Author Topic: Lolly @ Pop - Bristol Harbourside  (Read 2030 times)


3 review(s) for _GFE_SUZI_ (1 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Roth]

Offline Mcping

External Link/Members Only



After previous review and some difficulty booking I finally got to see Becky. Very disappointing.

Photos are clearly photoshopped so wasn't sure what to expect but wasn't impressed.

Becky is slim and nice perky tits and ass but covered in warts @ moles.

I was tempted to walk but in fairness she wasn't ugly and seemed friendly and I was horny. Owo was good, sloppy and deep. Sex was ok and she made some nice noises. She says she new to the UK and escorting - I couldn't tell, good English and ok sex in doggy & mish.

Throughout the punt I could hear Petite Amelia next door chatting away with a guy. Sounded very friendly but I hope the guy wasn't paying for anything other that talking.

All in all, Becky is not ugly and sexy was ok but shes no looker and at £80 for half hour I would normally expect more. Lots of moles and some odd marks on her legs including what looks like a cigarette burn on her ankle.

I won't be returning  :(

Offline Roth

Sorry you had a crap punt. :(  Shame as she sounded promising originally. :(

Offline Mcping


Offline Paris69

odd marks on her legs including what looks like a cigarette burn on her ankle.

 :(
[/quote]


For future reference

Hmm, be very careful with this. Some heroin users inject into their ankles, feet and between the toes.
Anywhere on the foot is at increased risk of the entry hole turning into an absess cos of the higher volume of bacteria 9sweaty feet) while also the lower blood flow doesn't help the healing process either.

IMO the 'cigarette burn 'might' have been an absess; while the marks on the legs could be residual bruising or absess scars.

Banned reason: Idiot fantasist
Banned by: daviemac

Offline hottext72

Sorry to hear she didn't work out for you.  I saw her last week and gave a positive review.

I agree she looks better in her photos, but most girls do.  I found her attractive girl, I agree she has some moles on her , but wouldn't call them warts. She was wearing hold ups when I saw her so didn't have a close look at her legs.



Offline Doombar

Thanks for the review OP.

Moles I dont mind but warts  :thumbsdown:

Offline Urban_G

I'm a little surprised this is a negative based on what you wrote, seems like the service was good enough and you said she wasn't ugly, was it just the moles that put you off?

I was looking to make this girl my next encounter but having 2nd thoughts now, may still go and see what I feel when meeting her :bomb:

Shaketherooom

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If he says he doesnt want to return then the neg is fair i'd say. Im grateful for the info as i was lining up a possible visit before.

Offline Blue Suede Goo

Thanks for the heads-up OP
I'll give her a wide berth. :drinks:

Offline Mcping

Just to clarify my reason for a negative - disappointed by looks, very bad skin with lots of moles & warts.
Considering the cost I'd say the service was barely acceptable and in hindsight and comments above the marks on her legs may not be cigarette burns but possibly signs of drug misuse.

I appreciate punting is subjective but I can't recommend

Offline AxC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 199
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Now calling herself Sexxxy_Becky and in Epsom.
Banned reason: Needs to review, nothing in over 4 years, counter reset to help
Banned by: Iloveoral