Author Topic: Virginia Office - Heathrow. Tourer  (Read 1156 times)


8 review(s) for virginia office (5 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by CoolTiger]

Offline Tony_Red

External Link/Members Only
or External Link/Members Only

A couple of short reviews for a couple of forgettable airport quickies.
Ratings/scores based on personal preferences. £60/30mins.

Comms and Planning 3/5 All by text . Get the feeling she does her own messaging.
Inside the room, I found out her English is decent.
Venue 3.5/5 Park-inn Heathrow, £2/hr parking
Face 2.5/5, Body 3/5 Early 30s. Bit of dry skin. I take my specs off during punts but she said she needs to keep hers on when I asked if they could come off - fair enough. Looks-wise she was not doing it for me. Slim toned (not gym toned) figure, Ok ass. small tits. Must have lost some weight recently - pics gave me the impression she was firmer and a bit meatier. Quite pale-skinned - something else I wasn't expecting looking at her pics. Very similar skin tone to 'Sexy leticia for you' (Brazilian WG who is often in Reading).
Services taken part in: OWO, RO, FK for a few seconds until I gave up cos it was so shit, Sex. Services enjoyed: Nothing I can remember. OW (her choice) was shit. She wraps her lips around the head only and does a sucking/blowing action. Reminded me of when I use the plunger on the kitchen sink when the kids have blocked it. Felt like a parlour punt..prob worse.

She was friendly in a professional way and not a clock watcher, but ultimately the services provided were very poor, regardless of whether I was into her looks or not.
Other girls have looked worse but have won me over with an outstanding service...

Final word: Forgettable punt with four-eyes

Offline pumps


Services taken part in: OWO, RO, FK for a few seconds until I gave up cos it was so shit, Sex. Services enjoyed: Nothing I can remember. OW (her choice) was shit.

Clarification here?



This dry skin you mention, on her face?


I'd do like her look personally, and would of probably liked her to keep those glasses on myself. I've seen her profile and always thought that two of the pictures weren't her.

As for not being meaty, thats a another huge disappointment, not to mention the service was terrible.

Thank god for ukp, look at all that useless AW feedback she has  :sarcastic:

Thanks for reviewing.

Offline Tony_Red

Dry skin (not terrible, but noticeable) on arms and back. Looked more like sun-burn than anything else.

Sorry, I meant OW. I was just copying and pasting a 'template' from another review to quickly rattle out these 2 reviews as quickly as possible. Definitely OW.

Pumps, having seen pics of the girls you review, definitely not meaty like any of those!
You will probably like the other girl I reviewed tonight.

I review ladies based on the punt, but the rating is also based on other ladies I have seen that are at a comparable price point. And the 2 WGs I have just posted reviews for do not come close to the likes of others in the £60-£80/hh price range, such as EmillyLove, Ola (Aleksandra) GlamourPorsha, even MyaMya (Romanian), and a host of others such as Julia Spicy, Curly Beauty, Polish Minx etc. The latter WGs I haven't seen but their reviews sound great.

As for WGs AW feedback- it's a load of shite. Sometimes I get the feeling there are WGs for those who want to get down and dirty...and there are WGs for those who want the massage, the chats, the company...
« Last Edit: March 10, 2017, 07:15:01 pm by Tony_Red »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Saw her last year
Found her attractive and engaging
Did not notice any dry skin
A little eccentric
If I remember correctly made me wash my banana beast and then she gave me owo
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline pumps



Pumps, having seen pics of the girls you review, definitely not meaty like any of those!
You will probably like the other girl I reviewed tonight.




My comment was going by your suggestion that she didn't look as curvy as her fully clothed picture.


« Last Edit: March 10, 2017, 07:39:17 pm by pumps »