External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members OnlyI've taken a little while to reflect on this, wondering whether the efflux of time would change how I felt about this booking, but unfortunately it hasn't. When I left I felt that it was a negative and still feel the same way now.
I'll be the first to admit that this might seem like an overly harsh grading but I simply can't find any redeeming qualities about this encounter. At best it was distinctly average, I was hoping for so much more.
Booking description: 2 hour in-call.
Price: £400 GFE (No extras).
Comms: Ok'ish. Prompt responses but in the end the comms process felt like they had a hint of desperation about them.
Brief email exchange followed by a confirmed AW booking request, postcode was then provided by text the day before and in reply, I confirmed that I would send a text for the actual apartment number just before the booking was due to commence.
On the day however, I received not one but two texts (morning and afternoon), these were both politely worded along the lines of are you going to turn up. Each time I responded in the affirmative but this just felt a bit OTT to me. To try and provide some balance, we'd never met before so I suspect that Megan was just trying to ensure that I wasn't a time waster which I do have some sympathy with.
Anyway it is what it is, but I didn't feel that this was the most auspicious of starts.
Location & venue: 10 floors of whores, just about passable. From what little I saw of it this particular apartment in The CC it was a very basic/no frills affair. Tiny bedroom with an even smaller bathroom, clean, tidy, fairly modern, fit for purpose. A freshly laundered towel, toiletries and glass of water were all provided.
Appearance: The pictures on Megan's AW profile were an accurate representation of her and whilst I fully accept that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and in person whilst not unattractive, Megan just didn't set my pulse racing at all.
Porcelain white skin with dyed jet black hair, wearing a little too much makeup for my liking, dressed in matching black underwear, sporting a pair of ubiquitous and clichéd Laboutins. I suspect Megan's in her early 20's and whilst I'm certainly no expert, I'd have a guess at a size 10, all natural, no gym bunny, around 5'7, a non-smoker with some tattoos.
Purely from a physical perspective this was a calculated gamble on my part as Megan isn't usually the type of SP that I'm attracted to, this booking was supposed to all be about the quality and delivery of the services on offer.
The meet: Whilst this was over a month ago, what I find rather telling is that I cannot remember a great deal about the actual encounter which in itself speaks volumes.
From what little I do remember, it consisted of two rounds to include FK, RO, OWO (which was pretty hands on, not much eye contact and no real discernible DT, some attention to balls), protected sex in multiple positions, mish, CG, pronebone, doggy etc. Sadly my overriding memory of all this was that it was a bit dull.
YMMV but what most surprised and disappointed me in equal measure was that I didn't feel that Megan really went looking for work in this booking and on the basis of my experience, I have a question mark over her work ethic.
Regrettably I didn't feel that any of the services that I received were delivered to a high standard, it all lacked the energy that I was craving and felt a little mechanical. These factors combined with the fact that I wasn't attracted to Megan meant that I didn't get close to getting off in this booking.
In summation: I was hoping that this experience would at least trigger one of the following KPIs but sadly it wasn't to be:
Great looks = Not for me, Megan just isn't my type;
Great skills = Sorry but not on the basis of the services that I received; and
Great attitude = This is the one single aspect of this booking that most disappointed me, whilst it wasn't poor, it could hardly be described as anything approaching 'great' either.
Would I return: I think the above speaks for itself, a resounding no.
