Well, if it ain't broke..
Personally, I like a bit of a narrative and as much detail as possible in a review, helps me to better understand what it's like to have sex with the WG in question and to try to make an informed decision on where I want to spend my money. In fact, it's one of the primary reasons I started to pay attention to this forum in the first place, and I in turn try to write my reviews like that. Sometimes I've maybe gone on a bit too much and not got to the point, or have not made things clear enough for all readers to understand. But ultimately I write a review for my own reasons, i.e., to get it out of my system, as a reference guide I refer back to, or just simply to get a good or bad memory on record. If other punters get something useful out of that then that's a nice bonus for everybody. Along with the indexing system, it seems to be a system that works well enough, and if people have questions they can always ask, that's why reviews have a reply section as far as I understand.
Personally, the shorter, more factual to the point reviews, I tend to skip past them as they don't really tell me much I don't already know.
A tick box system.. I can see the thinking, but just seems a good way of over-complicating things. For example: I don't drive to punts. I wouldn't really be able to tell you about the parking. What about the difference between GFE, PSE, FBSM, or BDSM services? How do you fit that into a tick box system? I think it could actually make the whole process slower and more confusing in practice. You have new posters on here so technology unknowing that they don't even know how to copy/paste a link, but I want to hear about their thoughts, opinions and experiences and much as everybody elses. In whatever form they choose to share said information, it's all useful to me.