Fragile ego's

[cueball]

I'm seeing more and more members threatening to stop contributing because they've received criticism on a post or a review.

What the bloody hell is wrong with them 

Are they so far up their own arses that they cannot handle a bit of flak?

Do they want us to reply with a "please don't go"?

Not from this lad, I'd say fuck off if your ego is so fragile that you can't handle opinions from other members.

What do you lads think?

[vw]

2 members already have shown how to take footballs home already this morning.

I fully expect their egos wanted us to beg them to stay, expect they will come back and post about vitriol, bulling, vile and other words members of this ilk often use.

Sad individuals IMO

[lewisjones23]

They are always the ones who in reports put that they made the WG cum multiple times 

a) who cares
b) they deffo didnt
c) why do people see it as some sort of goal

[freeze44]

Agree CB and as still a relative newbie took me a while to 'get it' and understand the history of the site. Suppose to be fair it's difficult for someone new if not used to internet forums and has to 'learn' the way this site works and how important it is to challenge bullshit etc.

Mistakes I made, and still likely to make some, was not to read up on the advice fully and take things easy at first as suppose easy to get wrapped up in the hobby and being like a 'kid in a sweet shop'. Some of them sweets been very tasty!

Felt like a learner driver at times and beginning to get it now but that don't come easy always..well not for a dumb fuck like me 

[Blue Moon]

Not from this lad, I'd say fuck off if your ego is so fragile that you can't handle opinions from other members.
What do you lads think?

I agree. This is a forum that's open to all members and we all have the right to our own opinions. Assuming that anyone disagreeing with a reviewer does it in a reasonable manner, they should agree to disagree and move on. Having a problem with an alternative view about an SP usually betrays some White Knightness lurking about (IMO)    Bm

[smiths]

I'm seeing more and more members threatening to stop contributing because they've received criticism on a post or a review.

What the bloody hell is wrong with them 

Are they so far up their own arses that they cannot handle a bit of flak?

Do they want us to reply with a "please don't go"?

Not from this lad, I'd say fuck off if your ego is so fragile that you can't handle opinions from other members.

What do you lads think?

I have noticed the same thing, man up or ship out, UKP is an adult punting forum where low lifes come to tout their product. Its right that posters get challenged and criticised.

And to those that cant stop moaning about review threads being derailed as they see it, sometimes some of us have to get our hands dirty sussing and drawing out low lifes be them touts or trolls.

[bearcat69]

I pertinent post cueball. Completely agree with you.

The internet is often an unhappy place for those that cannot take opposing opinions. Least of all a paid sex review site.

The way some go on, I think some posters think this is Facebook or Reddit or something. It's not, it's really not.

Oh well, all praise and respect to admin for keeping this place in order, and to those posters that continue to challenge the dodgy. For without them this site would not be the priceless resource it is.

[Zweihander7]

They are always the ones who in reports put that they made the WG cum multiple times 

a) who cares
b) they deffo didnt
c) why do people see it as some sort of goal

Making a random woman cum is not really an achievement (its much easier for some women than others), but making multiple women cum definitely is (particularly, as most women cant come from penetration, only clit stimulation)

Altho any guy going on about how he always makes WGs cum is definitely talking a load of BS

[Chorley]

I've only been on here a few weeks, but what a great site.
Most members on here are sound and not nearly as hostile as I'd been led to believe.

I'd agree that some members are very odd, such as a now banned member who told me I wasn't allowed to question his dodgy post (been a member for almost 2 years, no posts or reviews, then posts a link to a WG's website and a gushing review) because I was a newbie.   

Maybe I was wrong, but as I say he's now banned, so perhaps not.

[Happyjose]

I'm sure many of the self-deluded, the cuntstruck fanboys, prossies and pimps would love to see this site become snowflake central.

Ironically the compaints - usually along the lines of 'no wonder people are afraid to contribute with the attitude of some' - is clearly at odds with the fact that the site grows and goes from strength to strength.

I also don't agree with the suggestion that posters should make their point if in disagreement and politely move on.  Bollocks to that if someone is here to cause mischief. The banned section is elegant proof that the ethos and integrity of the site needs to be defended robustly.

Similar points made on Smiths excellent thread   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=132894.0

[Blue Moon]

I also don't agree with the suggestion that posters should make their point if in disagreement and politely move on.  Bollocks to that if someone is here to cause mischief. The banned section is elegant proof that the ethos and integrity of the site needs to be defended robustly.

I was suggesting that the reviewer should move on, not the member who disagrees with him. If a reviewer bites back purely to defend an SP - presumably to curry favour with her - then he should be brought to heel.    Bm

[hendrix]

Criticism of a review is one thing (I've had plenty as any look at my history would show ) - but outright lies about bareback being provided to me (and others) by certain prossies is hard to accept. Especially as some "established" members seem to prefer gossip via pm rather than factual reviews. 

That doesn't particularly make me want to review further because these scum always appear and get away with it by then going quiet and disappearing for a while.

[Marmalade]

Agree CB and as still a relative newbie took me a while to 'get it' and understand the history of the site. Suppose to be fair it's difficult for someone new if not used to internet forums and has to 'learn' the way this site works and how important it is to challenge bullshit etc.

Mistakes I made, and still likely to make some, was not to read up on the advice fully and take things easy at first as suppose easy to get wrapped up in the hobby and being like a 'kid in a sweet shop'. Some of them sweets been very tasty!

Felt like a learner driver at times and beginning to get it now but that don't come easy always..well not for a dumb fuck like me 

Well that's the difference. You've apparently learnt and joined the club. (At least I'm assuming so although you seemed to me a bit of a twat on off-topic who gives a fuck, that's just chit chat).

The whole point is that the site only flourishes by dint of punters who call a spade a spade instead of what their floosie prossie princess would like them to call it. Newbies often say, "Oh give them a chance" but in practice if people are cossetted they think that it's ok to be a silly fluffy so it's better (in my opinion) to be brutally honest at the first signs of someone being a twat. At least then they have a chance to realise it's not a knitting club. 

[Plan R]

They should try not allowed. Probably feel right at home with all the easily offended cunts on there.

[hungrypunt]

Its mirrored in society nowadays sadly. You cant say or do fuck all without someone "having" to report it, instead of either

A Ignore the person giving you the shit/joke/sacrasm whatever
B Give as good as you get
C Accept and move on in a lighthearted way.

i was watching a programme last night, about the cops, people calling in, because someone had text messaged a girl and guy , she was white he was black/mixed, and the message said something along the lines of, "hope you like getting the black cock" this was reported to the police, the police spent man hours on it,researched and went down and arrested some knob at his house, that had nothing better to do with his time. (obvs a sad wanker)

There were other instances, similar in vein, but in my mind ALL of em were keyboard warriors, who could have just bee told "yeah cheers wanker" do one, or whatever then get on with your life, block etc.
Its like a school fuckin playground played out on the interweb.

People just need to grow a pair and stand up for themselves. Some of the post reports on here do make me laugh though.

[mrfishyfoo]

They are always the ones who in reports put that they made the WG cum multiple times 

a) who cares
b) they deffo didnt
c) why do people see it as some sort of goal

a) Some of us actually like to give. 

b) What utter fucking bollocks. 

c) Is it ??

I accept that not all pro$$ies cum and I accept that the majority of them are hard nosed bitches BUT my experience is that a pro$$ie that is "enjoying herself" will give me a better service than one that isn't.

[vw]

a) Some of us actually like to give. 

b) What utter fucking bollocks. 

c) Is it ??

I accept that not all pro$$ies cum and I accept that the majority of them are hard nosed bitches BUT my experience is that a pro$$ie that is "enjoying herself" will give me a better service than one that isn't.

Talk of the devil.   

[mrfishyfoo]

I'm seeing more and more members threatening to stop contributing because they've received criticism on a post or a review.

What the bloody hell is wrong with them 

Are they so far up their own arses that they cannot handle a bit of flak?

Do they want us to reply with a "please don't go"?

Not from this lad, I'd say fuck off if your ego is so fragile that you can't handle opinions from other members.

What do you lads think?

I think there are too many punters "putting the pro$$ie" first.

Pro$$ies are there to serve their clients not the other way round.

The sooner these punters recognise this the better.

[mrfishyfoo]

Talk of the devil.   

I certainly don't make them all cum. 

[hendrix]

I certainly don't make them all cum. 

I've never made any of them cum, so *applause*

[James999]

I certainly don't make them all cum. 

If any punter believes he is pleasuring a pro$$ie then he should apply the Acid test, suggest he doesn't pay,  after all if he pleasures her that much she would see him for the enjoyment she gets from him 

Pro$$ies are masters at faking it and flattering egos 

[mrfishyfoo]

Pro$$ies are masters at faking it and flattering egos 

Couldn't agree more. 

[mrfishyfoo]

I've never made any of them cum, so *applause*

Damn it....they've certainly had me well fooled then.

Best have a word with myself. 

[Jimmyredcab]

If any punter believes he is pleasuring a pro$$ie then he should apply the Acid test, suggest he doesn't pay,  after all if he pleasures her that much she would see him for the enjoyment she gets from him 

Pro$$ies are masters at faking it and flattering egos 

Indeed ---------- or even ask the pro$$ie to meet up for a drink ------------- that should bring you down with a bump.

We are walking ATMs, nothing more.   

[Belgarion]

Criticism of a review is one thing (I've had plenty as any look at my history would show ) - but outright lies about bareback being provided to me (and others) by certain prossies is hard to accept. Especially as some "established" members seem to prefer gossip via pm rather than factual reviews. 

That doesn't particularly make me want to review further because these scum always appear and get away with it by then going quiet and disappearing for a while.

Yeah, I just put it down to bitterness on their sides and carry on.

I definitely do not review all my punts, especially the ones I put through AW.

An idiot accused me of lying in one but was asking me somewhere else for info.

Then when you highlight some people post shit, you get the people accusing you of white knighting when it is apparent the review is BS.

I've basically identified a few people on the site that I take seriously, the rest, I just laugh at them.

Not worth the hassle. Stick to the site ethos and ignore the bitter folk

[SamLP]

It's not only punters who can't take a bit of flak and throwing their toys out of the pram, I recall a few getting the huff because they reviewed a wg and no-one commented on their review.
Some seem to review for ego purposes and to please the wg. They revel and expect a virtual slap on the back to feed their egos, and will make their punt seem spectacular to draw out the comments.
Whereas I see more benefit in simple reviews rather than ego pleasing ones.

[mrfishyfoo]

We are walking ATMs, nothing more.   

Hilarious. 

One of the lasses I see asked me what sized tits she should get next. Of course I asked her why she was asking me and got told "You're buying them."

That made me smile as she well and truly reminded me of my "value" to her.

[hendrix]

It's not only punters who can't take a bit of flak and throwing their toys out of the pram, I recall a few getting the huff because they reviewed a wg and no-one commented on their review.
Some seem to review for ego purposes and to please the wg. They revel and expect a virtual slap on the back to feed their egos, and will make their punt seem spectacular to draw out the comments.
Whereas I see more benefit in simple reviews rather than ego pleasing ones.

Mcfly did that. Definite sign of a egotistical fruitloop.

[cat1144]

i am immune to criticism 

water off a cat's back 

[hendrix]

Yeah, I just put it down to bitterness on their sides and carry on.

I definitely do not review all my punts, especially the ones I put through AW.

An idiot accused me of lying in one but was asking me somewhere else for info.

Then when you highlight some people post shit, you get the people accusing you of white knighting when it is apparent the review is BS.

I've basically identified a few people on the site that I take seriously, the rest, I just laugh at them.

Not worth the hassle. Stick to the site ethos and ignore the bitter folk

I think when someone constantly makes snide accusations about a WG (and by default, punters that have seen her) that they've never seen, under the pretence of "pm gossip" then I have to conclude that they are a rival WG or a pimp who is losing business. We have a few here for sure, but they'll get found out. They always do. Just a shame that members that should know better sometimes support these pimps.

[vw]

I think when someone constantly makes snide accusations about a WG (and by default, punters that have seen her) that they've never seen, under the pretence of "pm gossip" then I have to conclude that they are a rival WG or a pimp who is losing business. We have a few here for sure, but they'll get found out. They always do. Just a shame that members that should know better sometimes support these pimps.

Is that the one your rebuttal mentioned him WKing maxes?

[hungrypunt]

I asked a girl straight out once about some hard fucking. An SA girl, and I followed it up with how do you know, you havent seen me yet.

Her reply, well youve got a cock and youve got a wallet, simple

Ah, Danni, how honest, 

[cueball]

Talk of the devil.   

  now don't be damaging his ego 

[hendrix]

Is that the one your rebuttal mentioned him WKing maxes?

Yep, that's certainly one of them.

[bearcat69]

a) Some of us actually like to give. 

b) What utter fucking bollocks. 

c) Is it ??

I accept that not all pro$$ies cum and I accept that the majority of them are hard nosed bitches BUT my experience is that a pro$$ie that is "enjoying herself" will give me a better service than one that isn't.

I think there are too many punters "putting the pro$$ie" first.

Pro$$ies are there to serve their clients not the other way round.

The sooner these punters recognise this the better.

Way I see it, she's serving me by giving me a good orgasm. As long as I am clean, respectful of her boundaries, on time and paying the correct fee then I do expect that as a minimum of good service.

If she's having fun, well good for her... But I'm not there to provide her with orgasms. She can hire a bloody gigolo for that. Each to there own and all that though. But the thought of punters paying WGs for her orgasm is hard for me to get my head around.

[cueball]

Way I see it,

Great quoting there bearcat, I honestly laughed out loud at that   

[vw]

It's not only punters who can't take a bit of flak and throwing their toys out of the pram, I recall a few getting the huff because they reviewed a wg and no-one commented on their review.
Some seem to review for ego purposes and to please the wg. They revel and expect a virtual slap on the back to feed their egos, and will make their punt seem spectacular to draw out the comments.
Whereas I see more benefit in simple reviews rather than ego pleasing ones.

Like this ?   

Amazing review by me, yet no one has mentioned a word of thanks or any comments.....and no, I am not trolling or looking for trouble but am just amazed at how ungrateful some people can be.

[bearcat69]

Great quoting there bearcat, I honestly laughed out loud at that   

[mrfishyfoo]

Great quoting there bearcat, I honestly laughed out loud at that   

Me too. 

Each to there own and all that though.

Isn't this the whole point ?? My money my choice how I spend it.

If I choose to put it in a shredder and then burn it that's my choice. If I choose to drink it, inject it or spend it on licking pro$$ie pussy that's my choice.

 

But the thought of punters paying WGs for her orgasm is hard for me to get my head around.

Fuck that what I don't get is a punter that's into denying a pro$$ie orgasms. Why pay to go to all that effort for nothing.

Each to there own and all that though. 

[bearcat69]

Me too. 

Isn't this the whole point ?? My money my choice how I spend it.

If I choose to put it in a shredder and then burn it that's my choice. If I choose to drink it, inject it or spend it on licking pro$$ie pussy that's my choice.

 

Fuck that what I don't get is a punter that's into denying a pro$$ie orgasms. Why pay to go to all that effort for nothing.

Each to there own and all that though. 

Yes of course your money your choice.

But also, my money my choice.

If you're assuming I'm into denying orgasms, then you've made an incorrect assumption.

It's not about denying anything - it's about me not denying myself of want I want. Her orgasm doesn't matter to me in a punt, I care about getting want I want out of the punt in the time I've paid for... I go to a punt to relax, to have a nice time, I'm not there to show the WG my amazing bedroom skills.

The thing is, I have no problem with any punter wanting to make a WG cum and going for that in a punt... It's their money and their prerogative. But I do feel though and think I always will be skeptical of either prossies claiming they cum for punters or punters insisting they make a WG cum. I don't see the need to prove that whole thing or make claims on it, and I don't see what it has to do with the quality of service the prossie provides.

[vw]

Fuck that what I don't get is a punter that's into denying a pro$$ie orgasms. Why pay to go to all that effort for nothing.

You make it sound like its hard work and a real struggle. 

[mrfishyfoo]

If you're assuming I'm into denying orgasms, then you've made an incorrect assumption.

Not at all. Just read a few reviews on here where that's what the punter wants.

 

[bearcat69]

Not at all. Just read a few reviews on here where that's what the punter wants.

 

Well you wouldn't see that in my reviews.

As I said, if the girls having fun then great. I would like to think most WGs are enjoying themselves. But who really knows for sure, eh? Best not to dwell on such things to carefully IMO.

[mrfishyfoo]

You make it sound like its hard work and a real struggle. 

For some maybe.

A good pro$$ie is in the "fantasy" business.

That's why they are so good at lying and acting isn't it ?? 

[rockharders]

Apart from touts, there are two types of punter who don't last long here:

1) White knights, arselickers, slimey two faced schemers
2) Fantasists who take this too seriously and too much ego

The two often overlap.

[vw]

now don't be damaging his ego 

Me? Someone else broke it!

To even suggest what you have suggested undermines the whole review process and says to me that you sir are a complete tosser. 

So I suggest you fuck off and get writing some of your own reviews instead of daring to suggest that mine is in anyway untrue. 

[smiths]

Indeed ---------- or even ask the pro$$ie to meet up for a drink ------------- that should bring you down with a bump.

We are walking ATMs, nothing more.   

And that's all I want to be and expect to be.

[mrfishyfoo]

Me? Someone else broke it!

Not at all MrVW if he had I'd have gone and melted down like what MrYLF did recently wouldn't I. 

As for littlebirdy now he did have an ego. GOOD RIDDANCE !!!! 

Wonder who he is now ?? Sure he'll stick his head above the parapet again soon. They always do don't they. 

[PepeMAGA]

If any punter believes he is pleasuring a pro$$ie then he should apply the Acid test, suggest he doesn't pay,  after all if he pleasures her that much she would see him for the enjoyment she gets from him 

Pro$$ies are masters at faking it and flattering egos 

Don't agree with that, I enjoy my job, doesn't mean I'd do it for free.
Different if she's feigning feelings or love though.

[vw]

Not at all MrVW if he had I'd have gone and melted down like what MrYLF did recently wouldn't I. 

To be fair you never melted down, maybe a tear in the eye but no melting.