Author Topic: Mandi and Amy Duo in Blackpool  (Read 2002 times)


6 review(s) for FUN LOVIN MANDI (6 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]
4 review(s) for sexy summertime suzy (3 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline Mi-Go

External Link/Members Only

and

External Link/Members Only

First time ever for a threesome so was not sure what to expect.

Price was £60 for 30 mins, OWO included but not sex.

Amy and Mandi work together in a house in a residential area of Blackpool.  Mandi is a size 12 with Amy a size 14.  Both were dressed in lingerie.

As it was a first for me I just went with the flow.  They started kissing and groping each other, and then I joined in.  Clothes soon came off and we were kissing and sucking each other.  Fulfilled a lifetime ambition of having my head between 2 huge pairs of breasts!  Full DFK from both girls.  Took it in turns to give me OWO, which was incredible by both of them.  Had a 4 hand massage which involved lots of ball and cock stroking.  Turned over and came over their tits.

The experience was even better than I expected.  Will certainly be back for more.

Offline cueball

Is full sex not offered or is it extra migo?

Offline Mi-Go

Is full sex not offered or is it extra migo?

Yes, full sex is offered (protected) for an extra £20.00.

Offline cueball

Yes, full sex is offered (protected) for an extra £20.00.

That's a good value two girl... Just had a look at their profiles... 120 quid for a two girl romp for an hour, full sex might be an addition but even that wouldn't push it out....

One to ponder on me thinks

Offline Laid_back_bloke

Seen these two a couple of years ago. Both gave FS, think it was £120 for an hour. Both are big girls. Mandi was at least a 14, Amy 16/18. Was fun, both very enthusiastic. But big girls not really my thing. If I remember, they hid their size with old photos of them in tight fitting lingerie. Also very strong stale fag Smoke smell. Something I really hate...
« Last Edit: June 19, 2017, 08:23:05 am by Laid_back_bloke »