Delicious Dani - Glasgow (aka Scottish Dani x )

[J_H]

External Link/Members Only

Not been a good week/weekend for me.

Because of the holidays (presumably) some of the usual suspects were unavailable (Keira, Ready & Raunchy), so tried one a bit more local to me. Not cheap at £80 and in a bit of a dodgy area too.

Comms were ok but she wouldn't do DFK though it's on her profile - to me that is a straight RED.

Things can only get better.



 

[Sinz]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

[Sinz]

Appreciate it if you can add links to the AW profile instead of link to the image

[J_H]

Cheers.

Problem is, I can only get the big long link, don't know how to get the short one - so I used the image one instead.

[Sinz]

Cheers.

Problem is, I can only get the big long link, don't know how to get the short one - so I used the image one instead.

It's at the bottom of the AW profile page, under the prices

[pay as u hoe]

Terrible review.......... it's a "must try harder"  on your report card I'm  afraid.

[J_H]

Punt didn't happen - I didn't take up the offer as DFK was off the Agenda.

[J_H]

The punt did happen eventually, as, magically, DFK was back on the Agenda - apparently. Not sure why it was off. The punt was a bare positive, Comms ok, flat ok, girl pleasant enough, not not something to write home about. DFK as it turned out was not as enthusiastic as I'd have liked - more like it was on sufferance. But she did what she said on her likes, DFK (after a fashion), OWO, CIM and RO (which was very nice), so it[s a pass. Would I return, probably not.

[youngatheart]

Thanks for the update, but I am a bit surprised that you even contemplated contacting her again after your first non-experience.

[J_H]

I was a bit desperate at the time having been unable to contact a few other WGs, and her number was on the profile. Explained the situation re DFK and she said ok. I think she said on the previous occasion she'd had toothache or something like that.

[tazman1002001]

The punt did happen eventually, as, magically, DFK was back on the Agenda - apparently. Not sure why it was off. The punt was a bare positive, Comms ok, flat ok, girl pleasant enough, not not something to write home about. DFK as it turned out was not as enthusiastic as I'd have liked - more like it was on sufferance. But she did what she said on her likes, DFK (after a fashion), OWO, CIM and RO (which was very nice), so it[s a pass. Would I return, probably not.

Just saw this girl available today so was looking at reviews.

J_H from what I can see you rated as negative ad services weren't on offer when you were trying to book, but the from the above post I can see that you did call her back and the services were now back on offer and you did see her, you rated your meeting as "the punt was a bare positive".

Based on your feedback I'm going to change the Negative rating to a Neutral rating for this booking,

[geezer_breezer]

Wait? What?

1. Why is someone else changing reviews?
2. Why is the review being changed now after all this time?
3. Why has the OP not been asked for permission? A better approach may be, 'OP, would you like me to change this review?'

[Sinz]

I agree in this instances the rating should not have been altered without OP’s request.

Rating reversed answer Admin notified.

[James999]

Based on your feedback I'm going to change the Negative rating to a Neutral rating for this booking,

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Jock D]

Based on your feedback I'm going to change the Negative rating to a Neutral rating for this booking,

Who the Fuck do you think you are?

[SeekingtheTruth]

Just saw this girl available today so was looking at reviews.

J_H from what I can see you rated as negative ad services weren't on offer when you were trying to book, but the from the above post I can see that you did call her back and the services were now back on offer and you did see her, you rated your meeting as "the punt was a bare positive".

Based on your feedback I'm going to change the Negative rating to a Neutral rating for this booking,

Not your call unless the OP has requested it.

[The_Don]

Just saw this girl available today so was looking at reviews.

J_H from what I can see you rated as negative ad services weren't on offer when you were trying to book, but the from the above post I can see that you did call her back and the services were now back on offer and you did see her, you rated your meeting as "the punt was a bare positive".

Based on your feedback I'm going to change the Negative rating to a Neutral rating for this booking,

Admin has stated that the OP needs to request or post for a change, helpers shouldn't do so with out a request.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=127781.msg1446615#msg1446615

20 members now have ability to move threads between sections and change review ratings. Those who have access will see new button or form on each topic, along with notice at the top of page linking to this post.

Thought best to start off with low number of 20 rather than give access to hundreds or even the full 1,200+ members who have access to Deleted Posts.

Those who have these new privileges shouldn't get confused into thinking they are moderators. You are not moderators and not above other members. The clue is in the name of the permission usergroup you now belong to - "Helpers". You are merely being given privileges to help with the running of the site, the site that you make use of (given all except one of you have 1,000+ posts). Similar to Wikipedia, the editors who write articles, organize the site, etc. don't get paid for their efforts, you won't either, you are helping your fellow punters by maintaining UKP, something I've done all myself in the past years.

Each change you make will automatically be logged in the new 'Notices' board. You need to fill out a reason textbox to. You need to be clear as to why you made the change.

It goes without saying that review ratings must only be changed when the author of the review (and no one else) requests the change, either them posting in their review topic or reporting their post. Never should a review rating be changed solely because you disagree with it. It's their review and they get to pick the rating, if they picked neutral when everyone thinks it should be negative, that is their choice, you can voice your opinion but never use the facility to change it.

Move topics if they are posted in the wrong region, e.g. a London review posted in Scotland section or they post in this main section and not the relevant regional board. But there are exemptions that need to be taken in consideration, for example if it's a post asking for whereabouts of some porn star who tours all over UK, in that case it's best kept in this main section. Or it's a post asking a general question (e.g. do you use agencies) but posted in a regional section, in that case it would be best kept in that regional board as they seek opinions of fellow locals and not punters throughout the UK.

The indexing of reviews, categorizing of topics, post editing to fix broken links, etc. is for future.
Freezing some new member because they're breaking the rules and I am offline is for the future too, I just need to decide the best way to go about that.

With these new and planned changes of allowing members to maintain the site as much as possible I have optimism that in the coming months I can spend less time on UKP (i.e. like when I was away for a week earlier this month or Christmas Day). But that's probably just a pipe dream.

Also to note:

Be VERY careful if someone asks for their negative review to be changed to different rating, because it could be a case of them being threatened / intimidated into changing it.
In fact such negative rating changes should be reported so I and others see it.

[tazman1002001]

Calm down ladies.... It's the first change I've done and I clearly wasn't clear on the rule around any changes.

I've changed back to a negative for now as i can see this wasn't part of the rules

......and Don't worry honey my boots fit perfectly 

[tazman1002001]

Hidden Image/Members Only

James start reviewing and making an actual contribution as has been stated previously for you 

[James999]

I've changed back to a negative for now as i can see this wasn't part of the rules

You Prick, you were told t was wrong and Sinz changed it back to negative.

You then change it back to neutral, and then back to negative again, seriously you need to put a check on your ego 

[tazman1002001]

You Prick, you were told t was wrong and Sinz changed it back to negative.

You then change it back to neutral, and then back to negative again, seriously you need to put a check on your ego 

It's clear from your response who the prick is....

[James999]

James

That's it, you've been shown out and so you try and deflect, grow up 

[tazman1002001]

That's it, you've been shown out and so you try and deflect, grow up 

Look forward to your review of this episode...

Oh that's right you don't do reviews   

Shown out.....mmmmmmm OK ... It's called an error 

[James999]

Shown out.....mmmmmmm OK ... It's called an error 

It's not an error, you decided that you should re grade someone elses review, i.e. that you knew better than him, so you dug up a 7 month old review and regarded it yourself, even without knowledge of the rules that's a fucking weird thing to do and smacks of your ego getting the better of you   

The fact that the review was changed back to it's original of negative by Sinz, and you then felt you had to change it back to neutral again, even after your "error" was pointed out to you and the rules posted, just shows how you're on some fucked up ego trip, and then message admin telling him you've changed it back, seriously do you think he's stupid enough to fall for that 

[tazman1002001]

It's not an error, you decided that you should re grade someone elses review, i.e. that you knew better than him, so you dug up a 7 month old review and regarded it yourself, even without knowledge of the rules that's a fucking weird thing to do and smacks of your ego getting the better of you   

Ok hunny ... Hope your feeling good about yourself ..I'm sure it can be sad on your own all day just sitting waiting for something to happen on UKP so you can pounce on it .... Glad I could help you have some sort of self importance today by making a big deal of my mistake (that is now rectified) .... I'm all for helping the under priveleged who have special needs   

Oh and I'm loving your post reports ..... Damn that some serious pent up anger/jealousy/breakdown you are displaying there 

[tazman1002001]

Admin has stated that the OP needs to request or post for a change, helpers shouldn't do so with out a request.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=127781.msg1446615#msg1446615



Also to note:

  thanks was a genuine error .... I'm sure we all make them 

[vw]

Wait? What?

1. Why is someone else changing reviews?

Maybe the girl asked him in pillow talk.   

[finn5555]

Just saw this girl available today so was looking at reviews.

J_H from what I can see you rated as negative ad services weren't on offer when you were trying to book, but the from the above post I can see that you did call her back and the services were now back on offer and you did see her, you rated your meeting as "the punt was a bare positive".

Based on your feedback I'm going to change the Negative rating to a Neutral rating for this booking,

Why resurrect an old post of has the pro$$ie incentivised you to do this 

[Happyjose]

Why resurrect an old post of has the pro$$ie incentivised you to do this 

Certainly stinks to high heaven - an unsanctioned change(s) that favours the prossies rep on here, on a relatively obscure aged review

At the very least a shocking abuse of privileges granted by Admin

[tazman1002001]

Guys i know everyone like a bit of gossip or someone to demonise on here but ive been very clear that-

- i was looking  available girls today and reading there reviews and thats what prompted me to look at her reviews
- The rules around changing review ratings were not fully clear to me so i have let admin know of my error as soon as it was pointed out to me and changed back to negative straight away when i realised i had made the change outwith the rules. (Some else had already changed it back and i put it back to neutral and then to positive as i didnt realise.

I know you all want some drama but you aint getting any out of me ..... so all please do have a great day... i kmow i will as im off to see a gorgeous WG this afternoon who i know will be a POSITIVE punt 

[James999]

- The rules around changing review ratings were not fully clear to me so i have let admin know of my error as soon as it was pointed out to me and changed back to negative straight away when i realised i had made the change outwith the rules. (Some else had already changed it back and i put it back to neutral and then to positive as i didnt realise.

Sounds like Bullshit, if you'd never changed a review before there would need to be a motive to change a 7 month old review, and regardless of "rules" basic common sense would prevail, as for the rest of the waffle, that's just your backtracking since you've been caught out.

You DIDN'T Change it back that was done by Sinz, you then altered it back to neutral AGAIN (and then back to negative) obviously not realising there is a clear audit trail showing of your actions, and this show your bullshit and attempt to cover your actions, hope she's worth it 

[The_Don]

so all please do have a great day... i kmow i will as im off to see a gorgeous WG this afternoon who i know will be a POSITIVE punt 

Good luck and hopefully enjoy the punt 

[auldie63]

Christ, how many more Neutral and Negative reviews has the king of the fluffies altered to suit his 'friends'? 

[johndoeyy]

Perhaps the prossie has made a special request directly to taz?
if the OP didnt request the change its very strange that this review gets dredged out from the archives. Is there an agenda we dont know about? Have you visited her or are you planning a visit taz?

[youngatheart]

Guys i know everyone like a bit of gossip or someone to demonise on here but ive been very clear that-

- i was looking  available girls today and reading there reviews and thats what prompted me to look at her reviews
- The rules around changing review ratings were not fully clear to me so i have let admin know of my error as soon as it was pointed out to me and changed back to negative straight away when i realised i had made the change outwith the rules. (Some else had already changed it back and i put it back to neutral and then to positive as i didnt realise.

I know you all want some drama but you aint getting any out of me ..... so all please do have a great day... i kmow i will as Imoff to see a gorgeous WG this afternoon who i know will be a POSITIVE punt 

It seems that you have made your mind up PRIOR to the punt that it is going to be a positive.

Am I the only one smelling a rat here???


I reckon that Taz should ask to be removed from the list of those capable of changing reviews.  If he doesn't, then I think WE should ask for his removal.

[auldie63]

How the fuck does an 'ordinary punter', who was previously banned on here, come back on with all these liberties that allow him do anything he wants on here?
I thought this site was to be different from the other WG biased sites that allow no criticism of the WGs that are around.
Is this the first sign that this site is going the same way? 

[tazman1002001]

Good luck and hopefully enjoy the punt 

Thanks went to see a gorgesous REGURAL and she was awesome 

[tazman1002001]

Christ, how many more Neutral and Negative reviews has the king of the fluffies altered to suit his 'friends'? 

Ahh it didnt take long for the bitter old vermin to get involved.

Happy new year.... hope your well   

[tazman1002001]

It seems that you have made your mind up PRIOR to the punt that it is going to be a positive.

Am I the only one smelling a rat here???


I reckon that Taz should ask to be removed from the list of those capable of changing reviews.  If he doesn't, then I think WE should ask for his removal.

 Read my post... it was an error plain and simple.

Now go busy YOURSELF and make yourself a useful contributor to this forum and stop being a sheep

[tazman1002001]

Sounds like Bullshit, if you'd never changed a review before there would need to be a motive to change a 7 month old review, and regardless of "rules" basic common sense would prevail, as for the rest of the waffle, that's just your backtracking since you've been caught out.

You DIDN'T Change it back that was done by Sinz, you then altered it back to neutral AGAIN (and then back to negative) obviously not realising there is a clear audit trail showing of your actions, and this show your bullshit and attempt to cover your actions, hope she's worth it 

Still no reviews... didnt think so 

[James999]

Read my post... it was an error plain and simple.

But it wasn't an error, you dug out an old review and decided that you would re grade the review, without any rules or guidelines common sense would say that's wrong.

And when you were caught out, and after you were told you broke the rules, and the rules were pointed out to you, you then went and changed the review AGAIN in an effort to cover your tracks, no other reason to change it back from Negative that Sinz corrected it to, but you did so in an effort to cover your tracks and claim you had corrected your previous change.

You have been caught out messing with the reviews and abusing Admins trust, and instead of putting your hands up you try and lie your way out of it 

[tazman1002001]

But it wasn't an error, you dug out an old review and decided that you would re grade the review, without any rules or guidelines common sense would say that's wrong.

And when you were caught out, and after you were told you broke the rules, and the rules were pointed out to you, you then went and changed the review AGAIN in an effort to cover your tracks, no other reason to change it back from Negative.

You have been caught out messing with the reviews and abusing Admins trust, and instead of putting your hands up you try and lie your way out of it 

Still no review from you..... im sure EVERYONE is thinking the same thing about you... Mr Keyboard Warrior 

And how can YOU determine it wasnt an error when im telling you MYSELF that it was an error 

[johndoeyy]

Thanks went to see a gorgesous REGURAL and she was awesome 

Whats  REGURAL ?
If you go to the bother of using CAPS LOCK do a SPELL CHECK.

[tazman1002001]

Whats  REGURAL ?
If you go to the bother of using CAPS LOCK do a SPELL CHECK.

Soriy teecher ser its wass a mitsake

Hopefully that will keep u busy for a bit whilst the grown ups try and have a chat about girls.... now run along 

[James999]

And how can YOU determine it wasnt an error when im telling you MYSELF that it was an error 

Because of the facts, an error is a Typo (as you made above) not seaking out a 7 month review and then regarding it, something you say you have never done before, so you'd either check the rules or apply common sense, you didn't you regraded a review on your own (possibly persuaded by pro$$ie or her mate) and when this was outed by Sinz and he corrected your "Error" you then went back and changed it AGAIN and AGAIN in an effort to cover your tracks. If it was an error (Which would require you being a total moron) then you wouldn't have gone back and changed it AGAIN and AGAIN after it was corrected.

Guess you didn't know it was recorded, we can all see what you did, so it's not about what you say or what I think it's a matter of FACT 

[johndoeyy]

Soriy teecher ser its wass a mitsake

Hopefully that will keep u busy for a bit whilst the grown ups try and have a chat about girls.... now run along 

You come across as very immature and needy. I guess thats why you are trying to curry favour with prossies. Most of us find money is enough to get what we need. You seem to have to go so much further to gain respect from girls that suck people off for a living.

[SeekingtheTruth]

Soriy teecher ser its wass a mitsake

You seem to make quite a few of those.....

[Courtney]

Still no reviews... didnt think so 

Look forward to your review of this episode...
Oh that's right you don't do reviews   

James start reviewing and making an actual contribution as has been stated previously for you 

Still no review from you..... im sure EVERYONE is thinking the same thing about you... Mr Keyboard Warrior 

It doesn’t look like “EVERYONE” is by the look of it. I’m not sure what James999’s review count has to do with your “mistake”

[tazman1002001]

You come across as very immature and needy. I guess thats why you are trying to curry favour with prossies. Most of us find money is enough to get what we need. You seem to have to go so much further to gain respect from girls that suck people off for a living.

 

[tazman1002001]

It doesn’t look like “EVERYONE” is by the look of it. I’m not sure what James999’s review count has to do with your “mistake”

  thanks for your input