Author Topic: Faith North East  (Read 18149 times)


2 review(s) for Faith North East (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by FCB]

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
  •  
Are the punters details now on SAAFE or is it just a case of starting or amending a thread about A to V?

Are the punters details now on Ugly Mugs and the Whatsapp group?

I am not clear what details have now been uploaded and where.

clients have no right to log into ugly mugs :unknown:

Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
clients have no right to log into ugly mugs

Pro$$ies are not supposed to tout on here, but it doesn't stop you  :hi:

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
  •  
Pro$$ies are not supposed to tout on here, but it doesn't stop you  :hi:

 :rolleyes:
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

walking dead

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
clients have no right to log into ugly mugs :unknown:
.
I am starting to think we need an underground punters group

Offline stevedave

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,293
  • Likes: 12
  •  
  • Reviews: 90
Nice and discreet  :dash:

Agreed. There is zero need for this PRIVATE message to be made public, hence the word private.

Piss poor.

Offline Mansell

.
I am starting to think we need an underground punters group

We've got one, your posting on it  ;)

Offline datwabbit

clients have no right to log into ugly mugs :unknown:

I did not suggest clients should be able to log onto those systems.

I was asking what info has been uploaded and where. Trying to follow what happened.

Offline LydiaAmour

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 115
  • Likes: 0
  •  
Just to settle any nerves regarding the saafe/ugly mugs thing - I can't see any info that could be about this client on Saafe, and if it has been reported to UM it hasn't been sent out. I can't comment on the watsapp sharing group as I think the group itself is a bad idea so I'm not in it.

What a storm in a teacup.

AmyBbw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's not in the wattsapp group I use if that's any help.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So not only were her threats vile and uncalled for they were also lies, this pro$$ie goes from worse to worse  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: March 02, 2017, 07:15:08 am by James999 »

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,417
  • Likes: 816
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
So not only were her threats vile and uncalled for they were also lies, this pro$$ie goes from worse to worse  :thumbsdown:

+ 1

Totally agree James, what a horrible vindictive cow she's shown herself to be. There's just no need for such a reaction to a very deserved negative review.

As for posting private messages, well words fail me you just don't.

She's so stupid she doesn't understand it's her continued responses that's kept this thread going. All she had to do was post one comment then leave it at that and this thread would be at the bottom of the page by now.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Offline Mansell

+ 1

Totally agree James, what a horrible vindictive cow she's shown herself to be. There's just no need for such a reaction to a very deserved negative review.

As for posting private messages, well words fail me you just don't.

She's so stupid she doesn't understand it's her continued responses that's kept this thread going. All she had to do was post one comment then leave it at that and this thread would be at the bottom of the page by now.     :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Ought to be held as an example of how to destroy your reputation in one easy lesson  :dash:

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's been asked to be left.

NUM were notified. But as Lydia said. Nothing was sent out.

This is absolutely rediculous.  I've spoken with shearer many times personally

And as for the private apology. Moresome on this thread told me to post it. I can't do right for doing wrong

You have all formed opinions and voiced  them more than once.  And as for "just a prossie" well that says more about yourself than anything. The main trolls of this thread have never even left a punt review ! And have only ever commented on reviews with neagativity and insults

And as for people still commenting , two minutes ago you were agreeing with shearer saying well said for it to all be left now.

Enough is enough.

Surely you must all be bored of this now - and if you're not. There are really a lot more things to be doing more interesting more exciting and more productive. I know I'm bored of it now anyway
« Last Edit: March 02, 2017, 09:13:05 am by Faith »

Offline baresi

After deliberating over the furore and the heated messages posted i have looked at my review - I stand by it absolutely but I am prepared to acknowledge there was somewhat of a breakdown in communications some of it on my part which resulted in what i consider a poor punt - in good faith Faith thought it was going to be a BDSM punt and I perhaps wanted a combination of GFE with BDSM - it doesn't work well it seems - the rights and wrongs of the messaging can be mulled over separately

Things were heated yesterday & I was pilloried within the exchange messaging on UKE and by Faith on here and still believe I was unfairly wronged - that said I am forgiveful and to throw an olive branch I communicated with Faith on PM - this was instigated by me and not her as i dislike the continuance of bad feelings which is not my forte - I think most girls I see will acknowledge I am friendly and personable and I would prefer that remains. I know some will question why I did exchange messages with Faith but I'm not vengeful and preferred an open approach to her to offer reconciliation and perhaps some blame can be apportioned to me for not providing clarity before and whilst we met

Faith is I believe genuinely upset causing her upset at home - I don't wish to apportion further blame in any direction and so I felt it best to apologise to her for the outpouring of negativity which has resulted from this - we have probably both suffered albeit I am very thick skinned - and to offer an olive branch. I don't believe she is a nasty lass and whilst I believe she could have handled the matter more objectively I don't want hostilities to continue unabated; I prefer the spirit of friendliness to the alternate options

My review stands and I have told Faith this but I don't want the vitriol to spill over against her and would prefer that we draw a veil over this thread or at least maintain a sense of realism. Hopefully lessons have been learnt for the future by all but I hope the gents (and any ladies) who read this will accept that I am illustrating it in a way which maintains the status quo.

To clarify and for the avoidance of doubt I have not been offered any favours; reduced pricing or anything like that by Faith although sometime in the foreseeable future to show there is no animosity I will arrange a GFE with Faith - at her normal rate I might add - I don't ask or receive favours nor would I expect to

If I have over stepped the mark with these comments and should not have acted as I have done now by posting this clarification then I apologise to all

As with this review all or any further ones will reflect the facts as I believe them to be resulting from my interactions with the escort - errors in grammar, spelling etc notwithstanding

Thank You



when you book this follow up meeting with her i'd get it in writing that she's going to take it  up the jacksie to avoid any confusion


Offline The Outsider

Well, if Faith hasn't actually (ab)used the various reporting options, and Shearer1955 is happy to forgive and forget, I guess we can all move on. 

Criticizing Faith's photos, questioning her age and so on actually distracts from the malicious threats she made to intimidate a reviewer.  That was the extent of my problem with her. 


James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's been asked to be left.

I know, you asked me in PM a number of times to "leave it" Of course you want the subject closed, the way you dealt with the client at the meeting seems poor, but the way you acted on here after was terrible, and you tried to bully your way through this negative review, however it backfiredand

And as for the private apology. Moresome on this thread told me to post it.

Yet again you blame others for YOUR actions  :dash:

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,417
  • Likes: 816
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
It's been asked to be left.

And as for the private apology. Moresome on this thread told me to post it. I can't do right for doing wrong

Enough is enough.

Surely you must all be bored of this now - and if you're not. There are really a lot more things to be doing more interesting more exciting and more productive. I know I'm bored of it now anyway

The only person who can give consent for you to post a private message is the person who sent it, your own integrity, if you had any, should tell you that.

As long as you keep posting members will reply, you stop posting = nothing to reply to, is that really that difficult to understand or do you just want the last word.   :unknown:

 

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
  •  
gosh why cant we all just get along sometimes so much hate goes on  :unknown:
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline Moresomes

I have stayed of this thread since my original post,and would have probably made no further comment, but as the lovely Faith appears to be attempting to obtain full milage from any source I will comment as follows. Since my original post I have been blitzed with PMs from Faith, in reply to which I made my feelings on her behavior very clear She then asked me if i wished to see the alleged apology and the reply from myself which once again she has twisted said, and I quote.

"If such an apology exists, why wouldn't you post it on this forum? I cant believe that you are refraining from doing so in order to spare his feelings, considering the hatchet job that you have attempted and failed to carry out on his review."

She then replied stating that she had in fact posted the OPs PM, and in her ensuing mini rant managed to sound quite pleased with herself. I replied to this with the following, followed by a final message that I was blocking any further PMs from her

So I see.
It's rather a shame that you haven't anything left available to you to continue to further humiliate and denigrate the reviewer.
You do appear to have worn him down to the point where he is hoping to bring the post to an early conclusion, so I hope that at this point you will consider your revenge complete and hopefully leave the man in peace. I wish you all the best, and I'm fairly sure that you will not be troubled by many reviews, positive or negative, on the forum in the future.
 
As I said previously, up until now I had only made the one thowaway post, but as this devious bunny boiler seems to be further snatching at any straw i would just like to bring this up.

PS, Faith. No more PMs please . You are still blocked.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
  •  
""If such an apology exists, why wouldn't you post it on this forum? "

which she did

blimey what a fucking palava that 2 people could deal with via pms or txts!
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline Moresomes

""If such an apology exists, why wouldn't you post it on this forum? "

which she did

blimey what a fucking palava that 2 people could deal with via pms or txts!

Try reading it in the context of regarding the bile she had previously posted Rebecca rather than going down the Prossies closing rank road.

Offline Moresomes

Try reading it in the context of regarding the bile she had previously posted Rebecca rather than going down the Prossies closing ranks road.

Quoted myself for some reason. Sorry
« Last Edit: March 02, 2017, 03:42:26 pm by Moresomes »

Offline Moresomes

Incidentally, The pm from me to her in which she says that I told her to put up the reviewers apology was sent at 8.31.24pm, and she actually posted his PM at 7.11.40.
Now I may be many things, but a time traveller is not one of them.   :hi:

Offline Mansell

I have stayed of this thread since my original post,and would have probably made no further comment, but as the lovely Faith appears to be attempting to obtain full milage from any source I will comment as follows. Since my original post I have been blitzed with PMs from Faith, in reply to which I made my feelings on her behavior very clear She then asked me if i wished to see the alleged apology and the reply from myself which once again she has twisted said, and I quote.

"If such an apology exists, why wouldn't you post it on this forum? I cant believe that you are refraining from doing so in order to spare his feelings, considering the hatchet job that you have attempted and failed to carry out on his review."

She then replied stating that she had in fact posted the OPs PM, and in her ensuing mini rant managed to sound quite pleased with herself. I replied to this with the following, followed by a final message that I was blocking any further PMs from her
 
As I said previously, up until now I had only made the one thowaway post, but as this devious bunny boiler seems to be further snatching at any straw i would just like to bring this up.

PS, Faith. No more PMs please . You are still blocked.

Thanks for the explanation which makes total sense, there is nothing more annoying than having what you have said manipulated around and then used against you, I bet your fuming.  :angry: :angry: :angry:

So when you getting your name changed to Dr Who  ;) :cool: ;)

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,417
  • Likes: 816
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
""If such an apology exists, why wouldn't you post it on this forum? "

which she did

blimey what a fucking palava that 2 people could deal with via pms or txts!

I firmly believe she posted that PM out of malice, there's some things you know are just wrong to do (no matter who tells you to do it), even by PM would be wrong. The OP's tried to sort things out with her privately but she just wants to get her revenge and the way she's gone on shows what a nasty, evil, vindictive cow she is.

All she had to do after Shearer sent her the PM was make one last post to say things had been sorted privately and that would've been the end of it, but not good enough for her she wanted public humiliation.  Backfired a bit though.   

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
gosh why cant we all just get along sometimes so much hate goes on

Why do you keep returning to the thread if you are not interested in it?

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Incidentally, The pm from me to her in which she says that I told her to put up the reviewers apology was sent at 8.31.24pm, and she actually posted his PM at 7.11.40.
Now I may be many things, but a time traveller is not one of them.   

Yet AGAIN she's been caught out in her attempt to denigrate the client she has just shown herself as an evil vindictive cow  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: March 02, 2017, 04:09:58 pm by James999 »

Looking4fun

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
After reading through some of the posts on this thread, my thoughts are,
the op needs to stand by his review don't start feeling guilty, the reviews are written to benefit punters not escorts.
Faith had you taken his thoughts on board & used them constructively,instead of posting on a punters website in an argumentative way,you would've been in a far better position than you are right now.
Let it go & learn from it!

Offline baresi

i miss Anthg he'd have sorted this out no bother

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline Moresomes

Well, I had no intention of coming back to this thread, but this manipulative cow left me no choice.
She'll be back because she's as thick as a scaffolders sandwich.
I can't quite make my mind up if she's, mad, bad, or dangerous. Probably all three, but definitely not too bright.

Offline johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,038
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 41

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Think he's taking a break from the forums atm.

He would have been an ideal client / victim for Faith  :wacko:

Offline madmania

Well this was some solid entertainment for my Sunday morning :thumbsup:

My own view is that the negative review was fair and reflected OPs feelings and then the prossie comes in all butthurt about it (pardon the pun) and starts intimidating OP with malicious threats.

That's not on imo and shows very bad character. Additionally, faith's initial positive response just shows that the review was likely correct and all allegations against OP are fake and used as spiteful revenge.

The matter seems closed now fortunately, but I couldn't resist posting as Id read the whole thread :hi:

Offline arthur

The prossie clearly has control issues and is dangerous.

Shes probably used to getting everything her own way but it didnt work out on this forum so she had to tone down her aggression, but still couldnt let it go.

At least UKP members have been warned and know to stay away from her.

Offline dubhcarr

thanks for the review OP sorry it went wrong for you but you have saved my hard earned.......thanks.....

Offline Mr blue

The prossie clearly has control issues and is dangerous.

Shes probably used to getting everything her own way but it didnt work out on this forum so she had to tone down her aggression, but still couldnt let it go.

At least UKP members have been warned and know to stay away from her.

She's a member on a swinging site , so will be used to loads of men messaging her and her being able to pick and choose who she meets off there , she won't have to use any effort or charm or even be polite they will just message for meets , she probably thought she could act the same way when she started escorting . My main gripe is I bet she doesn't tell her swinging meets that she escorts , if any of you want to meet her just get along to club f .
« Last Edit: March 19, 2017, 07:54:31 am by Mr blue »

Offline scoobyboy72

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 623
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
Banned reason: Requested in pm to Admin
Banned by: Head1

Offline datwabbit

. My main gripe is I bet she doesn't tell her swinging meets that she escorts , if any of you want to meet her just get along to club f .

She's probably more choosy at club f. She won't knock back ugly blokes as an escort.

Offline Brazilian Martian

She's probably more choosy at club f. She won't knock back ugly blokes as an escort.

Maybe but it's not like she's Charlize theron  :music:

Offline Mr blue

She's probably more choosy at club f. She won't knock back ugly blokes as an escort.

I meant her swinging partners might like to know she escorts before they agree to meet her , most I'm sure would want to know

Offline Tiger63

I meant her swinging partners might like to know she escorts before they agree to meet her , most I'm sure would want to know

The other way round as well....Iam sure someone who is considering paying £100 an hour to fuck her would much rather pay the £20 entrance fee and have her for free

Offline datwabbit

I meant her swinging partners might like to know she escorts before they agree to meet her , most I'm sure would want to know
:thumbsup:

Offline datwabbit

She's also now on SA.

External Link/Members Only

Is she after a sugar daddy or sugar baby? (I don't have an account so wondered what she was after)

I am more of a Canderel Daddy.

Offline scoobyboy72

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 623
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
Is she after a sugar daddy or sugar baby? (I don't have an account so wondered what she was after)

I am more of a Canderel Daddy.

A sugar daddy. Apparently she's intelligent and speaks three languages...
Banned reason: Requested in pm to Admin
Banned by: Head1

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
A sugar daddy. Apparently she's intelligent and speaks three languages...

Yes I speak French , Spanish and Norwegian. I do class myself as intelligent, or do you follow the opinions of the not allowed crew that all escorts are druggies and punters are dirty old men that couldn't pull without having to pay for it ?
As for SA. I am entitled to a personal life as well as a working one
As for swinging -well as above. Anyone is more than welcome to join the swinging club I attend. But if there is no attraction won't be fucking you.
As for letting people know I'm an escort. As well as my other job. I don't tell everyone just those I am friendly with and trust. Do you think that all escorts tell people they date in their personal life that they are escorts ???? I fail to understand the significance of swinging ?  But by people linking Accounts that are MY PERSONAL LIFE MY PERSONAL DETAILS -THATS OUTING !

« Last Edit: March 22, 2017, 10:13:00 am by Faith »

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I do class myself as intelligent

Why do you act so fucking stupid then  :unknown: Do you not have any common sense  :unknown:

And Whinge... Fucking hell how many whinging reports and PMs can someone send, you must be going for some sort of record  :scare:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yes I speak French , Spanish and Norwegian.
#

Seems you are also fluent in the language of bullshit !

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Why do you act so fucking stupid then  :unknown: Do you not have any common sense  :unknown:

And Whinge... Fucking hell how many whinging reports and PMs can someone send, you must be going for some sort of record  :scare:

0 reviews and how many posts ??? Thanks.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She's also now on SA.

External Link/Members Only


How can this idiot faith call SA outing, SA is a site for prossies in denial, still selling sex IMO.   :dash: :dash: