their money not mine, so if that how they are willing to spent it so be it. If they do a review that great that there willing to share, some one else may find it useful.






IMO London is crying out for good SPs like that.



We are lucky (in the respect of choice) compared to other parts of the UK.  There are many good (and bad) W/G in London.


Punting some times is about taking a chance.

If you don't like what you see, hear or feel. Walk away without handing over any money  :timeout:





at least until they get popular and their comms become shit or their prices go hiked  :lol:




I said before, it up to the W/G what price she set/charges. Some punters will pay, others will not and move on.



« Last Edit: February 22, 2018, 07:50:51 am by The_Don »

Offline pepsicolaboy




We are lucky (in the respect of choice) compared to other parts of the UK.  There are many good (and bad) W/G in London.

Thanks for referencing your older posts that cover my questions

 :hi:

Offline agcnospam

Hi chaps

Sorry to bump an old thread, just wondering if anyone out there has any up to date contact/profile info for this WG?

Thanks in advance!



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only