Bonnie Scotland , Glasgow

[Boinky]

I don't have a problem with the OP's "review" but will admit it's light on content.

I don't have a problem with you reporting it, although I wouldn't agree it was touting but can understand why you did and why it was moved.

Half this thread is 3 or 4 members talking crap about stuff that has nothing to do with either of the above, dragging up old issues and baiting/trolling.

It's getting old already and I'm pretty new. Too many threads seem to head down this path. As soon as one member of the group posts something then the others arrive and start all this over again and it has little if anything to do with reviews, punting or any other subject related to this forum other than cock waving.

Don't you think if newer members like me and members that don't post that often notice this then it affects the forum?
If I'd joined and seen this crap in the first few threads I looked at I'd log out and not waste my time, missing out on what is a very useful tool.

[Courtney]

If I'd joined and seen this crap in the first few threads I looked at I'd log out and not waste my time, missing out on what is a very useful tool.

...but there are many other threads elsewhere.  Yes there is history between some members, it crops up now and then.

[Happyjose]

I don't have a problem with the OP's "review" but will admit it's light on content.

I don't have a problem with you reporting it, although I wouldn't agree it was touting but can understand why you did and why it was moved.

Half this thread is 3 or 4 members talking crap about stuff that has nothing to do with either of the above, dragging up old issues and baiting/trolling.

It's getting old already and I'm pretty new. Too many threads seem to head down this path. As soon as one member of the group posts something then the others arrive and start all this over again and it has little if anything to do with reviews, punting or any other subject related to this forum other than cock waving.

Don't you think if newer members like me and members that don't post that often notice this then it affects the forum?
If I'd joined and seen this crap in the first few threads I looked at I'd log out and not waste my time, missing out on what is a very useful tool.

I agree with some of this, particularly the first two lines.

However, we regularly hear nonsense about certain members, or certain types of post, putting off new members, when the site stats seem to suggest that it is as popular as ever. Interestingly, Admin just banned a member for spouting such shite in a disrespectful manner, with his comment "Fuck off with your opinions"

Often it is the 'fluffier' members who complain about this, possibly because the longer established sites that cater for cuntstruck fanboys and various vested interests are dead in the water. It's not for this site to change to accomodate these types of members or potential members.

For the site to remain true to its ethos- which is essential -  it is necessary for members to challenge suspect reviews and reviewers. Admin relies upon this, though it is his decision alone on what action to take. To be fair, frivolous reports are often a banning reason, and Admin always takes a considered approach.

Some would call it bickering, some banter, but it's surprising how often such discourse results in a positive outcome for the site in general.

I'm not suggesting the above applies to you, but it's worth stating

[Boinky]

For the site to remain true to its ethos- which is essential -  it is necessary for members to challenge suspect reviews and reviewers.

And I completely agree with that, I've called out a couple myself.

This isn't that. It's just petty bickering between some members who obviously have previous history and follow each other about then drag any thread they take part in away from doing anything useful for the site or it's members.

I've said my piece and I'll leave it alone now but this constant baiting and trolling isn't doing anyone any good, other than stroking some egos.

[Cactus]

Mavgoose, just a suggestion, but rather than posting a new review of a prossie you've seen before, would it not have been more appropriate to tag this on to your original review as a follow up? Just state that you've seen her again and that she's better than ever, thus bumping the original review to the top of the Scottish board.

No issues with what you've done, just offering up what I'd have done.

As for the bickering, I just ignore it for what it is and don't get involved. Life's too short for vendettas with supposedly like minded folk on the internet.

[tazman1002001]

Look back through the posts you will CLEARLY see who the instigators are every time.... i just like to keep winding some of them up its just too easy. But i think for now best policy is to ignore them .... i urge everyone to do the same

[Cactus]

Look back through the posts you will CLEARLY see who the instigators are every time.... i just like to keep winding some of them up its just too easy. But i think for now best policy is to ignore them .... i urge everyone to do the same

So does that make you a troll then?

[Courtney]

So does that make you a troll then?

Yeah you would think he would be taking it easy after Admin giving him the courtesy of a second chance. 

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Mavgoose, just a suggestion, but rather than posting a new review of a prossie you've seen before, would it not have been more appropriate to tag this on to your original review as a follow up? Just state that you've seen her again and that she's better than ever, thus bumping the original review to the top of the Scottish board.

No issues with what you've done, just offering up what I'd have done.

As for the bickering, I just ignore it for what it is and don't get involved. Life's too short for vendettas with supposedly like minded folk on the internet.

Fair point.
Although doing it that way would only show up the original review in the review count.
I prefer, if I've seen them before, to do a separate, shorter review with its own 'score'

[Cactus]

Fair point.
Although doing it that way would only show up the original review in the review count.
I prefer, if I've seen them before, to do a separate, shorter review with its own 'score'

All well and good, there's no right or wrong way to do it really.  But why does the prossie need another review from the same person?  Or is it for the punter writing the reviews benifit to up their review count?  I think the only reason I'd do a new review would be if my view of the punt changed (like it did for the Blowjob Queen, who went from a positive to a neutral when my tastes got a bit more discerning), otherwise I don't think a new review would be warranted.

To each their own though 

[TommyMoundfrigger]

All well and good, there's no right or wrong way to do it really.  But why does the prossie need another review from the same person?  Or is it for the punter writing the reviews benifit to up their review count?  I think the only reason I'd do a new review would be if my view of the punt changed (like it did for the Blowjob Queen, who went from a positive to a neutral when my tastes got a bit more discerning), otherwise I don't think a new review would be warranted.

To each their own though 

Another fair point.
I do it to show consistency or perhaps there may be times when the service changes, for better of worse, when the prossie gets to know you?

[tazman1002001]

Hi pot meet mr kettle.

Yep .... And there he goes.

Now maybe time for a tag team knock out 

[Clattypats]

I'll  say something. ...For a short review that got moved...it's not half picked up momentum...

[tazman1002001]

I'll  say something. ...For a short review that got moved...it's not half picked up momentum...

 

[mavgoose]

Did everyone play nice since Friday ?

Just the one banning I see.

Couple points above re bumping the original review or doing a fresh review.

I've bumped some reviews. I've did a second review as it was a negative. I've done fresh reviews. Each to their own.

If I see a girl , go back a few times , and see her again a year or so later - my opinion is that merits a fresh review.
Maybe the content should have been more , but I reckoned you could work out what happened yourselves. Apologies.

To the newer members who confidently stated their points re the atmosphere of the forum - well said. Welcome and please input more.
THAT , in my opinion is the ethos of the site.

[Marmalade]

I think critics of Taz simply stopped posting. Maybe he's a reformed character (from days when he openly touted his reviews to prossies) in which case I would apologise yet if that is the case he would be joining me in ensuring the board was free of leech reviews. I've no wish to go through hundreds of his posts to wage against him and Admin has let him stay which is good enough for me so it is not my business. No doubt he'll send some more vitriol my way but I can take it. I wish everyone on the Scottish board best of luck and great punting (even though I'll mostly post on other sections of the Forum. ) cheers.

[Clattypats]

I think critics of Taz simply stopped posting. Maybe he's a reformed character (from days when he openly touted his reviews to prossies) in which case I would apologise yet if that is the case he would be joining me in ensuring the board was free of leech reviews. I've no wish to go through hundreds of his posts to wage against him and Admin has let him stay which is good enough for me so it is not my business. No doubt he'll send some more vitriol my way but I can take it. I wish everyone on the Scottish board best of luck and great punting (even though I'll mostly post on other sections of the Forum. ) cheers.

I dont think anyone should stop posting because of any particular person....

Personally I think reviews can be done in any style the OP wants or chooses to do it..There is no right or no wrong....Mav's review may have been short and sweet. ..which obviously wasn't classed as a review,as it got moved..

Reviews can come in all shapes and forms (as you prob well know )..I can do descriptive ones or less descriptive ones,depending on how I feel when I write it,or how the booking went...that's for me to decide..

Taz's reviews can be very descriptive,and so can mine be sometimes ..I like to know what happens in a booking though..which will ultimately make me decide to see that WG or not...

[tazman1002001]

The annoyance from me is the arrogance and self made policing of "others" reviews ..... "It he is touting...he is fluffy.... There isn't enough info.....there is too much info...he must be getting freebies" ....the list goes on and on and ALL of this with not one ounce of proof?

I know I can be guilty of putting newbies under pressure with "suspect" reviews but I "try" not too discourage them ....but that's now how it wlll ways come across but I want more of them to contribute and to TOFTT as we all need to share that responsibility lol ....

For anyone who doesn't want to post here ..... It's there choice completley maybe it will make for a more relaxed and less "jump on the bandwagon and give one or two people a hard time" type of forum space in Glasgow and it was like that upto recently. What results from this is the guilty parties start to get banned.

Good luck and happy punting to everyone .... Now let's stop ALLL of this chat and let's get out there and shag some prime pussy and share our experiences.... Both good and bad 

[pilgrim]

I don’t think it really matters if you do a new review or add-on to one that’s already in the system.  As long as the AW number is there, they get linked and you can read all the others just to get the complete picture of the WG.  The Ops post may have been removed from the review section but it certainly got the WG concerned plenty of air time.  She doesn’t do a lot of self promotion on other forums like other WGs, she doesn’t need to because everyone who has seen her knows she repeatedly provides a top notch service. It often is the case that if they get reported on that much, it becomes difficult to get a booking with your regular quality service provider.  Id better stop there as Im starting to sound like a fluffy devil who probably has no chance of seeing her as shes doing very well on her own and doesn’t need a chancer to try and promote her for a discount.  By the way Matrix, Im loving the Avatar, I got confused reading your posts, I mistook them to be by someone else and couldn’t understand why they were educational, informative, well constructed, spelt correctly and not full of fluffy pimping drivel.

[Clattypats]

I already said it picked up momentum when it got moved..Thanks for backing my point up...

[tazman1002001]

Well I had a great booking with her the other day on her tour .... Tremendous girl and damn what a figure ....she has the cutest ass ever I just couldn't stop biting it. Oh and when they say DT and sloppy blow job they should put up a pic of Bonnie ..... This girl is a trooper ...... She kept my cock in her mouth for a good 15mins and sucked the hell out of it .......

I will get my loveley review up when I get a chance..... Hopefully all the pilgrims sorry I mean real punters will be happy 

[Micky5633]

On a lighter note anyone know when she is due back in glasga?

[Clattypats]

On a lighter note anyone know when she is due back in glasga?

Good point.. ...inbetween all the shenanigans..I meant to ask that..

[mavgoose]

On a lighter note anyone know when she is due back in glasga?

She doesn't have set days or weeks etc. I believe it's very much on a "when she can" basis. It was months between the previous two visits , then just a week or so between the last two.

[auldie63]

To get back to the topic. Saw her when she was in the big G 6month or so ago and she was absolutely brilliant. Very pleasant girl that you can have a blether with, good sense of humour, and sexually one of the best I have had.
Would have seen her again this trip but owing to financial dissability was unable. Those lucky bastards in the Big E don't know what they've got.

[tazman1002001]

To get back to the topic. Saw her when she was in the big G 6month or so ago and she was absolutely brilliant. Very pleasant girl that you can have a blether with, good sense of humour, and sexually one of the best I have had.
Would have seen her again this trip but owing to financial dissability was unable. Those lucky bastards in the Big E don't know what they've got.

Your right they dont know what they have with this gem.... maybe we can persuade her to move to glasgow lol

[Santiago]

I know she's a gem

And lucky