Miss Kinky Katie Glasgow

[Jock D]

30mins Incall £60

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only -

Even as I start to write up this review, I am still undecided on whether to rate it... neutral or negative...hopefully this process will help me come to a conclusion

The meeting actually took place at Sexy Sami's flat in the St Georges Cross area(she wasn't there btw)...apparently Katie has been using her flat recently...but told me she has secured her own place south of the river...which she should now be working from? Comms were good and straightforward initial call and then texts.  On arrival, my first impressions of Katie weren't great. Where do I start? She's fat...pure and simple...dress size 10 stated  she's at least a 16... and surprising for a relatively young woman she has a collapsed arse...also looks to be well in her 30's(25 stated on profile)...her hair was scrapped back in a pony tail away from her face...maybe as a Polish lassie she's integrated too well into the Glesga culture...as she now looks like a bona fide schemie ned who's enjoyed too many visits to the chip shop.

On the plus side she has huge natural tits...and once we got the money thing out the way...her enthusiasm for her work was undenaible. Ironically, she really does share that same rampant sexual appetite that big Sammi has...almost as though it has been cloned. DFK...prolonged cock sucking...missionary & doggy were all given enthusiastically...to say the least! I actually think she probably out does Sami when it comes to the fucking...honestly she Really Goes for it...unfortunately for me though...I wasn't as enthusiastic as her as I genuinely didn't find her very attractive...and ended up as my choice...wanking myself off over her big tits as we were running out of time. For the record I left the flat 35mins after entering.

Therefore, I'm going to give Katie the benefit of the doubt and rate this a Neutral...for her unbridled enthusiasm and effort...if she came down a couple of dress sizes she would have the potential be a superstar...but until she does I won't be returning.

[JustHilts]

So your neutral is based on her size being bigger than stated? Does this mean her pics are out of date cos she doesn't look like a 16 in them; 12 maybe? Otherwise it sounds like a positive to me 

[Jock D]

Think you need to read the review again...neutral is based on false size...therefore pics are well out of date...false age...and not finding her pyhsically attractive.

[JustHilts]

Think you need to read the review again...neutral is based on false size...therefore pics are well out of date...false age...and not finding her pyhsically attractive.

That's what I was trying to confirm; guess it was a rhetorical question? And yes I noticed you mentioned age when I read back over.  Difficult to determine age from those pics so I take your word for it.

But another touchy reply to a genuine post as per Lovely Destiny thread; man this is a harsh site   

[Courtney]

man this is a harsh site   

...well it ain't not allowed thats for sure.

[JustHilts]

...well it ain't not allowed thats for sure.

I'm a big boy so I think I'll be ok; but a lot of angry young(ish) men around 

[Jock D]

But another touchy reply to a genuine post as per Lovely Destiny thread; man this is a harsh site   

Touchy reply...harsh That was me at my Easter Sunday...goodwill to all men best mate...a polite prompt response to you question!!! Let's hope I never have to reply to you when I am in a harsher frame of mind...you'd need 6 months intensive counselling to get over it.

[draper99]

Thought the review was informative enough to warrant a neutral from the punters point of view.
might be a few punters who would like a bigger girl who has sammi's appetite for sex.

at least the info is there now for any future punt/punters

[JustHilts]

Thought the review was informative enough to warrant a neutral from the punters point of view.
might be a few punters who would like a bigger girl who has sammi's appetite for sex.

at least the info is there now for any future punt/punters

I don't have an issue with the review at all, I was merely confirming what the OP's reasons were as the punt itself seemed ok? As I said earlier it was kind of a rhetorical question.

[draper99]

I don't have an issue with the review at all, I was merely confirming what the OP's reasons were as the punt itself seemed ok? As I said earlier it was kind of a rhetorical question.

wasn't aimed at you...just my point of view

[Scotpunter]

Looking at her pics I'd say her claim of being size 10 is based on a very elastic dress. 

I dont think a neutral is unfair if she is a good bit bigger than she claims. I don't find chunky girls attractive and the review helps me.

[Jock D]

Looking at her pics I'd say her claim of being size 10 is based on a very elastic dress. 

I dont think a neutral is unfair if she is a good bit bigger than she claims. I don't find chunky girls attractive and the review helps me.

Happy to hear that it was of some help ...that's what this site should be all about...and whilst I've always said that reviews are subjective, based on the reviewers opinion, and I stand by that...they can also be quite factual at the same time...e.g. she is nowhere near a size 10...Fact...she is fat...Fact...she has a collapsed arse, befitting of a woman in her 50s or 60s...Fact...Apologies for the Rafa style rant but you get the gist