Author Topic: Vanessa.RAEA Swaffham (and Norwich)  (Read 1771 times)


1 review(s) for Sweet Sweet Heart  (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline happyharry

I had a wedding to attend over in Swaffham so decided to sample to local wares whilst in that area. More recently, I've tended to see 30/40 year olds and this profile seemed to fit the bill:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Pinged her an e.mail five days ahead of my visit. 24 hours later it had not been read (and she doesn't seem to have logged in after that).

Bring on Plan B:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Communications: Very good. I called her to clarify that she offers OWO. She confirmed, subject to me taking a shower upon arrival. After that, she texted the postcode. I texted upon arrival and she promptly texted the precise address
Location : A cottage on the southern outskirts of Swaffham. Plenty of off road parking with no immediate overlooking neighbours. Note: no immediate street parking so if you don't want to park at the house then allow an extra 5 minutes to park away and walk. Inside, the cottage was clean and tidy. I caught a glimpse of another (blonde) girl as she disappreared into the living room. Faint whiff of cigarette smoke but nothing overpowering.
Vanessa : Her AW pics don't give much away but she is facially attractive and has a slender figure. Almost certainly has not had children. Firm "B" cup tits, a few tats, mostly on her arm and a navel piercing. Fully shaven. She looked younger than I expected. Not very good with age but I'd guess around 25. Her English is perfectly adequate. She said that she works out of Swaffham and Norwich.
The Meet : £120 for 1hr. Was asked to take my shoes off before being led upstairs. The room tidy, the bed sheets clean (although I found out later that the bed does creak a bit). I asked her to confirm that OWO was included. She confirmed, subject to me taking a shower. She added that CIM and Swallow were not on offer (her profile says "at discretion" so points deducted for that). Shower was a little hand held thing within the bath but it sufficed.
Back in the room for some light kissing (no French Kissing so more points deducted)). Clothes off and onto the bed. I went down on her. She really does have an adorable, small, tight pussy. Her clit stood to attention and her juices flowed. An orgasm (or a good fake) followed. This was looking promising.
I knelt beside her head and she got the message. The oral was good but no chance of the advertised Deepthroat (more points deducted). On to 69 with her on top. Her juices really were flowing. She tasted sweet. She shuddered and seemed to orgasm again (?)
Time to think about myself. I lay back and requested undivided oral attention. "You mustn't come in my mouth" she said - as a one pop man, that was unlikely 20 minutes into the punt. The oral was supplemented by some increasingly vigorous wanking which signalled to me that she was looking to get me finished and out the door. No chance. Rubbered up (applied with her mouth). Cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, got a slap for fingering her ass. Her pussy looks tiny and is tight. At one point I was studying the cracks on the ceiling as a distraction ! Onto "mish" with her legs over her shoulders for some deep penetration but little enthusiasm for kissing. It was starting to become a bit mechanical so I whipped off the rubber and requested more oral. "No cum in mouth" she reminded me. As I edged closer, I knelt by her face and unloaded on her face, neck, and tits. She promptly went off to the bathroom. I dressed, paid her, and departed with 10 minutes of the hour remaining.
Summary : A positive verging on a neutral. Vanessa is a "nice" girl and that's part of the problem. She's also rather inexperienced, and doesn't offer services advertised on her profile. She is a good looker, with a slender, toned, figure and that pussy is to die for. If you are happy with a vanilla session, with no FK or CIM then she'll deliver - but a 30 minute session might deliver best value.                      In future I'll stick to my rule book: 30/40 somethings, slim,confident, who really know how to give a man what he needs.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2017, 03:39:16 pm by happyharry »

Offline PeteSmyth

Sounds very much like a neutral review to me.

On her AW profile, it doesn't state she offers penetration - but you clearly had penetration during your appointment.

Confused. Not for me.

Jas1975

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If a booking has CiM and Swallow on the list THAT is what I am going for.  Makes it a neutral to me.

Offline happyharry

If a booking has CiM and Swallow on the list THAT is what I am going for.  Makes it a neutral to me.
Her profile clearly states that OWO, CIM, Frech Kissing, and Swallow are "at discretion".
Now we all know that "at discretion" really means "if you're lucky" or " if you pay extra"
With that in mind, I made it clear when booking, and upon arrival, that I expected OWO and she agreed to that. Had she also agreed to CIM, FK, & Swallow, and then refused, it would certainly have been a neutral or even a negative but I never requested or expected those services. The deciding factor in making it a positive was that small, tight, pussy.

Offline J.perdy

Decent review...my ignorance would led to a positive as well.  I've learned here if not agreed to before exchange, likely a no go.

Thanks for info, I'll keep this feedback in mind in future reviews.


Jas1975

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Her profile clearly states that OWO, CIM, Frech Kissing, and Swallow are "at discretion".
Now we all know that "at discretion" really means "if you're lucky" or " if you pay extra"

To me "at discretion" means yes unless there is a good reason not to i.e. unclean or somesuch.  So if no good reason to refuse, then it is a neutral at best review to me.

At discretion isn't "pay extra" because that is listed under extra charges (and I've paid extra for such things before).. 

Just my view on it.

Offline Bilbao

Ive been messaging with her hoping to arrange something when she's back in Norwich / next week apparently - she's been on AW off and on for a couple of years so should know the score / she was previously angel77 or something similar - she looks hot but lack of cim and lacklustre fk is a downer I must admit - not sure I'll bother now - I'll ask before the meet and see if she will....Maybe a way of extracting more cash from us punters - that's the EE way with the girls in Norwich!!

 :hi:

Offline J.perdy

To me "at discretion" means yes unless there is a good reason not to i.e. unclean or somesuch.  So if no good reason to refuse, then it is a neutral at best review to me.

At discretion isn't "pay extra" because that is listed under extra charges (and I've paid extra for such things before).. 

Just my view on it.

Thanks for insight, makes sense.

Offline Norfolkfuntimes

I met her when she was in Norwich. Her comms was a little bit iffy and she is slightly flakey, but in my humble opinion made up for it with her looks and personality. Very friendly and relaxed, beautiful legs and arse,  and a very pretty girl all round. Lovely skin, very toned.
For a fairly Vanilla service ( although enthusiastically delivered) I would definitely give her a big positive. I went back for a second go.

Offline Norfolkfuntimes


Offline Bilbao

I met her when she was in Norwich. Her comms was a little bit iffy and she is slightly flakey, but in my humble opinion made up for it with her looks and personality. Very friendly and relaxed, beautiful legs and arse,  and a very pretty girl all round. Lovely skin, very toned.
For a fairly Vanilla service ( although enthusiastically delivered) I would definitely give her a big positive. I went back for a second go.

How was her kissing? Light dfk or none? Any cim on offer?

Offline Norfolkfuntimes

Light kissing not DFK. Didn't ask for cim.