Author Topic: Delicious Dani - Glasgow (aka Scottish Dani x )  (Read 29333 times)


3 review(s) for Glasgow Dani x (2 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
I agree in this instances the rating should not have been altered without OP’s request.

Rating reversed answer Admin notified.

Just for the record did you read my post - where I said the rating has been reversed and Admin notified ?

Offline Happyjose

Just for the record did you read my post - where I said the rating has been reversed and Admin notified ?

The silence is deafening

I imagine he’s trying to figure out if forum stats might answer your question without his input/deflection/bullshit

Offline mr small

Did you agree a discount or freebie from her for changing the rating Taz ?

 :hi:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Just for the record did you read my post - where I said the rating has been reversed and Admin notified ?

No... as I skimmed past most of the posts as i gathered the jist of what my error was. I then went straight onto correct my error....  nothing more or less than that  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Did you agree a discount or freebie from her for changing the rating Taz ?

 :hi:

Mr snall you have clearly not read MY posts .... it was a mistake plain and simple  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Im just glad the Scottish Emily thread is getting a break just now  :lol:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
. I then went straight onto correct my error....

No you didn't you went and changed the post back to Neutral again, why lie  :unknown:

johndoeyy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Im just glad the Scottish Emily thread is getting a break just now  :lol:
Yes you are doing a fine job deflecting attention from another prossie. Anyone would think you were benefiting in some fashion

Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9

im sure EVERYONE is thinking the same thing about you... Mr Keyboard Warrior  :sarcastic:




Thank you for telling me what I think.

I am so glad I have you to do this for me.
Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0

Thank you for telling me what I think.

I am so glad I have you to do this for me.

Yeah it's so annoying...it's almost like if someone made a mistake... Admitted it..... But was still being told that he didn't make a mistake  :dash: ... It's fucking annoying isn't it  :thumbsdown:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
No you didn't you went and changed the post back to Neutral again, why lie  :unknown:

....... And still no reviews..... You troll .....  :thumbsdown:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yeah it's so annoying...it's almost like if someone made a mistake... Admitted it.....

But that's not what happened,

You changed from Negative to Neutral at 09.13

This was corrected back to Negative by Sinz at 10.18 and he alerted Admin and posted on this thread

You changed it from Negative to Neutral again at 11.07

You then changed it back to Negative at 11.08

Clearly not a mistake, but you realised you had been caught out and tried to cover your tracks, you didn't admit your "mistake" till after you were caught out and reported by sinz.  :thumbsdown:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
But that's not what happened,

You changed from Negative to Neutral at 09.13

This was corrected back to Negative by Sinz at 10.18 and he alerted Admin and posted on this thread

You changed it from Negative to Neutral again at 11.07

You then changed it back to Negative at 11.08

Clearly not a mistake, but you realised you had been caught out and tried to cover your tracks, you didn't admit your "mistake" till after you were caught out and reported by sinz.  :thumbsdown:

Ok troll you sound like a broken record.... But I'm only going to keep telling you what actually happened...... Not what you "think" happened.

Oh and still no reviews ?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Ok troll you sound like a broken record.... But I'm only going to keep telling you what actually happened...... Not what you "think" happened.

It's a question of facts, the notices clearly show you

You changed from Negative to Neutral at 09.13

This was corrected back to Negative by Sinz at 10.18 and he alerted Admin and posted on this thread

You changed it from Negative to Neutral again at 11.07

You then changed it back to Negative at 11.08

Clearly not a mistake, but you realised you had been caught out and tried to cover your tracks, you didn't admit your "mistake" till after you were caught out and reported by sinz.  :thumbsdown:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
It's a question of facts, the notices clearly show you

You changed from Negative to Neutral at 09.13

This was corrected back to Negative by Sinz at 10.18 and he alerted Admin and posted on this thread

You changed it from Negative to Neutral again at 11.07

You then changed it back to Negative at 11.08

Clearly not a mistake, but you realised you had been caught out and tried to cover your tracks, you didn't admit your "mistake" till after you were caught out and reported by sinz.  :thumbsdown:

Still no reviews troll?

Oh and I'm loving your "desperate" and sad reports to admin  :D , your such a loser  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: January 04, 2018, 08:24:51 am by tazman1002001 »
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
That's it, try and deflect from the facts, you've been caught out just grow a pair and admit it instead of trying to deflect from the facts that you

You changed from Negative to Neutral at 09.13

This was corrected back to Negative by Sinz at 10.18 and he alerted Admin and posted on this thread

You changed it from Negative to Neutral again at 11.07

You then changed it back to Negative at 11.08

Clearly not a mistake, but you realised you had been caught out and tried to cover your tracks, you didn't admit your "mistake" till after you were caught out and reported by sinz.  :thumbsdown:

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Still no reviews troll?

Oh and I'm loving your "desperate" and sad reports to admin  :D , your such a loser  :thumbsdown:

You know someone has lost the argument when they resort to saying James has no reviews.

You aren't doing yourself any favours here taz and look more foolish with every post you make.

Offline geezer_breezer

Taz, you're now rolling and fighting in the mud. For heaven's sake stop posting and arguing. It's ugly to watch and no one is winning.

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,778
  • Likes: 38
  •  
  • Reviews: 123
You know someone has lost the argument when they resort to saying James has no reviews.

You aren't doing yourself any favours here taz and look more foolish with every post you make.

It's ironic that he's constantly calling James a troll, when it's blatantly obvious that Taz is the biggest troll on UKP...as well as being an out of control deluded egomaniac... what a guy eh? :wacko:

johndoeyy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's ironic that he's constantly calling James a troll, when it's blatantly obvious that Taz is the biggest troll on UKP...as well as being an out of control deluded egomaniac... what a guy eh? :wacko:
General consensus right there

Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
Definition of the word Troll . . . .

"Someone who disagrees with Taz."
Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline Happyjose

It's ironic that he's constantly calling James a troll, when it's blatantly obvious that Taz is the biggest troll on UKP...as well as being an out of control deluded egomaniac... what a guy eh? :wacko:

+1. Even if you separate the clear abuse of the rules, the question remains: why change the rating to benefit the prossie?

It goes against the ethos of the site and there was almost no stimulus to do so.

The impartial observer can only see ego/incentives behind this.

His response seems to be smoke and mirrors, personal attacks, and bluster

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
 :D :lol:

You guys make me laugh.

I'm away to make some serious money now.... You guys enjoy your day online looking for things to moan about  ;) :thumbsup:

I will check in on you kids later .....  :hi:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,792
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
Surely just an innocent mistake. Looking to book the girl, read a review from seven months ago, read a post from the punter who reviewed the girl that says he finally got to see her (which would be a different review altogether),  then change the rating 2 or 3 times. Despite the initial review being perfectly valid. 💩

Who spends to much time online, again? I'm confused.

Offline mh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,000
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 53
You guys make me laugh.
I'm away to make some serious money now.... You guys enjoy your day online looking for things to moan about  ;) :thumbsup:
I will check in on you kids later .....  :hi:

Rather than antagonising everyone further with silly comments, I don't know why you've not just explained/admitted why you flip-flopped the status so many times yesterday. Looks to me like you made the original error changing it to a neutral, apologised, didn't realise it had already been corrected back to negative by someone else, "corrected" it again yourself - in error - back to a neutral then realised your new error and put it back to negative. Is that all it was? If so what's the issue with explaining it?

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
It's a question of facts, the notices clearly show you

You changed from Negative to Neutral at 09.13

This was corrected back to Negative by Sinz at 10.18 and he alerted Admin and posted on this thread

You changed it from Negative to Neutral again at 11.07

You then changed it back to Negative at 11.08

Clearly not a mistake, but you realised you had been caught out and tried to cover your tracks, you didn't admit your "mistake" till after you were caught out and reported by sinz.  :thumbsdown:

Brick wall James. Tis a stinker.  :dash:

Offline auldie63

He never made a mistake in his life so why should he explain himself to plebs like us?
Despite supposedly having thousands of punts he has never had a bad one because ' his extensive research before he punts', always ensures this.
He always gives glowing reviews of these outstanding punts and not because he ever got a discount in his life.
In short he is the mayor of LaLa Land.
The sooner he finds a disused aircraft hanger that he can get his head through the door of and pisses off there, the better for the rest of us mere mortals.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Still no reviews troll?

Oh and I'm loving your "desperate" and sad reports to admin  :D , your such a loser  :thumbsdown:

Unbanned "former" white knights, do they ever change their spots? 

Did you apply to review Scottish Emily?    :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

« Last Edit: January 04, 2018, 01:15:13 pm by vw »

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Unbanned "former" white knights, do they ever change their spots? 

Did you apply to review Scottish Emily?   

Taz changing / fixing review ratings for pro$$ies is a whole new level of white knighting  :thumbsdown:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
He always gives glowing reviews of these outstanding punts and not because he ever got a discount in his life.

i suspect many of his kind ilk apply to review escorts rather than booking them

I'm away to make some serious money now....

Reviewing?   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:


vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Taz changing / fixing review ratings for pro$$ies is a whole new level of white knighting  :thumbsdown:
Was predictable that some would abuse the new system for sexual/financial gain.

Good the cynical among us spot these things.

SeekingtheTruth

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
i suspect many of his kind ilk apply to review escorts rather than booking them

Reviewing?   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

Nah, he's still online.  :lol:

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,792
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 164


Did you apply to review Scottish Emily?    :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

:D :lol:

You guys make me laugh.

I'm away to make some serious money now.... You guys enjoy your day online looking for things to moan about  ;) :thumbsup:

I will check in on you kids later .....  :hi:


Reviewing?   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
:lol: :D :lol: That's fucking hilarious!  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: January 04, 2018, 05:06:37 pm by Matrix »

Offline mr small

Mr snall you have clearly not read MY posts .... it was a mistake plain and simple  :thumbsup:

I did read YOUR posts but like everyone else believe your full of shit.

 :hi:

Offline finn5555

I did read YOUR posts but like everyone else believe your full of shit.

 :hi:

 :D :D :D

Offline NigelF

I did read YOUR posts but like everyone else believe your full of shit.

 :hi:

+1

Offline bushman

Taz, I don't know you or any other punter on this site.
I use the rating giving to girls by the actual punter as part of my system to weed out the good from the bad.
Given that you have been previously been banned for reasons unknown to me and hundreds of others. I don't understand how you can think it is acceptable to change somebody elses review rating.
Have you ever seen admin do that?
You highlighted yourself as a bit of a wank in doing that.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Taz, I don't know you or any other punter on this site.
I use the rating giving to girls by the actual punter as part of my system to weed out the good from the bad.
Given that you have been previously been banned for reasons unknown to me and hundreds of others. I don't understand how you can think it is acceptable to change somebody elses review rating.
Have you ever seen admin do that?
You highlighted yourself as a bit of a wank in doing that.

Here was his last banning

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=112484.msg1306685#msg1306685

Offline bushman

Thanks. A white-knight with the power to change review ratings? I suppose that was a guarantee to only go one way.

Offline Davey Dykes

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,717
  • Likes: 31
  •  
  • Reviews: 119
I did read YOUR posts but like everyone else believe your full of shit.

 :hi:

Another vote here.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Another vote here.

Thanks for taking the time to come out and vote  :thumbsup:  :D :D
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline FBman78

Tax maybe you should stop changing reviews etc for a while and let others do it. Just that you added a location on a thread from a now banned member and that person has not confirmed the location.  Just think and look for confirmation before changing things to what you think bud.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Here was his last banning

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=112484.msg1306685#msg1306685

I didn't realise he was prev banned for white knighting  :thumbsdown: You would have thought he would have learnt his lesson when given a second chance, guess he feels his "relationships" with pro$$ies takes priority, and he will tidy up bad reviews for them  :thumbsdown:

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,778
  • Likes: 38
  •  
  • Reviews: 123
I didn't realise he was prev banned for white knighting  :thumbsdown: You would have thought he would have learnt his lesson when given a second chance, guess he feels his "relationships" with pro$$ies takes priority, and he will tidy up bad reviews for them  :thumbsdown:

Stupid people like Taz, never learn from their mistakes...The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result...or in his case thinking he won't get sussed out :crazy:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Stupid people like Taz, never learn from their mistakes...The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result...or in his case thinking he won't get sussed out :crazy:

There is nothing to suss out... it doesnt matter how much drivel you or others may come out with or keep repeating  :hi:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Tax maybe you should stop changing reviews etc for a while and let others do it. Just that you added a location on a thread from a now banned member and that person has not confirmed the location.  Just think and look for confirmation before changing things to what you think bud.

I have seen locations added to reviews where the Op hasnt confirmed? Can one the other users who has admin rights please confirm?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
There is nothing to suss out... it doesnt matter how much drivel you or others may come out with or keep repeating  :hi:

We don't type your reviews.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
We don't type your reviews.

I am completely happy with MY reviews thanks  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline finn5555

I am completely happy with MY reviews thanks  :thumbsup:

Trouble is with your cuntish behaviour you will be hard pressed to get anyone to believe you now  :unknown:
Still if you wish to continue writing reviews to boost your ego crack on  :hi:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I am completely happy with MY reviews thanks  :thumbsup:

Bet the recipients are too.   :sarcastic: :sarcastic: