Author Topic: Faith North East  (Read 18154 times)


2 review(s) for Faith North East (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by FCB]

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This looks like a case of poor communication on both sides leading to a bad booking.  The OP may have been a bit clumsy and some of the practices mentioned certainly aren't "best practice"!

However - unless there is more to this than posted - he doesn't seem to be a real threat or trouble maker.  In fact, Faith didn't seem concerned about him at all until after she read the negative review. 

It's just seems like a session that's gone wrong.  If Faith thinks that is justification for reporting to Saafe, NUM and so on, she just seems vindictive to me.  I'll be avoiding her.

You're right. This has been a lack of communication. I agree. One review. And I have left my opinion. Not that it means anything. I could solve the famine in third world countries  and cure cancer. I would still be the bad one
Because I have had an opinion and let people know that working girls share information about all punts (not realising this was an unknown ?). I've already made clear SEVERAL times the SAAFE issue is about the anus to vagina.
But positive have come out of this. Not just for me. Working girls are asking what SAAFE  is. If that's not a major positive then I don't know what is.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2017, 01:09:38 am by Faith »

Offline Roth

This looks like a case of poor communication on both sides leading to a bad booking.  The OP may have been a bit clumsy and some of the practices mentioned certainly aren't "best practice"!

However - unless there is more to this than posted - he doesn't seem to be a real threat or trouble maker.  In fact, Faith didn't seem concerned about him at all until after she read the negative review. 

It's just seems like a session that's gone wrong.  If Faith thinks that is justification for reporting to Saafe, NUM and so on, she just seems vindictive to me.  I'll be avoiding her.

Don't think she's reported to SAAFE just yet. :hi:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So in Summary after the meet she says

Positive   Faith North East (3)   27/02/2017 19:45   Offering Services
    Nice guy. On time and lots of stamina!! Thanks for a fun time xx

He then gives her a negative feedback and Then she gets very vindictive and threatening and posts on saafe warnings about him, and this seems to be for something that she Made up after the event, she said she checked he wasn't doing arse to pussy and he wasn't yet she still attacks him verbally for what she thought, despit it being wrong  :dash:

And the finger nail excuse, if it was genuine all she had to do was say, "you've got a sharp nail" and snip / file it for him.

She's desperate to make him the bad guy here which reflects badly on her  :thumbsdown:

Offline Shearer1955

I'm going to reply to some of her accusations -

This is an extract from my original review -

Unfortunately things went downhill soon thereafter - I fingered her bumhole with the intention of loosing it up as I wanted to fuck her anally but it was soon obvious this wasn't going to happen as she pulled my hand away; said she was sore (I think I was her final booking) & said it wasn't going to happen

Her immediate response was

as for fisting - I've been fisted MANY times before. Yes it is to made possible with time and lube and I fucking love it. But the way you rammed your sharp nailed fingers  into my vagina after  I told you you were hurting me, there was no way I was going to allow you to fist me !

: as for anal - when attempting to take me doggy style you were then going to ram you penis into my anus DRY!!  That together with the bullet point above was the reason I said no.


This was part of a reply she offered at 12.15.40 this morning which I believe illustrates that what i said in my review is factual -

As for anal, if I am sore or if someone is rough of course I have the right to say no. HOW CAN YOU INFER THAT A GIRL SHOULD DO SOMETHING THAT HURTS? escorting is about CONSENSUAL sex. What you are inferring is I discussed anal so I should have let him even though it hurt and I didn't want it ?

She mentions my intending to push my dick in her anus when dry - I didn't have a condom on at that point I had not applied lube so it is simply not a real version of events

She said I hurt her with my fingers - my nails are always cut very short and there is simply no way they were the problem - i am very fastidious about this . Now before we met we exchanged texts and she said she had a traffic light system of words being green is ok, amber is a warning; red is stop - she has replied by saying I was hurting her she has made absolutely no reference to her using either of these amber or red to imply any pain- as it happens and from my review when i inserted a third finger she visibly winced so I stopped any further penetration as I understood it was painful for her

I had spanked her at the beginning of the meeting and more towards the end of the meeting she said I could spank her again and harder - I did not but if she is suggesting that at any time she was uncomfortable  & to report me might someone explain why she was happy for me to this at a later point after her supposed version of events occurred

I did not use the same hand when i put fingers in her pussy or anus so they are irrelevant to the points at issue here

So to sum up i'm being vilified for what precisely?



« Last Edit: March 01, 2017, 08:49:40 am by Shearer1955 »

Offline maxxblue

He said he was going to screen shot it anyway so I saved him him the bother. I don't lie.

Then why did you say that you had reported it to SAAFE when you haven't?

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Then why did you say that you had reported it to SAAFE when you haven't?
m
I have clarified over and over and over again. Saafe have been notified about the subject of anus to vagina. Not about the punter. I have clarified this over and over and over again !

UKP have bLocked some of my responses. So how can I reapond ??

As for shearer saying I have made accusations. Not accusations. My version of events. As shearer has left his version of events.

How can I know if someone is using different fingers anus and vagina if I'm blindfolded? And shearer says he uses the same fingers anus and vagina with other girls no problem

HE LEFT HIS SIDE. I HAVE LEFT MINE. THERE ARE ALWAYS TWO SODES TO A PUNT. BUT APPARENTLY WORKING GIRLS ARENT ENTITLED TO THEIRS.

he has felt the need to respond to my "accusations" SO THIS SHOWS IT HAPPENED !

Like I said. I could solve world famine , cure cancer and bring world peace. But because I'm a working girl I will always be villainised. If people can't see that there are two sides to a pint. Then that's their issue

As for the traffic light system , I didn't need to use That. That was for BDSM LIMITS. hirting inside vaginally etc IS NOT BDSM

Offline The Outsider

HE LEFT HIS SIDE. I HAVE LEFT MINE. THERE ARE ALWAYS TWO SODES TO A PUNT. BUT APPARENTLY WORKING GIRLS ARENT ENTITLED TO THEIRS. .... I could solve world famine , cure cancer and bring world peace. But because I'm a working girl I will always be villainised.

Shearer didn't enjoy his time and left a negative review.  You didn't like the review and went on the attack.  I think most folks on here are happy to hear both sides and make their own minds up. Sometimes reviewers have been "called out" when their experience is dramatically different from others and the review seems vindictive.  It's not all one way on here. 

A negative review wouldn't necessarily stop me seeing somebody.  This kind of vengeful reaction and malicious reporting does.  I'd not want a booking in case it didn't go well and my number ended up on the info sharing group in revenge.   

You could have countered the review professionally in a polite and constructive way, pointing out any problems with expectations and communications. 

Offline Kev3773

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,073
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 90
Shearer didn't enjoy his time and left a negative review.  You didn't like the review and went on the attack.  I think most folks on here are happy to hear both sides and make their own minds up. Sometimes reviewers have been "called out" when their experience is dramatically different from others and the review seems vindictive.  It's not all one way on here. 

A negative review wouldn't necessarily stop me seeing somebody.  This kind of vengeful reaction and malicious reporting does.  I'd not want a booking in case it didn't go well and my number ended up on the info sharing group in revenge.   

You could have countered the review professionally in a polite and constructive way, pointing out any problems with expectations and communications.

Well said totally agree  :hi:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Look people can see this has gone on for long enough.

Why is that ?

I expect becuase this bit is a lie

all this has done is boost my bookings. Thanks

Looks like you have learned the lesson revenge is never good.

And if revenge doesn't work play the victim card..

because I'm a working girl I will always be villainised.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2017, 12:28:57 pm by vw »

Offline Brazilian Martian

I've had repeat BDSM punters as well as repeate GFE punters and all this has done is boost my bookings. Thanks

Then who ever visits you or is encouraged to visit needs their head examined or possible shock therapy  imo :crazy:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This kind of vengeful reaction and malicious reporting does.  I'd not want a booking in case it didn't go well and my number ended up on the info sharing group in revenge.   

You could have countered the review professionally in a polite and constructive way, pointing out any problems with expectations and communications.

She's old and probably used to getting away with this shit, in the old days of pro$$ienet etc then she probably would have, but in the modern world her behaviour is not acceptable and has backfired on her big time.  :music:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You're right. This has been a lack of communication. I agree. One review. And I have left my opinion. Not that it means anything. I could solve the famine in third world countries  and cure cancer. I would still be the bad one
Because I have had an opinion and let people know that working girls share information about all punts (not realising this was an unknown ?). I've already made clear SEVERAL times the SAAFE issue is about the anus to vagina.
But positive have come out of this. Not just for me. Working girls are asking what SAAFE  is. If that's not a major positive then I don't know what is.

Why post this then ?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Because you do what prossies do and lie and lie and backtrack.


Out of interest please tell the truth how many cancellations have you received since your outburst ?


Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Shearer didn't enjoy his time and left a negative review.  You didn't like the review and went on the attack.  I think most folks on here are happy to hear both sides and make their own minds up. Sometimes reviewers have been "called out" when their experience is dramatically different from others and the review seems vindictive.  It's not all one way on here. 

A negative review wouldn't necessarily stop me seeing somebody.  This kind of vengeful reaction and malicious reporting does.  I'd not want a booking in case it didn't go well and my number ended up on the info sharing group in revenge.   

You could have countered the review professionally in a polite and constructive way, pointing out any problems with expectations and communications.
Good meets end up on the info group too. Girls post a number of a guy they haven't met before and girls answer if they've seen them. Works for good or bad.

He had admitted in his post I visibly winced when he put his finger inside of me. So it shows he was hurting me

Look we can go back and forth back and forth.

He has said his point. I've said mine. People will make their decisions and make points of view. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. And so am I.

It hasn't damaged my work. I've had three bookings this morning all who read the review and an inbox full of bookings. So perhaps it's done me a favour.  And I've learned from this type of booking to only accept people who I have met before for bdsm play.

I'm sure shearer has realised bdsm is not to him. And perhaps should stick to GFE.

As for being old ? I'm 32. Don't really think I'm over this hill. But hey like I said. Everyone has heir own opinion.

Finish

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Good meets end up on the info group too. Girls post a number of a guy they haven't met before and girls answer if they've seen them. Works for good or bad.

Like info on mug punters you can short change on time of babble on to much.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

He has said his point. I've said mine. People will make their decisions and make points of view. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. And so am I.

Yes and this was your opinion AFTER the Punt, you said of him
Positive   Faith North East (3)   27/02/2017 19:45   Offering Services
    Nice guy. On time and lots of stamina!! Thanks for a fun time xx
So That's your opinion of how it went in your own words !

You only started to make shit up after he marked the meet as a negative, so he said it was Negative, you said it was positive.

Then you get vindictive and start to make shit up, a bit like your age, 32 :lol: Must have been a tough paper round  :sarcastic:

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yes and this was your opinion AFTER the Punt, you said of him
Positive   Faith North East (3)   27/02/2017 19:45   Offering Services
    Nice guy. On time and lots of stamina!! Thanks for a fun time xx
So That's your opinion of how it went in your own words !

You only started to make shit up after he marked the meet as a negative, so he said it was Negative, you said it was positive.

Then you get vindictive and start to make shit up, a bit like your age, 32 :lol: Must have been a tough paper round  :sarcastic:

Yeah I must have had a hard paper round. Be derogatory about my age if you like. You've never met me. I don't lie about my age.

I didn't make anything up I have given my version of events. Something's he mentioned weren't true so I clarified them.

I have already said a million times before about he aw review. I still stand by it. He was polite on time and stamina ! All true. I put his roughness down to thinking he thought that's what bdsm was. Hindsight I should have left the neg as well as the positive points. And as for anal to vagina. And checking for condom. I felt he didn't know. I told him no and lesson learned for him.

Say what you like about my age cos I'm laughing as I'm prob one of the only ones on aw who puts my real age !

People can be extremely brave behind a keyboard. This man shearer mentioned NOTHING to me in person. Despite me asking if he wanted to try other things or something else. Communication !

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have already said a million times before about he aw review.

Yet more  exaggeration.

Not sure why you expect people to believe you, wile exaggerating things still.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2017, 02:26:02 pm by vw »

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Faith he doesn't have to say anything to you in person, from his review it was clear that you were less than approachable and from your rants on here (after his feedback) he was probably intimidated by you, not a good point by the way on your part.

The issue here is instead of accepting you were at fault you have tried to blame him, your rant that you posted earlier gives a clear indication to how volatile you clearly are  :scare:

And Faith
PMing me and asking to discuss it there is nto going to work, it's not my booking "experience" you ripped into this guy in public simply because he did not find his time with you enjoyable, my comments are based purely on the facts above, i.e. you gave him a positive feedback, then when he negged you, you swung into full on attack mode, with numerous threats and accusations that YOU have posted on here, He's an older guy and probably a nice guy and you obviously thought you could bully him, that's not going to work on here or UKE  :music:



« Last Edit: March 01, 2017, 02:42:53 pm by James999 »

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yet more  exaggeration.

Not sure why you expect people to believe you, wile exaggerating things still.

Because it feels like I'm banging my head against a brick wall. I say something and people ask the same question over and over and over again. It's tiring.

Great user name. You suit it.


Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Faith he doesn't have to say anything to you in person, from his review it was clear that you were less than approachable and from your rants on here (after his feedback) he was probably intimidated by you, not a good point by the way on your part.

The issue here is instead of accepting you were at fault you have tried to blame him, your rant that you posted earlier gives a clear indication to how volatile you clearly are  :scare:

My point of view we'll never be accepted so I'll just leave it here. How was he intimated by me. He's old enough to be my father for Christs sake. And we sat having a conversation before. And then a conversation for ten minutes afterwards. And I also asked him on two or three occasions through the appointment did he wasn't to try something else. Do something else. He can't say I intimadted him I made him welcome offering a shower at beginning and end. Drinks. Helped him with the shower. Sent someone down to help him get into the building. Come on fairs fair

Offline rickym

I've said it and I've said it before. The issue raised with saafe is anus to vagina
And saafe is to keep working girls safe. Anyone who thinks otherwise, and is daft enough to to think that working girls don't check numbers with saafe ugly mugs and the info sharing group are deluded. Girls stay safe. Why is that a problem.
I had an issue with
Anus to vagina
Checking a punter wasn't bareback while I was blindfolded
And pointing out he hurt me with his nails.
Yes I left positive feedback. He was on time. He was polite and he had stamina. I put down his roughness to him not knowing what BDSM was
AT NO POINT have I said o would OUT him !
I would share this info with working girls , and bring up the subject that anus to vagina is not safe or hygienic for anyone. Anyway. My AW is going mad with bookings. So as they say. Only no publicity is bad publicity so thanks x
Yours sincerely
Clean
Hygienic
Safe
Working
Your aw bookings can't have been going that mad cos you've been on here all day!

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
My point of view we'll never be accepted

your point of view was accepted, you said of him......

Positive   Faith North East (3)   27/02/2017 19:45   Offering Services
    Nice guy. On time and lots of stamina!! Thanks for a fun time xx

It's the rant and the way you ripped into the guy after he gave you that is the issue, that's not a point of view, you were very aggressive and clerly intended to scare him into submission with your threats, do you not read your own posts you made on here?

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
He can't say I intimadted him

He didn't say that, you asked why he didn't say at the negative issues at the time of meeting and I suggested it was possibly due to your less than approachable attitude and intimidation, and I made that observation based on yoru posts here and the rant you sent him by text (That you posted on here)

You seem to be clutching at straws when the whole thing has been blown up because of your aggressive attitude & threats on here, is it going better for you on other sites? I'm sure the other washed up pro$$ies on Safe will be siding with you and blowing smoke up your arse, thats if it's not to sore to be used of course  :sarcastic:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Because it feels like I'm banging my head against a brick wall. I say something and people ask the same question over and over and over again. It's tiring.

Great user name. You suit it.

Thanks dear i like my name to, you can call me king if its to long for you.

Maybe a concise answer that doesn't change to suit your agenda would have helped you, saw from your first post on here you were trouble and needed a muzzle.

Also the arrogant this negative has made me busy bullshit, clearly is a lie or you would not even bother answering or arguing like most normal prossies.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Because it feels like I'm banging my head against a brick wall.

Of course it does, as you've made up excuses and tried to blame the client for your failings, on here people can see straight through that shit, let me guess you are used to getting your own way, even if you have to threat / bully to get it  :unknown:

Offline maxxblue

m
I have clarified over and over and over again. Saafe have been notified about the subject of anus to vagina. Not about the punter. I have clarified this over and over and over again !

This is not true.

Offline Shearer1955

To be fair to all, when I met Faith the conversation was perfectly satisfactory and I wasn't intimidated by her at all -  i'm not that sort of person  even though i may not be overly vocal I can defend myself verbally whenever I need to do so - I defend my review but acknowledge that effective communications helps all to deliver a better meeting & they failed this time - a mixture of BDSM & GFE probably doesn't work well together to get the best out of a meeting

My opinion of Faith herself is reflected in my review where i said she was not unattractive - i would actually say very pretty and as for her age I would say that is correct

Hope this clears any ambiguity  :hi:

I think this thread has arrived at its conclusion as we have exhausted everything


Offline Zooms

When in a hole stop digging!!

(Dennis Healey) he was correct as so well demonstrated by this thread

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is not true.

Maybe she is premod on saafe, just like she is on uke.  Maybe she has history on there for deception to ?


Offline Kev3773

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,073
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 90
To be fair to all, when I met Faith the conversation was perfectly satisfactory and I wasn't intimidated by her at all -  i'm not that sort of person  even though i may not be overly vocal I can defend myself verbally whenever I need to do so - I defend my review but acknowledge that effective communications helps all to deliver a better meeting & they failed this time - a mixture of BDSM & GFE probably doesn't work well together to get the best out of a meeting

My opinion of Faith herself is reflected in my review where i said she was not unattractive - i would actually say very pretty and as for her age I would say that is correct

Hope this clears any ambiguity  :hi:

I think this thread has arrived at its conclusion as we have exhausted everything

Well said, if only she had accepted it for what it was she wouldn't have come out of this half as bad, but unfortunately for her her image is seriously tarnished and many will be wary of visiting her now. Me personally she is a never.  :hi:

Offline Mansell


Well said, if only she had accepted it for what it was she wouldn't have come out of this half as bad, but unfortunately for her her image is seriously tarnished and many will be wary of visiting her now. Me personally she is a never.  :hi:

+ 1 Never as well.

Offline Kev3773

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,073
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 90

Offline hungrypunt

She's not looking too happy  :cool:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Profile on UKE states "I am Fucking Fuming"  or wtte

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Profile on UKE states "I am Fucking Fuming"  or wtte

Why is she fuming?

Offline Brazilian Martian

She's not looking too happy  :cool:

Hidden Image/Members Only

No offence meant but she does look like the sort you see on benefit britain.

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Why is she fuming?


That's an old status update.
 From yesterday morning.

I'm several updates ahead keep up boys x

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
No offence meant but she does look like the sort you see on benefit britain.

Never claimed a benefit in my life. And those people who have found themselves needing to fall on to benefits because they are ill or they have been made redundant etc. I would never judge.

I work full time. And not escorting I may add.

Perhaps check your facts before you slag of a percentage of this  forum who my have found themselves on benefits because of no fault of their own.

Offline Kev3773

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,073
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 90
No offence meant but she does look like the sort you see on benefit britain.

At the rate her reputation has gone downhill she'll soon be joining them on benefits  :D

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
No offence meant but she does look like the sort you see on benefit britain.

What like White Dee  :unknown:

Hidden Image/Members Only


Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
What like White Dee  :unknown:

Hidden Image/Members Only

This is rediculous.

None of this is to do with the review. It is trolling and bullying. I don't post pictures of punters up on here and pic random people to compare them with ?!
I would never Judge a person if they were ill or fallen on hard times and had to rely on benefits.

Personally I've never claimed benefits touch wood. I work full time. And not escorting I may i add

Offline Brazilian Martian

Never claimed a benefit in my life. And those people who have found themselves needing to fall on to benefits because they are ill or they have been made redundant etc. I would never judge.

I work full time. And not escorting I may add.

Perhaps check your facts before you slag of a percentage of this  forum who my have found themselves on benefits because of no fault of their own.

No offence to people that have worked and fallen on hard times my gripe is with the lazy cunts that do fuck all but sit at home watching TV. While tax payer's money is given to them kind of like broken britain, those shows that show people who have not worked since 1985 but yet get over 30 grand a year handouts. I'm just saying your picture was not the most flattering and I know it's wrong to judge, but if I had to guess what your profession was from that image I would say she does not have one. It's not like I'm going to think you work as a marine biologist.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

That's an old status update.
 From yesterday morning.

I'm several updates ahead keep up boys x

One of your updates said this

"Received a very long apology. Thank you. And I accept your apology. Let's move on peeps xx"

Would be interested if reviewer sent this to you or if it is a smoke and mirrors status ?

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
One of your updates said this

"Received a very long apology. Thank you. And I accept your apology. Let's move on peeps xx"

Would be interested if reviewer sent this to you or if it is a smoke and mirrors status ?

Perhaps she asked the council for a new kitchen and they turned her down but felt sorry for her so sent her a nice apology letter  :unknown:

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
One of your updates said this

"Received a very long apology. Thank you. And I accept your apology. Let's move on peeps xx"

Would be interested if reviewer sent this to you or if it is a smoke and mirrors status ?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Faith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Perhaps she asked the council for a new kitchen and they turned her down but felt sorry for her so sent her a nice apology letter  :unknown:

Why would it be bad if a person lives in a council house or has to claim benefits. ? Why is this a bad thing ? Please elaborate.

I don't fall in to your small minded category but I'm interested all the rest.

Thanks.

Offline Shearer1955

After deliberating over the furore and the heated messages posted i have looked at my review - I stand by it absolutely but I am prepared to acknowledge there was somewhat of a breakdown in communications some of it on my part which resulted in what i consider a poor punt - in good faith Faith thought it was going to be a BDSM punt and I perhaps wanted a combination of GFE with BDSM - it doesn't work well it seems - the rights and wrongs of the messaging can be mulled over separately

Things were heated yesterday & I was pilloried within the exchange messaging on UKE and by Faith on here and still believe I was unfairly wronged - that said I am forgiveful and to throw an olive branch I communicated with Faith on PM - this was instigated by me and not her as i dislike the continuance of bad feelings which is not my forte - I think most girls I see will acknowledge I am friendly and personable and I would prefer that remains. I know some will question why I did exchange messages with Faith but I'm not vengeful and preferred an open approach to her to offer reconciliation and perhaps some blame can be apportioned to me for not providing clarity before and whilst we met

Faith is I believe genuinely upset causing her upset at home - I don't wish to apportion further blame in any direction and so I felt it best to apologise to her for the outpouring of negativity which has resulted from this - we have probably both suffered albeit I am very thick skinned - and to offer an olive branch. I don't believe she is a nasty lass and whilst I believe she could have handled the matter more objectively I don't want hostilities to continue unabated; I prefer the spirit of friendliness to the alternate options

My review stands and I have told Faith this but I don't want the vitriol to spill over against her and would prefer that we draw a veil over this thread or at least maintain a sense of realism. Hopefully lessons have been learnt for the future by all but I hope the gents (and any ladies) who read this will accept that I am illustrating it in a way which maintains the status quo.

To clarify and for the avoidance of doubt I have not been offered any favours; reduced pricing or anything like that by Faith although sometime in the foreseeable future to show there is no animosity I will arrange a GFE with Faith - at her normal rate I might add - I don't ask or receive favours nor would I expect to

If I have over stepped the mark with these comments and should not have acted as I have done now by posting this clarification then I apologise to all

As with this review all or any further ones will reflect the facts as I believe them to be resulting from my interactions with the escort - errors in grammar, spelling etc notwithstanding

Thank You

Offline Brazilian Martian

After deliberating over the furore and the heated messages posted i have looked at my review - I stand by it absolutely but I am prepared to acknowledge there was somewhat of a breakdown in communications some of it on my part which resulted in what i consider a poor punt - in good faith Faith thought it was going to be a BDSM punt and I perhaps wanted a combination of GFE with BDSM - it doesn't work well it seems - the rights and wrongs of the messaging can be mulled over separately

Things were heated yesterday & I was pilloried within the exchange messaging on UKE and by Faith on here and still believe I was unfairly wronged - that said I am forgiveful and to throw an olive branch I communicated with Faith on PM - this was instigated by me and not her as i dislike the continuance of bad feelings which is not my forte - I think most girls I see will acknowledge I am friendly and personable and I would prefer that remains. I know some will question why I did exchange messages with Faith but I'm not vengeful and preferred an open approach to her to offer reconciliation and perhaps some blame can be apportioned to me for not providing clarity before and whilst we met

Faith is I believe genuinely upset causing her upset at home - I don't wish to apportion further blame in any direction and so I felt it best to apologise to her for the outpouring of negativity which has resulted from this - we have probably both suffered albeit I am very thick skinned - and to offer an olive branch. I don't believe she is a nasty lass and whilst I believe she could have handled the matter more objectively I don't want hostilities to continue unabated; I prefer the spirit of friendliness to the alternate options

My review stands and I have told Faith this but I don't want the vitriol to spill over against her and would prefer that we draw a veil over this thread or at least maintain a sense of realism. Hopefully lessons have been learnt for the future by all but I hope the gents (and any ladies) who read this will accept that I am illustrating it in a way which maintains the status quo.

To clarify and for the avoidance of doubt I have not been offered any favours; reduced pricing or anything like that by Faith although sometime in the foreseeable future to show there is no animosity I will arrange a GFE with Faith - at her normal rate I might add - I don't ask or receive favours nor would I expect to

If I have over stepped the mark with these comments and should not have acted as I have done now by posting this clarification then I apologise to all

As with this review all or any further ones will reflect the facts as I believe them to be resulting from my interactions with the escort - errors in grammar, spelling etc notwithstanding

Thank You

Fair enough i respect your choice to go down this path but I don't understand it. She reported you or said she did which made out you are a danger to prossies in the north east area.
She has been caught out with her lies, but I'm done with this as long as other potential punters, read this thread carefully and think long and hard if they want to book her.

Martian


Offline datwabbit

Are the punters details now on SAAFE or is it just a case of starting or amending a thread about A to V?

Are the punters details now on Ugly Mugs and the Whatsapp group?

I am not clear what details have now been uploaded and where.