Hasn't this been asked before ??
Anyways a pro$$ie fucking a punter who has seen blatant barebackers isn't enough evidence to support her being a barebacker herself.
For a pro$$ie to be included in this list there needs to be evidence to show that she has BBed a punter or has openly offered BB to a punter OR is blantantly advertising BB.
That said it shows a very poor level of due diligence on her part that she has seen this cunt.
Spot on.
I know a couple of wg's I have punted with who are spotlessly clean use quality condoms and would kick your arse out the door if bb was requested. Reading through their feedback both have feedback from guys who have feedback of their own from women who bb with virtually every punter.
As Mr FF says poor due diligence by the girls but if they're seeing a dozen guys a day (both women I'm referring to worked at parlours) and using quality condoms going through every client's feedback probably isn't a priority.
It's up to us as punters to take respobsibility for our own sexual health and part of that is outing irresponsible punters and WGs alike. If this impacts on a WGs earning potential and she loses money or regular clients she'll take notice.
