Author Topic: Cutest Lucy E1 near Liverpool Street station.  (Read 6786 times)


71 review(s) for LusciousLucy666 (60 positive, 3 neutral, 8 negative) [Indexed by Steely Dan]

Offline Bassman

External Link/Members Only

Ok, so you may have seen my post about waiting for confirmation or not.

Well it was Lucy I was trying to see.

Since her comms seems to have improved of late, I thought I'd arrange something. Tried for the previous week. But she wasn't available when I was. Arranged for the other day at the weekend just gone. Received full address.

Text night before to confirm everything was still ok. No reply.

Her location is out of my usual punting area. Meant an earlier start to my day then usual. But I had to be near by for a work thing later in the day. So the next morning, despite no reply, I went on my way texting to say I was leaving and to let me know if there was an issue.

I could after all do the work thing earlier if I was left at a loose end. So I wasn't heading way out of my way just to go home if she fucked me about.

Text to say I was near by. No reply. Call, rings, no answer. 10mins before booking I text, no reply. Call just before time and it's engaged. Wait a few mins call back, rings, no answer.

Went off to the work thing which was 20 mins away. Text to say she's a joker basically.

Get a text later that day from her apologising and to rearrange for the next day. Or whenever I want.

Either I got bumped, or there was a non work related issue. Either way a text takes a few seconds to write, after all she knew I was coming, and was on the phone just before the booked time.

Im not one for hanging around. I may reply and try something out but doubt it. I'm not free now for a while, so she's not likely to remember me. And what's to stop her doing it again. Service seems to be top notch. But my time is too valuable to me to waste, no matter how good she may be.

Peace out.


Offline BillGoldberg

Sorry about that Bassman

Her comms are the pits

She is a magnificent punt, but the appalling comms, which basically amount to complete piss taking, and the price hike means I won't be booking her again, despite her being the best punt I had in 2016

Offline davison

Bassman not sure if you saw my review. If you were Thursday that's when she blew me off as well. She said an emergency came up when she was out of the flat without her work phone. Got back as soon as she could and texted as soon as she could.  She got a bit teary about it so she may have been telling the truth. Who knows. If you were not Thursday then this is a pattern and it's clearly bullshit.

She's spectacular but the comms and scheduling are a complete piss take.

Offline Bassman

Bassman not sure if you saw my review. If you were Thursday that's when she blew me off as well. She said an emergency came up when she was out of the flat without her work phone. Got back as soon as she could and texted as soon as she could.  She got a bit teary about it so she may have been telling the truth. Who knows. If you were not Thursday then this is a pattern and it's clearly bullshit.

She's spectacular but the comms and scheduling are a complete piss take.

It was Thursday. But like I said, her phone was engaged at one point meaning she was using it when I was trying to get hold of her. I'm not sure I'd be so quick to believe her, but then we were both messed about on the same day.

Offline Bassman

Sorry about that Bassman

Her comms are the pits

She is a magnificent punt, but the appalling comms, which basically amount to complete piss taking, and the price hike means I won't be booking her again, despite her being the best punt I had in 2016

Her comms certainly are naff. I'm surprised she leaves feed back on AW as she goes ages without replying to her emails. Her texts also come across odd. Sometimes near enough perfect English and sometimes English of someone who is 'spelling it how it sounds'.  :kissgirl:

And as naff as her comms are they were even worse 6 months + ago lol. The price is one I wouldn't usually pay. But I've done ok recently and fancied a one off. No doubt she needs it to keep her in that location as I know how much the rent is there. It's not cheap at all!

Offline Bassman

It was Thursday. But like I said, her phone was engaged at one point meaning she was using it when I was trying to get hold of her. I'm not sure I'd be so quick to believe her, but then we were both messed about on the same day.

Also, to add davison, you received a text that morning. I was still waiting for a reply. As well as being on the phone, she was still able to text(you) whilst I was still waiting for a reply to my messages. Sorry, but I call BS on her emergency.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,398
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
YMMV, with any W/G.


Thanks for sharing via this review and the warning about her (or their) wiliness to waste another punters time (again).


Get a text later that day from her apologising and to rearrange for the next day. Or whenever I want.



Did she (or they) offer any from of redemption for cancelling on you  :unknown:



Either I got bumped, or there was a non work related issue. Either way a text takes a few seconds to write, after all she knew I was coming, and was on the phone just before the booked time.

Im not one for hanging around. I may reply and try something out but doubt it. I'm not free now for a while, so she's not likely to remember me. And what's to stop her doing it again. Service seems to be top notch. But my time is too valuable to me to waste, no matter how good she may be.



At the end of the day, time is important and its not, some think that can be replaced or regained (unlike money)!

Her current reviews are mixed and as for service, comms are part of that (IMO).

At her current rate of: £3.33 per min (on 60 min bookings) and £4.00 per min (on 30 min bookings). The ca$h you saved could fund other punts.

But that up to you  :unknown:

I did read your thread > Confirmation or Just Go and Hope it's on?

I've booked a few W/G, several days in advanced.

But I normally book W/G, on the day and with only a few hours notice. If I can't get the time I want, I will punt elsewhere or not at all.

I've found experience can be a harsh teacher and I've learned, not to travel with out confirmation, first. As, it can be waste of time.

As I've noted in several reviews. Even with confirmation, is also best to have back up plans in place. In case I have walk, for what ever reason.



Below is a current profile screen shot and picture:

Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only


Offline pumps

I agree with the above and The don.

@ £200 an hour the prossie needs to be squeaky clean when it comes to honouring the appointment time a punter wants.

Offline Bassman

YMMV, with any W/G.


Thanks for sharing via this review and the warning about her (or their) wiliness to waste another punters time (again).


Did she (or they) offer any from of redemption for cancelling on you  :unknown:


At the end of the day, time is important and its not, some think that can be replaced or regained (unlike money)!

Her current reviews are mixed and as for service, comms are part of that (IMO).

At her current rate of: £3.33 per min (on 60 min bookings) and £4.00 per min (on 30 min bookings). The ca$h you saved could fund other punts.

But that up to you  :unknown:

I did read your thread > Confirmation or Just Go and Hope it's on?

I've booked a few W/G, several days in advanced.

But I normally book W/G, on the day and with only a few hours notice. If I can't get the time I want, I will punt elsewhere or not at all.

I've found experience can be a harsh teacher and I've learned, not to travel with out confirmation, first. As, it can be waste of time.

As I've noted in several reviews. Even with confirmation, is also best to have back up plans in place. In case I have walk, for what ever reason.



Below is a current profile screen shot and picture:

Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

No form of redemption offered. She can't afford it living there lol.

Like I said, I had plans near there that day, but had it just been a 'day off' I wouldn't have bothered travelling. I find it's easier to book the more popular girls a week in advance. Or at least a few days in advance. Especially as I like to punt early in the day.

Not sure if I'll text her back, probably wouldn't get a response anyway lol!

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I've seen her 5 times and never had problems with comms. Maybe I got lucky or maybe the com problems are a recent thing.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I've seen her 5 times and never had problems with comms. Maybe I got lucky or maybe the com problems are a recent thing.

At £200 an hour you have more money than sense.    :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:

Offline davison

At £200 an hour you have more money than sense.    :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:

Could not disagree more.  He had good luck initially with her showing up, and by now I am sure he is a valued reg she would not fuck over.  Everything about her actual service once in the apartment is flawless and rare, 200 is the right price point for that (KDD is higher).  If you have the money for that (which I do not) I think seeing her regularly makes a lot of sense.

Offline Bassman

I've seen her 5 times and never had problems with comms. Maybe I got lucky or maybe the com problems are a recent thing.

She has a history of bad comms. Maybe you got lucky the first time, depending on when you saw her first. But after she moved from Caledonian Road her comms got ridiculous I believe. Plenty of comments about it in the past. They seem to have improved a little since then. She actually replies to texts, but that's probably due to her needing more customers now.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,398
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
YMMV, with any W/G

Everything about her actual service once in the apartment is flawless and rare,

 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Perhaps you missed her other reviews  :unknown:

Here a link> https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=8190


And some (current) stats:

35 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative

Hardly

flawless

IMO!



200 is the right price point for that (KDD is higher).  If you have the money for that (which I do not) I think seeing her regularly makes a lot of sense.



There no correlation, between price and quality, when it comes to W/G (IMO). I've punted a few (W/G) priced @ £180+ PH that were far worse than some £60 P/H in terms of service and attitude. Beauty is very subjective and ranks lower than service and attitude when I punt. So, its down to what a punter considers true VFM.




« Last Edit: February 11, 2017, 12:31:33 pm by The_Don »

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
YMMV, with any W/G

 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Perhaps you missed her other reviews  :unknown:

Here a link> https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=8190


And some (current) stats:

35 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative

Hardly

IMO!

She's the best I've ever had, and many others have said she's one of the best, so it's not outrageous to suggest her service is a notch above the norm. I've paid more than £200 many times and not received a fraction of what she gives. Shame about her comms, though.

Offline SamLP

Sorry to hear that Bassman. I tried to see her once last year when she was charging £150ph.
Initially was told she was fully booked, then she got back to me an hour later at 11am telling me she had availability at 2pm.
I confirmed and asked her to send the address. She didn't, so I texted to remind her.
Well she sent it at 1.45pm, by which I had given up. It would have taken me an hour to get to her place and needed it in time to plan my journey.
All she did was say sorry and that was the last time I tried.

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,398
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
She's the best I've ever had, and many others have said she's one of the best, so it's not outrageous to suggest her service is a notch above the norm.


Like I stated above. YMMV with any W/G. Its clear to see, her service isn't

flawless

From the current reviews.


I've paid more than £200 many times and not received a fraction of what she gives.


I've not punt her and to be blunt, I have no plans to.

IMO, no W/G is currently worth £200 P/H.

In fact, some of my best punts have been with W/G. That charged between, £60 to £100 P/H range and some could enlighten, a few W/G out there, that charge 2 or 3 times that amount (IMO).



There no correlation, between price and quality, when it comes to W/G (IMO). I've punted a few (W/G) priced @ £180+ PH that were far worse than some £60 P/H in terms of service and attitude. Beauty is very subjective and ranks lower than service and attitude when I punt. So, its down to what a punter considers true VFM.



« Last Edit: February 11, 2017, 01:56:47 pm by The_Don »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1

Like I stated above. YMMV with any W/G. Its clear to see, her service isn't

From the current reviews.



I've not punt her and to be blunt, I have no plans to.

IMO, no W/G is currently worth £200 P/H.

In fact, some of my best punts have been with W/G. That charged between, £60 to £100 P/H range and some could enlighten, a few W/G out there, that charge 2 or 3 times that amount (IMO).


I pay homage to women's beautiful looks
My weakness
And I pay within reason ( nearly 120% more than the average hourly rate of £120)
I have a beauty addiction

Men have gambling  drugs alcohol ( I don't thankfully)

But I do have beauty addiction towards world class model looking beautiful women!!

I have to feed my lizard tongue and banana beast with them.
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Type_O_Negative

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well i don't want to start WW3 but paying 200 for a girl who is nothing special (in my book) in terms of beauty (i wouldn't even look at her if i saw her walking on the high street) is mental.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Well i don't want to start WW3 but paying 200 for a girl who is nothing special (in my book) in terms of beauty (i wouldn't even look at her if i saw her walking on the high street) is mental.

Not going on about cutest lucy

But real stunners
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Brazilian Martian

Well i don't want to start WW3 but paying 200 for a girl who is nothing special (in my book) in terms of beauty (i wouldn't even look at her if i saw her walking on the high street) is mental.

I could not agree more, a basic prossie in terms of looks who has had so much smoke blown up her ass by a few punters thinks she's the queen of sheba.

When I look at her she looks more EE than Portuguese.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Bassman

Well i don't want to start WW3 but paying 200 for a girl who is nothing special (in my book) in terms of beauty (i wouldn't even look at her if i saw her walking on the high street) is mental.
Hey man, some of the WG's you've seen don't float my boat. But as they say: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. For me, she looks like someone I know facially. From her pics at least good enough to get me going.

Sorry to hear that Bassman. I tried to see her once last year when she was charging £150ph.
Initially was told she was fully booked, then she got back to me an hour later at 11am telling me she had availability at 2pm.
I confirmed and asked her to send the address. She didn't, so I texted to remind her.
Well she sent it at 1.45pm, by which I had given up. It would have taken me an hour to get to her place and needed it in time to plan my journey.
All she did was say sorry and that was the last time I tried.

I tried her a few times last year as well. I never got a reply to my texts. It was the height of her poor comms. She's only slightly better now lol.

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Like I stated above. YMMV with any W/G. Its clear to see, her service isn't

From the current reviews.



I've not punt her and to be blunt, I have no plans to.

IMO, no W/G is currently worth £200 P/H.

In fact, some of my best punts have been with W/G. That charged between, £60 to £100 P/H range and some could enlighten, a few W/G out there, that charge 2 or 3 times that amount (IMO).

If a girl charged under £100 for the sort of service Lucy provides then she would quickly be inundated. She'd then probably put the prices up. In fact, that's sort of what happened with Lucy because she used to be under 150. I've had some pretty good under 100 punts but nothing like Lucy provides. Maybe not flawless but very rare, hence the price.

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well i don't want to start WW3 but paying 200 for a girl who is nothing special (in my book) in terms of beauty (i wouldn't even look at her if i saw her walking on the high street) is mental.

I guess you are happy with fairly normal sex because you don't seem to be registering that people repeatedly see her for service. Some people, such as myself, prioritise experience over looks. I think she's sexy and gorgeous, anyway, if not classically beautiful.

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,659
  • Likes: 570
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
I guess you are happy with fairly normal sex because you don't seem to be registering that people repeatedly see her for service. Some people, such as myself, prioritise experience over looks. I think she's sexy and gorgeous, anyway, if not classically beautiful.

Exactly.

Some people just want a bit of kissing, cuddling, a basic bj and sex. I will not pay even £50 for that type of service, but each to their own.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
At £200 an hour you have more money than sense.    :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:

Yet you wont pay LESS than £100 an hour as you label ALL WGs who charge that as skanks, now that's what I can senseless. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285

Like I stated above. YMMV with any W/G. Its clear to see, her service isn't

From the current reviews.



I've not punt her and to be blunt, I have no plans to.

IMO, no W/G is currently worth £200 P/H.

In fact, some of my best punts have been with W/G. That charged between, £60 to £100 P/H range and some could enlighten, a few W/G out there, that charge 2 or 3 times that amount (IMO).

Its an absolute fact their is no correlation between what a WG charges and how good she may be as that's dictated by her attitude. When I punted with this WG she was charging £150 an hour and I mentioned in my review about her becoming a forum darling and what could happen, it did and has, she put her price up to cash in.

My absolute limit is £200 an hour, this WG isn't worth that to me. Same as you I have had good punts from £60-100 an hour.

Offline Hobbit

Exactly.

Some people just want a bit of kissing, cuddling, a basic bj and sex. I will not pay even £50 for that type of service, but each to their own.

Can't understand those people. Paying all that money just for a kiss and cuddle..crazy.

Offline Hobbit

Its an absolute fact their is no correlation between what a WG charges and how good she may be as that's dictated by her attitude. When I punted with this WG she was charging £150 an hour and I mentioned in my review about her becoming a forum darling and what could happen, it did and has, she put her price up to cash in.

My absolute limit is £200 an hour, this WG isn't worth that to me. Same as you I have had good punts from £60-100 an hour.

I rather pay £100 or less and have a bad punt which is easier to digest but paying £200+ and then risking a bad punt is a hard pill to swallow. 

Type_O_Negative

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Can't understand those people. Paying all that money just for a kiss and cuddle..crazy.

But it works in both ways - paying 200 for a girl who is many light years away from being a stunner - crazy.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I pay anywhere from £100 to £250 MAX single lady
Duo I paid arguably the most beautiful sexy duo in London of Angela escort london/ sophia lawrence at £400 for the hour


Miya baby and sophia lawrence have been the most expensive at £250 per hour
Gisselleblew I have paid £200 per hour
English playgirl £220 per hour
Jessica ann £200 per hour

Emily creme brulee  £160 per hour
Brazil abbelle  £150 per hour
Lovely dyana  £150 per hour

Stacy summer £100 per hour ( bagain of the century)


Just a few of many examples

Sex was obviously protected 2 shots

Deep tongue wrestling kissing
OWO
Mango licking
Fingering mango

All gave super fantastic girlfriend experience

All at the very high end of female physical beauty...

No regrets what so ever....


All beautiful memory tatoos in my mind forever..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline davison

But it works in both ways - paying 200 for a girl who is many light years away from being a stunner - crazy.

From what I believe to be your decision matrix, I would highly recommend you become a regular of model perfect face and body HOD Kim at 130ph.  Enjoy yourself, and leave the "far from stunners" to those of us who have attitude and quality of service among our buying criteria.

External Link/Members Only

Type_O_Negative

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
From what I believe to be your decision matrix, I would highly recommend you become a regular of model perfect face and body HOD Kim at 130ph.  Enjoy yourself, and leave the "far from stunners" to those of us who have attitude and quality of service among our buying criteria.

External Link/Members Only

ALL girls i visit offer a very good attitude and quality of service. But unlike you i'm not so desperate to shag such a "beauty"  :sarcastic: like Cutest Lucy WG charges 200/hour...

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
From what I believe to be your decision matrix, I would highly recommend you become a regular of model perfect face and body HOD Kim at 130ph.  Enjoy yourself, and leave the "far from stunners" to those of us who have attitude and quality of service among our buying criteria.

External Link/Members Only

What's the point of paying for a mingher who has good attitude and service? When put a little bit more extra money in and pay for a stunner with good attitude and service like what I do.

There is big difference in taste  between  sainsburys basic ice cream and haagen daaz ice cream..

I rest my case
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,659
  • Likes: 570
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
But it works in both ways - paying 200 for a girl who is many light years away from being a stunner - crazy.

But a "stunner" is subjective as we all know. Many punters disagree on how girls look and that's completely normal. Whereas, when you're pissing in her mouth and she's simultaneously bouncing her arsehole on a huge dildo you know exactly what you've paid for.


Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
3 F''s
My rule

Fit friendly French kissing DONE DEAL
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,659
  • Likes: 570
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
3 F''s
My rule

Fit friendly French kissing DONE DEAL

Yeah, see, I don't particularly care about kissing prossies, and almost never do RO  :vomit: but each to their own.

Offline Hobbit

But a "stunner" is subjective as we all know. Many punters disagree on how girls look and that's completely normal. Whereas, when you're pissing in her mouth and she's simultaneously bouncing her arsehole on a huge dildo you know exactly what you've paid for.

I kind of agree with what you are saying. However when a man cums, only then he realizes how attractive the girl is. Because, after all you have to look at them and talk to them in between rounds, and if you don't find them facially or physically attractive then it can be difficult not to think I could have spent my money somewhere else.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I pay anywhere from £100 to £250 MAX single lady
Duo I paid arguably the most beautiful sexy duo in London of Angela escort london/ sophia lawrence at £400 for the hour


Miya baby and sophia lawrence have been the most expensive at £250 per hour
Gisselleblew I have paid £200 per hour
English playgirl £220 per hour
Jessica ann £200 per hour

Emily creme brulee  £160 per hour
Brazil abbelle  £150 per hour
Lovely dyana  £150 per hour

Stacy summer £100 per hour ( bagain of the century)


Just a few of many examples

Sex was obviously protected 2 shots

Deep tongue wrestling kissing
OWO
Mango licking
Fingering mango

All gave super fantastic girlfriend experience

All at the very high end of female physical beauty...

No regrets what so ever....


All beautiful memory tatoos in my mind forever..


After I have shot out twice all the above ladies (and many others) have a,ways still looked stunning BECAUSE THEY ARE STUNNING!
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I kind of agree with what you are saying. However when a man cums, only then he realizes how attractive the girl is. Because, after all you have to look at them and talk to them in between rounds, and if you don't find them facially or physically attractive then it can be difficult not to think I could have spent my money somewhere else.

Response to your thread above
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,659
  • Likes: 570
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
I kind of agree with what you are saying. However when a man cums, only then he realizes how attractive the girl is. Because, after all you have to look at them and talk to them in between rounds, and if you don't find them facially or physically attractive then it can be difficult not to think I could have spent my money somewhere else.

Agreed, they have to be attractive enough certainly. And, that'll vary from punter to punter.

A complete model looking stunner that won't, for example, swallow piss and spunk out of a glass,  is a complete waste of money for me nowadays, be it £60 or £600

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
But a "stunner" is subjective as we all know. Many punters disagree on how girls look and that's completely normal. Whereas, when you're pissing in her mouth and she's simultaneously bouncing her arsehole on a huge dildo you know exactly what you've paid for.

Dis-gusting, :D but true. :thumbsup:

Offline davison

ALL girls i visit offer a very good attitude and quality of service. But unlike you i'm not so desperate to shag such a "beauty"  :sarcastic: like Cutest Lucy WG charges 200/hour...

Perhaps you (or King Tarzan) could alleviate my desperation by recommending women you consider attractive who provide the full range of service and enthusiasm demonstrated by Lucy at a price point you find acceptable?

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Agreed, they have to be attractive enough certainly. And, that'll vary from punter to punter.

A complete model looking stunner that won't, for example, swallow piss and spunk out of a glass,  is a complete waste of money for me nowadays, be it £60 or £600

Looks are the initial lure but I require much more than that and particularly the WG having a great attitude, a cold stunner is as much use to me as a chocolate teapot.

Punters all assess WGs differently of course and there will never be unanimous agreement on what is the right price to pay, as it will depend on what punters are prepared to pay.

Offline Hobbit

Agreed, they have to be attractive enough certainly. And, that'll vary from punter to punter.

A complete model looking stunner that won't, for example, swallow piss and spunk out of a glass,  is a complete waste of money for me nowadays, be it £60 or £600

I think it comes down to compromise. We all know it is extremely hard to find an attractive model like girl that's going provide a service that your referring to. There does seems to however be a correlation between model looks and poor service, but that runs through most of society. Lately I find that girls above 30 tend to provide the dirty, passionate session that I like.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Perhaps you (or King Tarzan) could alleviate my desperation by recommending women you consider attractive who provide the full range of service and enthusiasm demonstrated by Lucy at a price point you find acceptable?

Go to

KarenPretty  £150
Angela escort london  £160 special offer for 1 hour
Brazil abbelle at £170 for hour now ( contact her see if she could give you better deal)
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline davison

Go to

KarenPretty  £150
Angela escort london  £160 special offer for 1 hour
Brazil abbelle at £170 for hour now ( contact her see if she could give you better deal)

Thank you.

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Its an absolute fact their is no correlation between what a WG charges and how good she may be as that's dictated by her attitude. When I punted with this WG she was charging £150 an hour and I mentioned in my review about her becoming a forum darling and what could happen, it did and has, she put her price up to cash in.

My absolute limit is £200 an hour, this WG isn't worth that to me. Same as you I have had good punts from £60-100 an hour.

It's not an absolute fact is it? Where is your study? I'd suggest there probably is a correlation between price and service as well as one between  price and looks, otherwise WGs who charge more would go out of business. I gave you an example of how it works: Lucy used to charge less than 150 but obviously there are enough punters who are sufficiently enamoured by her service that they will pay more.

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
But it works in both ways - paying 200 for a girl who is many light years away from being a stunner - crazy.

We're going round in circles here. I've already covered this: you prioritise looks, whereas many others prioritise service. People have different priorities- it's really not complicated.

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I kind of agree with what you are saying. However when a man cums, only then he realizes how attractive the girl is. Because, after all you have to look at them and talk to them in between rounds, and if you don't find them facially or physically attractive then it can be difficult not to think I could have spent my money somewhere else.

Don't take this the wrong way but I get the feeling that some of you have never had REALLY good sex and I mean REALLY good. The kind where you're not thinking any more- you are just animal. Most people haven't, I suspect.